Science and Technology news... :: View topic - Search for Genez Defining DAFN Behavior...

R. Steve Walz · Guest

xxr4218 wrote:
[quote]
makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote in message news:<3FC49C42.E1DBA16A@worldnet.att.net>...
"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Getting the goodz on DAFNz:

Taking the squirm out of the worm -- 11/20/2003

Hillsborough High teacher Laura Dietz (center) shows students during
last week>s project to manipulate worms' genes.

"If a sequence of DNA IS_RESPONSIBLE_FOR_A_PARTICULAR_TRAIT or process,
that gene sequence may be responsible for that trait in humans, too,"
said Laura Dietz, the group>s faculty co-advisor.

By feeding the C. elegans bacteria that contains portions of C.remanei
genes, they hope to *SHUT_DOWN_CERTAIN_TRAITS* in the C. elegans. This
process, known as RNAi, will help them discover which traits ?
guiding *EVERYTHING_FROM_LOCOMOTION_TO_REPRODUCTION* ?are linked with
which gene segments...

How long before the DNA segmentz are found for:

Car jacking
Holding-up 7-11>s
IQ-75 Achievement Gapz
Drive-by shooting
Welfare dependency
Out-of-wedlock breeding.....??
--------------------------
An infinite amount of time, since those are cultural, you racist MORON!
The exact SAME behaviors are found in ALL races EQUALLY when they are
subjected to those SAME inhumane conditions of life, even caucasians!!

Asians came to the USA, in 1850s to work on the western railroads,
and were (some cases still are) subject to the same bad living
conditions/discrimination, and have emerged victorious in good-life
outcomes. Japanese-Americans were imprisoned during WW2, lost their
homes/businesses. Did they go on s spree of OOW_Breeding, welfare
dependency, crime/carjacking/driveby-shooting? Nope, just went back
to solid decision-making and bootstrapped their way to the top
with brainpower.

Asian OOW birthrate in the USA is 15%, DAFNz 70%. Top universities
UCLA/CalBerkeley are half Asian. Asians top the SAT scores.

It>s not cultural, it>s *GENETIC*. Are guns being held to the heads
of DAFNz forcing them to Breed_OOW?? Nope. It>z just ztupidity...

AMEN! Liberals hate Asians because they expose the egalitarian dogma
that all men are created equal. IQ>s are genetic...
-------------------[/quote]
Liberals don>t hate Asians, YOU shit do, and IQs aren>t genetic or
else your parents were retarded morons.
Steve

xxr4218 · Guest

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<3FC6BB93.5866@armory.com>...
[quote]makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

Asians came to the USA, in 1850s to work on the western railroads,
and were (some cases still are) subject to the same bad living
conditions/discrimination, and have emerged victorious in good-life
outcomes.
[]
Japanese-Americans were imprisoned during WW2, lost their
homes/businesses.
--------------
They came with the long history of their families and its acquired
^^^^^^^^
cultural intelligence and support structures intact.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[/quote]
Acquired cultural intelligence? Are you saying that the intelligent
cultures existed before the people who created them?

What came first: people or their culture?

You seem to think that people are derived from their cultures,
however, it>s the other way around. Cultures are products of the
people that produced them. A successful culture is created by
industrious people. A failed culture is created by non-industrious
people.

[quote]
Did they go on s spree of OOW_Breeding, welfare
dependency, crime/carjacking/driveby-shooting? Nope, just went back
to solid decision-making and bootstrapped their way to the top
with brainpower.
--------------------
Blacks were robbed of their families, often at very young age, they
were chained and dragged across the ocean, never to see their families
or even hear their own language ever again, and they were kept in
abject slavery for 350 YEARS!
[/quote]
Slavery was/is horrible! However, descendants of white owned slaves
live much better lives than the black owned slaves that exist today in
their homeland.

[quote]They had NO acquired body of culture
to sustain them!
[/quote]
They had no substainable culture to begin with! Sub-Saharan black
Africans to this day have a failed culture. They have no one to blame
for their failures except themselves. The only hope they have for
survival is contact w/ advances cultures.

Remember: Cultures are not acquired. Cultures are created...

[quote]

Asian OOW birthrate in the USA is 15%, DAFNz 70%.
-----------------------
Lie. The birthrates differ, but not that markedly.

Top universities UCLA/CalBerkeley are half Asian.
------------------
No, 1/8th to 1/4.

Asians top the SAT scores.
-------------------------
Some Asians, only a few percent more than others. That>s cultural.
Whites who don>t are partly blue-collar classes who have NEVER gone
to college before, unlike Asians, who have entrenched educational
systems thousands of years older than that of Europe and the USA.

