Science and Technology news... :: View topic - The crankiest FTL site.....................................

gabydewilde · Guest

On Nov 1, 1:47 pm, Herbert Brandt <socialghost2...@yahoo.de> wrote:
[quote]gabydewilde schrieb:> On Oct 31, 7:13 pm, john271008 <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
gaby, can you please learn to spell 'more'?

Do you always talk bullshit like this?

Kake this, DUDE :

John St. Clair Akwei vs.
NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA

Table of Contents

Cover Page
NSA Mission & Operations
Communications Intelligence
Signals Intelligence
Domestic Intelligence
Independently Operating Personnel Target Citizens
NSA>s Domestic Electronic Surveillance Network
Signals Intelligence Remote Computer Tampering
Detecting EMF Fields in Humans for Surveillance
NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulatlon
Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM
NSA Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology
Table: An example of EMF Brain Stimulation
NSA Techniques and Resources
Remote RNM Devices
Spotters and Walk-Bys in Metropolitan Areas
Chemicals and Drugs
Intelligence/Anti-Terrorist Equipment
Resources
Further Resources

Cover Page

Evidence for the Lawsuit filed at the US courthouse in Washington, D.C.
(Civil Action 92-0449)

John St.Clair Akwei vs. NSA Ft George G. Meade, MD

My knowledge of the National Security Agency>s structure, national
security activities, proprietary technology,and covert operations to
monitor individual citizens.

Table of Contents

The NSA>s mission and
the NSA>s domestic Intelligence operation.

Communications Intelligence (COMINT)

Blanket coverage of all electronic communication in the U.S.
and the world to ensure national security. The NSA at Ft. Meade,
Maryland has had the most advanced computers in the world since the
early 1960>s. NSA technology is developed and implemented in secret from
private corporations, academia, and the general public.

Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)

The Signals Intelligence mission of the NSA has evolved into a
program of decoding EMF waves in the environment for wirelessly tapping
into computers and tracking persons with the electrical currents in
their bodies. Signals Intelligence is based on the fact that everything
in the environment with an electric current in it has a magnetic flux
around it which gives off EMF waves. The NSA/DoD has developed
proprietary advanced digital equipment which can remotely analyze all
objects whether man-made or organic that have electrical activity.

Domestic Intelligence (DOMINT)

The NSA has records on all U.S. citizens. The NSA gathers
information on U.S. citizens who might be of interest to any of the over
50,000 NSA agents (HUMINT). These agents are authorized by executive
order to spy on anyone. The NSA has a permanent National Security
Anti-Terrorist surveillance network in place. This surveillance network
is completely disguised and hidden from the public.

Tracking individuals in the U.S. is easily and cost-effectively
implemented with the NSA>s electronic surveillance network. This network
(DOMINT) covers the entire U.S., involves tens of thousands of NSA
personnel, and tracks millions of persons simultaneously. Cost effective
implementation of operations is assured by NSA computer technology
designed to minimize operations costs.

NSA personnel serve in Quasi-public positions in their communities
and run cover businesses and legitimate businesses that can inform the
intelligence community of persons they would want to track. N.S.A.
personnel in the community usually have cover identities such as social
workers, lawyers and business owners.
Individual citizens occasionally targeted for surveillance
by independently operating NSA personnel.

NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of
individuals in the U.S. by using the NSA>s domestic intelligence network
and cover businesses. The operations independently run by them can
sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of
tens of thousands of unwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to
happen. NSA Domint has the ability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens
or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be
diagnosed with ill mental health.

Table of Contents

NSA>s domestic electronic surveillance network

As of the early 1960>s the most advanced computers in the world
were at the NSA, Ft. Meade. Research breakthroughs with these computers
were kept for the NSA. At the present time the NSA has nanotechnology
computers that are 15 years ahead of present computer technology.

The NSA obtains blanket coverage of information in the U.S. by
using advanced computers that use artificial intelligence to screen all
communications, irregardless of medium, for key words that should be
brought to the attention of NSA agents/cryptologists. These computers
monitor all communications at the transmitting and receiving ends. This
blanket coverage of the U.S. is a result of the NSA>s Signals
Intelligence (SIGINT) mission.

The NSA>s electronic surveillance network is based on a cellular
arrangement of devices that can monitor the entire EMF spectrum. This
equipment was developed, implemented, and kept secret in the same manner
as other electronic warfare programs.

With this technology NSA personnel can non-obtrusively tap into any
communication device in existence. This includes computers, telephones,
radio and video-based devices, printers, car electronics, and even the
minute electrical fields in humans (for tracking individuals).
Signals Intelligence Remote Computer Tampering

The NSA keeps track of all PCs and other computers sold in the U.S.
This is an integral part of the Domestic Intelligence network.

The NSA>s EMF equipment can tune in RF emissions from personal
computer circuit boards (while filtering out emissions from monitors and
power supplies). The RF emission from PC circuit boards contains digital
information in the PC. Coded RF waves from the NSA>s equipment can
resonate PC circuits and change data in the PC>s. Thus the NSA can gain
wireless modem-style entry into any computer in the country for
surveillance or anti-terrorist electronic warfare.

Radio and Television signals can be substituted at the receiving
end with special EMF equipment. Replacing signals in Radios and
Televisions is another outgrowth of the NSA>s Signals Intelligence
(SIGINT) mission.
Detecting EMF Fields in Humans for Surveillance.

A subject>s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects
can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment NSA
cryptologists can remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can
be decoded into a person>s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is
then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the
Signals lntelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA>s computers will
then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out
and track anyone in the U.S.

Table of Contents

NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation

NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote
Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain
Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the
early 1950>s, which included neurological research into "radiation"
(non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The
resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security
Archives as "Radiation Intelligence," defined as "information from
unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not
including radioactivity or nuclear detonation."

Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in
the same manner as other electronic warfare programs of the U.S.
government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology
and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also
international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret.

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes
electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated
brain mapping can continuously monitor all the electrical activity in
die brain continuously. The NSA records aid decodes individual brain
maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security
purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military
for Brain-to-computer link. (In military fighter aircraft, for example.)

For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the
speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject>s verbal
thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain>s auditory cortex
thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the
ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by
simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can
map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject>s brain
and show images from the subject>s brain on a video monitor. NSA
operatives see what the surveillance subject>s eyes are seeing. Visual
memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual
cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this
to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject>s brain while
they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.

Table of Contents

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM

There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the
1940>s. The NSA, Ft. Meade has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM
system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor
audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no
physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of
surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech and 3D sound, and
subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject>s
brain (bypassing the ears) and images can be sent into the visual
cortex. RNM can alter a subject>s perceptions, moods, and motor control.

Speech cortex/auditory cortex link has become the ultimate
communications system for the intelligence community. RNM allows for a
complete audio-visual brain-to-brain link or brain-to-computer link.

