| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:06 am Post subject: Re: To prove Jesus Christ really was a Messiah in history - |
 |
|
On Nov 2, 8:03 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
[quote]David <pchristain...@yahoo.com> 03/11/2008 00:46 wrote:
On Nov 2, 6:23 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
David <pchristain...@yahoo.com> 02/11/2008 23:52 wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:18 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
David <pchristain...@yahoo.com> 02/11/2008 13:08 wrote:
On Nov 1, 11:33 pm, N...@Valid.invalid wrote:
Plus, this thread has NOTHING to do with archaeology!
...
"Out of all the relics associated with Jesus only the
Pilate inscription and the Caiaphas ossuary are early,
legitimate artefacts." - quoting myself earlier in this thread
David Christainsen
yeah, go quote yourself.
Elsewhere.
Why does Peter Alaca still act like a complete jerk concerning
a subject he has absolutely no interest in?
Yet, Peter has engaged in interesting conversation over
archaeology with Tom McDonald whose professionalism I respect.
It is a total paradox...go figure.
David Christainsen
Why does Carl the Liar still dumps his shit in sci.archaeology?
"Out of all the relics associated with Jesus only the
Pilate inscription and the Caiaphas ossuary are early,
legitimate artefacts." - quoting myself earlier in the thread
Let the reader note carefully how RASH Peter Alaca
is to challenge the professionalism of my simple
statement.
Simple, that>s the word.
[/quote]
Don>t let facts get in your way, troll. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Peter Alaca
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: Re: To prove Jesus Christ really was a Messiah in history - |
|
|
David <pchristainsen@yahoo.com> 02/11/2008 23:52 wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 7:18 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
David <pchristain...@yahoo.com> 02/11/2008 13:08 wrote:
On Nov 1, 11:33 pm, N...@Valid.invalid wrote:
Plus, this thread has NOTHING to do with archaeology!
...
"Out of all the relics associated with Jesus only the
Pilate inscription and the Caiaphas ossuary are early,
legitimate artefacts." - quoting myself earlier in this thread
David Christainsen
yeah, go quote yourself.
Elsewhere.
Why does Peter Alaca still act like a complete jerk concerning
a subject he has absolutely no interest in?
Yet, Peter has engaged in interesting conversation over
archaeology with Tom McDonald whose professionalism I respect.
It is a total paradox...go figure.
David Christainsen
[/quote]
Why does Carl the Liar still dumps his shit in sci.archaeology? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Peter Alaca
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: Re: To prove Jesus Christ really was a Messiah in history - |
|
|
David <pchristainsen@yahoo.com> 03/11/2008 00:46 wrote:
[quote]On Nov 2, 6:23 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
David <pchristain...@yahoo.com> 02/11/2008 23:52 wrote:
On Nov 2, 7:18 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
David <pchristain...@yahoo.com> 02/11/2008 13:08 wrote:
On Nov 1, 11:33 pm, N...@Valid.invalid wrote:
Plus, this thread has NOTHING to do with archaeology!
...
"Out of all the relics associated with Jesus only the
Pilate inscription and the Caiaphas ossuary are early,
legitimate artefacts." - quoting myself earlier in this thread
David Christainsen
yeah, go quote yourself.
Elsewhere.
Why does Peter Alaca still act like a complete jerk concerning
a subject he has absolutely no interest in?
Yet, Peter has engaged in interesting conversation over
archaeology with Tom McDonald whose professionalism I respect.
It is a total paradox...go figure.
David Christainsen
Why does Carl the Liar still dumps his shit in sci.archaeology?
"Out of all the relics associated with Jesus only the
Pilate inscription and the Caiaphas ossuary are early,
legitimate artefacts." - quoting myself earlier in the thread
Let the reader note carefully how RASH Peter Alaca
is to challenge the professionalism of my simple
statement.
[/quote]
Simple, that>s the word. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