It>s not cultural, it>s *GENETIC*.
---------------------
You need to do coursework in this to show you you>re an idiot.
[/quote]
Cultures is the product of it>s creators and is therefore: IT>S
GENETIC!

[quote]

For god sake go look this stuff up and quit believing Nazi websites
written by hateful morons!
Steve
[/quote]
Look up what? Logic doesn>t need to be researched..

Guest

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:
[quote]
makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

And with so many
minds free to think towards solving their own problems, rather than
being crushed under some assigned drudgery, of course the Renaissance
followed..

Recognize that you are talking *White_People* here. A few thouzand
milez to the South, no effortz whatzoever were made to advance
what pazzed for civilization among the DAFNbongo SpearChuckerz...
to the

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.
[/quote]
IQ-75 Africa would literally not even have had the *WHEEL*
if white colonists hadn>t introduced it to them. Greece
and Rome were high tech for their time and it doesn>t exactly
snow on the Mediterranean.

White - smart

DAFN - dumb...

BroJack · Guest

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:52:23 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
wrote:

[quote]You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires.
[/quote]
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Seems the pedophile majored in Afrocentric revisionist history.

BroJack

Chuckles · Guest

R. Steve Walz wrote:
[quote]xxr4218 wrote:

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote in message news:<3FC49C42.E1DBA16A@worldnet.att.net>...

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Getting the goodz on DAFNz:

Taking the squirm out of the worm -- 11/20/2003

Hillsborough High teacher Laura Dietz (center) shows students during
last week>s project to manipulate worms' genes.

"If a sequence of DNA IS_RESPONSIBLE_FOR_A_PARTICULAR_TRAIT or process,
that gene sequence may be responsible for that trait in humans, too,"
said Laura Dietz, the group>s faculty co-advisor.

By feeding the C. elegans bacteria that contains portions of C.remanei
genes, they hope to *SHUT_DOWN_CERTAIN_TRAITS* in the C. elegans. This
process, known as RNAi, will help them discover which traits ?
guiding *EVERYTHING_FROM_LOCOMOTION_TO_REPRODUCTION* ?are linked with
which gene segments...

How long before the DNA segmentz are found for:

Car jacking
Holding-up 7-11>s
IQ-75 Achievement Gapz
Drive-by shooting
Welfare dependency
Out-of-wedlock breeding.....??

--------------------------
An infinite amount of time, since those are cultural, you racist MORON!
The exact SAME behaviors are found in ALL races EQUALLY when they are
subjected to those SAME inhumane conditions of life, even caucasians!!

Asians came to the USA, in 1850s to work on the western railroads,
and were (some cases still are) subject to the same bad living
conditions/discrimination, and have emerged victorious in good-life
outcomes. Japanese-Americans were imprisoned during WW2, lost their
homes/businesses. Did they go on s spree of OOW_Breeding, welfare
dependency, crime/carjacking/driveby-shooting? Nope, just went back
to solid decision-making and bootstrapped their way to the top
with brainpower.

Asian OOW birthrate in the USA is 15%, DAFNz 70%. Top universities
UCLA/CalBerkeley are half Asian. Asians top the SAT scores.

It>s not cultural, it>s *GENETIC*. Are guns being held to the heads
of DAFNz forcing them to Breed_OOW?? Nope. It>z just ztupidity...

AMEN! Liberals hate Asians because they expose the egalitarian dogma
that all men are created equal. IQ>s are genetic...

-------------------
Liberals don>t hate Asians, YOU shit do, and IQs aren>t genetic or
else your parents were retarded morons.
Steve
[/quote]
Nope, Steve is a retarted moron.

Tiny Human Ferret · Guest

R. Steve Walz wrote:
[quote]makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

R. Steve Walz wrote:

Look, I loved Latin and studied it for 5 years, but Rome was the
ultimate feudalism, with as many as 2/3rds slaves as its residents.
Steve

The origins of Feudalism as we had it in the Dark Ages was when the
Romans -- mostly in the Empire in the East, originally -- declared that
even free citizens must enter the trades and occupations of their
fathers, couldn>t travel farther from their tax-collector than a certain
distance, etc. In effect, the free citizens became slaves in all but
name. At the height of the Republic slavery was comparatively rare, and
as the form of government was exchanged to that of a monarchy and the
empire expanded, so did slavery, after all one of the main economic
factors in the Empire was the constant stream of slaves returned to the
capital from the newly conquered provinces.

The argument is easily made that one of the reasons that there was so
little advance in development of mechanism was that it was far cheaper
to expend slaves than to develop machines. Once the empire was in its
final collapse and the plagues swept through, there weren>t even enough
people to keep any of the survivors in bondage, and with such
desperation for manpower combining with such a superfluity of metals
just lying about, development of mechanism wasn>t just economically
viable, but essential to make up for the lack of labor. And with so many
minds free to think towards solving their own problems, rather than
being crushed under some assigned drudgery, of course the Renaissance
followed..