Table of Contents

National Security Agency Signals Intelligence
Electronic Brain Link Technology

NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person>s
bioelectric fields.

The NSA>s Signals Intelligence has the proprietary ability to
remotely and non-invasively monitor information in the human brain by
digitally decoding the evoked potentials in the 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt
electro-magnetic emissions from the brain.

Neuronal activity in the brain creates a shifting electrical
pattern that has a shifting magnetic flux. This magnetic flux puts out a
constant 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt electromagnetic (EMF) wave. Contained in
the electromagnetic emission from the brain are spikes and patterns
called "evoked potentials."

Every thought, reaction, motor command, auditory event, and visual
image in the brain has a corresponding "evoked potential" or set of
"evoked potentials." The EMF emission from the brain can be decoded into
the current thoughts, images and sounds in the subject>s brain.

NSA SigInt uses EMF-transmitted Brain Stimulation as a
communications system to transmit information (as well as nervous system
messages) to intelligence agents and also to transmit to the brains of
covert operations subjects (on a non-perceptible level).

EMF Brain Stimulation works by sending a complexly coded and pulsed
electromagnetic signal to trigger evoked potentials (events) in the
brain, thereby forming sound and visual images in the brain>s neural
circuits. EMF Brain Stimulation can also change a person>s brain-states
and affect motor control.

Two-way Electronic Brain-Link is done by remotely monitoring neural
audio-visual information while transmitting sound to the auditory cortex
(bypassing the ears) and transmitting faint images to the visual cortex
(bypassing the optic nerves and eyes, the images appear as floating 2-D
screens in the brain).

Two-Way Electronic Brain Link has become the ultimate
communications system for CIA/NSA personnel. Remote Neural Monitoring
(RNM, remotely monitoring bioelectric information in the human brain)
has become the ultimate surveillance system. It is used by a limited
number of agents in the U.S. Intelligence Community.

RNM requires decoding the resonance frequency of each specific
brain area. That frequency is then modulated in order to impose
information in That specific brain area. The frequency to which the
various brain areas respond varies from 3 Hz to 50 Hz. Only NSA Signals
Intelligence modulates signals in this frequency band.

An example of EMF Brain Stimulation:

Brain Area

Bioelectric
Resonance
Frequency

Information Induced
Through Modulation
Motor Control Cortex

10 HZ
Motor Impulse Co-ordination
Auditory Cortex

15 HZ
Sound which bypasses the ears
Visual Cortex

25 HZ
Images in the brain, bypassing the eyes
Somatosensory Cortex

09 HZ
Phantom Touch Sense
Thought Center

20 HZ
Imposed Subconscious Thoughts

This modulated information can be put into the brain at varying
intensities from subliminal to perceptible.

Each person>s brain has a unique set of bioelectric
resonance/entrainment frequencies. Sending audio information to a
person>s brain at the frequency of another person>s auditory cortex
would result in that audio information not being perceived.

The Plaintiff learned of RNM by being in two-way RNM contact with
the Kinnecome group at the NSA, Ft. Meade. They used RNM 3D sound direct
to the brain to harass the Plaintiff from 10/90 to 5/91. As of 5/91 they
have had two-way RNM communications with the Plaintiff and have used RNM
to attempt to incapacitate the Plaintiff and hinder the Plaintiff from
going to authorities about their activities against the Plaintiff in the
last twelve years.

The Kinnecome group has about 100 persons working 24-hours-a-day at
Ft Meade. They have also brain-tapped persons the Plaintiff is in
contact with to keep the Plaintiff isolated. This is the first time ever
that a private citizen has been harassed with RNM and has been able to
bring a lawsuit against NSA personnel misusing this intelligence
operations method.

Table of Contents

NSA Techniques and Resources

Remote monitoring/tracking of individuals in any location. inside
any building, continuously, anywhere in the country.

A system for inexpensive implementation of these operations allows
for thousands of persons in every community to be spied on constantly by
the NSA.
Remote RNM Devices

a) NSA>s RNM equipment remotely reads the evoked potentials
(EEGs) of the human brain for tracking individuals and can send messages
through the nervous system to affect their performance.

b) [Information missing from original]

c) RNM can electronically identify individuals and track then
anywhere in the U.S. This equipment is on a network and is used for
domestic intelligence operations, government security, and military base
security, and in case of bioelectric warfare.

Spotters and Walk-Bys in Metropolitan Areas

a) Tens of thousands of persons in each area working as
spotters and neighborhood/business place spies (sometimes unwittingly)
following and checking on subjects who have been identified for covert
control by NSA personnel.

b) Agents working out of offices can be in constant
communication with Spotters who are keeping track of the NSA>s thousands
of subjects in public.

c) NSA Agents in remote offices can instantly identify (using
RNM) any individual spotted in public whom is in contact with
surveillance subject.

Chemicals and Drugs into Residential Buildings with
hidden NSA-lnstalled and maintained plastic plumbing lines.

a) The NSA has kits for running lines into residential tap
water and air ducts of subjects for the delivery of drugs (such as
sleeping gas or brainwashing aiding drugs). This is an outgrowth of CIA
pharmapsychology.

Brief Overview of Proprietary U.S.
Intelligence/Anti-Terrorist Equipment Mentioned.

Fixed network of special EMF equipment that can read EEGs in
human brains and identify/track individuals by using digital computers.
ESB (Electrical Stimulation to the Brain) via EMF signal from the NSA
Signals Intelligence is used to control subjects.

EMF equipment that gathers information from PC circuit boards
by deciphering RF emissions thereby gaining wireless modem-style entry
into any personal computer in the country.

[/quote]
yeah, pffft!

[quote] All equipment hidden, all technology secret, all scientific
research unreported (as in electronic warfare research).

[/quote]
This would be completely the wrong terminology.

Then the statement is also in denial of it>s own application.

hahahaha

[quote] Not known to the public at all,
[/quote]
Before we had personal computers it was common knowledge the pentagon
had computing power capable of accurately predicting world events.

[quote]yet complete and thorough
implementation of this method of domestic intelligence has been in place
since the early 1980>s.

Herbert
[/quote]
which begs to question,

Why not make people smart and make social, technological, economic and
mortal progress? Such system represents a 100 meter high wall with
nuke turrets every 10 meters. So why also chain people to the ground?
What other motivation other than sadism could still justify that? In
stead of loved and looked up to our leaders chose to be sadists living
in subterranean caves. Sadism is a cheap thrill it only lasts for a
short time and it makes applicant more and more perverted. It has
nothing to do with enlightenment. People naturally love having
leaders. In stead of taking their throne and ruling the galaxy they
prefer to be cave dwellers ruling primates. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

They are on to us, how do we kill everyone? What would be the most
efficient method? Our leaders are seriously paranoiah. It comes
natural to sadists. If everyone around you is unhappy then you to will
have the pleasure of unhapyness free and at no charge. Knowing what
the cause is makes it even worse for them then it could ever be for
us. Global sufocation? disease marketing? It>s not 1800 the machines
do all the work. The wall is 100 meters high, and look how paranoya
our leaders are? Just stop beating the cows and they will stop trying
to escape. But I guess they don>t have sufficent inteligence to
comprehand that? nah, that cant be it, they just didn>t think about
it, that is why.

