fitz
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: Schrödinger>s Universe |
 |
|
Schrödinger>s Universe
One of the very best books, that has recently come out, is Dr. Milo
Wolff>s brand new book: Schrödinger>s Universe.
I>ve just now finished reading it and I predict that someday it will
be ranked in importance right up there next to Newton>s Principia.
I agree with the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a
scalar, standing wave, resonance universe.
Dr. Milo Wolff is correct: all electrons give and receive tiny bits
of
energy among each other and they do this basically (in all
directions)
in a scalar manner. Also Dr. Wolff correctly reiterates, constantly
throughout this book, that there is a definite reason for Mach>s
principle and the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance that
has a spherical wave form.
This is exactly the type of resonance universe that Schrödinger
claimed we have.
There are some important "firsts" in Dr. Wolff>s book as well.
I was reading the final chapter of Schrödinger>s Universe where Milo
Wolff asked, "What is the origin of space?"
If I may be so bold as to tell you the answer to what space and time
really are, then here it is:
There is no such thing as force in the tensor math of General
Relativity. There is only more space, than average, where repulsive
force exists between two objects. And there is less space, than
average, existing between two gravitational objects that have an
attractive force between themselves.
Thus, the tensor math of GR shows you exactly what the origin of
space
is: It>s telling us essentially that space and force are equivalent.
Once you see this then you can solve the paradox of "action at a
distance" where the past seemingly becomes involved both in obtaining
light from distant stars and in the Feynman diagrams used in quantum
mechanics.
Let>s first start off this tiny lesson by looking at an electron and
its anti-particle the positron.
In this Schrödinger Universe, the electron is entirely constructed
from two distinct frequencies, its scalar resonant frequency and its
spin frequency.
The positron also is built up of the same two, its scalar frequency
and its spin frequency.
But both the positron>s scalar and spin frequencies are 180 degrees
out of phase with the electron>s scalar and spin frequencies.
So when these two standing wave entities meet, the wave crests of one
go into the wave troughs of the other and both are completely
annihilated.
This is one of the startling facts of quantum theory.
The people who have read my words on http://www.rbduncan.com/ and
http://www.amperefitz.com know that the best way to see the big
picture in all this is to see the scalar frequency of the electron as
a clock that determines time. Then think of the spin frequency
determining force and space (It>s the spin of the electron that
causes
the magnetic force). Also, by reading, what you see in the above
links, you will see what force the spin of the quark causes).
And by reading what is in the above links you will also know that
what
we see is an average time and space that is really made up of
numerous
quanta bits, the same as energy. This concept of an average time and
space made up of numerous quanta bits of time and space is extremely
important in the correct understanding of both time and space. I>ll
explain this further as we proceed.
Think of the entire electron as never being involved in light
transfers. In fact, only a very minute portion of the closest sides
of
the emitting and receiving electrons are involved and if these "see"
themselves as moving at the same frequency then they will also "see"
themselves on the same Minkowski light cone and they will be able to
transfer this quantum of light energy from one to the other.
Sigma chemical bonding is a proven fact and it must always be seen as
a binding force between a spin up and a spin down electron whose
closest sides are going in the same direction. Light energy is also
exchanged, exactly the same way as a binding force, that ends up
transferring this light energy between a spin up and a spin down
electron where very minute portions of their closest sides are always
going in the same direction.
One additional thing is very important and this is that energy only
diminishes with the square of the distance when multiple numbers of
electrons are involved because it is these numbers involved, in the
transfer, that fall off with the square of the distance. Between only
two electrons, the energy remains at the same strength out to the
Hubble limit of distance. A quantum of light energy does not diminish
in intensity with distance: This is another quantum theory fact.
You see stars as being far away and their light as coming from the
past. This is because the vast majority of the star>s electrons are
out of phase with your electrons but that does not mean all of these
very minute portions of the closest sides of those electrons are
going
to be out of phase with all the very minute portions of the closest
sides of your electrons.
Quantum theory is trying to teach us all about this peculiar space-
time setup but we are slow learners.
It is of little importance if an electron on the distant star is in
the past and the electron in your eye is in the present: what really
matters is that a very minute portion of the closest sides of the
electron in your eye and the one on the star both "see" each other in
the correct alignment and "see" their frequencies at the same phase
so
as to be on the same Minkowski light cone.
Only then can light energy be transmitted. See: Ampere>s Laws
http://www.rbduncan.com/Ampere
Observing it this way, you eliminate the necessity for aether,
"action
at a distance", time reversal and a lot of other nonsense.
Light goes through a vacuum!
