| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
 |
|
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/2edf4e97d3a3c1b3/ce7bb3f151dd5f7e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=gary+johnson#ce7bb3f151dd5f7e
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
gdewilde@gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:48 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
On Oct 8, 12:04 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> [snip disinfo101] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/2edf4e97d3a3c1b3/ce7bb3f151dd5f7e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=gary+johnson#ce7bb3f151dd5f7e
So what does this prove? It is not evidence for meyer.[/quote]
> But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
On Oct 7, 3:04 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
[quote]knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...
So what does this prove? It is not evidence for meyer.
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
[/quote]
You are the dumbest f ck on the Net.
You respond before there is even time to read and verify Gary
Johnson>s paper and work.
Sick, sick ,dork, dork,...... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Eeyore
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:41 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/2edf4e97d3a3c1b3/ce7bb3f151dd5f7e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=gary+johnson#ce7bb3f151dd5f7e
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
[/quote]
They conduct experiments on Google Groups ? Crikey. What next for Google ? The World ?
Graham |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:34 pm Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
Eeyore wrote:
[quote]
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/2edf4e97d3a3c1b3/ce7bb3f151dd5f7e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=gary+johnson#ce7bb3f151dd5f7e
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
They conduct experiments on Google Groups ? Crikey. What next for Google ? The World ?
Graham
I just realized that I could have saved a lot of time in my research. I[/quote]
could just have made it up and sent a video to youtube and posted my
claims on usenet. That would have been a lot less work. Less worry
about being wrong too. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Fred Kasner
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:41 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/2edf4e97d3a3c1b3/ce7bb3f151dd5f7e?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=gary+johnson#ce7bb3f151dd5f7e
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
[/quote]
That>s the point that you miss entirely. The whole of science is built
on experiments save for the work of the cosmologists since they have no
access to experimental galaxies. But the basic science is supported by
experiment here on Earth. The physical laws we support were established
as proven hypothesis to become theories (the nonscience use of the word
is at odds with the way scientists use it) and the repeated support of
the theories finally lead to them being called laws. No exceptions are
permitted. And when wants to modify them it is up to the claimant to
provide the proof of the moderation or of the limited validity of such
laws. You are not permitted to demand acceptance of such claims by
insisting that the disproof remains with others. The proof for
extraordinary claims falls on the claimant.
FK |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Fred Kasner
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:42 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]On Oct 7, 3:04 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...
So what does this prove? It is not evidence for meyer.
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
You are the dumbest f ck on the Net.
You respond before there is even time to read and verify Gary
Johnson>s paper and work.
Sick, sick ,dork, dork,......
[/quote]
Sorry, foulmouth, but that title is clearly reserved for you.
FK |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:44 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, Fred Kasner <fkas...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote]knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
That>s the point that you miss entirely. The whole of science is built
on experiments save for the work of the cosmologists since they have no
access to experimental galaxies. But the basic science is supported by
experiment here on Earth. The physical laws we support were established
as proven hypothesis to become theories (the nonscience use of the word
is at odds with the way scientists use it) and the repeated support of
the theories finally lead to them being called laws. No exceptions are
permitted. And when wants to modify them it is up to the claimant to
provide the proof of the moderation or of the limited validity of such
laws. You are not permitted to demand acceptance of such claims by
insisting that the disproof remains with others. The proof for
extraordinary claims falls on the claimant.
FK
[/quote]
The proof is in the simple experiment which you refuse to do.
No "laws" of physics are broken and NO SUCH CLAIMS HAVE EVER BEEN MADE
AS SUCH.
Lazy, cheap, know it all, "scientist?" |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, Fred Kasner <fkas...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
That>s the point that you miss entirely. The whole of science is built
on experiments save for the work of the cosmologists since they have no
access to experimental galaxies. But the basic science is supported by
experiment here on Earth. The physical laws we support were established
as proven hypothesis to become theories (the nonscience use of the word
is at odds with the way scientists use it) and the repeated support of
the theories finally lead to them being called laws. No exceptions are
permitted. And when wants to modify them it is up to the claimant to
provide the proof of the moderation or of the limited validity of such
laws. You are not permitted to demand acceptance of such claims by
insisting that the disproof remains with others. The proof for
extraordinary claims falls on the claimant.
FK
The proof is in the simple experiment which you refuse to do.
[/quote]
So far you refuse to do the experiment. You have had more than
ten years and you still are refusing.
[quote]No "laws" of physics are broken and NO SUCH CLAIMS HAVE EVER BEEN MADE
AS SUCH.
[/quote]
Claims to split hydrogen using less energy than you get back
from it violates conservation of energy.
Claiming to be vibrating bonds apart violates laws of physics.
Claiming to get energy from teh nucleus violates laws.
Having smiley faces on electrons violates something.