All the fun we could have?

I guess they really don>t know what they are missing.

They should talk to the sun and the stars - literally.

Ask higher up what they think of our ant farm ;o)

_____
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress

Herbert Brandt · Guest

Keith P Walsh schrieb:
[quote]On 29 Oct, 13:22, Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:

I don>t know why you>re so obsessed with this patent. A patent is not a
scientific theory. The purpose of patent claims is to provide legal
documentation that the claimant can use to prove (in the legal sense)
that he had some idea first. If an inventor has any ideas or
afterthoughts relating to the use of his invention, however vague and
speculative, he throws them in as extra claims. Their purpose is not to
prove (in the scientific sense) that the idea is feasible, either in
theory or practice. As such, they can be wildly speculative, and no more
compelling reason to believe something might be true than an episode of
your favourite sci-fi series would be.

Richard,

I understand perfectly well what the function and status of a patent
document are.

However, I also understand that if the ideas set out in a patent
document are not tried out in practice then, according to the
established principles of scientific understanding, YOU NEVER GET TO
FIND OUT WHETHER THEY WORK OR NOT.

Sure you can sit around making up excuses for PRESUMING that the
invention won>t work without ever bothering to try (which is what I
think you>re doing).

But that isn>t science. It>s just guesswork.

Don Kelly is guilty of the same lazy thinking as you are.

On 22nd October he wrote:

"I have seen patents that were thinly disguised perpetual motion
machines and didn>t work."

So what?

US patent 3951134 doesn>t describe a "thinly disguised perpetual
motion machine". It describes an invention for influencing human brain
activity remotely. And it was granted to Robert G Malech in April
1976.

The fact that someone else>s patent may have proved useless doesn>t
have any bearing whatsoever on the validity of this one (at least,
according to the established principles of scientific understanding it
doesn>t).

I would say that the implications of there being any possibility that
the claims set out in Robert G Malech>s patent might be true are so
important that, from a scientific point of view, it doesn>t make any
sense that no single attempt should have been made during the last 36
years to find out in practice whether or not they are achievable.

I have read your reasons why you do not agree with this point, but I>m
afraid I don>t accept that they are valid.

However I would like to test your logic with another question if I
may. I presume that you have some professional and/or academic
connection with the world of electromagnetics. Had you ever heard of
Robert G Malech before his name was brought to your attention in this
newsgroup thread? And if not, do you think that this is more to be
likely because the claims in his patent are not valid, or is it more
likely to be because they are?

(For example, if his claims really were "patently fallacious",
wouldn>t his reputation have been famously celebrated up there along
with Santa Claus and the flying elephants, at least in
"electromagnetic" circles?)

Keith P Walsh

PS, I>m mindful of the fact that Bill Snyder thinks he has found
evidence of experiments which refute the claims of US patent 3951134.
However I get the impression that his "evidence" is more concerned
with studies to measure heating rates in human cell-tissue caused by
RF and Microwave energy. A signal which is only designed to stimulate
neurological synapses might not cause any discernable temperature
increase, and would therefore register a "safe" result in such a
study. But feel free to butt in again if you think I>m wrong Bill.

Keith,
don´t trouble, theses lazy guys are in favour of their opinions.[/quote]

These guys don´t think once about the following yet :

John St. Clair Akwei vs.
NSA, Ft. Meade, MD, USA

Table of Contents

Cover Page
NSA Mission & Operations
Communications Intelligence
Signals Intelligence
Domestic Intelligence
Independently Operating Personnel Target Citizens
NSA>s Domestic Electronic Surveillance Network
Signals Intelligence Remote Computer Tampering
Detecting EMF Fields in Humans for Surveillance
NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulatlon
Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM
NSA Signals Intelligence Electronic Brain Link Technology
Table: An example of EMF Brain Stimulation
NSA Techniques and Resources
Remote RNM Devices
Spotters and Walk-Bys in Metropolitan Areas
Chemicals and Drugs
Intelligence/Anti-Terrorist Equipment
Resources
Further Resources

Cover Page

Evidence for the Lawsuit filed at the US courthouse in Washington, D.C.
(Civil Action 92-0449)

John St.Clair Akwei vs. NSA Ft George G. Meade, MD

My knowledge of the National Security Agency>s structure, national
security activities, proprietary technology,and covert operations to
monitor individual citizens.

Table of Contents

The NSA>s mission and
the NSA>s domestic Intelligence operation.

Communications Intelligence (COMINT)

Blanket coverage of all electronic communication in the U.S.
and the world to ensure national security. The NSA at Ft. Meade,
Maryland has had the most advanced computers in the world since the
early 1960>s. NSA technology is developed and implemented in secret from
private corporations, academia, and the general public.

Signals Intelligence (SIGINT)

The Signals Intelligence mission of the NSA has evolved into a
program of decoding EMF waves in the environment for wirelessly tapping
into computers and tracking persons with the electrical currents in
their bodies. Signals Intelligence is based on the fact that everything
in the environment with an electric current in it has a magnetic flux
around it which gives off EMF waves. The NSA/DoD has developed
proprietary advanced digital equipment which can remotely analyze all
objects whether man-made or organic that have electrical activity.

Domestic Intelligence (DOMINT)

The NSA has records on all U.S. citizens. The NSA gathers
information on U.S. citizens who might be of interest to any of the over
50,000 NSA agents (HUMINT). These agents are authorized by executive
order to spy on anyone. The NSA has a permanent National Security
Anti-Terrorist surveillance network in place. This surveillance network
is completely disguised and hidden from the public.

Tracking individuals in the U.S. is easily and cost-effectively
implemented with the NSA>s electronic surveillance network. This network
(DOMINT) covers the entire U.S., involves tens of thousands of NSA
personnel, and tracks millions of persons simultaneously. Cost effective
implementation of operations is assured by NSA computer technology
designed to minimize operations costs.

NSA personnel serve in Quasi-public positions in their communities
and run cover businesses and legitimate businesses that can inform the
intelligence community of persons they would want to track. N.S.A.
personnel in the community usually have cover identities such as social
workers, lawyers and business owners.
Individual citizens occasionally targeted for surveillance
by independently operating NSA personnel.

NSA personnel can control the lives of hundreds of thousands of
individuals in the U.S. by using the NSA>s domestic intelligence network
and cover businesses. The operations independently run by them can
sometimes go beyond the bounds of law. Long-term control and sabotage of
tens of thousands of unwitting citizens by NSA operatives is likely to
happen. NSA Domint has the ability to covertly assassinate U.S. citizens
or run covert psychological control operations to cause subjects to be
diagnosed with ill mental health.