There is absolutely nothing in a vacuum to transfer this light.
Understanding this shows you there is no such thing as aether nor is
there any such thing even needed to transfer light.
However, you have to know exactly what space and time are to properly
see this.
The more out of phase the scalar frequencies of two electrons are,
then the more time that exists between them.
Yes, the average time between an electron on that star and one in
your
eye are indeed very much out of phase -- separated by much time --
but
not a very minute portion of the closest sides of the two light
transferring electrons: they are exactly in phase with each other and
"see" themselves existing at the same time and on the same Minkowski
light cone.
Think of time and space, respectively, as both phase relationships in
this scalar frequency and spin frequency universe of Schrödinger.
The closer the scalar frequencies are, in phase, then the closer the
items are to each other in time.
The same with spin frequencies and if no phase difference exists,
between very minute portions of the spin frequencies of similar
entities, then they are in the same space.
As we deal with scalar resonances, we must have a more exact concept
of what space and time actually are.
Space and time are things that are constantly being produced by out
of
phase resonances: this is simply the way things are set up in this
universe and this average space and time set up between everything
remains basically the same. But a minor portion of it can be changed
or you wouldn>t have gravity or any other type force. So bits of it
can be changed and are changed to give you the various forces. Only
the mean or average setup remains basically the same. The tensor math
of general relativity is proof it works like this.
You can>t remove the average space and time between everything but
space and time can be removed, and a tiny bit is removed, from a very
minute portion of the closest sides of two electrons with opposite
spins in the same equatorial spin plane: that>s exactly why we have
sigma bonding along with heat and light and the radio wave spectrum.
This is how sigma bonding is produced and how light and heat are
transferred: You must think of it as a direct transfer between two
electrons whose very minute portions "see" themselves both in the
same
place at the same time. It>s as simple as that.
We can no longer think of light, traveling from place to place, in a
wave form. It does not travel like water waves on top of water or as
sound waves through air or even like high or low frequency electrical
waves through wires. Scientists of the future, who will learn more
about space and time than we know, will see the light transfer
between
electrons as a direct transfer.
These scalar, standing wave entities are actual wave forms and light
is a wave form while in your eye but please do not think of it as a
wave while it is being transferred through a vacuum. You must see it
as a direct transfer through the vacuum because it acts as a binding
force, causing a long distance sigma bond between the two electrons
and this effects the quantum transfer. In the future it will be seen
as a Schrödinger resonance reaction. So I guess Viv Pope is right,
after all, about preaching this fact to us.
As this energy transfer of light, from a distant star in the past,
comes to your eye in the present then something else important
happens
as well in this Universe of Schrödinger>s. There is then a balance
reaction in the total average phase shift of the electrons in that
past to the total average phase of the scalar frequency, of all the
electrons, in your present time.
Using sunlight, we are pulling enormous energy out of the past, even
though it>s only a few minutes in the past. But the universe balances
this out as well with a simple average phase change.
It does get a bit more complicated because we have two clocks: the
electron>s scalar frequency and the quark>s.
In addition, we also have those two spin frequencies giving us force
and space.
It>s really simple when you see how it all works and when you do see
exactly how it works then you>ll also see this is a true Theory of
Everything.
Now for the really important question:
Is A. Garrett Lisi>s mathematical Theory of Everything spherical
model
really a model of Dr. Milo Wolff>s spherical, scalar, standing wave
resonance?
Perhaps it is. Better check this link out: http://www.rbduncan.com/lisiimp.htm
Yes my friends I>m very much afraid that, as well as in Galileo>s
age,
the universities are all asleep at the switch on this one too.
See this entire post in color at: http://www.amperefitz.com/schrod.htm
Have a good day & visit my site at goodreads:
http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/276352
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Orig. July 17, 2008 this revised July 22, 2008 |
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: Re: Schrödinger>s Universe |
|
|
On Jul 23, 1:09 pm, fitz <zeus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]Schrödinger>s Universe
One of the very best books, that has recently come out, is Dr. Milo
Wolff>s brand new book: Schrödinger>s Universe.
I>ve just now finished reading it and I predict that someday it will
be ranked in importance right up there next to Newton>s Principia.
I agree with the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a
scalar, standing wave, resonance universe.
Dr. Milo Wolff is correct: all electrons give and receive tiny bits
of
energy among each other and they do this basically (in all
directions)
in a scalar manner. Also Dr. Wolff correctly reiterates, constantly
throughout this book, that there is a definite reason for Mach>s
principle and the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance that
has a spherical wave form.
