| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Spaceman
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:43 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
 |
|
PD wrote:
[quote]On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
There>s that 3rd grade dare again. Don>t you have anything else you
can try?
It>s like you>re trying to fence with a chopstick.
[/quote]
There is the perfect non answer from the con man yet again. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:45 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
doug wrote:
[quote]He is an unemployed tire changer who cannot understand physics so
it is a waste of his time for him to look at something that is
so far beyond him.
[/quote]
Doug the perpetual lying sack of crap really likes PD.
He is cheering the lies as loud as he can.
:) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:47 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
PD wrote:
[quote]On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
:)
Notice that all you>ve demonstrated so far, Spaceman, is that you>re a
liar, claiming to have looked up something on the internet that is not
available on the internet.
[/quote]
bullshit PD,
I looked up the experiment and stated the data is not on the internet
and asked you to explain how the observer is moving and such.
and you pullesd the copyright twist first and then the I don>t have to
show you anything twist.
You are the lying sack of crap here.
And you prove it with almost every post now.
Con man to no end is all you are.
Or like I said.. just freakin stupid. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:48 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
PD wrote:
[quote]On Oct 13, 8:43 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
There>s that 3rd grade dare again. Don>t you have anything else you
can try?
It>s like you>re trying to fence with a chopstick.
There is the perfect non answer from the con man yet again.
That>s right. That>s because you>re not ENTITLED to an answer. So you
get a non-answer. That>s all you deserve.
[/quote]
The perfect con man reply from PD the con man once again. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:58 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
doug wrote:
[quote]Spaceman wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:33 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:03 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
Poor PD, he thinks a clock with a different local rate
I didn>t say "different local rate".
SAME local rate.
Wrong.
The clocks prove they have different local rates when they
get back together and show different times on thier faces.
Again you are either an ingorant idiot, or a con man.
No, when they are together, they have identical rates. When they
are NOT local to each other is when they have different NONlocal
rates. However, their LOCAL rates are the same.
Total bullshit and they have not done such is proven when they
return together.
You truly prove you have no clue about precision timing.
LOL
I know this is confusing to you. Always has been.
Bullshit on top of bullshit that time.
Translation: He has no clue what is going on so he just
blusters. What do you think -1 x -1 is now?
[/quote]
It is equal to your brain capacity in the amount
of thought processes you can run at once. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
doug wrote:
[quote]Spaceman wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
:)
Notice that all you>ve demonstrated so far, Spaceman, is that
you>re a liar, claiming to have looked up something on the internet
that is not available on the internet.
bullshit PD,
I looked up the experiment and stated the data is not on the internet
So don>t be so lazy. Go to a library and look it up.
[/quote]
Why should I have to look it up, PD said he knows all about it.
He should easilty be able to post the observers motion speeds
and a bit of the setup of the experiment.
So far all I see is a bunch of lies and con man games from him.
And of course a little cheerleader named Doug. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
doug wrote:
[quote]Spaceman wrote:
doug wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:33 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:03 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
Poor PD, he thinks a clock with a different local rate
I didn>t say "different local rate".
SAME local rate.
Wrong.
The clocks prove they have different local rates when they
get back together and show different times on thier faces.
Again you are either an ingorant idiot, or a con man.
No, when they are together, they have identical rates. When they
are NOT local to each other is when they have different NONlocal
rates. However, their LOCAL rates are the same.
Total bullshit and they have not done such is proven when they
return together.
You truly prove you have no clue about precision timing.
LOL
I know this is confusing to you. Always has been.
Bullshit on top of bullshit that time.
Translation: He has no clue what is going on so he just
blusters. What do you think -1 x -1 is now?
It is equal to your brain capacity in the amount
of thought processes you can run at once.
Still don>t know then?
[/quote]
The answer has been given.
The answer is 1 using the basic rules of math.
The answer is - 1 using the basic logic of reality.
Apparently you can not grasp such logic since you
still say apples times apples will equal oranges.
:) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:28 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
[quote]On Oct 13, 6:03 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
doug wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
:)
Notice that all you>ve demonstrated so far, Spaceman, is that
you>re a liar, claiming to have looked up something on the
internet that is not available on the internet.
bullshit PD,
I looked up the experiment and stated the data is not on the
internet
So don>t be so lazy. Go to a library and look it up.
Why should I have to look it up, PD said he knows all about it.
He should easilty be able to post the observers motion speeds
and a bit of the setup of the experiment.
Why do you have the expectation that people have to clamor to teach
you?
[/quote]
I only expect when people state facts that they can back them up with
examples.
It is called science.
But of course.. We all know you are not into science.
You are into scifi where you can state anything you want and it
is law just because you say it.
LOL |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:37 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
PD wrote:
[quote]On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
It should take less time than all the dancing you have done so far
to not do such.