Table of Contents

NSA>s domestic electronic surveillance network

As of the early 1960>s the most advanced computers in the world
were at the NSA, Ft. Meade. Research breakthroughs with these computers
were kept for the NSA. At the present time the NSA has nanotechnology
computers that are 15 years ahead of present computer technology.

The NSA obtains blanket coverage of information in the U.S. by
using advanced computers that use artificial intelligence to screen all
communications, irregardless of medium, for key words that should be
brought to the attention of NSA agents/cryptologists. These computers
monitor all communications at the transmitting and receiving ends. This
blanket coverage of the U.S. is a result of the NSA>s Signals
Intelligence (SIGINT) mission.

The NSA>s electronic surveillance network is based on a cellular
arrangement of devices that can monitor the entire EMF spectrum. This
equipment was developed, implemented, and kept secret in the same manner
as other electronic warfare programs.

With this technology NSA personnel can non-obtrusively tap into any
communication device in existence. This includes computers, telephones,
radio and video-based devices, printers, car electronics, and even the
minute electrical fields in humans (for tracking individuals).
Signals Intelligence Remote Computer Tampering

The NSA keeps track of all PCs and other computers sold in the U.S.
This is an integral part of the Domestic Intelligence network.

The NSA>s EMF equipment can tune in RF emissions from personal
computer circuit boards (while filtering out emissions from monitors and
power supplies). The RF emission from PC circuit boards contains digital
information in the PC. Coded RF waves from the NSA>s equipment can
resonate PC circuits and change data in the PC>s. Thus the NSA can gain
wireless modem-style entry into any computer in the country for
surveillance or anti-terrorist electronic warfare.

Radio and Television signals can be substituted at the receiving
end with special EMF equipment. Replacing signals in Radios and
Televisions is another outgrowth of the NSA>s Signals Intelligence
(SIGINT) mission.
Detecting EMF Fields in Humans for Surveillance.

A subject>s bioelectric field can be remotely detected, so subjects
can be monitored anywhere they are. With special EMF equipment NSA
cryptologists can remotely read evoked potentials (from EEGs). These can
be decoded into a person>s brain-states and thoughts. The subject is
then perfectly monitored from a distance.

NSA personnel can dial up any individual in the country on the
Signals lntelligence EMF scanning network and the NSA>s computers will
then pinpoint and track that person 24 hours-a-day. The NSA can pick out
and track anyone in the U.S.

Table of Contents

NSA Signals Intelligence Use of EMF Brain Stimulation

NSA Signals Intelligence uses EMF Brain Stimulation for Remote
Neural Monitoring (RNM) and Electronic Brain Link (EBL). EMF Brain
Stimulation has been in development since the MKUltra program of the
early 1950>s, which included neurological research into "radiation"
(non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The
resulting secret technology is categorized at the National Security
Archives as "Radiation Intelligence," defined as "information from
unintentionally emanated electromagnetic waves in the environment, not
including radioactivity or nuclear detonation."

Signals Intelligence implemented and kept this technology secret in
the same manner as other electronic warfare programs of the U.S.
government. The NSA monitors available information about this technology
and withholds scientific research from the public. There are also
international intelligence agency agreements to keep this technology secret.

The NSA has proprietary electronic equipment that analyzes
electrical activity in humans from a distance. NSA computer-generated
brain mapping can continuously monitor all the electrical activity in
die brain continuously. The NSA records aid decodes individual brain
maps (of hundreds of thousands of persons) for national security
purposes. EMF Brain Stimulation is also secretly used by the military
for Brain-to-computer link. (In military fighter aircraft, for example.)

For electronic surveillance purposes electrical activity in the
speech center of the brain can be translated into the subject>s verbal
thoughts. RNM can send encoded signals to the brain>s auditory cortex
thus allowing audio communication direct to the brain (bypassing the
ears). NSA operatives can use this to covertly debilitate subjects by
simulating auditory hallucinations characteristic of paranoid schizophrenia.

Without any contact with the subject, Remote Neural Monitoring can
map out electrical activity from the visual cortex of a subject>s brain
and show images from the subject>s brain on a video monitor. NSA
operatives see what the surveillance subject>s eyes are seeing. Visual
memory can also be seen. RNM can send images direct to the visual
cortex. bypassing the eyes and optic nerves. NSA operatives can use this
to surreptitiously put images in a surveillance subject>s brain while
they are in R.E.M. sleep for brain-programming purposes.

Table of Contents

Capabilities of NSA operatives using RNM

There has been a Signals Intelligence network in the U.S. since the
1940>s. The NSA, Ft. Meade has in place a vast two-way wireless RNM
system which is used to track subjects and non-invasively monitor
audio-visual information in their brain. This is all done with no
physical contact with the subject. RNM is the ultimate method of
surveillance and domestic intelligence. Speech and 3D sound, and
subliminal audio can be sent to the auditory cortex of the subject>s
brain (bypassing the ears) and images can be sent into the visual
cortex. RNM can alter a subject>s perceptions, moods, and motor control.

Speech cortex/auditory cortex link has become the ultimate
communications system for the intelligence community. RNM allows for a
complete audio-visual brain-to-brain link or brain-to-computer link.

Table of Contents

National Security Agency Signals Intelligence
Electronic Brain Link Technology

NSA SigInt can remotely detect, identify and monitor a person>s
bioelectric fields.

The NSA>s Signals Intelligence has the proprietary ability to
remotely and non-invasively monitor information in the human brain by
digitally decoding the evoked potentials in the 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt
electro-magnetic emissions from the brain.

Neuronal activity in the brain creates a shifting electrical
pattern that has a shifting magnetic flux. This magnetic flux puts out a
constant 30-50 hz, .5 milliwatt electromagnetic (EMF) wave. Contained in
the electromagnetic emission from the brain are spikes and patterns
called "evoked potentials."

Every thought, reaction, motor command, auditory event, and visual
image in the brain has a corresponding "evoked potential" or set of
"evoked potentials." The EMF emission from the brain can be decoded into
the current thoughts, images and sounds in the subject>s brain.

NSA SigInt uses EMF-transmitted Brain Stimulation as a
communications system to transmit information (as well as nervous system
messages) to intelligence agents and also to transmit to the brains of
covert operations subjects (on a non-perceptible level).

EMF Brain Stimulation works by sending a complexly coded and pulsed
electromagnetic signal to trigger evoked potentials (events) in the
brain, thereby forming sound and visual images in the brain>s neural
circuits. EMF Brain Stimulation can also change a person>s brain-states
and affect motor control.

Two-way Electronic Brain-Link is done by remotely monitoring neural
audio-visual information while transmitting sound to the auditory cortex
(bypassing the ears) and transmitting faint images to the visual cortex
(bypassing the optic nerves and eyes, the images appear as floating 2-D
screens in the brain).