This is exactly the type of resonance universe that Schrödinger
claimed we have.
There are some important "firsts" in Dr. Wolff>s book as well.
I was reading the final chapter of Schrödinger>s Universe where Milo
Wolff asked, "What is the origin of space?"
If I may be so bold as to tell you the answer to what space and time
really are, then here it is:
There is no such thing as force in the tensor math of General
Relativity. There is only more space, than average, where repulsive
force exists between two objects. And there is less space, than
average, existing between two gravitational objects that have an
attractive force between themselves.
Thus, the tensor math of GR shows you exactly what the origin of
space
is: It>s telling us essentially that space and force are equivalent.
Once you see this then you can solve the paradox of "action at a
distance" where the past seemingly becomes involved both in obtaining
light from distant stars and in the Feynman diagrams used in quantum
mechanics.
Let>s first start off this tiny lesson by looking at an electron and
its anti-particle the positron.
In this Schrödinger Universe, the electron is entirely constructed
from two distinct frequencies, its scalar resonant frequency and its
spin frequency.
The positron also is built up of the same two, its scalar frequency
and its spin frequency.
But both the positron>s scalar and spin frequencies are 180 degrees
out of phase with the electron>s scalar and spin frequencies.
So when these two standing wave entities meet, the wave crests of one
go into the wave troughs of the other and both are completely
annihilated.
This is one of the startling facts of quantum theory.
The people who have read my words onhttp://www.rbduncan.com/andhttp://www..amperefitz.comknow that the best way to see the big
picture in all this is to see the scalar frequency of the electron as
a clock that determines time. Then think of the spin frequency
determining force and space (It>s the spin of the electron that
causes
the magnetic force). Also, by reading, what you see in the above
links, you will see what force the spin of the quark causes).
And by reading what is in the above links you will also know that
what
we see is an average time and space that is really made up of
numerous
quanta bits, the same as energy. This concept of an average time and
space made up of numerous quanta bits of time and space is extremely
important in the correct understanding of both time and space. I>ll
explain this further as we proceed.
Think of the entire electron as never being involved in light
transfers. In fact, only a very minute portion of the closest sides
of
the emitting and receiving electrons are involved and if these "see"
themselves as moving at the same frequency then they will also "see"
themselves on the same Minkowski light cone and they will be able to
transfer this quantum of light energy from one to the other.
Sigma chemical bonding is a proven fact and it must always be seen as
a binding force between a spin up and a spin down electron whose
closest sides are going in the same direction. Light energy is also
exchanged, exactly the same way as a binding force, that ends up
transferring this light energy between a spin up and a spin down
electron where very minute portions of their closest sides are always
going in the same direction.
One additional thing is very important and this is that energy only
diminishes with the square of the distance when multiple numbers of
electrons are involved because it is these numbers involved, in the
transfer, that fall off with the square of the distance. Between only
two electrons, the energy remains at the same strength out to the
Hubble limit of distance. A quantum of light energy does not diminish
in intensity with distance: This is another quantum theory fact.
You see stars as being far away and their light as coming from the
past. This is because the vast majority of the star>s electrons are
out of phase with your electrons but that does not mean all of these
very minute portions of the closest sides of those electrons are
going
to be out of phase with all the very minute portions of the closest
sides of your electrons.
Quantum theory is trying to teach us all about this peculiar space-
time setup but we are slow learners.
It is of little importance if an electron on the distant star is in
the past and the electron in your eye is in the present: what really
matters is that a very minute portion of the closest sides of the
electron in your eye and the one on the star both "see" each other in
the correct alignment and "see" their frequencies at the same phase
so
as to be on the same Minkowski light cone.
Only then can light energy be transmitted. See: Ampere>s Lawshttp://www.rbduncan.com/Ampere
Observing it this way, you eliminate the necessity for aether,
"action
at a distance", time reversal and a lot of other nonsense.
Light goes through a vacuum!
There is absolutely nothing in a vacuum to transfer this light.
Understanding this shows you there is no such thing as aether nor is
there any such thing even needed to transfer light.
However, you have to know exactly what space and time are to properly
see this.
The more out of phase the scalar frequencies of two electrons are,
then the more time that exists between them.
Yes, the average time between an electron on that star and one in
your
eye are indeed very much out of phase -- separated by much time --
but
not a very minute portion of the closest sides of the two light
transferring electrons: they are exactly in phase with each other and
"see" themselves existing at the same time and on the same Minkowski
light cone.
Think of time and space, respectively, as both phase relationships in
this scalar frequency and spin frequency universe of Schrödinger.