It doesn>t matter how much time it takes for me to tell you to go look
it up yourself. It>s right there. All you have to do is remove your
lazy, subsidized ass from your chair.
PD
He is an unemployed tire changer who cannot understand physics so[/quote]
it is a waste of his time for him to look at something that is
so far beyond him. Remember that you gave him that nice reference
about atomic clocks and he could not even begin to fathom what
it was saying. It was good for a few laughs though even if
we should not be laughing at idiots. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:38 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Spaceman wrote:
[quote]PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
:)
[/quote]
Or, of course, there is the fact that you would not
understand any of the explainations. You have not
understood anything so far so why would you change?
It is amazing that you are too lazy to actually look
up something. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Spaceman wrote:
[quote]doug wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:33 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:03 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
Poor PD, he thinks a clock with a different local rate
I didn>t say "different local rate".
SAME local rate.
Wrong.
The clocks prove they have different local rates when they
get back together and show different times on thier faces.
Again you are either an ingorant idiot, or a con man.
No, when they are together, they have identical rates. When they
are NOT local to each other is when they have different NONlocal
rates. However, their LOCAL rates are the same.
Total bullshit and they have not done such is proven when they
return together.
You truly prove you have no clue about precision timing.
LOL
I know this is confusing to you. Always has been.
Bullshit on top of bullshit that time.
Translation: He has no clue what is going on so he just
blusters. What do you think -1 x -1 is now?
It is equal to your brain capacity in the amount
of thought processes you can run at once.
Still don>t know then?[/quote]
[quote]
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Spaceman wrote:
[quote]PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
:)
Notice that all you>ve demonstrated so far, Spaceman, is that you>re a
liar, claiming to have looked up something on the internet that is not
available on the internet.
bullshit PD,
I looked up the experiment and stated the data is not on the internet
[/quote]
So don>t be so lazy. Go to a library and look it up. It is free
but you have to get out of your chair. I know the reason you
do not want to do it is that you do not understand any of it.
You did not understand even a tiny bit of the article on atomic
clocks and you looked pretty silly for that.
[quote]and asked you to explain how the observer is moving and such.
and you pullesd the copyright twist first and then the I don>t have to
show you anything twist.
You are the lying sack of crap here.
And you prove it with almost every post now.
Con man to no end is all you are.
Or like I said.. just freakin stupid.
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Spaceman wrote:
[quote]doug wrote:
He is an unemployed tire changer who cannot understand physics so
it is a waste of his time for him to look at something that is
so far beyond him.
Doug the perpetual lying sack of crap really likes PD.
He is cheering the lies as loud as he can.
:)
You are still an unemployed tire changer who cannot even[/quote]
multiply -1 x -1. That is pretty sad. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Spaceman wrote:
[quote]PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:33 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:03 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
Poor PD, he thinks a clock with a different local rate
I didn>t say "different local rate".
SAME local rate.
Wrong.
The clocks prove they have different local rates when they
get back together and show different times on thier faces.
Again you are either an ingorant idiot, or a con man.
No, when they are together, they have identical rates. When they are
NOT local to each other is when they have different NONlocal rates.
However, their LOCAL rates are the same.
Total bullshit and they have not done such is proven when they
return together.
You truly prove you have no clue about precision timing.
LOL
I know this is confusing to you. Always has been.
Bullshit on top of bullshit that time.
Translation: He has no clue what is going on so he just[/quote]
blusters. What do you think -1 x -1 is now? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:43 am Post subject: Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativit |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
[quote]On Oct 13, 6:28 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Oct 13, 6:03 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
wrote:
doug wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 8:34 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 3:01 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Oct 13, 2:37 pm, "Spaceman"
space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh
So you can>t give the proof, and of course you can not
even explain the experiment at all since you never actually
read it all either.
Of course I have.
Then explain how it works con man PD.
No.
Thanks for yet another proof that you can>t.
OR
You won>t because then you would be caught in your lying
con man game even more than you are proving now.
:)
Notice that all you>ve demonstrated so far, Spaceman, is that
you>re a liar, claiming to have looked up something on the
internet that is not available on the internet.
bullshit PD,
I looked up the experiment and stated the data is not on the
internet
So don>t be so lazy. Go to a library and look it up.
Why should I have to look it up, PD said he knows all about it.
He should easilty be able to post the observers motion speeds
and a bit of the setup of the experiment.
Why do you have the expectation that people have to clamor to teach
you?
I only expect when people state facts that they can back them up with
examples.
It is called science.
Yes, and a crucial part of science is the literature reference.
You are given the literature reference, and you are expected to read
it.
[/quote]
I was told it had an observer speed , I asked that
someone to explain such.
They did not.
They are full of shit so far just like you are. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
