| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jabriol
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 1:49 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
 |
|
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:sn39mvoi3f74jahtn8vlacq4kvuo4fj0ee@4ax.com...
[quote]Libertarius wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis wrote:
snip
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
I guess he has trouble admitting whenever he>s wrong. Oh well.
[/quote]
the point is I am not wrong, and he knows it
[quote]I do remember some NT verse about Adam, but maybe it was Paul
who was attributed to the verse I>m thinking of.
[/quote]
The Paul would be a liar as well, because he based his premise on a myth, on
something that the catholic church says it is not true... why follow pauls
advice? |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
jabriol
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 1:52 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F6488BE.491BDC53@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
[quote]
jabriol wrote:
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F63B336.2B7E9213@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in
message
news:3F639BDE.90A6A7F9@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:h6m6mv0ov2q7r11lk3ejklegbquohjvnqg@4ax.com...
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
John Hattan <john@thecodezone.com> wrote in message
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
In Genesis, exist the term, reproduction according to
"kind",
this
indicate there is a barrier between lifeforms... the
manpanzee
would
prove, no such barrier exist. More so if manpanzee cold
then
reproduce.
I dunno. There seems to be plenty of religious people who
don>t
take
Genesis literally in the first place.
I remember my high school physics teacher (a Catholic
priest)
saying
that the first step to reconciling science and the Bible is
to
realize
that the book of Genesis is 102% mythology.
And that is why Catholics have many problems.
they find no need to follow biblical principles, because to
them
the
Bible
is not true.. Christ is a Liar etc.
Catholics think Christ was a liar?
yup.. Christ refered to adam and eve.... if genesis is
mythology..
then
the
point Jesus was making to them is based on a lie.
===>Do you think two lies make a truth?
JABRIEL LIE #1: Catholics think Christ was a liar
JABRIEL LIE #2: "Christ refered to adam and eve"
Could you substantiate either of those statements?
Libertarius
==========
yeah read the bible: mathew, luke, mark and John..
then get back to us..
===>I obviously have, better than YOU.
ONE MORE TIME:
WHERE in those books misspelled by you did Jesus refer to
Adam and Eve?
Respond to the point or admit you lied! -- L.
If you read the accounts you would already know, if you have knowledge
of
the one book that was written in hebrew you would know..
===>WHAT A DISHONEST LIAR YOU ARE, JABRIOL!
Unable to cover your lies, you resort to such obfuscation.
If you were not so dishonest, you would have given the reference
from the start!
[/quote]
So you don>t know... ok I belive you dont... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
jabriol
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 1:53 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F64BFDC.C02F2CEF@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
[quote]
Elroy Willis wrote:
Libertarius wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis wrote:
snip
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
I guess he has trouble admitting whenever he>s wrong. Oh well.
I do remember some NT verse about Adam, but maybe it was Paul
who was attributed to the verse I>m thinking of.
===>Adam is mentioned in one of the two contradictory genealogies
OF Jesus (See Luke 3:38), but never BY Jesus.
And there are some strange references to Adam in the Pauline letters,
e.g. 1 Corinthians 15:45
So also it is written,
"The first MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING SOUL." [the he adds:]
The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.
Whatever THAT means.
The "life-giving spirit" or "life breath" is what the story says YHWH
breaqthed into the noses of his creatures.
Is THAT what Saul/Paul claims "the last Adam" had become???
(Anyway, there have been MANY Adams since then, Jesus was
by no means the last one. I even have a nephew named Adam).
And then Adam is mentioned WITH Eve in support of male superiority
in 1 Timothy 2:13-14
For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.
And it was not Adam who was deceived,
but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
Jabriol should learn about his Bible a little more before
he uses false "quotations" in support of his pseudo-arguments.
Libertarius
============
[/quote]
I bet he looked up one of those online bibles with a search engine and type
in Adam eh?.. wow we are amazed at your use of google search engine..give
you a B plus..
but, does it matter, all you have posted is false, because the catholic
church says that adam and eve is fiction... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Libertarius
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:05 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
[quote]"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:nhr8mv8vdv2mi3ilmnn2dr8p8ceohguvbv@4ax.com...
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
Libertarius <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
jabriol wrote:
Libertarius <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
jabriol wrote:
yup.. Christ refered to adam and eve.... if genesis is mythology..
then the point Jesus was making to them is based on a lie.
===>Do you think two lies make a truth?
JABRIEL LIE #1: Catholics think Christ was a liar
JABRIEL LIE #2: "Christ refered to adam and eve"
Could you substantiate either of those statements?
yeah read the bible: mathew, luke, mark and John..
then get back to us..
===>I obviously have, better than YOU.
ONE MORE TIME:
WHERE in those books misspelled by you did Jesus refer to
Adam and Eve?
Respond to the point or admit you lied! -- L.
