Science and Technology news... :: View topic - so what does hayek and von mises think of youtube and the in

Guest

time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo.

has the world gone immoral?

has it become one gigantic intellectual commune?

calvin · Guest

On Nov 20, 6:17 am, sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote:
[quote]time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo.
has the world gone immoral?
has it become one gigantic intellectual commune?
[/quote]
Of course we need more government, in everything, and
now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
what we>re going to get. So rejoice.

Richard Schultz · Guest

In rec.arts.movies.past-films calvin <crice5@windstream.net> wrote:

: Of course we need more government, in everything, and
: now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
: what we>re going to get. So rejoice.

Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.

-----
Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"You don>t even have a clue about which clue you>re missing."

calvin · Guest

On Nov 20, 10:26 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
[quote]In rec.arts.movies.past-films calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:

: Of course we need more government, in everything, and
: now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
: what we>re going to get. So rejoice.

Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.
[/quote]
You mean my liberty to make trans-continental phone calls
to Al-Qaeda members? You>re right, at least I>ll be free to do
that again.

calvin · Guest

On Nov 20, 9:45 am, trotsky <gmsi...@email.com> wrote:
[quote]calvin wrote:
On Nov 20, 6:17 am, sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote:
time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo. has the world gone immoral?
has it become one gigantic intellectual commune?

Of course we need more government, in everything, and
now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
what we>re going to get. So rejoice.

Calvin, you>re an ass anyway, but do you have to resort to out and out
lying?
...
Let>s face it, calvin, you and your ilk are lying pieces of trash and
those right wing radio talking points just aren>t going to fly anymore.
My suggestion is you take a permanent vacation--from life.
[/quote]
I was trying to talk on the bright side, your bright side.
But let>s look at one thing. A few weeks ago I had to
pay over $4 per gallon of gas. Then a few days ago I
had to pay $1.97 for the same kind of gas at the same
place. Under Bush, it went up and down. Surely it
will go up again. Now, under Obama, let>s see if it ever
comes down again. Obama said, when it was over $4,
that he didn>t mind that. He was just sorry it went up so
fast. I>m not saying that the price of gas is the most
important thing, only that it is something that everyone
experiences directly and personally.

Guest

On 20 nov, 15:26, "Kingo Gondo" <kingo_nospam_go...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]sirbl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:451840c0-b145-443a-8f8e-3f570cdfb0d1@w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo.

You inadvertently (naturally) raise (not pose) a good question--why IS the
"culture industry" as dead as a dodo?
[/quote]
ok you stewe and calvin:

let>s just say cunts rule the world. they>re expensive to maintain,
wanna go traveling buy condoms and such, not to mentions curtains.

however, when it came to 'the free flow of information', we>ve become
one huge communist regime. everything on youtube is one buttfuck after
the other on the von mises and hayek backend of things

Guest

well that depends on what one has to sell. if strong sociology>s the
code of the day im fucked. thats why my thesis i looked for the one
less likely to do this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLSsOO1TWDU

steve · Guest

[quote]time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo.

has the world gone immoral?

has it become one gigantic intellectual commune?
[/quote]
No idea why you bring up LVM and FAH in this context, but I think I can
safely say that Hayek would have absolutely loved the internet. The free
flow of information and the (still forming) spontaneous order would have
facinated him. LVMs writing is so dry that I have no sense of his
personality..well, maybe that is his personality.

Are you under the impression that the classic libertarians are prudish or
something? Maybe elitist? I dont get your question (but that isnt
unusual).

steve
--
We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We
laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate
and bid the geldings to be fruitful. - C.S. Lewis

Kingo Gondo · Guest

<sirblob2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:451840c0-b145-443a-8f8e-3f570cdfb0d1@w34g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
[quote]time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo.
[/quote]
You inadvertently (naturally) raise (not pose) a good question--why IS the
"culture industry" as dead as a dodo?

trotsky · Guest

calvin wrote:
[quote]On Nov 20, 6:17 am, sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote:
time for some gubbamunt? after all, the culture industry>s as dead as
a dodo.
has the world gone immoral?
has it become one gigantic intellectual commune?

Of course we need more government, in everything, and
now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
what we>re going to get. So rejoice.
[/quote]

Calvin, you>re an ass anyway, but do you have to resort to out and out
lying?

http://www.independent.org/newsroom/news_detail.asp?newsID=31

[quote]Under Bush, Federal Spending Increases at Fastest Rate in 30 Years
[/quote]

http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2003/Bush-Government-Grows4sep03.htm

[quote]Despite Bush>s Credo,
Government Grows
[/quote]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/19/big-government-gets-bigger/

[quote]Big government gets bigger
Under Bush, the cost of protection, war and economic collapse reach historic levels
[/quote]

Let>s face it, calvin, you and your ilk are lying pieces of trash and
those right wing radio talking points just aren>t going to fly anymore.
My suggestion is you take a permanent vacation--from life.

steve · Guest

On 20-Nov-2008, calvin <crice5@windstream.net> wrote:

[quote]Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush
administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.

