| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mark K. Bilbo
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 9:01 pm Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
 |
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:17:23 +0000, Dave Oldridge wrote:
[quote]"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:3f400b6e$0$262$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
I have no clue of what oldridge is talking about..
Stop dissembling. You know exactly what I>m talking about.
You>re only fooling yourself. Anyway, lying in God>s name is the LEAST of
your sins and most of them remain unrepented. Do you think to fool God?
Harrassed any rape victims lately? Urged anyone to suicide?
God knows who and what you are. So do we. Your soul is beginning to look
VERY flammable!
[/quote]
If hell exists, gawd>s gonna christen it with Jabbers...
--
Mark K. Bilbo |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Mark K. Bilbo
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 9:01 pm Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:43:55 -0400, JTEM wrote:
[quote]
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote
Millions of bones and other evidence of past life
have been unearthed by scientists, and these are called fossils. If
evolution were a fact, surely in all of this there should be ample
evidence of one kind of living thing evolving into another kind.
You mean, we>d have something like "millions of bones and other evidence
of past life" as evidence?
[/quote]
Yeah, something like that instead of millions of bones and other evidence
of past life!
--
Mark K. Bilbo |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark K. Bilbo
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2003 9:25 pm Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:24:54 -0400, JTEM wrote:
[quote]
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote
JTEM wrote:
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote
Millions of bones and other evidence of past life
have been unearthed by scientists, and these are called fossils. If
evolution were a fact, surely in all of this there should be ample
evidence of one kind of living thing evolving into another kind.
You mean, we>d have something like "millions of bones and other
evidence of past life" as evidence?
Yeah, something like that instead of millions of bones and other
evidence of past life!
Well, maybe if we stopped wasting out time with the millions of bones and
other evidence of past life, we could search for millions of bones and
other evidence of past life.
[/quote]
Yeah but then all we>d have are millions of bones and other evidence of
past life...
--
Mark K. Bilbo |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jack
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2003 8:24 am Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
[quote]"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:3f3fa913$0$8955$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
"Zachriel" <angel@zachriel.com> wrote in message
news:dYM%a.5540$nI2.2217686116@twister2.starband.net...
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030817145912.50369.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com...
Millions of bones and other evidence of past life
have been unearthed by scientists, and these are
called fossils. If evolution were a fact, surely in
all of this there should be ample evidence of one kind
of living thing evolving into another kind. But the
Bulletin of Chicago>s Field Museum of Natural History
commented: "Darwin>s theory of [evolution] has always
been closely linked to evidence from fossils, and
probably most people assume that fossils provide a
very important part of the general argument that is
made in favor of darwinian interpretations of the
history of life. Unfortunately, this is not strictly
true."
Why not? The Bulletin went on to say that Darwin "was
embarrassed by the fossil record because it didn>t
look the way he predicted it would . . . the geologic
record did not then and still does not yield a finely
graduated chain of slow and progressive evolution."
That is a quote out-of-context by David Raup. You are misrepresenting
his views, by making it seem as if he doesn>t accept biological
evolution. Please retract your misrepresentation or provide
additional content
showing
that you are properly representing his views.
no, that is your intepretation, not my intent.
We realize that it was not your intent to properly represent his views.
In fact, it was your intent to sin.
Oh, here we go again. Dave knows a sinner when he sees one, boy. No[/quote]
doubt 'bout that. Never mind the point his target was trying to make,
legit or not; just pin him for the sinner he is. Always great fun for
the whole family.
[quote]And since this intent apparently
remains intact, you are an unrepentant sinner.
Yeah, hit 'em again, Davey. You got him on the run.[/quote]
[quote]The sin in question,
false witness, is a very deadly one and God has appointed a final place
for people who retain this intent and who will not repent of it:
Re 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and
murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone:
which is the second death.
But then, given your record, this is probably your goal in life...
And who better to approve the sentence than our own Dave Oldridge,[/quote]
sinner-sniffer extrodinaire!
Pride? Naah. Not our boy, Davey! He>s God>s right hand man, shooting
down them there sinners so>s to make God>s job easier.
Put 'er there, Davey! God>s got special place for His dep-u-ties, too.
Jack |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Dave Oldridge
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2003 6:44 pm Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
|
|
Jack <macjazz@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:3F482FE8.50001@bigfoot.com:
[quote]
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:3f3fa913$0$8955$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com:
"Zachriel" <angel@zachriel.com> wrote in message
news:dYM%a.5540$nI2.2217686116@twister2.starband.net...
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030817145912.50369.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com...
