| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Representative Trantis Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2003 2:28 am Post subject: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
| Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about him? |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Steve Hayes Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2003 10:42 am Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 20:28:41 -0000, "Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote:
[quote]Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about him?
[/quote]
Ed Conrad is as old as coal, has a fossil brain, and posts in all the wrong
newsgroups.
Follow-ups set to alt.fan.ed-conrad
And would that all people who had anything to say about Ed Conrad set
follow-ups to there.
It might not reduce the idiotic, boring, irrelevant stuff posted by Ed Conrad.
But it might reduce the number of off-topic replies.
Steve Hayes
hayesmstw@hotmail.com
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
stew dean Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2003 5:52 pm Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
[quote]Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about him?
[/quote]
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they where
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
Why? That>s open to debate.
Also open to debate is how to deal with him. Most people take the
sensible root of ignoring him. Some choose to engage him, or at least
try and make him look foolish. Again the effect of replying to him is
debatable although I personaly now side with the 'ignore him' camp
having realised what waste of time replying to Ed is.
He does like being talked about though. I think we view him like some
would view a member of a freak show.
Stew Dean |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Ed Conrad Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2003 6:43 pm Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
On 31 Oct 2003 03:52:21 -0800, stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk (stew
dean) wrote:
[quote]"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about him?
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they were
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
Why? That>s open to debate.
Also open to debate is how to deal with him. Most people take the
sensible root of ignoring him. Some choose to engage him, or at least
try and make him look foolish. Again the effect of replying to him is
debatable although I personaly now side with the 'ignore him' camp
having realised what waste of time replying to Ed is.
He does like being talked about though. I think we view him like some
would view a member of a freak show.
Stew Dean
================================================
THE REAL CONCRETIONS ARE THE PSEUDOS' BRAINS[/quote]
[quote]===============================================
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs[/quote]
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins
[quote]
===============================================
OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg
Wilton Krogman, one of the world>s foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania>s anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."
A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.
http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.
This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.
"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================
OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here>s a petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
Here>s a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG
Here>s a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG
Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified human
toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG
Here>s the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia.
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it >>during American Medical Laboratory
testing. This is the specimen >>that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae (who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretense
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
Here are two photos of the internal surface of bone
and the petrified tibia under 2,000X magnification.
The first shows what the internal surface of cadaver
bone looks like, the second offers a view of the internal
surace of the specimen that Krogman had identified as
a portion of a petrified tibia.
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/more.htm
This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
Here>s a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
Here>s a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
Here>s a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
Here>s a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
Here>s a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
Here>s another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
Here>s a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found just
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG
Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Ed Conrad Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 2:35 pm Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:03:13 +0200, "Bushmanland Crafts & Tours"
<info@bushmanland.co.za> wrote:
[quote]
"Ed Conrad" <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:pa7fqvc6al04a2bv92eg6t7ummjadji32g@4ax.com...
On 31 Oct 2003 03:52:21 -0800, stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk (stew
dean) wrote:
"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about
him?
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they were
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
[/quote]
You>re totally wrong in your assessment, Stew.
The bottom line is that I have brought to light the incredible
deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy that exists
in your Scientific Establishment concerning your non-search
for physical evidence that your theory of man>s evolution
is totally wrong.
State-of-the-art testing HAS been performed on some of these
specimens -- confirming they ARE petrified bone, teeth and
even soft organs (some human) -- found between anthracite
veins, but the monumental conspiracy against truth remains
adamant in its denial.
Your science isn>t Science, Stew. It>s a sham.
[quote]
Why? That>s open to debate.
Also open to debate is how to deal with him. Most people take the
sensible root of ignoring him. Some choose to engage him, or at least
try and make him look foolish. Again the effect of replying to him is
debatable although I personaly now side with the 'ignore him' camp
having realised what waste of time replying to Ed is.
He does like being talked about though. I think we view him like some
would view a member of a freak show.
Stew Dean
================================================
THE REAL CONCRETIONS ARE THE PSEUDOS' BRAINS
===============================================
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins
===============================================
OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg
Wilton Krogman, one of the world>s foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania>s anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."
A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.
http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.
This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.
"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================
OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here>s a petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
Here>s a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG
Here>s a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG
Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified human
toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG
Here>s the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia.
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it >>during American Medical Laboratory
testing. This is the specimen >>that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae (who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretense
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
Here are two photos of the internal surface of bone
and the petrified tibia under 2,000X magnification.
The first shows what the internal surface of cadaver
bone looks like, the second offers a view of the internal
surace of the specimen that Krogman had identified as
a portion of a petrified tibia.
