| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BradGuth
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:07 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
 |
|
On Nov 14, 5:35 am, oldc...@webtv.net (oldcoot) wrote:
[quote]Painius sed :
The Pacific basin is much too shallow to > have spawned the Moon.
Not speaking pro or con for the impact theory, but consider 'what if' a
moon-sized mass *had* been blasted loose from the Earth. At this size
scale, the remaining mass of the planet woulda sought hydrostatic
equilibrium under the force of gravity, returning to sphericity. The
"crater" would be largely filled in, leaving only vestiges of the 'deep
impact'.
[/quote]
That is true, as well as Earth would not have had a seasonal tilt, the
Arctic ocean basin nor antipode generated mountains, because Earth
would have been at least 99.9% fluid.
~ BG |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
oldcoot
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
Painius sed :
[quote]The Pacific basin is much too shallow to > have spawned the Moon.
[/quote]
Not speaking pro or con for the impact theory, but consider 'what if' a
moon-sized mass *had* been blasted loose from the Earth. At this size
scale, the remaining mass of the planet woulda sought hydrostatic
equilibrium under the force of gravity, returning to sphericity. The
"crater" would be largely filled in, leaving only vestiges of the 'deep
impact'. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
Spirits are always busy doing tons of things we NEVER GET TO SEE,
Mark! lmfjao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yeah sure...
Saul Levy
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:01:52 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]You are free to look at it that way of course...
...but I always saw the Moon as the Earth>s baby.
Just the right size to have been birthed from the Pacific
Ocean...even if just spiritually.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:56 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
Because it NEVER HAPPENED, BradBoi! lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:04:27 -0800 (PST), BradGuth
<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]Folks here in never never land can>t accept an icy lithobraking
encounter. It>s mostly a faith-based thing that devout pretend-
Atheists are forever stuck with, just like those Zionist/Nazis were
stuck with Hitler, and later with GW Bush.
~ BG[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 2:57 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
Sounds like a BradBoi FAIRY TALE!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:07:57 -0800 (PST), BradGuth
<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 14, 5:35 am, oldc...@webtv.net (oldcoot) wrote:
Painius sed :
The Pacific basin is much too shallow to > have spawned the Moon.
Not speaking pro or con for the impact theory, but consider 'what if' a
moon-sized mass *had* been blasted loose from the Earth. At this size
scale, the remaining mass of the planet woulda sought hydrostatic
equilibrium under the force of gravity, returning to sphericity. The
"crater" would be largely filled in, leaving only vestiges of the 'deep
impact'.
That is true, as well as Earth would not have had a seasonal tilt, the
Arctic ocean basin nor antipode generated mountains, because Earth
would have been at least 99.9% fluid.
~ BG[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:07 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
On Nov 14, 7:56 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]"Saul Levy" <saulle...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:skorh4pf947fcjo09ajik1gln68ut6b8lq@4ax.com...
Spirits are always busy doing tons of things we NEVER GET TO SEE,
Mark! lmfjao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yeah sure...
Saul Levy
You need to stop taking things at face value, Saul.
Things are not always what they appear to be.
Common misfiring of brain neurons by atheists.
[/quote]
Saul Levy has a brain? (you>ve got to be kidding)
~ BG |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:13 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote in message
news:gxaTk.130644$Mh5.124615@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
[quote]"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nu6dnWc99avIZYHUnZ2dnUVZ_sTinZ2d@posted.internetamerica...
"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote in message
news:huKRk.121770$Mh5.69681@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
news:l-udnbrURLdinI3UnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@posted.internetamerica...
"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote in message
news:D6TPk.111158$Mh5.50860@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
As you may know, i converted the articles i wrote back in
June about our Sister Planet Selene, to .html web pages!
So now you can read about how our planet Selene needs
to be reclassified anytime you want to! It>s high time for
us to "reinstate" our Moon back to the status it held for
hundreds, perhaps thousands of years! It is time for all
of us to accept that Selene is NOT just a mere satellite of
Earth. The Moon is a full-fledged major planet in its own
right!
And now you can read all about *why* anytime you like!
So please do go see the official website of...
THE PLANET MOON
http://paine_ellsworth.home.att.net/billbill.html#Selene
This website is dedicated to one of the most prolific and
fascinating science and sf writers who ever lived:
I s a a c A s i m o v
Asimov was the originator of most of these ideas, and he
was instrumental in helping to shape this official proposal
to the IAU (the International Astronomical Union).