Recognize that you are talking *White_People* here. A few thouzand
milez to the South, no effortz whatzoever were made to advance
what pazzed for civilization among the DAFNbongo SpearChuckerz...
to the

------------------
You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.
[/quote]
In an interesting segment on PBS, they demonstrated a 4,000 year old
Central African technique for making exceptional quality carbon-steel.
This three-day process was essentially a Bessemer converter, in which
ore was mixed with charcoal, all encased in a clay mound, with air being
pumped in through the bottom.

It seems that this didn>t see more use mostly because of the fairly
large amounts of land that needed to be cleared to make the charcoal.
The ore was plentiful as was the manpower, but you had to chop something
like an acre of forest down in order to process enough ore to get a
pound of steel. (not sure of exact figures, but the point was that it
would have been ecologically destructive above a certain level, in a
region not exactly noted for firewood.)

--
The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may
often assume the appearance, and produce the effects,
of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy.
--Gibbons, "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

Tiny Human Ferret · Guest

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
[quote]
"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

And with so many
minds free to think towards solving their own problems, rather than
being crushed under some assigned drudgery, of course the Renaissance
followed..

Recognize that you are talking *White_People* here. A few thouzand
milez to the South, no effortz whatzoever were made to advance
what pazzed for civilization among the DAFNbongo SpearChuckerz...
to the

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.

IQ-75 Africa would literally not even have had the *WHEEL*
if white colonists hadn>t introduced it to them. Greece
and Rome were high tech for their time and it doesn>t exactly
snow on the Mediterranean.
[/quote]
The wheel isn>t particularly useful on the sands of the Sahara, nor for
mot of the rainy season in sub-saharan Africa.

--
The incapacity of a weak and distracted government may
often assume the appearance, and produce the effects,
of a treasonable correspondence with the public enemy.
--Gibbons, "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire

BroJack · Guest

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:35:53 -0500, Tiny Human Ferret
<ixnayamspay_klaatu@earthops.net> wrote:

[quote]makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

And with so many
minds free to think towards solving their own problems, rather than
being crushed under some assigned drudgery, of course the Renaissance
followed..

Recognize that you are talking *White_People* here. A few thouzand
milez to the South, no effortz whatzoever were made to advance
what pazzed for civilization among the DAFNbongo SpearChuckerz...
to the

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.

IQ-75 Africa would literally not even have had the *WHEEL*
if white colonists hadn>t introduced it to them. Greece
and Rome were high tech for their time and it doesn>t exactly
snow on the Mediterranean.

The wheel isn>t particularly useful on the sands of the Sahara,
[/quote]
It>s being used today.

[quote]nor for
mot of the rainy season in sub-saharan Africa.
[/quote]
What about the dry season in sub-Saharan Africa?

BroJack

BroJack · Guest

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:34:40 -0500, Tiny Human Ferret
<ixnayamspay_klaatu@earthops.net> wrote:

[quote]R. Steve Walz wrote:
makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

R. Steve Walz wrote:

Look, I loved Latin and studied it for 5 years, but Rome was the
ultimate feudalism, with as many as 2/3rds slaves as its residents.
Steve

The origins of Feudalism as we had it in the Dark Ages was when the
Romans -- mostly in the Empire in the East, originally -- declared that
even free citizens must enter the trades and occupations of their
fathers, couldn>t travel farther from their tax-collector than a certain
distance, etc. In effect, the free citizens became slaves in all but
name. At the height of the Republic slavery was comparatively rare, and
as the form of government was exchanged to that of a monarchy and the
empire expanded, so did slavery, after all one of the main economic
factors in the Empire was the constant stream of slaves returned to the
capital from the newly conquered provinces.

The argument is easily made that one of the reasons that there was so
little advance in development of mechanism was that it was far cheaper
to expend slaves than to develop machines. Once the empire was in its
final collapse and the plagues swept through, there weren>t even enough
people to keep any of the survivors in bondage, and with such
desperation for manpower combining with such a superfluity of metals
just lying about, development of mechanism wasn>t just economically
viable, but essential to make up for the lack of labor. And with so many
minds free to think towards solving their own problems, rather than
being crushed under some assigned drudgery, of course the Renaissance
followed..

Recognize that you are talking *White_People* here. A few thouzand
milez to the South, no effortz whatzoever were made to advance
what pazzed for civilization among the DAFNbongo SpearChuckerz...
to the

------------------
You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.