You mean my liberty to make trans-continental phone calls
to Al-Qaeda members? You>re right, at least I>ll be free to do
that again.
[/quote]
Liberals freak out when a conservative (or psuedo-conservative) nibbles at
the edges of the constitution, but applaud when big chunks of the document
are bitten out (by either side) when it suits thier collectivist agenda.

steve
--
We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We
laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate
and bid the geldings to be fruitful. - C.S. Lewis

Kingo Gondo · Guest

"calvin" <crice5@windstream.net> wrote in message
news:c5893341-f2ac-4157-9f9e-9f5355c4c4d0@f20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 20, 10:26 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
[quote]In rec.arts.movies.past-films calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:

: Of course we need more government, in everything, and
: now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
: what we>re going to get. So rejoice.

Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.
[/quote]
You mean my liberty to make trans-continental phone calls
to Al-Qaeda members? You>re right, at least I>ll be free to do
that again.

Reply:

It is at times like this that you sound the most idiotic, calvin. Can you
not help yourself--is it a reflex?

http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/030408b.asp

http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/04/11/aclu/

http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0603/0603biggov.htm

Kingo Gondo · Guest

"steve" <steve@steve.com> wrote in message
news:n9gVk.22599$VN1.5055@newsfe02.iad...
[quote]
On 20-Nov-2008, calvin <crice5@windstream.net> wrote:

Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush
administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.

You mean my liberty to make trans-continental phone calls
to Al-Qaeda members? You>re right, at least I>ll be free to do
that again.

Liberals freak out when a conservative (or psuedo-conservative) nibbles at
the edges of the constitution, but applaud when big chunks of the document
are bitten out (by either side) when it suits thier collectivist agenda.
[/quote]
Another moron heard from.

The civil liberties issues that have arisen under this Administration are
not a liberal/conservative matter, you fool (see my links to calvin). For
example, respect for habeas corpus is not partisan--it is the absolute
bedrock of this nation, and I will make common cause with anyone who
supports it, and vehemently oppose those willing to toss it aside,
regardless of your inane labels. Lincoln was a tyrannical asshole for
curtailing it during the Civil War; FDR and the Supreme Court liberals (most
notably Douglas and Black in the Korematsu decision) were scum for doing so
to American citizens of Japanese origin during WWII; and our current
Decider-In-Chief was an absolute disgrace as well.

f ck you and you small-minded partisanship.

calvin · Guest

On Nov 20, 11:28 am, "Kingo Gondo" <kingo_nospam_go...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]"calvin" <cri...@windstream.net> wrote in message
On Nov 20, 10:26 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:
In rec.arts.movies.past-films calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:
Of course we need more government, in everything, and
now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
what we>re going to get. So rejoice.
Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.
You mean my liberty to make trans-continental phone calls
to Al-Qaeda members? You>re right, at least I>ll be free to do
that again.
It is at times like this that you sound the most idiotic, calvin. Can you
not help yourself--is it a reflex?
http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/030408b.asp
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/04/11/aclu/
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0603/0603biggov.htm
[/quote]
(It>s mighty tedious having to correct the attributions hierarchy
after your newsreader gets through with it.)

I looked over the links you gave. Sorry, but I believe the war
on terror is a real thing, and I don>t believe that Bush and Cheney
have wanted to take away rights of the people. They simply
have found it necessary to take certain actions, generally with
congressional approval. In the case of executive orders, Obama
can simply issue counter orders, if he dares. It has already been
said that Obama may leave some these orders in place, for
the sake of his 'flexibility', which is a hoot. No flexibility for
Bush was proper, it seems.

nick · Guest

On Nov 20, 10:39 am, calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:
[quote]On Nov 20, 10:26 am, schu...@mail.biu.ack.il (Richard Schultz) wrote:

In rec.arts.movies.past-films calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote:

: Of course we need more government, in everything, and
: now that the Democrats have absolute power, that>s
: what we>re going to get. So rejoice.

Since the Democrats seem to be interested in restoring some of the
civil liberties that were taken away from you by the Bush administration,
I>d say that in fact, you personally are likely to get less government.

You mean my liberty to make trans-continental phone calls
to Al-Qaeda members? You>re right, at least I>ll be free to do
that again.
[/quote]
I wouldn>t joke about that. Now you>re on record as saying you
consort with Al Qaeda and there>s still two months left in the Bush
administration. I>ll try to come visit if you wind up in the Goose
Creek, SC brig but since most of the prisoners there go from one year
to the next without even seeing their lawyers I might not have much
luck.


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Philosophy Forum	Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 1 of 3