| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Double-A
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
 |
|
On Oct 14, 5:09 am, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
[quote]Mark I got the picture The Earth is flat and since it has no frame of
reference it can not be spinning. It can not be held up by turtles
since we can not see under our feet. Go figure TreBert
[/quote]
I guess it can>t be spinning because the stack of turtles would get
twisted!
Double-A |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
"Double-A" <double-a2@hush.com> wrote in message
news:592b8475-a46b-484e-9208-87ed2ce0b28e@b2g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:23 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglaz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes
just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe
revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
[/quote]
I know I have heard this, but how does this get around the "nothing
moves faster than c" rule with all those stars and galaxies zooming
around the Earth at FTL speeds?
***Relative to the objects around them, they are not moving at all.
Everything>s relative, rememember?
[quote]One day we will be in a spacecraft somewhere between the Milky Way and
Andromeda.
When we are between the two, in primordial drive, we will know the true
meaning of the nature of motionlessness.
[/quote]
No, we will still be in motion with regards to the two glaxies.
**Only from one frame of reference: that of things almost infinite distance
away. Not from the immediate frame of reference at all.
Just imagine being in such deep space. You can tell you aren>t moving.
[quote]Because you can>t have motion unless you are comparing the states of two
or
more objects.
If you don>t do that, you are motionless.
Aren>t you motionless right now, as you sit at your keyboard typing?
Of course you are.
[/quote]
At least his fingers are in motion.
***On the average, they are not.
Think relativistically, and we will conquer the stars. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:09 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
So there are NO Doppler shifts then, Mark? lmao!
Doppler shifts SHOW MOTION!
Your education stopped with the 14th century.
Saul Levy
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:23:05 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
One day we will be in a spacecraft somewhere between the Milky Way and
Andromeda.
When we are between the two, in primordial drive, we will know the true
meaning of the nature of motionlessness.
Because you can>t have motion unless you are comparing the states of two or
more objects.
If you don>t do that, you are motionless.
Aren>t you motionless right now, as you sit at your keyboard typing?
Of course you are.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:34 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:8j9af4p3vpa578ph3udo03jf7u7hq2cgfe@4ax.com...
[quote]So there are NO Doppler shifts then, Mark? lmao!
Doppler shifts SHOW MOTION!
[/quote]
Only because you assume it does.
[quote]
Your education stopped with the 14th century.
Saul Levy
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:23:05 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out
side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes
just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe
revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
One day we will be in a spacecraft somewhere between the Milky Way and
Andromeda.
When we are between the two, in primordial drive, we will know the true
meaning of the nature of motionlessness.
Because you can>t have motion unless you are comparing the states of two
or
more objects.
If you don>t do that, you are motionless.
Aren>t you motionless right now, as you sit at your keyboard typing?
Of course you are.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
I assume NOTHING, Mark. lmao!
I KNOW!
While YOU DON>T!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:34:22 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:8j9af4p3vpa578ph3udo03jf7u7hq2cgfe@4ax.com...
So there are NO Doppler shifts then, Mark? lmao!
Doppler shifts SHOW MOTION!
Only because you assume it does.
Your education stopped with the 14th century.
Saul Levy
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:23:05 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out
side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes
just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe
revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
One day we will be in a spacecraft somewhere between the Milky Way and
Andromeda.
When we are between the two, in primordial drive, we will know the true
meaning of the nature of motionlessness.
Because you can>t have motion unless you are comparing the states of two
or
more objects.
If you don>t do that, you are motionless.
Aren>t you motionless right now, as you sit at your keyboard typing?
Of course you are.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:qf1bf4l3v69aricae8t6crhutmbu85i7ke@4ax.com...
[quote]I assume NOTHING, Mark. lmao!
I KNOW!
While YOU DON>T!
Saul Levy
[/quote]
You just think you know.
LMAO!
[quote]
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:34:22 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:8j9af4p3vpa578ph3udo03jf7u7hq2cgfe@4ax.com...
So there are NO Doppler shifts then, Mark? lmao!
Doppler shifts SHOW MOTION!
Only because you assume it does.
Your education stopped with the 14th century.
Saul Levy
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:23:05 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglazier@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth
spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would
all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out
side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes
just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe
revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
One day we will be in a spacecraft somewhere between the Milky Way and
Andromeda.
When we are between the two, in primordial drive, we will know the true
meaning of the nature of motionlessness.
Because you can>t have motion unless you are comparing the states of two
or
more objects.
If you don>t do that, you are motionless.
Aren>t you motionless right now, as you sit at your keyboard typing?
