| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jim McGinn
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:09 am Post subject: Rick Slipped |
 |
|
Richard Wagler <taxidea3@shaw.ca> wrote
[quote]The capacity for
keeping after your target, continually harassing it, preventing
it from resting or feeding until it is completely gassed is
based on our system of thermoreguation which allows
humans to deal with heat very effectively.
[/quote]
It so funny how conventional believers of this NG are constantly
hounding the AAT dimwits about how ridiculous their theory is and
being very careful to not reveal any details on their own hypothesis,
pretending not to have one. But every once in a while somebody, in
this case Wagler, slips up and lets out some details of their
simpleminded model. This is pure comedy. To all the slow witted
readers of this NG allow me to make explicit for you just what it is
that Wagler is saying here (because God knows we>ll never get him to
explain it). What he is saying is that our chimpanzee-like ancestors
transitioned into a lifestyle in which they were chasing down prey
over long distances in relatively treeless, or sparcely treed,
"savanna" habitat.
This is the dimwitted crap the comprises the whole discipline of
paleoanthropology. This is it, folks. This is the prevailing
paradigm. You won>t get any of them to admit it, but this is the
idiocy that bounces around in their brain cells when they lie in bed
at night imagining the earliest years of hominid evolution. And when
I say the whole discipline I mean the whole discipline. Every last
one of them.
Jim |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
firstjois
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2003 8:19 pm Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
"Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ac6a5059.0309092009.32a266e3@posting.google.com...
[snip]
:
: This is the dimwitted crap the comprises the whole discipline of
: paleoanthropology. This is it, folks. This is the prevailing
: paradigm. You won>t get any of them to admit it, but this is the
: idiocy that bounces around in their brain cells when they lie in bed
: at night imagining the earliest years of hominid evolution. And when
: I say the whole discipline I mean the whole discipline. Every last
: one of them.
:
: Jim
See, Jim, this is what I mean. Aren>t we so awfully darned lucky that one
human being knows everything and is trying his damnedest to help us all
out.
I think you are getting a little bit more of the AAR fervor every day, not
the theme, but the method. Have you written any obscure articles you can
quote?
Bless you,
Jois |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Philip Deitiker
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:21 am Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:19:37 -0400, "firstjois"
<firstjoisyike@hotmail.com> did some sarious thank>n and
scribbled:
[quote]I think you are getting a little bit more of the AAR fervor every day, not
the theme, but the method. Have you written any obscure articles you can
quote?
[/quote]
He has his manifesto probably revision 10 now. You haven>t
read the "McGinnian Manifesto" yet. My goodness Jois where
have you been? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jim McGinn
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 5:59 am Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
"firstjois" <firstjoisyike@hotmail.com> wrote
[quote]: This is the dimwitted crap the comprises the whole discipline of
: paleoanthropology. This is it, folks. This is the prevailing
: paradigm. You won>t get any of them to admit it, but this is the
: idiocy that bounces around in their brain cells when they lie in bed
: at night imagining the earliest years of hominid evolution. And when
: I say the whole discipline I mean the whole discipline. Every last
: one of them.
:
: Jim
See, Jim, this is what I mean. Aren>t we so awfully darned lucky that one
human being knows everything and is trying his damnedest to help us all
out.
I think you are getting a little bit more of the AAR fervor every day, not
the theme, but the method. Have you written any obscure articles you can
quote?
[/quote]
You don>t dispute the my characterization of your
nonhypothesis. (Which you snipped, not surprisingly.)
Whenever anybody points out that you all have no hypothesis
and don>t even have a good enough understanding to properly
frame the issues you just ignore it and, instead, make take
an adhominen attack. (Exactly like Verhaegen.) It>s really
all you know how to do. Your methods are indistinguishable
from those defending a religious belief. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jim McGinn
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 6:04 am Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
Philip Deitiker <Nopdeitik@att.net.spam > wrote in message news:<ts1vlvkj78h88tbcu816773944sn6k1cgc@4ax.com>...
[quote]On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:19:37 -0400, "firstjois"
firstjoisyike@hotmail.com> did some sarious thank>n and
scribbled:
I think you are getting a little bit more of the AAR fervor every day, not
the theme, but the method. Have you written any obscure articles you can
quote?
He has his manifesto probably revision 10 now. You haven>t
read the "McGinnian Manifesto" yet. My goodness Jois where
have you been?
[/quote]
My hypothesis deal with the issue of why humans are like
they are. It just so happens that humans are ideological
creatures. If we are to gain an understanding of why
humans are like we are we must be honest and explicit about
how human actually are. We can>t just pretend not to
notice certain traits/abilities that are complex or
discomforting. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
firstjois
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 6:21 am Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
"Jim McGinn" <jimmcginn@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ac6a5059.0309101659.4cd8871a@posting.google.com...
[snip]
:
: You don>t dispute the my characterization of your
: nonhypothesis. (Which you snipped, not surprisingly.)
:
I must have missed it. Naturally, I can>t remember my nonhypothesis never
mind your characterization of it.
Jois
--
I got news for you, pal. I>m right on everything I state here. Jim
(Eat your heart out Marco!) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
firstjois
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 6:25 am Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
"Philip Deitiker" <Nopdeitik@att.net.spam > wrote in message
news:ts1vlvkj78h88tbcu816773944sn6k1cgc@4ax.com...
: On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:19:37 -0400, "firstjois"
: <firstjoisyike@hotmail.com> did some sarious thank>n and
: scribbled:
:
:
: >I think you are getting a little bit more of the AAR fervor every day,
not
: >the theme, but the method. Have you written any obscure articles you
can
: >quote?
:
: He has his manifesto probably revision 10 now. You haven>t
: read the "McGinnian Manifesto" yet. My goodness Jois where
: have you been?
:
Obscure, obscure! Not famous stuff like the "McGinnian Manifesto" |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jim McGinn
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:57 am Post subject: Re: Rick Slipped |
|
|
"firstjois" <firstjoisyike@hotmail.com> wrote
[quote]: You don>t dispute the my characterization of your
: nonhypothesis. (Which you snipped, not surprisingly.)
:
I must have missed it. Naturally, I can>t remember my nonhypothesis never
mind your characterization of it.
[/quote]
This is my point.
Jim |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