If you read the accounts you would already know, if you have knowledge
of
the one book that was written in hebrew you would know..
your question shows me you do not know.. and that you are lying...or
ignorant.
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
You admit to not knowing.. I know..any person who had seriouly read the
Bible should know.. If I quoted, then we go into another area, of what this
text or that text ""really means". the whole principle of marraiage and
divorce is based on this particular verse... catholics should be able to
quote it in his sleep..
[/quote]
===>Adam is listed as one of Jesus' ancestors. Otherwise
NEITHER ADAM NOR EVE IS MENTIONED
IN THE GOSPELS, YOU LIAR!
And you claimed JESUS referred to "Adam and Eve"?
You think by changing the subject to the discussion of marriage ("one flesh"),
you can hide your lie?
And even THAT is found only in MARK and MATTHEW, not
"mathew, luke, mark and John", as you ASSerted.
[quote]Libertarious should not have difficulty with this.. I wonder why he has a
problem.
I quoted the text many times before...
[/quote]
===>More Jabriolite LIES!
There is NO WAY you could have quoted Jesus as mentioning
"Adam and Eve". -- L. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Libertarius
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:07 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
[quote]"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F648933.CBDD78AA@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
Elroy Willis wrote:
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
Libertarius <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
jabriol wrote:
Libertarius <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
jabriol wrote:
yup.. Christ refered to adam and eve.... if genesis is mythology..
then the point Jesus was making to them is based on a lie.
===>Do you think two lies make a truth?
JABRIEL LIE #1: Catholics think Christ was a liar
JABRIEL LIE #2: "Christ refered to adam and eve"
Could you substantiate either of those statements?
yeah read the bible: mathew, luke, mark and John..
then get back to us..
===>I obviously have, better than YOU.
ONE MORE TIME:
WHERE in those books misspelled by you did Jesus refer to
Adam and Eve?
Respond to the point or admit you lied! -- L.
If you read the accounts you would already know, if you have knowledge
of
the one book that was written in hebrew you would know..
your question shows me you do not know.. and that you are lying...or
ignorant.
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
here is something more simple I gave you clue, and you still didnt know...
admit that you don>t and maybe I will tell you where in Mathew you might
find it.
no more clues..
[/quote]
===>No more brains in your head.
NOWHERE does ANY of the Gospels say that
Jesus mentioned EITHER Adam OR Eve.
So, stop lying! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Libertarius
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:10 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
[quote]"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:sn39mvoi3f74jahtn8vlacq4kvuo4fj0ee@4ax.com...
Libertarius wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis wrote:
snip
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
I guess he has trouble admitting whenever he>s wrong. Oh well.
the point is I am not wrong, and he knows it
I do remember some NT verse about Adam, but maybe it was Paul
who was attributed to the verse I>m thinking of.
The Paul would be a liar as well, because he based his premise on a myth, on
something that the catholic church says it is not true... why follow pauls
advice?
[/quote]
===>You are so full of hatred toward Catholics, yet
your nonsense is much WORSE, or perhaps BECAUSE
of that? You are trying to direct attention away from your
absurdities? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
JaBrIoL
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:11 am Post subject: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
"Missy Morino" <all-evil@theWickedWTs.net> wrote in message news:<rgR8b.90$U11.30@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com>...
[quote]"--sexkitten--" <not@naddress.com> wrote in message
news:bjsaf8$mqseg$1@ID-163025.news.uni-berlin.de...
Since you are determined to turn up on this board like a bad penny....
when
did evolution become a JW doctrine?
=====================
It didn>t. Jabbers is trying a new tactic to disprove evolution and push
his sect>s creation beliefs. The man needs a hobby or something better to
do with this time than troll the NGs and posting boards. A JW could be
disfellowshipped for believing evolution occurred.
[/quote]
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to slander
JW>s
Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts or sling
mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time on
discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated information.
Therefore participating with her attempt at slander, and distributing
false information elsewhere, may make you a lying fool as well.. Why
throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Carol:
*She can never present evidence.
*she never reveal the source of her info(because there is none). Her
common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*She always hide her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles.
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which her ISP allows her to do.
And if you don>t belive me...just read her reply on this thread..
She can>t resists...
She knows Jabriol is always right.
If you want to get rid of Carol, tell her to go home and service her
husband, like any decent honorable housewife would. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Libertarius
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:11 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
[quote]"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F64BFDC.C02F2CEF@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
Elroy Willis wrote:
Libertarius wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis wrote:
snip
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
I guess he has trouble admitting whenever he>s wrong. Oh well.
I do remember some NT verse about Adam, but maybe it was Paul
who was attributed to the verse I>m thinking of.
===>Adam is mentioned in one of the two contradictory genealogies
OF Jesus (See Luke 3:38), but never BY Jesus.