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/more.htm
This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
Here>s a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
Here>s a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
Here>s a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
Here>s a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
Here>s a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
Here>s another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
Here>s a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found just
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG
Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com
Hi ED
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG - I want to figure
out an engraving made on gneiss depicted by ( Bushman) San I>ll send you
the image if you want. It>s not on http://www.bushmanland.co.za
Elma
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Bushmanland Crafts & Tour Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:03 pm Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
"Ed Conrad" <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:pa7fqvc6al04a2bv92eg6t7ummjadji32g@4ax.com...
[quote]On 31 Oct 2003 03:52:21 -0800, stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk (stew
dean) wrote:
"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about
him?
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they were
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
Why? That>s open to debate.
Also open to debate is how to deal with him. Most people take the
sensible root of ignoring him. Some choose to engage him, or at least
try and make him look foolish. Again the effect of replying to him is
debatable although I personaly now side with the 'ignore him' camp
having realised what waste of time replying to Ed is.
He does like being talked about though. I think we view him like some
would view a member of a freak show.
Stew Dean
================================================
THE REAL CONCRETIONS ARE THE PSEUDOS' BRAINS
===============================================
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins
===============================================
OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg
Wilton Krogman, one of the world>s foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania>s anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."
A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.
http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.
This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.
"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================
OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here>s a petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
Here>s a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG
Here>s a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG
Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified human
toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG
Here>s the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia.
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it >>during American Medical Laboratory
testing. This is the specimen >>that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae (who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretense
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
Here are two photos of the internal surface of bone
and the petrified tibia under 2,000X magnification.
The first shows what the internal surface of cadaver
bone looks like, the second offers a view of the internal
surace of the specimen that Krogman had identified as
a portion of a petrified tibia.
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/more.htm
This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
Here>s a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
Here>s a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
Here>s a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
Here>s a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
Here>s a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
Here>s another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
Here>s a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found just
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG
Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com
Hi ED[/quote]
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG - I want to figure
out an engraving made on gneiss depicted by ( Bushman) San I>ll send you
the image if you want. It>s not on http://www.bushmanland.co.za
Elma > >
> |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Ed Conrad Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:32 pm Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:03:13 +0200, "Bushmanland Crafts & Tours"
<info@bushmanland.co.za> wrote:
[quote]
"Ed Conrad" <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:pa7fqvc6al04a2bv92eg6t7ummjadji32g@4ax.com...
On 31 Oct 2003 03:52:21 -0800, stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk (stew
dean) wrote:
"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about
him?
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they were
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
[/quote]
You>re totally wrong in your assessment, Stew.
The bottom line is that I have brought to light the incredible
deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy that exists
in your Scientific Establishment concerning your non-search
for physical evidence that your theory of man>s evolution
is totally wrong.
State-of-the-art testing HAS been performed on some of these
specimens -- confirming they ARE petrified bone, teeth and
even soft organs (some human) -- found between anthracite
veins, but the monumental conspiracy against truth remains
adamant in its denial.
Your science isn>t Science, Stew. It>s a sham.
[quote]
Why? That>s open to debate.
Also open to debate is how to deal with him. Most people take the
sensible root of ignoring him. Some choose to engage him, or at least
try and make him look foolish. Again the effect of replying to him is
debatable although I personaly now side with the 'ignore him' camp
having realised what waste of time replying to Ed is.
He does like being talked about though. I think we view him like some
would view a member of a freak show.
Stew Dean
================================================
THE REAL CONCRETIONS ARE THE PSEUDOS' BRAINS
===============================================
Petrified Bones, Teeth and Soft Organs
(Some Human) Found Between Coal Veins
===============================================
OLDEST HUMAN SKULL EVER FOUND
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z11calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/krogwskull.jpg
Wilton Krogman, one of the world>s foremost experts
on human anatomy, holds what he had identified as
a petrified human calvarium, a skull with the eye
sockets broken off, that was discovered between
Pennsylvania>s anthracite veins. He is shown at his
desk at the Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., where
moments later he beckoned a colleague -- a medical
doctor -- to examine "the oldest human skull ever
found."
A CATscan was performed on this specimen with
favorable results.
http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
Meanwhile, Haversian canals were identified in the
cell structue, the tell-tale sign of bone. And dried
blood was found on the specimen during testing at
American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va.
This is the official report from AML which had
erformed Calculus Analysis by Crystallography.
The final report, dated April 21, 2000, was issued
by Dr. Nathan Sherman, director of laboratories.