The closer the scalar frequencies are, in phase, then the closer the
items are to each other in time.
The same with spin frequencies and if no phase difference exists,
between very minute portions of the spin frequencies of similar
entities, then they are in the same space.
As we deal with scalar resonances, we must have a more exact concept
of what space and time actually are.
Space and time are things that are constantly being produced by out
of
phase resonances: this is simply the way things are set up in this
universe and this average space and time set up between everything
remains basically the same. But a minor portion of it can be changed
or you wouldn>t have gravity or any other type force. So bits of it
can be changed and are changed to give you the various forces. Only
the mean or average setup remains basically the same. The tensor math
of general relativity is proof it works like this.
You can>t remove the average space and time between everything but
space and time can be removed, and a tiny bit is removed, from a very
minute portion of the closest sides of two electrons with opposite
spins in the same equatorial spin plane: that>s exactly why we have
sigma bonding along with heat and light and the radio wave spectrum.
This is how sigma bonding is produced and how light and heat are
transferred: You must think of it as a direct transfer between two
electrons whose very minute portions "see" themselves both in the
same
place at the same time. It>s as simple as that.
We can no longer think of light, traveling from place to place, in a
wave form. It does not travel like water waves on top of water or as
sound waves through air or even like high or low frequency electrical
waves through wires. Scientists of the future, who will learn more
about space and time than we know, will see the light transfer
between
electrons as a direct transfer.
These scalar, standing wave entities are actual wave forms and light
is a wave form while in your eye but please do not think of it as a
wave while it is being transferred through a vacuum. You must see it
as a direct transfer through the vacuum because it acts as a binding
force, causing a long distance sigma bond between the two electrons
and this effects the quantum transfer. In the future it will be seen
as a Schrödinger resonance reaction. So I guess Viv Pope is right,
after all, about preaching this fact to us.
As this energy transfer of light, from a distant star in the past,
comes to your eye in the present then something else important
happens
as well in this Universe of Schrödinger>s. There is then a balance
reaction in the total average phase shift of the electrons in that
past to the total average phase of the scalar frequency, of all the
electrons, in your present time.
Using sunlight, we are pulling enormous energy out of the past, even
though it>s only a few minutes in the past. But the universe balances
this out as well with a simple average phase change.
It does get a bit more complicated because we have two clocks: the
electron>s scalar frequency and the quark>s.
In addition, we also have those two spin frequencies giving us force
and space.
It>s really simple when you see how it all works and when you do see
exactly how it works then you>ll also see this is a true Theory of
Everything.
Now for the really important question:
Is A. Garrett Lisi>s mathematical Theory of Everything spherical
model
really a model of Dr. Milo Wolff>s spherical, scalar, standing wave
resonance?
Perhaps it is. Better check this link out:http://www.rbduncan.com/lisiimp..htm
Yes my friends I>m very much afraid that, as well as in Galileo>s
age,
the universities are all asleep at the switch on this one too.
See this entire post in color at:http://www.amperefitz.com/schrod.htm
Have a good day & visit my site at goodreads:
http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/276352
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Orig. July 17, 2008 this revised July 22, 2008
[/quote]
BOOK: ONE WITH THE UNIVERSE-
THE MECHANICS OF
THE UNIVERSE
by Allen C. Goodrich
SEE: ISBN 0-595-41598-9
ISBN 0-595-85946-1
COPYRIGHT 1984-2008 ALLEN C. GOODRICH
OBSERVATIONS: :
1. BECAUSE THERE IS NO KNOWN METHOD BY WHICH ENERGY
CAN BE TRANSMITTED TO AN ORBITING BODY, WITHOUT
PHYSICALLY CONTACTING THE BODY, TO CHANGE ITS ORBIT,
AS IT WAS PREDICTED BY SIR ISAAC NEWTON, IT IS ASSUMED
THAT THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS APPLIES AND THAT
THE TOTAL ENERGY OF THE ORBITING BODY REMAINS
CONSTANT, .NO ENERGY CHANGE, OR FORCE OF GRAVITY IS
INVOLVED IN THE ORBITING PROCESS. THE SUM OF KINETIC
AND POTENTIAL ENERGIES OF THE ORBITING BODY IS A
CONSTANT.
ANY POSITIVE CHANGE OF KINETIC ENERGY IS ACCOMPANIED
BY A SIMULTANEOUS NEGATIVE CHANGE OF POTENTIAL
ENERGY.
2. THE KINETIC AND POTENTIAL ENERGIES OF AN
ORBITAL BODY ARE NEARLY EQUAL, AND CONSISTENT WITH
THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS. NO FORCE OF GRAVITY
IS NECESSARY TO CAUSE ORBITAL MOTION.
