| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Robert Blass
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:02 am Post subject: Re: U.S. Debt Clock runs out of digits |
 |
|
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:41:42 -0700, retrogrouch@comcast.net sayd the
following:
[quote]On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:35:38 -0700 (PDT), Lawyerkill
Lawyerkill@aol.com> wrote:
BTW way it was the Democrats that blocked an amendment that would
require full disclosure of the spending provisions known as earmarks
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/jan/12/20070112-123022-7858r/
"Senate Democrats backed off promises to reform pork spending
yesterday, using procedural tactics similar to ones they attacked
Republicans for employing in past Congresses.
Why are you posting a two year old article?
There>s been an ear mark bill passed in the senate since then.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-08-02-senate-votes_N.htm?csp=34
Did you not know that or is it about intentionally creating
misimpressions?
[/quote]
He>s in love with o>reilly, he wants everyone to know. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Robert Blass
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:02 am Post subject: Re: U.S. Debt Clock runs out of digits |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:35:38 -0700 (PDT), Lawyerkill
<Lawyerkill@aol.com> sayd the following:
[quote]Pork was put in by both sides, to get more votes on both sides, and
they did.
If you get rid of the spin and look at both sides you will see that
both these parties are useless. Congress controls the budget and the
laws.
BTW way it was the Democrats that blocked an amendment that would
require full disclosure of the spending provisions known as earmarks
[/quote]
"both sides do it" and the "get rid of the spin" comments clearly make
you a O>reilly cumsucker specialist.
Enjoy it....maybe add some sugar on warmer days? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robert Blass
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:02 am Post subject: Re: U.S. Debt Clock runs out of digits |
|
|
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:26:13 -0500, kim <kim@everywhere.net> sayd the
following:
[quote]On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:24:01 -0700, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> wrote:
"Lawyerkill" <Lawyerkill@aol.com> wrote in
Some economists believe the $700bn bail-out plan for ailing
US financial institutions could send the national debt
level to $11 trillion.
And Congress wants to do another 150B tax cut.
Sure why not, it>s just a computer number anyway!
Those scumbag SOB GOP congressmen who threw a tantrum like schoolgirls
licked their chops and vote for the bailout as soon as that extra $100
billion of pork was added. Need to recall every one of their asses
out of office.
[/quote]
No what we need is a wholesale slaughterhouse of all republicans with
o>reilly leading the way.... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robert Blass
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:02 am Post subject: Re: U.S. Debt Clock runs out of digits |
|
|
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:24:01 -0700, "DB" <DeeBee@netscape.net> sayd the
following:
[quote]
"Lawyerkill" <Lawyerkill@aol.com> wrote in
Some economists believe the $700bn bail-out plan for ailing
US financial institutions could send the national debt
level to $11 trillion.
And Congress wants to do another 150B tax cut.
Sure why not, it>s just a computer number anyway!
[/quote]
O>reilly is not a computer number though. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robert Blass
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:02 am Post subject: Re: U.S. Debt Clock runs out of digits |
|
|
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:59:34 -0700 (PDT), Lawyerkill
<Lawyerkill@aol.com> sayd the following:
[quote]And Congress wants to do another 150B tax cut.
[/quote]
That>s the genius of giving money to RICH people while taking money
from POOR people. It>s pure o>reilly genius.
O>reilly should probably be in charge of all branches of gov>t.
O>reilly would cause the stocks to be UP 3,000% before Nov 1
What>s worse the O>reilly? Wanting to suck off o>reilly would be
worse. We have MILLIONS of MEN who secretly want to suck o>reilly off.
so sad conservatives... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
