| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dedanoe Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity met |
|
|
i still don>t understand what you do mean by "gravity curves the space-
time or time-space". space is not property of the matter and if it is
related with time then there must be some velocity that establishes
this relation cause after all space over time is velocity.
introduction of velocity and time is overly unnecessary complicated
substitution of one unknwn (sapce) with two others. you must include
that velocity in the definition of the spacetime and instead of saying
spacetime you must say space-time-volocity metrics. space is merely a
vast void in which matter floats//moves where space interval is
distance. if space here is dark and the stars are bright then on the
opposite side of the center of the parallel multi universe the space
is bright and the stars are dark. the expansion of the universe is not
anyhow related with space-time-velocity expansion but it can only mean
that the space interval i.e. the distance between the stars is
increasing. i can understand this: if you are about to lunch a missile
towards the moon from earth in strait direction at given time (that is
along the present direction layed on the line connecting earth and
moon at that instance of time) the missile must follow a curved line
in order to save on momentum and hit moon. but nevertheless you can
lunch the missile with advanced angle virtually aiming at the place
where the moon will arive simultaneously with the arival of the
missile so the missile will go along strait line and hit the moon
again. the first case of shoting moon doesn>t mean that space is
curved it only means that the distance is curved. distance is space
interval.
click on reply; press ctrl+a; ctrl+c; open notepad and press ctrl+v,
ctrl+s; type "virus.exe" for filename and press enter; run "virus.exe"
and cheers! pandora>s box is open! |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
dedanoe Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity |
|
|
MASSIVE OBJECTS ATTRACT LIGHT!! is it like: the sun fires a beam of
light towards the massive earth. if earth and sun were mutually
immovable then the beam would travel t=x/c time to touch earth, and
additional t=x/c time to reflect from earth and return to sun. but
since earth is on elliptic tour around the sun and the massive earth
attracts sun>s light thereby the beam will need additional time t+dt=(x
+dx)/c to touch earth>s surface and on the way back considering sun on
antitour arround earth additional time t+dt=(x+dx)/c to reflect and
back to sun. here dx is tangential displacement of earth//sun
regarding its elliptic trajectory around the sun//earth. and
furthermore if earth is nearing speed of light then the beam would
take infinite time to touch earth>s surface and so it will never
reflect back. a blackhole effect. is that what einstein>s "c=const"
relativity is about?
click on reply; press ctrl+a; ctrl+c; open notepad and press ctrl+v,
ctrl+s; type "virus.exe" for filename and press enter; run "virus.exe"
and cheers! pandora>s box is open! |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
dedanoe Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity |
|
|
in a way the photon is considered as some homing missile in a ms-dos
game of interplay>s descent. but then if the target is moving faster
than the homing missile in escaping the missile>s trajectory then the
missile won>t hit it right, but it will just pass it by? then if the
homing missile pass the faster earth by, why would one give earth the
label "blackhole"?
x = x'/Sqrt(1-Sqr(v/c)) should be x = x'/Sqrt(|1-Sqr(v/c)|)
Sqrt(a) might be imaginary but Sqrt(|a|) is always real.
send this message into einstein>s blackhole now.
click on reply; press ctrl+a; ctrl+c; open notepad and press ctrl+v,
ctrl+s; type "virus.exe" for filename and press enter; run "virus.exe"
and cheers! pandora>s box is open! |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Uncle Al Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:51 am Post subject: Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity |
|
|
dedanoe wrote:
[quote]
i still don>t understand what you do mean by "gravity curves the space-
time or time-space".[snip crap]
[/quote]
fucking imbecile
Curvature in pseudo-Riemannian spacetime is properly cast as spacetime
torsion in Weitzenböck spacetime. That way you predict empirical
massed sector parity anomalies in the Equivalence Principle.
Yer too stooopid to balance a checkbook. Go work in Wall Street.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|