3. TWO EQUATIONS ARE INDICATED TO BE OPERATIVE.
m (2 PI L )^2 / t ^2 + G (M-m) m / L = A CONSTANT. AND
DELTA m (2 PI L ) ^2 / t ^2 = - DELTA G (M-m ) m / L .
4. AT ANY OTHER RADIUS,THAN THE ORBITAL RADIUS, THE
TOTAL ENERGY MUST BE DIFFERENT A CHANGE OF
TOTAL ENERGY MUST ACCOMPANY A CHANGE OF ORBITAL
RADIUS.BUT NO KNOWN METHOD IS AVAILABLE TO MAKE
THIS ENERGY CHANGE POSSIBLE...
AT ANY OTHER ORBITAL RADIUS , THE KINETIC ENERGY
WOULD NOT BE THE SAME AS THE POTENTIAL ENERGY,
AND A FORCE OF GRAVITY WOULD BE
NEEDED TO MAKE ANY TOTAL ENERGY CHANGE.
THERE IS ONLY ONE ORBITAL RADIUS AT WHICH THE SUM
OF EQUAL MAGNITUDES OF KINETIUC AND POTENTIAL
ENERGIES.IS THE TOTAL ENERGY OF THE ORBITING MASS.
5. THE KINETIC AND POTENTIAL ENERGIES OF THE PLANETS
AND MOONS WERE CALCULATED AND THEY WERE ALL
FOUND TO CONFORM TO THIS PREDICTION.
A PARTICULAR TOTAL OF KINETIC AND POTENTIAL ENERGIES,
WHERE THE TWO ENERGIES ARE NEARLY EQUAL, CAN HAVE
ONLY ONE SPECIAL MEAN ORBITAL RADIUS AND BE
CONSISTENT WITH THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS.
6. THE MASS m IS SO MUCH LESS THAN THE MASS M , THAT
M-m REMAINS ALMOST UNCHANGED AS THE VALUE OF m
CHANGES ( PLEASE SEE THE BOOK FOR DEFINITIONS ).
KINETIC AND POTENTIAL ENERGIES
WERE OBSERVED TO BE THE CONTROLLING FACTOR
WHERE ORBITAL MOTION IS CONCERNED..
THIS IS TRUE IF THE ENERGIES ARE CALCULATED FROM
THE MASSES OR CHARGES.
7. THIS CONCEPT IS UNIQUE AND PROVIDES A MORE
LOGICAL METHOD OF EXPLAINING ORBITAL MOTION
THAN THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE THEORY PROPOSED BY
SIR ISAAC NEWTON..
SUMMARY
THE MECHANICS OF
THE UNIVERSE
Copyright 1984-2007 Allen C. Goodrich
No force is necessary to cause orbital motion.
The planets orbit the sun at a special mean orbital
radius L to conserve total energy. The modified
first law of thermodynamics , which states that the
total energy of the universe is a constant, is the
fundamental equation of the universe. Any mass
with orbital motion has kinetic and potential
energies which depend on its velocity and mean
orbital radius L from the center of the mass of
the rest of the effective universe. The mass
travels at This orbital radius because this is the only
orbital radius where no force or change of total
energy is necessary to maintain the orbit.The sum
of its kinetic and potential energies is a constant
and the magnitudes of kinetic and potential
energies are nearly equal.
m (2 pi L)^2 / t^2 + G m(M-m) /L = A CONSTANT.
(if no charges are present)
+ Delta m(2 pi L)^2/T^2 = - Delta Gm(M-m)/L
What>s so important about this modified first law
of thermodynamics?
Kinetic energy m (2 pi L)^2 / t^2 of a mass m is
orbital motion relative to the rest of the effective
universe (M-m) and potential energy
G(M-m) m / L, where L is the mean orbital radius,
are nearly equal at equilibrium, where no energy
change occurs and the total energy is constant.
At equilibrium, any change of kinetic energy must
be accompanied by an equal and opposite, sign,
change of potential energy.
The universe has been found to be expanding
at an accelerating rate. The potential energy of the
universe is continually decreasing and the kinetic
energy is continually increasing. Again, to conserve
the total energy relative to the rest of the universe.
This is why the modified first law is so important.
The conservation of total energy must be maintained
relative to the rest of the expanding universe. Kinetic
and potential energies must be computed relative to
the rest of the expanding universe.
This modified first law leads to the conclusion that
the force of gravity and the velocity of light are
misleading illusions. |
|