[quote]
Lazy, cheap, know it all, "scientist?"[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
On Oct 8, 10:52 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
[quote]knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, Fred Kasner <fkas...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
That>s the point that you miss entirely. The whole of science is built
on experiments save for the work of the cosmologists since they have no
access to experimental galaxies. But the basic science is supported by
experiment here on Earth. The physical laws we support were established
as proven hypothesis to become theories (the nonscience use of the word
is at odds with the way scientists use it) and the repeated support of
the theories finally lead to them being called laws. No exceptions are
permitted. And when wants to modify them it is up to the claimant to
provide the proof of the moderation or of the limited validity of such
laws. You are not permitted to demand acceptance of such claims by
insisting that the disproof remains with others. The proof for
extraordinary claims falls on the claimant.
FK
The proof is in the simple experiment which you refuse to do.
So far you refuse to do the experiment. You have had more than
ten years and you still are refusing.
No "laws" of physics are broken and NO SUCH CLAIMS HAVE EVER BEEN MADE
AS SUCH.
Claims to split hydrogen using less energy than you get back
from it violates conservation of energy.
No such claim has EVER BEEN MADE.[/quote]
You get out what you put in.
Put in HH0 + an electron or two and you get out the same things in a
diferent form.
[quote]Claiming to be vibrating bonds apart violates laws of physics.
Claiming to get energy from teh nucleus violates laws.
Having smiley faces on electrons violates something.
Lazy, cheap, know it all, "scientist?"[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Don Lancaster
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
doug wrote:
[quote]
So far you refuse to do the experiment. You have had more than
ten years and you still are refusing.
[/quote]
Equivalent experiments ARE done by EIS researchers many thousands of
times each hour. I HAVE DONE THE SAME EXPERIMENTS.
They uniformly fail to show any credible Meyer electrocity mechanism.
No mechanism, no Meyer electrocity.
End of story.
See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse137.pdf for an EIS tutorial.
See http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu08.asp#05-22-08 for the utterly
overwhelming evidence against the Meyer electrocity.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: don@tinaja.com
Please visit my GURU>s LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
PV
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
fkasner@sbcglobal.net writes:
[quote]That>s the point that you miss entirely. The whole of science is built
on experiments save for the work of the cosmologists since they have no
access to experimental galaxies.
[/quote]
Cosmologists do experiments too. You can>t have science without making a
hypothesis and testing it. *
--
* PV something like badgers--something like lizards--and something
like corkscrews. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:34 pm Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
Don Lancaster wrote:
[quote]doug wrote:
So far you refuse to do the experiment. You have had more than
ten years and you still are refusing.
Equivalent experiments ARE done by EIS researchers many thousands of
times each hour. I HAVE DONE THE SAME EXPERIMENTS.
They uniformly fail to show any credible Meyer electrocity mechanism.
No mechanism, no Meyer electrocity.
End of story.
See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse137.pdf for an EIS tutorial.
See http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu08.asp#05-22-08 for the utterly
overwhelming evidence against the Meyer electrocity.
You do know that facts never seem to stand in the way of[/quote]
these people>s paranoia. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
doug
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage |
|
|
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]On Oct 8, 10:52 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Oct 8, 4:41 pm, Fred Kasner <fkas...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...
But you DORKS don>t believe in REAL EXPERIMENTS.
That>s the point that you miss entirely. The whole of science is built
on experiments save for the work of the cosmologists since they have no
access to experimental galaxies. But the basic science is supported by
experiment here on Earth. The physical laws we support were established
as proven hypothesis to become theories (the nonscience use of the word
is at odds with the way scientists use it) and the repeated support of
the theories finally lead to them being called laws. No exceptions are
permitted. And when wants to modify them it is up to the claimant to
provide the proof of the moderation or of the limited validity of such
laws. You are not permitted to demand acceptance of such claims by
insisting that the disproof remains with others. The proof for
extraordinary claims falls on the claimant.
FK
The proof is in the simple experiment which you refuse to do.
So far you refuse to do the experiment. You have had more than
ten years and you still are refusing.
No "laws" of physics are broken and NO SUCH CLAIMS HAVE EVER BEEN MADE
AS SUCH.
Claims to split hydrogen using less energy than you get back
from it violates conservation of energy.
No such claim has EVER BEEN MADE.
You get out what you put in.
Put in HH0 + an electron or two and you get out the same things in a
diferent form.
[/quote]
That is standard electrolysis. Meyer claimed he was doing
something special. If he is doing standard electrolysis, then
he did nothing new. If he claims something else, he is claiming
to violate the laws of physics.
[quote]
Claiming to be vibrating bonds apart violates laws of physics.
No commment?
Claiming to get energy from teh nucleus violates laws.
No comment?[/quote]
[quote]Having smiley faces on electrons violates something.
Lazy, cheap, know it all, "scientist?"
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
