Science and Technology news... :: View topic - The PERFECT EQUATION = LOSSLESS COMPRESSION!!!! TRUE!!!!

The Jackal · Guest

There has been a tremendous breaktrough equation at
adamsplatform.com.au. It is quite simple the form content and
behaviour of matter summarised in ONE EQUATION -A PERFECT EQUATION for
an imperfect time! ITS TIME FOR THE PERFECT WORLD OF PERFECT COMPUTING
- IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES WITH THIS SOLE EQUATION ENABLING
EVERYTING????

I am the Jackal and I will return with the story behind this
BREAKTHROUGH ANNOUNCEMENT in two weeks time!!!!

adamsplatform.com.au = perfect computing equation now in "original"
owners handwriting!

Fibonacci Code · Guest

On Jun 7, 4:05 pm, The Jackal <j...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
[quote]There has been a tremendous breaktrough equation at
adamsplatform.com.au. It is quite simple the form content and
behaviour of matter summarised in ONE EQUATION -A PERFECT EQUATION for
an imperfect time! ITS TIME FOR THE PERFECT WORLD OF PERFECT COMPUTING
- IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES WITH THIS SOLE EQUATION ENABLING
EVERYTING????

I am the Jackal and I will return with the story behind this
BREAKTHROUGH ANNOUNCEMENT in two weeks time!!!!

adamsplatform.com.au = perfect computing equation now in "original"
owners handwriting!
[/quote]

It seem to me it is the weird scan lines flow,

Providence · Guest

i like the " pk = ? "

that>s totally lossless, when you don>t have any definition already,
there>s nothing to lose! :)

Guest

On Jun 7, 9:58 pm, Providence <psioni...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]i like the " pk = ? "

that>s totally lossless, when you don>t have any definition already,
there>s nothing to lose! :)
[/quote]
I got a laugh from the nonsense about the equation being in the
original owner>s handwriting.

What does that have to do with working code? Watch the excuses start
in the next few days like always.

Has there ever been one of these kook/crook/con-artist/super-ego who
ever thought to try and test their compressor/decompressor in real
life first before blasting these stupid claims?

Industrial One · Guest

On Jun 7, 6:48 pm, earlcolby.pottin...@sympatico.ca wrote:
[quote]On Jun 7, 9:58 pm, Providence <psioni...@gmail.com> wrote:

i like the " pk = ? "

that>s totally lossless, when you don>t have any definition already,
there>s nothing to lose! :)

I got a laugh from the nonsense about the equation being in the
original owner>s handwriting.

What does that have to do with working code? Watch the excuses start
in the next few days like always.

Has there ever been one of these kook/crook/con-artist/super-ego who
ever thought to try and test their compressor/decompressor in real
life first before blasting these stupid claims?
[/quote]
I did, and when I reduced a 40-KB chunk of RAD down by 600 bytes
losslessly, I assumed it worked. Later I found it couldn>t recursively
compress, nor would it work on the next 10,000 40-KB pseudorandom
streams.

I didn>t read the first post, what>s this thread about again?

Sportman · Guest

On Jun 8, 2:48 am, earlcolby.pottin...@sympatico.ca wrote:
[quote]I got a laugh from the nonsense about the equation being in the
original owner>s handwriting.
I see something as 1:10 maybe 10 times lossless compression.[/quote]

[quote]What does that have to do with working code? Watch the excuses start
in the next few days like always.

Has there ever been one of these kook/crook/con-artist/super-ego who
ever thought to try and test their compressor/decompressor in real
life first before blasting these stupid claims?
The website is still registered by Adam Clark and he builded and[/quote]
demonstrated and let tested his video compression/decompression code
before he was put aside.

Maybe Adam found this newgroup or a friend?

erpy · Guest

Sportman ha scritto:
[quote]On Jun 8, 2:48 am, earlcolby.pottin...@sympatico.ca wrote:

I got a laugh from the nonsense about the equation being in the
original owner>s handwriting.

I see something as 1:10 maybe 10 times lossless compression.