Millions of bones and other evidence of past life
have been unearthed by scientists, and these are
called fossils. If evolution were a fact, surely in
all of this there should be ample evidence of one kind
of living thing evolving into another kind. But the
Bulletin of Chicago>s Field Museum of Natural History
commented: "Darwin>s theory of [evolution] has always
been closely linked to evidence from fossils, and
probably most people assume that fossils provide a
very important part of the general argument that is
made in favor of darwinian interpretations of the
history of life. Unfortunately, this is not strictly
true."
Why not? The Bulletin went on to say that Darwin "was
embarrassed by the fossil record because it didn>t
look the way he predicted it would . . . the geologic
record did not then and still does not yield a finely
graduated chain of slow and progressive evolution."
That is a quote out-of-context by David Raup. You are
misrepresenting his views, by making it seem as if he doesn>t accept
biological evolution. Please retract your misrepresentation or
provide additional content
showing
that you are properly representing his views.
no, that is your intepretation, not my intent.
We realize that it was not your intent to properly represent his
views. In fact, it was your intent to sin.
Oh, here we go again. Dave knows a sinner when he sees one, boy. No
doubt 'bout that. Never mind the point his target was trying to make,
legit or not; just pin him for the sinner he is. Always great fun for
the whole family.
[/quote]
Look, if you want to follow Jabbie as your spiritual leader, then do so.
But don>t come caterwauling to the rest of us when his grunge rubs off on
you, OK?
[quote]And since this intent apparently
remains intact, you are an unrepentant sinner.
Yeah, hit 'em again, Davey. You got him on the run.
[/quote]
Naw, he>s already circling the pit. Jabby works for the devil, don>tcha
know.
[quote]
The sin in question,
false witness, is a very deadly one and God has appointed a final
place for people who retain this intent and who will not repent of it:
Re 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and
murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all
liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and
brimstone: which is the second death.
But then, given your record, this is probably your goal in life...
And who better to approve the sentence than our own Dave Oldridge,
sinner-sniffer extrodinaire!
[/quote]
Hey, I just point out the error.
[quote]Pride? Naah. Not our boy, Davey! He>s God>s right hand man,
shooting
down them there sinners so>s to make God>s job easier.
Put 'er there, Davey! God>s got special place for His dep-u-ties,
too.
[/quote]
Only doing my job. If you don>t like it, take it up with the Boss.
Apparently YOU don>t like it. Now why would that be?
--
Rev. Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
Paradoxically, most real events are highly improbable. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Budikka
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 3:43 am Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
|
|
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote
Who cares what he lied about this time?
And before you blather more lies, bullshit and assininity on this
topic, you need to catch up on your previous moronic displays first.
Define and detail what the "colossal holes" are in the Theory of
Evolution. I have been waiting some consdierable time to see you list
them. Can you or can you not? If you can, then do so. If you
cannot, then admit that you are doing nothing but spreading lies with
your clueless posts.
Budikka |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Dave Oldridge
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2003 7:16 pm Post subject: Re: Evolutionists disagreements\ The Fossil Record.. how acc |
|
|
Jack <macjazz@bigfoot.com> wrote in news:3F4984BA.3060504@bigfoot.com:
[quote]Hey, I just point out the error.
So "error" = "false witness"? If I come to believe that D-Day was
[/quote]
No, but false witness is an egregious spiritual error. The thing is,
people like Jabby don>t "believe" that t.o is censored, they just lie
about it. If you KNOW that most history professors and all of the
surviving participants disagree with for date for D-day. Moreover, the
moral equivalent here would be claiming that D-Day never took place at
all but was "faked." And saying you "know" such a thing would definitely
be to lie (or be so deluded as to be unable to distinguish truth from
falsehood at even an elementary level).
[quote]June 5, am I "bearing false witness" when I make that claim? Or do I
just need educating? Seems "false witness" requires malicious motive,
something a bit harder to ascribe. After all, a lie isn>t just
erroneous information; it>s intentionally misleading. As much as I
may disagree with the point of view of any number of participants
here, I can>t believe a single one of them has nefarious motives.
If someone makes a claim you believe to be false, and call him a
"false witness", then later find he was correct after all, were you
then the "false witness"--or just mistaken?
[/quote]
That>s why I>m fairly careful about throwing around the accusation. But
some people DO merit it. When you correct someone with evidence and
logic and they just brush you off and repeat their false claims, then
it>s time to call a lie a lie.
[snip]
[quote]Your job? Who died and left you the job of assigning evil motives to
people? I can>t even say what your motives are, unless you state
them...which I don>t think you have.
[/quote]
Jesus died for sinners. But He requires that they repent first.
Believe me, I didn>t volunteer for this. I got drafted.
--
Dave Oldridge
ICQ 1800667
Paradoxically, most real events are highly improbable. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
