| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Robert Cohen
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2003 9:27 pm Post subject: The SUV Tax Ripoff Story |
 |
|
I watched two network newses last night, but can>t recall which one did the SUV
tax gimmick write-off story.
I think it was Dan Rather, but maybe Pete Jennings
It seems the big 6000 pound boogers have cost the (other) taxpayers something
around a billion bucks in tax avoidance/credit/deduction/write-off.
I certainly do readily concede the SUVs provide jobs for trhe auto industry
(labor & management etal), and pleasure & utility fo their happy consumers.
Too bad the Congresssjerks can>t come up with a simple incentive plan to
substantively partially solve our traffic & pollution problems.
Let me suggest one (scroll down approx half a page at the cohen agenda website)
http://hometown.aol.com/robtcohen/myhomepage/ |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
No One
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 8:08 pm Post subject: Re: The SUV Tax Ripoff Story |
|
|
[quote]Too bad the Congresssjerks can>t come up with a simple incentive plan to
substantively partially solve our traffic & pollution problems.
[/quote]
I>ve got one, if you are not a government official and you are caught
driving a car you are dragged out the car and shot on the spot. I think
that would be incentive enough for most people to stop driving those evil
machines which would solve all of our traffic problems and a lot of our
pollution problems. And it would even allow the elite of us (I>m refering
to the goverment types of course) still drive. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robert Cohen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 1:30 am Post subject: Re: The SUV Tax Ripoff Story |
|
|
re: shooting us on the spot for driving our dumb & ugly machines
yeah, an interneter often is too glib for his own good, i concede, but please
just take a gander at a simple occam-razored rather obvious common sensical
concept noted-linked
over-night, we partially solve a terrible predicament of the era, until
something better is brought about
if it>s too dumb & simplistic to become ordinary reality, then change a couple
of perceptions of ordinary realities |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Don Lancaster
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 2:26 am Post subject: Re: The SUV Tax Ripoff Story |
|
|
Robert Cohen wrote:
[quote]
re: shooting us on the spot for driving our dumb & ugly machines
yeah, an interneter often is too glib for his own good, i concede, but please
just take a gander at a simple occam-razored rather obvious common sensical
concept noted-linked
over-night, we partially solve a terrible predicament of the era, until
something better is brought about
if it>s too dumb & simplistic to become ordinary reality, then change a couple
of perceptions of ordinary realities
[/quote]
Since smaller vehicles make annoying crunching noises when crunched by a
SUV owner, it is those smaller vehicles that clearly should be banned.
Just on their annoyance factor alone.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@tinaja.com fax 847-574-1462
Please visit my GURU>s LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jonas Heisenberg
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 2:59 pm Post subject: Re: The SUV Tax Ripoff Story |
|
|
Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote in message news:<3FB92F06.F59885E@tinaja.com>...
[quote]Robert Cohen wrote:
re: shooting us on the spot for driving our dumb & ugly machines
yeah, an interneter often is too glib for his own good, i concede, but please
just take a gander at a simple occam-razored rather obvious common sensical
concept noted-linked
over-night, we partially solve a terrible predicament of the era, until
something better is brought about
if it>s too dumb & simplistic to become ordinary reality, then change a couple
of perceptions of ordinary realities
Since smaller vehicles make annoying crunching noises when crunched by a
SUV owner, it is those smaller vehicles that clearly should be banned.
[/quote]
Abrams - the next fad in personal transportation.
> Just on their annoyance factor alone. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