In an interesting segment on PBS, they demonstrated a 4,000 year old
Central African technique for making exceptional quality carbon-steel.
This three-day process was essentially a Bessemer converter, in which
ore was mixed with charcoal, all encased in a clay mound, with air being
pumped in through the bottom.
[/quote]
Yeah, the segment was the brainchild of Dr. Mobutu Lumumba, Professor
of Afro-centric Revisionist History at Howard University.

[quote]It seems that this didn>t see more use mostly because of the fairly
large amounts of land that needed to be cleared to make the charcoal.
The ore was plentiful as was the manpower, but you had to chop something
like an acre of forest down in order to process enough ore to get a
pound of steel. (not sure of exact figures, but the point was that it
would have been ecologically destructive above a certain level, in a
region not exactly noted for firewood.)
[/quote]
The old cop-out excuse as to why this brilliant practice didn>t
continue and be verified by honest historians.

BroJack

Guest

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:
[quote]
makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

IQ-75 Africa would literally not even have had the *WHEEL*
if white colonists hadn>t introduced it to them. Greece
and Rome were high tech for their time and it doesn>t exactly
snow on the Mediterranean.

The wheel isn>t particularly useful on the sands of the Sahara, nor for
mot of the rainy season in sub-saharan Africa.
[/quote]
It>s a lot easier to carry water jugs, or anything else heavy, thru
jungle trails, using a wheelbarrow or similar device. Instead of
lugging the stuff on their shoulderz the way they *still* do it....

Guest

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:
[quote]
R. Steve Walz wrote:
makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
Recognize that you are talking *White_People* here. A few thouzand
milez to the South, no effortz whatzoever were made to advance
what pazzed for civilization among the DAFNbongo SpearChuckerz...
to the

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.

In an interesting segment on PBS, they demonstrated a 4,000 year old
Central African technique for making exceptional quality carbon-steel.
This three-day process was essentially a Bessemer converter, in which
ore was mixed with charcoal, all encased in a clay mound, with air being
pumped in through the bottom.

It seems that this didn>t see more use mostly because of the fairly
large amounts of land that needed to be cleared to make the charcoal.
The ore was plentiful as was the manpower, but you had to chop something
like an acre of forest down in order to process enough ore to get a
pound of steel. (not sure of exact figures, but the point was that it
would have been ecologically destructive above a certain level, in a
region not exactly noted for firewood.)
[/quote]
If you check the original peer-reviewed literature on these findings,
the process was all inferred from digging in a few firepits and
finding some steel fragments that were likely made by accident (some
iron ore in the soil of the fire pit where a few logs were burned).
PBZ luvz liberal revizionizt hiztory...

R. Steve Walz · Guest

BroJack wrote:
[quote]
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 03:52:23 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com
wrote:

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires.
[/quote]

[quote]Seems the pedophile
BroJack
---------------[/quote]
You>re a lying piece of slandering Rightist shit with no assets,
who lives in your mommas basement!

I happen to know this for a FACT because I paid good money to
discover it in pursuit of suing you for everything you own!

You have NOTHING, you>re a judgement-proof little racist shit
with a ten dollar computer. And you KNOW IT!
Steve

R. Steve Walz · Guest

makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:
[quote]
"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.

IQ-75 Africa would literally not even have had the *WHEEL*
if white colonists hadn>t introduced it to them.
-----------------[/quote]
I suppose the Hittites and Egyptians were white?
Garbage!

BroJack · Guest

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 07:34:43 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
wrote:

[quote]I suppose the Hittites and Egyptians were white?
[/quote]
If the Egyptians were black, I wonder what happened to them. Aren>t
black genes "dominant"? The current dwellers for the most part don>t
look negroid. Were they conquered by the current brown-skinned,
hook-nosed peeps who dwell in Egypt and exterminated or driven into
the sub-Saharan bush?

[quote]Garbage!
[/quote]
I wouldn>t call them "garbage," just piss-poor excuses for humanity,
unabe to fend-off the current "race" of Egyptians.

BroJack

MIB529 · Guest

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<3FD03535.68DD@armory.com>...
[quote]makemyday@worldnet.att.net wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" wrote:

You>re an idiot. You don>t even know the technology of Egypt or
central African empires. But also, they didn>t need it as much,
in a warmer climate.

IQ-75 Africa would literally not even have had the *WHEEL*
if white colonists hadn>t introduced it to them.
-----------------
I suppose the Hittites and Egyptians were white?
Garbage!
[/quote]
If I remember 19th-century racial ideology, the standard racist
claim is that the elites in Egypt were white, and the slaves were
black. (Even today, this is a common misconception that all
slaves are and always have been black.)


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Anthropology Forum	Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Page 3 of 4