[/quote]
PR+PG+PB > rR^k + rG^k + rB^k

....where do you see "10 times lossless compression" ?!

Assuming "P" stands for "pixel" while RGB is quite clear.... I don>t see
compression in that statement. (is he summing RGB values ?! :))
Moreover:

(next) -> PR, PG, PB > 80% (....of what ?!)

(next) -> P^k ?!.... (I already lost it....)

(next) -> Pd = k; Pd = Pk .....(next) -> PR > PG, PB (...is this saying
"all the red pixels are bigger than green and blue ones" ??)

....rrrright.... I definitely lost it.... :))) I find no meaning here, sorry.

erpy · Guest

Sportman ha scritto:
[quote]On Jun 8, 2:48 am, earlcolby.pottin...@sympatico.ca wrote:

I got a laugh from the nonsense about the equation being in the
original owner>s handwriting.

I see something as 1:10 maybe 10 times lossless compression.

What does that have to do with working code? Watch the excuses start
in the next few days like always.

Has there ever been one of these kook/crook/con-artist/super-ego who
ever thought to try and test their compressor/decompressor in real
life first before blasting these stupid claims?

The website is still registered by Adam Clark and he builded and
demonstrated and let tested his video compression/decompression code
before he was put aside.

Maybe Adam found this newgroup or a friend?

[/quote]
Has anyone, instead, investigated this guy>s stuff ?:

http://www.stoneageworkshop.com/

....at least he shows some math.

jacko · Guest

On Jun 9, 2:43 am, erpy <i...@forwardgames.com> wrote:
[quote]Sportman ha scritto:

On Jun 8, 2:48 am, earlcolby.pottin...@sympatico.ca wrote:

I got a laugh from the nonsense about the equation being in the
original owner>s handwriting.

I see something as 1:10 maybe 10 times lossless compression.

What does that have to do with working code? Watch the excuses start
in the next few days like always.

Has there ever been one of these kook/crook/con-artist/super-ego who
ever thought to try and test their compressor/decompressor in real
life first before blasting these stupid claims?

The website is still registered by Adam Clark and he builded and
demonstrated and let tested his video compression/decompression code
before he was put aside.

Maybe Adam found this newgroup or a friend?

Has anyone, instead, investigated this guy>s stuff ?:

http://www.stoneageworkshop.com/

...at least he shows some math.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
I read some way back while researching and saw actual microfilm entry
while filing pat pend GB9622021.5 in uk patent office when it was
where the LSE is now. Chancery lane. I had a look see and it was
nothing to do with my absorbative modulation methods. I don>t think it
would work well. it was file via australia i think. sure the name
looks familiar.

well my compression method is now open, as i never filed the
modifications necessary to get it working with the patent office, and
so opensquirt constitues prior art to prevent anyone later patenting
the idea. I am so sure i have filed many non working methods evolving
to this at the uk office, but seeing a picture of a terminal loop like
in linked list diagrams, and working out which computationonal
structure (rightfield) mathes this "resonant pictorial
vision" (leftfield) did take a number of years. Well i can say that
the modulation code never changed after it was filed first, only the
supporting topology of the bias element ever changed in subsequent
filings. later i dfiscovered that binomial averages, helps to free the
limit of a 2:1 bias. as any bias no matter how small can be powered to
2:1 (e.g. 1^n:1.00000000000001^n) as anybody who obsesses on pushing
square root on an fx-82 will tell you, will diverge to 2:1 with
n>>infinity.

i once saw this dimond electrode structure placed round a torus
cyclotron in my head once, and do wonder some amazing things now. but
thats another 11:40 story, and the creation of a four minute nuclear
egg head.

cheers

http://indi.hpsdr.com/My%20OpenSquirt.zip

ok>

jacko · Guest

Google maps area 42?? or was that just ..