Two-Way Electronic Brain Link has become the ultimate
communications system for CIA/NSA personnel. Remote Neural Monitoring
(RNM, remotely monitoring bioelectric information in the human brain)
has become the ultimate surveillance system. It is used by a limited
number of agents in the U.S. Intelligence Community.

RNM requires decoding the resonance frequency of each specific
brain area. That frequency is then modulated in order to impose
information in That specific brain area. The frequency to which the
various brain areas respond varies from 3 Hz to 50 Hz. Only NSA Signals
Intelligence modulates signals in this frequency band.

An example of EMF Brain Stimulation:

Brain Area

Bioelectric
Resonance
Frequency

Information Induced
Through Modulation
Motor Control Cortex

10 HZ
Motor Impulse Co-ordination
Auditory Cortex

15 HZ
Sound which bypasses the ears
Visual Cortex

25 HZ
Images in the brain, bypassing the eyes
Somatosensory Cortex

09 HZ
Phantom Touch Sense
Thought Center

20 HZ
Imposed Subconscious Thoughts

This modulated information can be put into the brain at varying
intensities from subliminal to perceptible.

Each person>s brain has a unique set of bioelectric
resonance/entrainment frequencies. Sending audio information to a
person>s brain at the frequency of another person>s auditory cortex
would result in that audio information not being perceived.

The Plaintiff learned of RNM by being in two-way RNM contact with
the Kinnecome group at the NSA, Ft. Meade. They used RNM 3D sound direct
to the brain to harass the Plaintiff from 10/90 to 5/91. As of 5/91 they
have had two-way RNM communications with the Plaintiff and have used RNM
to attempt to incapacitate the Plaintiff and hinder the Plaintiff from
going to authorities about their activities against the Plaintiff in the
last twelve years.

The Kinnecome group has about 100 persons working 24-hours-a-day at
Ft Meade. They have also brain-tapped persons the Plaintiff is in
contact with to keep the Plaintiff isolated. This is the first time ever
that a private citizen has been harassed with RNM and has been able to
bring a lawsuit against NSA personnel misusing this intelligence
operations method.

Table of Contents

NSA Techniques and Resources

Remote monitoring/tracking of individuals in any location. inside
any building, continuously, anywhere in the country.

A system for inexpensive implementation of these operations allows
for thousands of persons in every community to be spied on constantly by
the NSA.
Remote RNM Devices

a) NSA>s RNM equipment remotely reads the evoked potentials
(EEGs) of the human brain for tracking individuals and can send messages
through the nervous system to affect their performance.

b) [Information missing from original]

c) RNM can electronically identify individuals and track then
anywhere in the U.S. This equipment is on a network and is used for
domestic intelligence operations, government security, and military base
security, and in case of bioelectric warfare.

Spotters and Walk-Bys in Metropolitan Areas

a) Tens of thousands of persons in each area working as
spotters and neighborhood/business place spies (sometimes unwittingly)
following and checking on subjects who have been identified for covert
control by NSA personnel.

b) Agents working out of offices can be in constant
communication with Spotters who are keeping track of the NSA>s thousands
of subjects in public.

c) NSA Agents in remote offices can instantly identify (using
RNM) any individual spotted in public whom is in contact with
surveillance subject.

Chemicals and Drugs into Residential Buildings with
hidden NSA-lnstalled and maintained plastic plumbing lines.

a) The NSA has kits for running lines into residential tap
water and air ducts of subjects for the delivery of drugs (such as
sleeping gas or brainwashing aiding drugs). This is an outgrowth of CIA
pharmapsychology.

Brief Overview of Proprietary U.S.
Intelligence/Anti-Terrorist Equipment Mentioned.

Fixed network of special EMF equipment that can read EEGs in
human brains and identify/track individuals by using digital computers.
ESB (Electrical Stimulation to the Brain) via EMF signal from the NSA
Signals Intelligence is used to control subjects.

EMF equipment that gathers information from PC circuit boards
by deciphering RF emissions thereby gaining wireless modem-style entry
into any personal computer in the country.

All equipment hidden, all technology secret, all scientific
research unreported (as in electronic warfare research).

Not known to the public at all, yet complete and thorough
implementation of this method of domestic intelligence has been in place
since the early 1980>s.

Herbert
[quote]

[/quote]

Guest

plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
[quote]plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
--- quoting from Wikipedia on Kleiber>s Law ---
The exponent for Kleiber>s law, which is called a power law, was a
matter of dispute for many decades. It is still contested by a
diminishing number as being 2/3 rather than the more widely accepted
3/4. Because the law concerned the capture, use, and loss of energy by
a biological system, the system>s metabolic rate was at first taken to
be 2/3 because energy was thought of mostly in terms of heat energy.
Metabolic rate was expressed in energy per unit time, specifically
calories per second. Two thirds expressed the relation of the square
of the radius to the cube of the radius of a sphere, with the volume
of the sphere increasing faster than the surface area, with increases
in radius. This was purportedly the reason large creatures lived
longer than small ones - that is, as they got bigger they lost less
energy per unit volume through the surface, as radiated heat.
--- end quoting ---

If you read the above encyc entry of Kleiber>s law in biology, it
almost reads as
if you were reading about the Fusion Barrier Principle where it talks
of squaring
the radius versus cubing the radius and surface area versus volume. In
fact,
this is similar to my deriving the Fusion Barrier Principle by saying
the Faraday
Law is a cylinder that contains inside itself the sphere of Coulomb>s
Law and
the cylinder has a 1/3 greater volume than the sphere inside.

So it is nice to see that biology has this problem of volume versus
surface area.

And I do believe that Klieber>s law should really be the exponent 2/3
not the 3/4.
Although many animals such as the elephant more closely follow the 3/4
exponent, it is the 2/3 exponent that is the **lower limit**. Are
there any animals
of a square root exponent of E = M^0.5?

I would dare say that was impossible for an animal to exist to have an
exponent
of 1/2. So what I dare say, is that the lower limit is exponent 2/3
and although
alot of animals have an exponent of 3/4, means nothing of note.
Because it is
similar to saying that most tokamaks reach about 25% breakeven. The
important
thing is the **limits**. And the number 2/3 breakeven is an upper
limit in fusion
physics and the number 2/3 exponent in Klieber>s law is a lower limit
for biological
individuals.

[/quote]
Here is a good website that discusses Kleiber>s Law with respect to
the recent
NATURE publication on plant metabolism with a law of exponent equal to
1, not
3/4 nor 2/3.

Hunting around there are plenty of exceptions to the so called
Kleiber>s Law for
both exponents 3/4 and 2/3. So what I inclined to think is that the
law is a
RANGE of values of exponent and the important thing is to find the
upper and lower
bounds.

