| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Greg D. Moore (Strider)
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:31 pm Post subject: STS-400 EVA plan |
 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-400
Not sure how accurate that is, but quite interesting nonetheless.
--
Greg Moore
SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available!
Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Brian Thorn
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:29 am Post subject: Re: STS-400 EVA plan |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:31:36 -0400, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
<mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> wrote:
[quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-400
Not sure how accurate that is, but quite interesting nonetheless.
[/quote]
1. Atlantis is rolling out first, not Endeavour.
2. Endeavour would have to grapple something else, as their is no
grapple point on the end of Atlantis>s RMS. I think it is going to
grapple Atlantis>s OBSS boom, but don>t quote me.
Brian |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jorge R. Frank
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:39 am Post subject: Re: STS-400 EVA plan |
|
|
Brian Thorn wrote:
[quote]On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:31:36 -0400, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-400
Not sure how accurate that is, but quite interesting nonetheless.
[/quote]
There are some inaccuracies. For example, RCO and AORP are not the same
thing; the latter was to have been a more ambitious system and was never
built.
[quote]1. Atlantis is rolling out first, not Endeavour.
2. Endeavour would have to grapple something else, as their is no
grapple point on the end of Atlantis>s RMS. I think it is going to
grapple Atlantis>s OBSS boom, but don>t quote me.
[/quote]
Correct. They are grappling the EFGF ("shoulder") on the OBSS, since it
provides the shortest translation path to the airlock. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