Of course you are.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:20 pm Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
Mark Take a long time laps picture of a star while you are sitting
typing and when you develope the film the star is not a dot but a
streak. That has to get your thinking right TreBert |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Double-A
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
On Oct 14, 2:36 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]"Double-A" <double...@hush.com> wrote in message
news:592b8475-a46b-484e-9208-87ed2ce0b28e@b2g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:23 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglaz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes
just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe
revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
I know I have heard this, but how does this get around the "nothing
moves faster than c" rule with all those stars and galaxies zooming
around the Earth at FTL speeds?
***Relative to the objects around them, they are not moving at all.
Everything>s relative, rememember?
[/quote]
Relative to the motionless Earth they would be moving FTL.
Double-A |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:16 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
I DO think you know NOTHING, Mark! lmao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:07:10 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:qf1bf4l3v69aricae8t6crhutmbu85i7ke@4ax.com...
I assume NOTHING, Mark. lmao!
I KNOW!
While YOU DON>T!
Saul Levy
You just think you know.
LMAO![/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
Mark will claim that>s a HOAX, BEERTbrain! lmao!
Or some other such nonsense!
He wasted his education. So did his teachers.
Saul Levy
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:20:44 -0400, herbertglazier@webtv.net (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:
[quote]Mark Take a long time laps picture of a star while you are sitting
typing and when you develope the film the star is not a dot but a
streak. That has to get your thinking right TreBert[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
"Double-A" <double-a2@hush.com> wrote in message
news:2cd61485-f09d-4803-8813-b435a71667c5@r37g2000prr.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 14, 2:36 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]"Double-A" <double...@hush.com> wrote in message
news:592b8475-a46b-484e-9208-87ed2ce0b28e@b2g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 13, 6:23 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglaz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:9869-48F34E57-853@storefull-3334.bay.webtv.net...
Mark I seem to be missing some thing reading these answers. Earth
spins
like a top
Bert,
Only from one frame of reference does Earth spin like a top.
But don>t you think that if Earth really did spin like a top, we would
all
get flung off from it?
In one frame of reference the Earth is flat as a pancake. Just go out
side
and observe the ground for yourself.
To those that understand relativity, and what it really means, it makes
just
as much sense to say that the Earth is motionless, ane the universe
revolves
around it, as it is to say that the Earth rotates, and the universe is
motionless.
I know I have heard this, but how does this get around the "nothing
moves faster than c" rule with all those stars and galaxies zooming
around the Earth at FTL speeds?
***Relative to the objects around them, they are not moving at all.
Everything>s relative, rememember?
[/quote]
Relative to the motionless Earth they would be moving FTL.
***But that is not what is considered. What is considered is the
speed relative the space fabric where those other stars far away are. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gbgcf4t5hi7j5u9kjg3bggfbtjpohqo07v@4ax.com...
[quote]I DO think you know NOTHING, Mark! lmao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
[/quote]
Coming from a bird brain like you...that means absolutely nothing!
ROFLMAO!
[quote]
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:07:10 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:qf1bf4l3v69aricae8t6crhutmbu85i7ke@4ax.com...
I assume NOTHING, Mark. lmao!
I KNOW!
While YOU DON>T!
Saul Levy
You just think you know.
LMAO![/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 6:51 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
Anyone can compare my posts to yours, Mark.
It>s very clear that you are TOTALLY FUCKED UP!
All of your basic premises are just NONSENSE!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:35:55 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gbgcf4t5hi7j5u9kjg3bggfbtjpohqo07v@4ax.com...
I DO think you know NOTHING, Mark! lmao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
Coming from a bird brain like you...that means absolutely nothing!
ROFLMAO![/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:le7df4t63u0287lmcp4sovb0af7e7iqine@4ax.com...
[quote]Anyone can compare my posts to yours, Mark.
It>s very clear that you are TOTALLY FUCKED UP!
All of your basic premises are just NONSENSE!
Saul Levy
[/quote]
There is no "anyone, " because you are just plain STUPID!
[quote]
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:35:55 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gbgcf4t5hi7j5u9kjg3bggfbtjpohqo07v@4ax.com...
I DO think you know NOTHING, Mark! lmao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy
Coming from a bird brain like you...that means absolutely nothing!
ROFLMAO![/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: Re: What if (on Trade winds) |
|
|
Something else you got WRONG, Mark! lmfjao!
It is so much fun taunting the BOZOS!
Saul Levy
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:14 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:le7df4t63u0287lmcp4sovb0af7e7iqine@4ax.com...
Anyone can compare my posts to yours, Mark.
It>s very clear that you are TOTALLY FUCKED UP!
All of your basic premises are just NONSENSE!
Saul Levy
There is no "anyone, " because you are just plain STUPID!
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:35:55 -0500, "Mark Earnest"
gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:gbgcf4t5hi7j5u9kjg3bggfbtjpohqo07v@4ax.com...
I DO think you know NOTHING, Mark! lmao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Saul Levy[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