--- quoting from website ---
http://universe-review.ca/R10-35-metabolic.htm

This new result can be
explained by the theory if the metabolic rate of plants R is
proportional to L4 by including the internal dimension as another
metabolic site, so that R M. With the older theory, which gives the
2/3 power law, R L3 would be sufficient to yield the same result.
A 2008 research indicates that most organisms' metabolisms are
clustered between 1 and 10 watts per kgm of mass. It seems that an
optimum metabolic rate is located within this range. Mathematically,
this finding is consistent with the R M law because it implies a
constant derivative dR/dM 5x10-3 watts/gm. Whereas the R M3/4 law
would yield a mass dependent derivative dR/dM M-1/4.

--- end quoting ---

So it is my opinion that the 2/3 exponent is the lower bound. To go
below 2/3 would violate the Maxwell
Equations.

Now I have to search and hunt around to see if there are any going
below 2/3 exponent. And see if
there is any going above 1 exponent in plants.

I wonder if viruses have been included in this analysis?

And perhaps the most important question of all-- is there fractals
within the Maxwell Equations? I
doubt it. And is there fractals in either the Schrodinger or Dirac
Equations? Again, I doubt it

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Guest

plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
(snipped)
[quote]
So it is my opinion that the 2/3 exponent is the lower bound. To go
below 2/3 would violate the Maxwell
Equations.

Now I have to search and hunt around to see if there are any going
below 2/3 exponent. And see if
there is any going above 1 exponent in plants.

I wonder if viruses have been included in this analysis?

And perhaps the most important question of all-- is there fractals
within the Maxwell Equations? I
doubt it. And is there fractals in either the Schrodinger or Dirac
Equations? Again, I doubt it

[/quote]
Remember in the NOVA PBS show it illustrated how fractals are created
by
self-similar reproduction of say the triangles to form a mountain
range. Well, you
can replicate self-similar squares or cubes or circles or ellipses or
other geometric
forms and end up with fractals. So Fractals are not primary geometry,
are they!
Fractals are secondary. What is primary geometry is the old Euclidean
geometry
of squares, rectangles circles etc etc.

We start physics not with some large chaotic system, we start physics
with the
primary basics of Maxwell Equations, Schrodinger Equation and Dirac
Equation,
none of which are Fractal but whose solutions can be iterated to form
a secondary
geometry of Fractals. Example: the Schrodinger equation gives
geometrical solutions
to what the geometry of the first 10 elements in the periodic table
are. Now if we conjoin
those 10 elements to form a new geometry, it can end up being a
Fractal, just as
the TV show conjoining self-similar triangles to form a mountain
range.

So, is the number 2/3 exponent and 1 exponent in the Maxwell
Equations? Yes of course,
in the fact that the Coulomb law is a sphere and the Faraday law is a
cylinder which
yields the 2/3 exponent and the 1 exponent.

Also, anyone who plays around with magnets and iron filings on a sheet
of paper and
tries to get a "fractal pattern", I dare them.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Guest

It is gratifying to me that 2 weeks ago NOVA presented the Everett>s
Many World hypothesis and last
week NOVA presented fractals. Here I have a opportunity to link
together these two programs.
In the Everett show they demonstrated very clearly what the Double
Slit Experiment was all about. Better
than most every education institute could ever offer how to show what
the Double Slit Experiment was
all about. They showed the screen had three fuzzy dots where most
people would think there should be
only 2 dot smudges. The biggest dot smudge was in between the two
slits (indicating the superposition
of waves).

Now fast forward to the NOVA Fractal show where they discuss the
Kleiber law and we have exponent
2/3 and some favor exponent 3/4 and a science experiment says plants
have exponent 1. So we have
what can be called a Double Slit Result for Kleiber>s law, where we
have two huge smudges of
2/3 and 1 and we have 3/4 in between those two.

So what I am indicating is that the Kleiber>s Law is really a Double
Slit Experiment result.

So, watch the two programs over again and see if you come to the same
conclusion I have, that
we are witnessing in Kleiber>s Law not some old fashioned Classical
physics of large objects
moving slowly (metabolism), but rather instead, we are witnessing
Quantum Mechanics of
plants and animals whose metabolism versus mass follows Quantum
Mechanics in the Double
Slit.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Herbert Brandt · Guest

Keith P Walsh schrieb:
[quote]On 8 Aug, 10:07, Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
(It might help if you try to imagine what you would have to do to
demonstrate that, to the best of our knowledge and ability, it is NOT
possible to achieve such a thing.)
You can>t. Like all conspiracy theories, your hypothesis is
unfalsifiable.

I don>t have a conspiracy theory.

What I have is a question.

And the question is this - "Has anyone ever carried out experimental
investigations to demonstrate whether or not it is possible to
directly influence the human thought process using electromagnetic
signals?"

(And this of course excludes those signals normally referred to as tv
and radio signals. People are not normally able to pick up broadcast
signals such as these without the aid of familiar items of receiver
equipment - although having said that, people with metal dental
fillings in their teeth have reported doing so, and metal dental
fillings are not normally recognised as items of radio/tv receiver
equipment - however I suppose that such people might easily be
dismissed as "conspiracy theorists" simply for having made such
reports.)

I think it is quite easy to imagine how you would test whether or not
an electromagnetic signal with a wavelength outside the range of
visible light could influence the behavior of an individual subjected
to the signal. In fact, what am I talking about?, I don>t have to
imagine it, I saw the very same thing happen on a bbc tv program last
night. The world-famous violinist Vanessa Mae was subjected to an
experiment whereby a contraption which produced a strong local
electromagnetic field was activated in close proximity to her head,
and all of a sudden she couldn>t even sign her own name! But of course
she knew what was going on - would it be possible to do this sort of
thing remotely WITHOUT the subject being aware of the cause of the
effect?

Anyway, back to your statement above. Only by carrying out experiments
is it possible to find out what works and what doesn>t. The more
frequencies you try without gaining a positive result then the wider
the range of possibilities eliminated.

What I>m asking is, has anyone ever tried any?

And if so, Who?

And when?

And what happened?

And if not, why not?

I think that for emotional reasons many people find it intolerable to
be placed in a position of ignorance - especially regarding a matter
which is potentially very important.

And in order to maintain some degree of emotional security such people
may have a tendency to presume that any question which they can>t
answer must be unimportant.

And in so doing they are failing to be scientific.

I wonder if that could that be you.

Keith P Walsh

PS. that Vanessa Mae program is at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00cwgzk/

More evidence are shown by the following links :[/quote]

http://mindcontrolvictim.blogspot.com/

http://peacepink.ning.com/

Enjoy that !

Herbert

gabydewilde · Guest

On Nov 2, 3:47 pm, Herbert Brandt <socialghost2...@yahoo.de> wrote:
[quote]Keith P Walsh schrieb:

On 8 Aug, 10:07, Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
(It might help if you try to imagine what you would have to do to
demonstrate that, to the best of our knowledge and ability, it is NOT
possible to achieve such a thing.)
You can>t. Like all conspiracy theories, your hypothesis is
unfalsifiable.