Fine, the Moon is a planet.
A little, bitty planet.
Or a great big Moon.
Either way, Venus is our Sister Planet,
and always has been.
Too ingrained in literature.
The more the merrier, Mark!
Earth and Moon are just closer sister planets,
that>s all.
You are free to look at it that way of course...
...but I always saw the Moon as the Earth>s baby.
Just the right size to have been birthed from the Pacific
Ocean...even if just spiritually.
Actually, the Moon as having been once filling the
Pacific basin and then somehow having been broken
off from Earth was at one time a scientific Moon-origin
theory. It was, however, refuted long ago. The Pacific
basin is much too shallow to have spawned the Moon.
Moreover, the Moon is so old, that the Pacific basin
didn>t even exist back then. Geology of the Earth,
changes in locations of bodies of water and land, have
been altered dramatically since the time when the
Moon came on the scene.
[/quote]
What about the idea that the Moon seperated from the Earth while both were
still in a partly molten state? Then the Earth and Moon would just seal
themselves up like two seperating blobs of mercury.
There has to be some reason why all the continents started all bunched
up together on one side of the world, doesn>t there?
[quote]
Though admittedly, there is still some romance to the
story.
[/quote]
And the fictional artists were often onto reality, IMHO. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mark Earnest
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:13 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:skorh4pf947fcjo09ajik1gln68ut6b8lq@4ax.com...
[quote]Spirits are always busy doing tons of things we NEVER GET TO SEE,
Mark! lmfjao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yeah sure...
Saul Levy
[/quote]
You need to stop taking things at face value, Saul.
Things are not always what they appear to be.
Common misfiring of brain neurons by atheists. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:14 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
On Nov 15, 7:25 am, "Painius" <starswirlern...@maol.com> wrote:
[quote]"oldcoot" <oldc...@webtv.net> wrote in message...
news:16082-491D7EAE-776@storefull-3331.bay.webtv.net...
Painius sed :
The Pacific basin is much too shallow to > have spawned the Moon.
Not speaking pro or con for the impact theory, but consider 'what if' a
moon-sized mass *had* been blasted loose from the Earth. At this size
scale, the remaining mass of the planet woulda sought hydrostatic
equilibrium under the force of gravity, returning to sphericity. The
"crater" would be largely filled in, leaving only vestiges of the 'deep
impact'.
Good point! Still, with a lot of continental drift since
the Moon came on the scene, there>s no way of telling
just where a Moon-sized chunk might have come from.
[/quote]
But there is a way to tell where and of when an icy lithobraking
encounter took place, along with the creation of antipode mountains
(such as the antipode mountains of Antarctica), plus our Arctic ocean
basin and seasonal tilt.
~ BG |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:20 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
Are you going to start citing the work of SPIRITS, Mark? lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:56:47 -0600, "Mark Earnest"
<gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message
news:skorh4pf947fcjo09ajik1gln68ut6b8lq@4ax.com...
Spirits are always busy doing tons of things we NEVER GET TO SEE,
Mark! lmfjao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yeah sure...
Saul Levy
You need to stop taking things at face value, Saul.
Things are not always what they appear to be.
Common misfiring of brain neurons by atheists.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Painius
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
"oldcoot" <oldcoot@webtv.net> wrote in message...
news:16082-491D7EAE-776@storefull-3331.bay.webtv.net...
[quote]Painius sed :
The Pacific basin is much too shallow to > have spawned the Moon.
Not speaking pro or con for the impact theory, but consider 'what if' a
moon-sized mass *had* been blasted loose from the Earth. At this size
scale, the remaining mass of the planet woulda sought hydrostatic
equilibrium under the force of gravity, returning to sphericity. The
"crater" would be largely filled in, leaving only vestiges of the 'deep
impact'.
[/quote]
Good point! Still, with a lot of continental drift since
the Moon came on the scene, there>s no way of telling
just where a Moon-sized chunk might have come from.
happy days and...
starry starry nights!
--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth
P.S.: "Be ashamed to die until you have won some
victory for humanity."
[quote]Horace Mann
[/quote]
P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Painius
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:45 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6b6dnZuZia6m1YPUnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@posted.internetamerica...
[quote]"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote in message
news:gxaTk.130644$Mh5.124615@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nu6dnWc99avIZYHUnZ2dnUVZ_sTinZ2d@posted.internetamerica...