And there are some strange references to Adam in the Pauline letters,
e.g. 1 Corinthians 15:45
So also it is written,
"The first MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING SOUL." [the he adds:]
The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.
Whatever THAT means.
The "life-giving spirit" or "life breath" is what the story says YHWH
breaqthed into the noses of his creatures.
Is THAT what Saul/Paul claims "the last Adam" had become???
(Anyway, there have been MANY Adams since then, Jesus was
by no means the last one. I even have a nephew named Adam).
And then Adam is mentioned WITH Eve in support of male superiority
in 1 Timothy 2:13-14
For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.
And it was not Adam who was deceived,
but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
Jabriol should learn about his Bible a little more before
he uses false "quotations" in support of his pseudo-arguments.
Libertarius
============
I bet he looked up one of those online bibles with a search engine and type
in Adam eh?.. wow we are amazed at your use of google search engine..give
you a B plus..
[/quote]
===>Is THAT what you did to find out you were wrong, yet not
honest enough to admit it? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Libertarius
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:13 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
[quote]"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F6488BE.491BDC53@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F63B336.2B7E9213@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in
message
news:3F639BDE.90A6A7F9@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:h6m6mv0ov2q7r11lk3ejklegbquohjvnqg@4ax.com...
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
John Hattan <john@thecodezone.com> wrote in message
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
In Genesis, exist the term, reproduction according to
"kind",
this
indicate there is a barrier between lifeforms... the
manpanzee
would
prove, no such barrier exist. More so if manpanzee cold
then
reproduce.
I dunno. There seems to be plenty of religious people who
don>t
take
Genesis literally in the first place.
I remember my high school physics teacher (a Catholic
priest)
saying
that the first step to reconciling science and the Bible is
to
realize
that the book of Genesis is 102% mythology.
And that is why Catholics have many problems.
they find no need to follow biblical principles, because to
them
the
Bible
is not true.. Christ is a Liar etc.
Catholics think Christ was a liar?
yup.. Christ refered to adam and eve.... if genesis is
mythology..
then
the
point Jesus was making to them is based on a lie.
===>Do you think two lies make a truth?
JABRIEL LIE #1: Catholics think Christ was a liar
JABRIEL LIE #2: "Christ refered to adam and eve"
Could you substantiate either of those statements?
Libertarius
==========
yeah read the bible: mathew, luke, mark and John..
then get back to us..
===>I obviously have, better than YOU.
ONE MORE TIME:
WHERE in those books misspelled by you did Jesus refer to
Adam and Eve?
Respond to the point or admit you lied! -- L.
If you read the accounts you would already know, if you have knowledge
of
the one book that was written in hebrew you would know..
===>WHAT A DISHONEST LIAR YOU ARE, JABRIOL!
Unable to cover your lies, you resort to such obfuscation.
If you were not so dishonest, you would have given the reference
from the start!
So you don>t know... ok I belive you dont...
[/quote]
===>Neither do YOU.
NO ONE does.
You are simply LYING!
NOWHERE do you find Jesus mentioning EITHER Adam OR Eve! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
John Wilkins
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 4:04 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
Elroy Willis <elo@airmail.net> wrote:
[quote]Libertarius wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis wrote:
snip
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
I guess he has trouble admitting whenever he>s wrong. Oh well.
I do remember some NT verse about Adam, but maybe it was Paul
who was attributed to the verse I>m thinking of.
[/quote]
Jesus is reported in one of the gospels as having referred to marriage
in terms of "what God has joined together", i.e., in Genesis. That is an
indirect mention.
--
John Wilkins wilkins.id.au
For long you live and high you fly,
and smiles you>ll give and tears you>ll cry
and all you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
jabriol
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 4:45 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F64D8AA.6A344F7C@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
[quote]
jabriol wrote:
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F648933.CBDD78AA@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
Elroy Willis wrote:
jabriol <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in alt.atheism
Libertarius <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in
message
jabriol wrote:
Libertarius <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in
message
jabriol wrote:
yup.. Christ refered to adam and eve.... if genesis is
mythology..
then the point Jesus was making to them is based on a lie.
===>Do you think two lies make a truth?
JABRIEL LIE #1: Catholics think Christ was a liar
JABRIEL LIE #2: "Christ refered to adam and eve"
Could you substantiate either of those statements?
yeah read the bible: mathew, luke, mark and John..
then get back to us..
===>I obviously have, better than YOU.
ONE MORE TIME:
WHERE in those books misspelled by you did Jesus refer to
Adam and Eve?
Respond to the point or admit you lied! -- L.
If you read the accounts you would already know, if you have
knowledge
of
the one book that was written in hebrew you would know..
your question shows me you do not know.. and that you are
lying...or
ignorant.
