| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jabriol
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2003 2:55 pm Post subject: Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist don>t want to |
 |
|
From: Frank J (fnci@comcast.net)
Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist
don>t want to touch this
subject\ Robert Jastrow
[quote]He
added: "Scientists have no proof that life was not
the result of an act of
creation."
[/quote]
because there can be no such "proof." Creation, or
design, in the general sense is unfalsifiable.
[Jabriol replies: "evolution as the origin of man can
not be falsified as well"]
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Denis Loubet
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:43 pm Post subject: Re: Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist don>t want |
|
|
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030902145506.91119.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com...
[quote]
From: Frank J (fnci@comcast.net)
Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist
don>t want to touch this
subject\ Robert Jastrow
He
added: "Scientists have no proof that life was not
the result of an act of
creation."
because there can be no such "proof." Creation, or
design, in the general sense is unfalsifiable.
[Jabriol replies: "evolution as the origin of man can
not be falsified as well"]
[/quote]
Sure it can. All we need is an unambiguous observation of a human being
created from dust by a god, and evolution as the origin of man is instantly
falsified.
What would it take to falsify your position?
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Budikka
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:03 am Post subject: Re: Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist don>t want |
|
|
jabriol <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message news:<20030902145506.91119.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com>...
[quote]From: Frank J (fnci@comcast.net)
Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist
don>t want to touch this
subject\ Robert Jastrow
He
added: "Scientists have no proof that life was not
the result of an act of
creation."
because there can be no such "proof." Creation, or
design, in the general sense is unfalsifiable.
[Jabriol replies: "evolution as the origin of man can
not be falsified as well"]
[/quote]
Jabriol, before you blather more lies, bullshit and assininity on this
topic, you need to catch up on your previous moronic displays first.
Define and detail what the "colossal holes" are in the Theory of
Evolution. I have been waiting some considerable time to see you list
them, ever since you plagiarised Booker>s article form two decades
ago.
Can you detail what these colossal holes are, or not? If you can,
then do so, right here in this thread, which I will monitor. If you
cannot, then admit that you are doing nothing but spreading lies with
your clueless posts on evolution.
Budikka |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Sean Hamerton
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 4:34 pm Post subject: Re: Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist don>t want |
|
|
The Earl of Sandwich invented the sandwich, Plato invented the plate, and
now Denis Loubet has invented...
[quote]
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030902145506.91119.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com...
From: Frank J (fnci@comcast.net)
Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist
don>t want to touch this
subject\ Robert Jastrow
He
added: "Scientists have no proof that life was not
the result of an act of
creation."
because there can be no such "proof." Creation, or
design, in the general sense is unfalsifiable.
[Jabriol replies: "evolution as the origin of man can
not be falsified as well"]
Sure it can. All we need is an unambiguous observation of a human being
created from dust by a god, and evolution as the origin of man
is instantly falsified.
[/quote]
Such a shame that god will never prove himself, since proof denies faith
and without faith he is nothing.
--
Ahead Groove Factor Five. YEAH! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Denis Loubet
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:14 am Post subject: Re: Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist don>t want |
|
|
"Sean Hamerton" <hamerton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:bj4jjt$ffht8$2@ID-173453.news.uni-berlin.de...
[quote]The Earl of Sandwich invented the sandwich, Plato invented the plate, and
now Denis Loubet has invented...
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030902145506.91119.qmail@web10806.mail.yahoo.com...
From: Frank J (fnci@comcast.net)
Subject: Re: Abiogenesis: Why do evolutionist
don>t want to touch this
subject\ Robert Jastrow
He
added: "Scientists have no proof that life was not
the result of an act of
creation."
because there can be no such "proof." Creation, or
design, in the general sense is unfalsifiable.
[Jabriol replies: "evolution as the origin of man can
not be falsified as well"]
Sure it can. All we need is an unambiguous observation of a human being
created from dust by a god, and evolution as the origin of man
is instantly falsified.
Such a shame that god will never prove himself, since proof denies faith
and without faith he is nothing.
[/quote]
That statement is SO right, but perhaps not in the way you think.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