I don>t have a conspiracy theory.

What I have is a question.

And the question is this - "Has anyone ever carried out experimental
investigations to demonstrate whether or not it is possible to
directly influence the human thought process using electromagnetic
signals?"

(And this of course excludes those signals normally referred to as tv
and radio signals. People are not normally able to pick up broadcast
signals such as these without the aid of familiar items of receiver
equipment - although having said that, people with metal dental
fillings in their teeth have reported doing so, and metal dental
fillings are not normally recognised as items of radio/tv receiver
equipment - however I suppose that such people might easily be
dismissed as "conspiracy theorists" simply for having made such
reports.)

I think it is quite easy to imagine how you would test whether or not
an electromagnetic signal with a wavelength outside the range of
visible light could influence the behavior of an individual subjected
to the signal. In fact, what am I talking about?, I don>t have to
imagine it, I saw the very same thing happen on a bbc tv program last
night. The world-famous violinist Vanessa Mae was subjected to an
experiment whereby a contraption which produced a strong local
electromagnetic field was activated in close proximity to her head,
and all of a sudden she couldn>t even sign her own name! But of course
she knew what was going on - would it be possible to do this sort of
thing remotely WITHOUT the subject being aware of the cause of the
effect?

Anyway, back to your statement above. Only by carrying out experiments
is it possible to find out what works and what doesn>t. The more
frequencies you try without gaining a positive result then the wider
the range of possibilities eliminated.

What I>m asking is, has anyone ever tried any?

And if so, Who?

And when?

And what happened?

And if not, why not?

I think that for emotional reasons many people find it intolerable to
be placed in a position of ignorance - especially regarding a matter
which is potentially very important.

And in order to maintain some degree of emotional security such people
may have a tendency to presume that any question which they can>t
answer must be unimportant.

And in so doing they are failing to be scientific.

I wonder if that could that be you.

Keith P Walsh

PS. that Vanessa Mae program is at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00cwgzk/

More evidence are shown by the following links :

http://mindcontrolvictim.blogspot.com/

http://peacepink.ning.com/

Enjoy that !

Herbert
[/quote]
lol @ Enjoy.

Here is some good ""entertainments"".

"Experiments conducted by researcher Herbert Krugman reveal that when
a person watches television, brain activity switches from the left to
the right hemisphere. The left hemisphere is the seat of logical
thought. Here, information is broken down into its component parts and
critically analyzed. The right brain, however, treats incoming data
uncritically, processing information in wholes, leading to emotional,
rather than logical responses. The shift from left to right brain
activity also causes the release of endorphins, the body>s own natural
opiates--thus, it is possible to become physically addicted to
watching television, a hypothesis borne out by numerous studies which
have shown that very few people are able to kick the television habit.
It>s no longer an overstatement to note that the youth today that are
raised and taught through network television are intellectually dead
by their early teens." http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=25168

_____
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress

Guest

Come to think of it, since Fractal geometry is basically the
conglomeration of self-similar objects such as
triangles to compose a mountain range. That the Fractal theory would
be a tiny subset of Fourier Analysis
since that is basically the conglomeration of all sizes of circles,
the sine and cosine functions conglomerated.

So here I make a conjecture, that Fractal theory is not something new
and big but rather a part of
the old Fourier Analysis theory.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Guest

plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:
[quote]Come to think of it, since Fractal geometry is basically the
conglomeration of self-similar objects such as
triangles to compose a mountain range. That the Fractal theory would
be a tiny subset of Fourier Analysis
since that is basically the conglomeration of all sizes of circles,
the sine and cosine functions conglomerated.

[/quote]
Remember what I said earlier and probably will repeat saying for the
remainder
of my life-- the hardest thing to do and be in science is to interpret
correctly
the facts, data and experiments of science. An example of this
inability
to interpret is shown in both NOVA tv shows of Everett Many Worlds
and Mandelbrot>s Fractals. The ability of scientists to become
scientists
but once they become scientists, the lack of ability to correctly
interpret
things. Where Everett dreams up "Many Worlds and Parallel Universes"
which noone in this entire world has ever experienced and if one says
the Universe itself is an atom containing smaller atoms inside itself
collapses the wavefunction and thus-- only one World. So, everyone
including Everett have to be silly fools to believe in Many World>s
when
a simple theory of Atom Totality dismisses the foolish Parallel
Universe.

Likewise, Mandelbrot focuses his career in science on one idea-- *self
similar*
and says he sees self-similar in Nature, in trees and forests, in
waves,
in coastline in mountain ranges in antennae, and yet so observing is
Mandelbrot but utterly failing in the ultimate *seeing*. Seeing that
an
Atom Totality, not a Big Bang theory but an Atom Totality theory
is *self similar*. So that an Atom Totality theory as a foundation, a
basis,
a underpinning of why there are fractals at all in this world is
because
the Universe itself is just one big atom containing smaller atoms.

So not only does Mandelbrot deserve a prize for being observant but a
prize
for being simultaneously the most foolish of scientists who cannot
even
interpret what he believes to be true.

And in the NOVA tv program it said that Fractals were not like by
other
mathematicians because it had no new math come from Fractals. Well,
there is a good reason as to why Fractals never made "new math" is
because
when we see something advertized as a new theory but it never
unleashes
new math means it is probably a subset of the old math.

You see what I mean when I say that scientists find it easy to develop
new
ideas, new experiments and deliver new data, but are utter fools and
simpletons
when it comes to interpretation and understanding of what they offer.

If one examines the old mathematics of Fourier Analysis, ( I should
emphasize
that) FOURIER ANALYSIS. Look up this great and grand theory that
Fourier
started for he conjectured that any smooth curve function, especially
periodic
functions are all assembled by components of the sine and cosine
function.

One can actually say that Fourier is the first mathematician that gave
us
Mathematical-Quantum-Mechanics because Fourier Analysis is duality--
duality of sine to cosine and superposition which are the hallmarks of
Quantum Mechanics.

[quote]So here I make a conjecture, that Fractal theory is not something new
and big but rather a part of
the old Fourier Analysis theory.
[/quote]

Now I forgotten the date of when Fourier was alive and discovering of
Fourier Analysis. I do remember reading that Fourier accompanied
Napoleon
to Egypt and that Fourier was working on the "Heat Equation" that
he discovered Fourier Analysis-- all smooth curves are sine and cosine
additives.

If my memory is correct, Fourier never proved the Analysis theory but
rather conjectured it was true and it took future generations to
actually
prove Fourier Analysis.

So, stepping forward in time to the 1970s and beyond with Mandelbrot.
So Mandelbrot comes up with the idea of "self-similar" and where
mathematics by the 1970s has Fourier Analysis widespread and well
proven. So how is it that Mandelbrot fails to recognize that Fourier
Analysis is "self similar"? That sine and cosine are self similar.
How
does Mandelbrot fail to see that?