Industrial One · Guest

On Jun 11, 3:03 pm, jacko <jackokr...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]http://indi.hpsdr.com/My%20OpenSquirt.zip

ok
[/quote]
None of the mirror links for squirt.zip worked...

jacko · Guest

On Jun 12, 12:26 pm, Industrial One <industrial_...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]On Jun 11, 3:03 pm, jacko <jackokr...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://indi.hpsdr.com/My%20OpenSquirt.zip

ok

None of the mirror links for squirt.zip worked...
[/quote]
the mirror server indi.microfpga.com does not have directory listing
so it is difficult to download the directory, I will at some point
write a php directory index.php page so that the individual files
become downloadable from the My%20OpenSquirt directory. I only put
lena on hpsdr aswell, as my 1GB/month limit is approaching fast. but
you have the java files and the pdf, so why not build it? i think in
the woo-woo circumstances it is not for me to write the algorithm, but
to get some independent clean room team to write it. in this way i
could not be accused of 'hidden information'. anyhow it makes more
sense to write a virtual device driver for the k ring virtual media,
and then wory about storing information upon the virtual device. just
in case my spelling errors are percumulationing your store content
size upon many a news server, well i do think that little bit extra is
well worth it :)

by the way i once as small called a spring a doyoinker, but am not
sure if that would be the correct entry level spelling. also doobly
may not be the best way to pronounce a type of noise reduction tandy
once stocked.

kids eeh.

Guest

Yep, I was right. Here come all the lame excuses. And of-course if
anyone else tries to write the code and it fails he will just blame
the coder instead of admitting his idea is junk.

If his claim was true, who cares about hidden files. Give us the
decompresser/compressor combo and we can test it ourself.

And if he wants to keep the compressor code itself secret, then let us
send test files to be compressed *AFTER* he releases a copy of the
decompresser.

All other excuses are just another woo-woo who will not admit they are
wrong.

Industrial One · Guest

On Jun 12, 8:45 am, jacko <jackokr...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Jun 12, 12:26 pm, Industrial One <industrial_...@hotmail.com
wrote:

On Jun 11, 3:03 pm, jacko <jackokr...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://indi.hpsdr.com/My%20OpenSquirt.zip

ok

None of the mirror links for squirt.zip worked...

the mirror server indi.microfpga.com does not have directory listing
so it is difficult to download the directory, I will at some point
write a php directory index.php page so that the individual files
become downloadable from the My%20OpenSquirt directory. I only put
lena on hpsdr aswell, as my 1GB/month limit is approaching fast. but
you have the java files and the pdf, so why not build it? i think in
[/quote]
I tried to compile it back in summer 2006 but something went wrong, I
don>t remember what. I don>t do java anyhow, Java blows.

[quote]the woo-woo circumstances it is not for me to write the algorithm, but
to get some independent clean room team to write it. in this way i
could not be accused of 'hidden information'. anyhow it makes more
[/quote]
If I could get the opportunity to test your codec on a file, store on
a Floppy/Flashstick and decompress on another machine losslessly then
I think it>s irrefutable that your algorithm works and any accuser can
be safely ignored. Feel free to write it yourself.

jacko · Guest

On Jun 13, 5:56 am, earlcolby.pottin...@sympatico.ca wrote:
[quote]Yep, I was right.
Yet to be proven[/quote]

[quote]Here come all the lame excuses.
Probably are lame to most people I can see that.[/quote]

[quote]And of-course if
anyone else tries to write the code and it fails he will just blame
the coder instead of admitting his idea is junk.
if they try to write the code they will have only tried, if they do[/quote]
write the code then they would have wrote it. I see no reason to be
lame them physically or out of falacious logic.

[quote]If his claim was true, who cares about hidden files. Give us the
decompresser/compressor combo and we can test it ourself.
WAS, WAS, don>t you mean IS. you seem to say no proof is false rather[/quote]
than that indeterminate middle state.

[quote]And if he wants to keep the compressor code itself secret, then let us
send test files to be compressed *AFTER* he releases a copy of the
decompresser.
the file contains enough to make both, hence no secrecy at all shows[/quote]
how much you looked.

[quote]All other excuses are just another woo-woo who will not admit they are
wrong.
do you have some proof that it don>t work in order for me to need to[/quote]
admit anything?

well cheers for that mr. fash.


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Compression Forum	Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 1 of 3