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t
you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
here is something more simple I gave you clue, and you still didnt
know...
admit that you don>t and maybe I will tell you where in Mathew you might
find it.
no more clues..
===>No more brains in your head.
NOWHERE does ANY of the Gospels say that
Jesus mentioned EITHER Adam OR Eve.
well if you insist in your ignorance and beliefs so be it...
So, stop lying!
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
jabriol
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 4:49 am Post subject: Re: Manpanzee: was=Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F64D929.CAEDC44A@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
[quote]
jabriol wrote:
"Elroy Willis" <elo@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:sn39mvoi3f74jahtn8vlacq4kvuo4fj0ee@4ax.com...
Libertarius wrote in alt.atheism
Elroy Willis wrote:
snip
Why not just come up with some gospel verses to support your point?
Like you, I thought Jesus talked about Adam and Eve, but I guess we
were both wrong. I>m not ashamed to admit I was wrong, why can>t
you
do the same?
===>There is a difference, Elroy.
You are HONEST.
Jabriol is DISHONEST!
Simple enough?
I guess he has trouble admitting whenever he>s wrong. Oh well.
the point is I am not wrong, and he knows it
I do remember some NT verse about Adam, but maybe it was Paul
who was attributed to the verse I>m thinking of.
The Paul would be a liar as well, because he based his premise on a
myth, on
something that the catholic church says it is not true... why follow
pauls
advice?
===>You are so full of hatred toward Catholics, yet
your nonsense is much WORSE, or perhaps BECAUSE
of that? You are trying to direct attention away from your
absurdities?
[/quote]
Either the church accept Genesis, or it call Genesis a myth, a lie... if
Genesis is a myth and Lies, then everything reffered to Genesis is a lie as
well..
this mean the global flood, that Jesus referred to as well.. oh yeah, your
going to say Jesus did not refer to the flood neither eh?
cant have both ways.. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Al Klein
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:56 am Post subject: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:01:01 GMT, "jabriol" <jabriol@Neogenesis.net>
posted in alt.atheism:
[quote]"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:qku4mvgpbaul8vfnl25ngksovref38b32t@Pern.rk...
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:25:24 -0700, "--sexkitten--" <not@naddress.com
posted in alt.atheism:
Since you are determined to turn up on this board like a bad penny.... when
did evolution become a JW doctrine?
Since Jabbers figured out how to use it to terrorize rape victims on
usenet.
How so?
Rape is a human trait...
[/quote]
How would you know anything about humans?
--
"If we really know Truth, we do not fear hearing falsehoods or half-truths; if we are not sure of the truth - we shudder and try to shout down every utterance." - A. J. Mims
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Al Klein
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:57 am Post subject: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:08:49 -0700, "--sexkitten--" <not@naddress.com>
posted in alt.atheism:
[quote]"jabriol" <jabriol@Neogenesis.net> wrote in message
news:1GD8b.4227722$cI2.596211@news.easynews.com...
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:qku4mvgpbaul8vfnl25ngksovref38b32t@Pern.rk...
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:25:24 -0700, "--sexkitten--" <not@naddress.com
posted in alt.atheism:
Since you are determined to turn up on this board like a bad penny.... when
did evolution become a JW doctrine?
Since Jabbers figured out how to use it to terrorize rape victims on
usenet.
How so?
Rape is a human trait...
See original question.
[/quote]
Jabbers hasn>t evolved that far yet.
--
"I have never imputed to Nature a purpose or a goal, or anything that could be under-
stood as anthropomorphic. What I see in Nature is a magnificent structure that we can
comprehend only very imperfectly, and that must fill a thinking person with a feeling of
humility. This is a genuinely religious feeling that has nothing to do with mysticism."
- 1954 or 1955; quoted in Dukas and Hoffman _Albert Einstein the Human Side_, p. 39
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Al Klein
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2003 5:58 am Post subject: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day III |
|
|
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:01:06 GMT, "jabriol" <jabriol@Neogenesis.net>
posted in alt.atheism:
[quote]"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:3nu4mvsnlcv5beta2tmpgh7m9rivh8egdq@Pern.rk...
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:32:14 GMT, "jabriol" <jabriol@Neogenesis.net
posted in alt.atheism:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vfe2mv49got7e1mfojapeq5otbj6gg4fv3@Pern.rk...
Why would that matter? You>ve already stated, right here on usenet,
that you won>t look at the evidence.
where did I said that..?
Right in the next sentence.
I said give me some peered reviewed evidence.. not
T.O. non-peered review hupla...
and nobody has sent me or directed me to peered reviewed data.. T.O Faqs
are not peered reviewed...
[/quote]
See? What did I say?
[quote]So your peer-reviewed evidence that your god exists is ...
[/quote]
None at all, eh?
--
"...I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand
why I dismiss yours."
- Stephen F. Roberts
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