That fractals are nothing but a tiny, tiny, microscopic subset of
Fourier
Analysis?

Instead of NOVA tv spending an hour on interviews with "clever fools"
the world of science deserves an hour spent on Fourier Analysis.

Now I have to go and see how Fourier>s conjecture was finally proven
true, and I have the feeling it is not an easy proof.

Also, there is Fourier Analysis for curves but also Analysis for the
surface
of a sphere and called something different since it is 2nd
dimensional. I
forgot what the name of that Fourier Analysis is.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Guest

I wrote yesterday:

[quote]Now I have to go and see how Fourier>s conjecture was finally proven
true, and I have the feeling it is not an easy proof.

[/quote]
Fourier Analysis proof, as I wrote yesterday is not an easy proof for
it involves
all of Series convergence theory. All the tricks of the trade of
convergence
and it looks as though from the history that the fight to prove
Fourier Analysis
took two centuries and was not even well established by 1970. It looks
as
though there are still blemishes in Fourier Analysis, just as there
are
blemishes and exceptions in Calculus.

My feeling is that in mathematics there are a small number of topics
that are extremely and of the utmost importance such as Calculus
and such as Fourier Analysis/Convergence theory. Of course mathematics
has the big programs of geometry and arithmetic, but then it has
what can be called the second tier big programs of Calculus and
Fourier Analysis. And all the other mathematics is minor in scope.

So that mathematics can really be bundled up as 4 big programs--
geometry versus arithmetic and Calculus versus Fourier Analysis.

And the reason I think for this bundling is because of Physics is
bundled up by duality of particle versus wave and we have
the programs of Quantum Mechanics, Maxwell Equations and
Dirac Equation. Geometry is a duality of Arithmetic and Calculus
is a duality of geometry and arithmetic as well as Fourier Analysis.

These big programs of mathematics are not going to have simpleton
proofs but are going to take centuries with alot of exceptions.

[quote]Also, there is Fourier Analysis for curves but also Analysis for the
surface
of a sphere and called something different since it is 2nd
dimensional. I
forgot what the name of that Fourier Analysis is.

[/quote]
It can be argued, but I have no time to dive into this conjecture,
that Fourier
Analysis whether the 1 dimensional or 2 dimensional on the sphere
surface,
that Fourier Analysis is really a subset of Calculus. Where series
convergence
is taken to be the limit concept in calculus.

So I wonder if anyone has tried giving a proof of the Fourier
speculation that all
curves are the sums of sine and cosine, by simply invoking Calculus
where
tangent lines are all slopes at a point and transferring that idea to
Fourier
series convergence at a point. What is constant and the same in
Calculus--
tangent lines, we have sine and cosine as the same in Fourier
Analysis.

So perhaps I can simplify a proof of the Fourier Analysis theory by
replacing
it with Calculus.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Salmon Egg · Guest

In article
<ec8334d5-5dbb-4953-b125-9261f67a4f21@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com wrote:

[quote]I wrote yesterday:

Now I have to go and see how Fourier>s conjecture was finally proven
true, and I have the feeling it is not an easy proof.
[/quote]
<snip>

I made the mistake of reading through this crap before I realized who
the author was. For the benefit of anyone else who was suckered in, the
theory of simple Fourier analysis is well established. Sines and cosines
form a complete set of functions in the Sturm-Louiville sense.

Reading from Courant and Hilbert first German volume on Mathematical
Physics in the early 1950>s did it for me. This was in spite of having
to fight the German language. I highly recommend that book. An English
version was published by the middle 1950>s.

Bill

--
Private Profit; Public Poop! Avoid collateral windfall!

Guest

Funny how I started this thread which is now about 107 posts long,
started it with one book and
how it has branched out where I am moving ahead with 4 or 5 or 6 books
all in this one thread.
And where in the last ten posts I discuss Fractals and how the
branching of a tree tells us alot
about where all the trees of that forest are. Similarly, where I
started this thread with one book
in mind, has now branched out to several books and today I start a new
book where I
conjecture that the proof of Fourier Analysis can be made by
replacement of concepts of
Calculus, that the series convergence is similar to slopes or tangent
lines in Calculus.

I conjecture that Fourier Analysis is another form of Calculus, and
instead of convergence
we replace with limit. So that if the Fourier Conjecture is not true,
then you would have
a situation in Calculus where you have a function of a smooth curve
that does not have
a limit, nor derivative nor integral.

In other words, Fourier Analysis is Calculus where we exchange or
interchange concepts
and where one theory proves the other theory.

Now how is this possible? It is possible because of duality. It is
sort of like Projective
Geometry only instead of lines and points projection we have entire
subjects such as
Calculus and Fourier Analysis as projections.

Think of physics in that a system can be analyzed in terms of energy
and time, but that
same system can be analyzed in terms of position and momentum and thus
we can
interchange the two. If we prove something with energy/time the same
result is given
by position/momentum.

So, likewise, if every smooth curve in Calculus has a derivative and
integral in every interval
of points on the curve, then that same smooth curve must obey the
Fourier Analysis that
every interval of points is the summation of sine and cosine.

I have not read how the Fourier Conjecture was proven in the 20th
century, and I suspect
it is a very complicated proof where someone has to be a expert on the
ins and outs of
series convergence. Something that would easily absorb a lifetime
career of a mathematician
just to know the ins and outs of series convergence and the Fourier
Analysis proof. Likewise
an entire career can be absorbed in knowing the Calculus and its
complex proofs.

But what I am conjecturing is that the Calculus and Fourier Analysis
are not separate subjects
but intertwined and interrelated so that one can skip back and forth
between the two to find
easier proofs.

When you think about it, the limit, the slopes, the tangents, the
areas under a curve, in Calculus,
they all look related to series, the convergence of series, the sine
and cosine in Fourier Analysis.

Since they are so similar, and since we already have a proof of the
Calculus that all smooth curves
have a tangent to a point on the curve and have an integral, that we
can replace that proof with
each point as a summation of sine and cosine of Fourier Analysis.

So the gist of the Fourier Analysis proof would be to say that if not
true, then Calculus is not true.
Or we can come at it from the starting point of Fourier Analysis, and
say that a proof in Calculus
has to be true because the proof in Fourier Analysis was true.

Quite remarkable that a NOVA tv show on Fractals shows how the
branches on a tree in a forest
tells alot of the trees in that forest, which Fractals are a minor
subset of Fourier Analysis, and now
I am conjectureing that Fourier Analysis is equivalent to Calculus in
part, and thus the branching
of this thread into 4 or 5 or 6 books.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Guest

plutonium.archime...@gmail.com wrote:

[quote]
Now I have to go and see how Fourier>s conjecture was finally proven
true, and I have the feeling it is not an easy proof.

Also, there is Fourier Analysis for curves but also Analysis for the
surface
of a sphere and called something different since it is 2nd
dimensional. I
forgot what the name of th


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com