"The specimen consists of 1 irregularly
shaped, brown calculus weighing less
than 0.0010 grams and measuring 1X1X0.5
mm. No nidus is observed. The calculi
indicates a composition of dried blood
intermingled with a few small crystals
resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z12calv.jpg
http://www.edconrad.com/images/z13cav.jpg
=============================================
OTHER PETRIFIED BONES, TEETH AND
SOFT ORGANS FOUND BETWEEN COAL VEINS
Here>s a petrified human femur still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
Here>s a petrified human finger, with fingernail:
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-008S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/FINGER/MVC-011S.JPG
Here>s a petrified human toe (with toe nail), found only
10-15 feet from the petrified finger.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-017S.JPG
Here are the petrified human finger and the petrified human
toe shown together.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG
Here>s the specimen that Krogman identified as a tibia.
It contains Haversian canals, proof of bone, and dried
blood was found on it >>during American Medical Laboratory
testing. This is the specimen >>that was fraudulently
tested by Andrew MacRae (who produced microscopic photos
of the cell structure of a rock on the false pretense
that he was showing the cell structure of this specimen).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
Here are two photos of the internal surface of bone
and the petrified tibia under 2,000X magnification.
The first shows what the internal surface of cadaver
bone looks like, the second offers a view of the internal
surace of the specimen that Krogman had identified as
a portion of a petrified tibia.
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/more.htm
This is the boulder containing the complete human skull.
Testing has confirmed the presence of Haversian canals
and American Medical Laboratories discovered it contains
dried blood.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
Here>s a petrified human mandible (frontal).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
Here>s a portion of a human mandible (side).
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
Here>s a giant petrified tooth.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
Here>s a petrified dinosaur foot still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
Here>s a petrified fetus of some large animal.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
Here>s another petrified fetus, still embedded in slate.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
Here are several views of portion of a giant prehistoric
scorpion identified as such by Krogman.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-010S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
Here>s a photo of the same portion of a petrified giant
scorpion -- found 22 years ago -- alongside one found just
weeks ago.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG
Here are two views of a piece of wood that appears to have
been handcarved for use as a tool or a weapon.
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad.com
Hi ED
http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SCORPIONS/MVC-039S.JPG - I want to figure
out an engraving made on gneiss depicted by ( Bushman) San I>ll send you
the image if you want. It>s not on http://www.bushmanland.co.za
Elma
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Lenny Flank Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
Ed Conrad <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<3sjsqvgrogenm5klihuq1rbegtptiu1f48@4ax.com>...
[quote]On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:03:13 +0200, "Bushmanland Crafts & Tours"
info@bushmanland.co.za> wrote:
"Ed Conrad" <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:pa7fqvc6al04a2bv92eg6t7ummjadji32g@4ax.com...
On 31 Oct 2003 03:52:21 -0800, stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk (stew
dean) wrote:
"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message
news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about
him?
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they were
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
You>re totally wrong in your assessment, Stew.
The bottom line is that I have brought to light the incredible
deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy that exists
in your Scientific Establishment concerning your non-search
for physical evidence that your theory of man>s evolution
is totally wrong.
[/quote]
That>s nice.
What part of a scorpion>s anatomy did you say your, uh, rock was, Ed?
is it a telson, an aculeus, a pecten, a trochanter, or what.
Or aren>t you smart enough to know a scorpion>s ass end from your own,
Ed.
===============================================
Lenny Flank
"There are no loose threads in the web of life"
Creation "Science" Debunked:
http://www.geocities.com/lflank
DebunkCreation Email list:
http://www.groups.yahoo/group/DebunkCreation |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
harvest dancer Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 1:35 am Post subject: Re: What The Hell Is This Ed Conrad Stuff? |
|
|
stewart@webslave.dircon.co.uk (stew dean) wrote in message news:<2b68957a.0310310352.479b855b@posting.google.com>...
[quote]"Representative Trantis" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:<bnrs9j$har$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>...
Who is Ed Conrad, and why do so many people have so much to say about him?
Ed Conrad is a internet Kook who has some very strange ideas. He is
not a creationist but does not accept evolution. For some reason he
found a few concretions that looked a bit like human and animal
remains and when he asked for an expert opinion he was told they where
not fossils. When he asked if they would double check they laughed and
refused as they where very sure. Ed didnt understand this and has not
understood much about the whole thing since.
Why? That>s open to debate.
Also open to debate is how to deal with him. Most people take the
sensible root of ignoring him. Some choose to engage him, or at least
try and make him look foolish. Again the effect of replying to him is
debatable although I personaly now side with the 'ignore him' camp
having realised what waste of time replying to Ed is.
He does like being talked about though. I think we view him like some
would view a member of a freak show.
Stew Dean
[/quote]
He should at least be a respectable and decent kook and clean up his
posts, instead of inserting a slew of >'s all over them.
Jason |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|