hagen
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:08 pm Post subject: The proof of a blindfolded |
 |
|
Pick up every single of my illustration you choose, and you ought to
be convinced. For instance this one:
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/chain3.htm
"A first-rate demonstration of a non-grammatical contents in a
structure".
This tabulation of the signgroups, which marks 30 pair of signgroups;
Each pair tied together by an identical sign (marked blue). The two
components of the pair have moreover each <u>one</u> offshoot (red
letters) to the next floor pairs, which possess exactly the same
qualities (one sign in common, each component with an offshoot to the
next pair). In this way all 61 signgroups are linked together by one
single string.
The most frequent elements are ’BA’ with thirteen occurrences, and the
thorn with seventeen. Those two are isolated from the above countings.
This chaining together make use of as many as 30 out of a total of 46
signs (2/3) as links.
The blindfolded . . .
SOME THOUGHTS
If all the words in a piece of poetry or a prosaic text, chosen by
random, could be linked together in an <u>unbroken chain by double
stitch!</u> Same as could those clusters of pictographs; Would’nt we
then expect, that unknown disciplines inside philology had developed
during time? For instance *metaphorical translations of texts into
unambiguous patterns, like the harmony of the spheres, or like
Mandelbrot music? This is not the case in texts, otherwise opponents
of my discovery would long have dished up with competitive examples
from Literature, but they stay mute, whereas in systems alias
protokols, ledgers, book-keeping by double entrance, various tables,
such symmetri like ’a hollow pyramide’ or 'a gnomonical arrangement'
is given by itself. <u>Thereby my break-through is in reality settled</
u>. Follow-up-questions like, what is the origin of the subject?, how
old?, an interwoven text simultaneously?, or is it a fake?, etc. - you
name it -, are of course secondary questions.
Marathon man . . . |
|