"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote in message
news:huKRk.121770$Mh5.69681@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"Mark Earnest" <gmearnest@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
news:l-udnbrURLdinI3UnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@posted.internetamerica...
"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote in message
news:D6TPk.111158$Mh5.50860@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
As you may know, i converted the articles i wrote back in
June about our Sister Planet Selene, to .html web pages!
So now you can read about how our planet Selene needs
to be reclassified anytime you want to! It>s high time for
us to "reinstate" our Moon back to the status it held for
hundreds, perhaps thousands of years! It is time for all
of us to accept that Selene is NOT just a mere satellite of
Earth. The Moon is a full-fledged major planet in its own
right!
And now you can read all about *why* anytime you like!
So please do go see the official website of...
THE PLANET MOON
http://paine_ellsworth.home.att.net/billbill.html#Selene
This website is dedicated to one of the most prolific and
fascinating science and sf writers who ever lived:
I s a a c A s i m o v
Asimov was the originator of most of these ideas, and he
was instrumental in helping to shape this official proposal
to the IAU (the International Astronomical Union).
Fine, the Moon is a planet.
A little, bitty planet.
Or a great big Moon.
Either way, Venus is our Sister Planet,
and always has been.
Too ingrained in literature.
The more the merrier, Mark!
Earth and Moon are just closer sister planets,
that>s all.
You are free to look at it that way of course...
...but I always saw the Moon as the Earth>s baby.
Just the right size to have been birthed from the Pacific
Ocean...even if just spiritually.
Actually, the Moon as having been once filling the
Pacific basin and then somehow having been broken
off from Earth was at one time a scientific Moon-origin
theory. It was, however, refuted long ago. The Pacific
basin is much too shallow to have spawned the Moon.
Moreover, the Moon is so old, that the Pacific basin
didn>t even exist back then. Geology of the Earth,
changes in locations of bodies of water and land, have
been altered dramatically since the time when the
Moon came on the scene.
What about the idea that the Moon seperated from the Earth while both were
still in a partly molten state? Then the Earth and Moon would just seal
themselves up like two seperating blobs of mercury.
[/quote]
That>s a good idea, actually.
[quote]There has to be some reason why all the continents started all bunched
up together on one side of the world, doesn>t there?
[/quote]
We don>t know that they did, Mark. There is still a
lot of controversy over what the world was like
before Pangaea.
[quote]Though admittedly, there is still some romance to the
story.
And the fictional artists were often onto reality, IMHO.
[/quote]
Be careful what you *believe*, Mark. It can come
back to bite you. A study of Jonestown is a good
case in point. Sometimes false beliefs can be fatal.
The upside is that even more often, false beliefs can
lead to youthful questioning that can lead to Truth.
happy days and...
starry starry nights!
--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth
P.S.: "Hide not your talents, they for use were made.
What>s a sun-dial in the shade?"
[quote]Benjamin Franklin
[/quote]
P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 11:24 pm Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
Painius Of the 3 theories Earth creating the Moon do to a great
collision is the worse. It can not answer the questions it creates(that
makes it bad) It has to be explained in to many words that even a bar
maid would not under stand (Bohr) Unanius could have its tilt by a
close encounter. Venus might have lost its Earth like spin by a close
encounter. Lots of large asteroids and comets have hit the Earth,and
made great craters but none have ever even put a small rock in orbit let
alone a planet Imperial thinkers have given us 3 bad theories Poles
changing polarity,Water on Mars surface and this crazy moon creation
theory TreBert |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Saul Levy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:49 am Post subject: Re: The Moon That Is Really A Planet |
|
|
All atheists have MORE BRAINS than RELIGIOUS NUTJOBS, BradBoi!
lmfjao!
Saul Levy
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:07:31 -0800 (PST), BradGuth
<bradguth@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 14, 7:56 pm, "Mark Earnest" <gmearn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"Saul Levy" <saulle...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:skorh4pf947fcjo09ajik1gln68ut6b8lq@4ax.com...
Spirits are always busy doing tons of things we NEVER GET TO SEE,
Mark! lmfjao!
BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yeah sure...
Saul Levy
You need to stop taking things at face value, Saul.
Things are not always what they appear to be.
Common misfiring of brain neurons by atheists.
Saul Levy has a brain? (you>ve got to be kidding)
~ BG[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
