Mort Zuckerman
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject: "The Wrecking Crew" and Nancy Johnson (R-New Britain) |
 |
|
To: emcsweegan@nasw.org, zerhoune@od.nih.gov,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups.com, kshepard@calea.org, fitzmas@gmail.com,
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, modelt1918@sbcglobal.net,
jdrazen@nejm.org, letters@courant.com, Jgerberding@cdc.gov,
michael.cole@po.state.ct.us, conndcj@po.state.ct.us, executive-
editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, news-
tips@nytimes.com, the-arts@nytimes.com, bizday@nytimes.com,
foreign@nytimes.com, metro@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com,
dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline.net, trvl@hotmail.com,
illinoislyme@aol.com, jlender@courant.com, tinajgarcia@yahoo.com,
jhornberger@fff.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us, kurtzh@washpost.com,
georgewill@washpost.com, pj@allegorypress.com,
commissioner.dcf@po.state.ct.us, FalNields@aol.com,
bransfield@comcast.net, vtsherr@comcast.net, oca@po.state.ct.us,
freethinker@charter.net, scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us,
governor.rell@po.state.ct.us, attorney.general@po.state.ct.us,
randall.samborn@usdoj.gov
Cc: francam@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir,
eugenerobinson@washpost.com, horgan@courant.com,
bmiller@newstimes.com, trvl@hotmail.com, rastro18@aol.com,
billcurryct@gmail.com, amcguigan@rms-law.com, rjmurzyn@aol.com,
paulcraigroberts@yahoo.com, sidney_blumenthal@yahoo.com,
criminal.division@usdoj.gov, karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov,
christopher.christie@usdoj.gov, richard.Levin@yale.edu,
harold.koh@yale.edu, james.phillips@yale.edu, inquire@aldf.com,
lyme@idsociety.org
Subject: "The Wrecking Crew" and Nancy Johnson (R-New Britain)
Date: Nov 9, 2008 11:59 AM
ARTICLE BELOW- BRATTLEBORO]
Clearly the Bushies are trying to bump us all off with
the naturally occurring spread of interesting and new
diseases resulting from global warming. Ie., the
epidemics of asthma, autism, Relapsing Fever, antibiotic
resistant tuberculosis and common hospital infections.
And swine lagoons (mentioned below), which are the
primary antibiotic-efflux-pump store for bacteria-
a virtual Walmart for bacteria.
What puzzles me is that no one looks into "The Nature
Conservancy," involving the Weld Brothers: the late
David (Chair of the ALDF.com Lyme RICO cabal), and
William, the wildman of Boston and friends of the
insider Bushies, like Jonathan (Riggs Bank Scandal CEO
& Republican Party Treasurer for the State of New York)
and (Judge) John M. Walker (Second Circuit, Yale Law
School, still):
http://www.actionlyme.org/ALDF_BOARD.htm
How the hell did R-New Britain Nancy Johnson (US Congress)
end up going on a $17,000 free vacation (on the Nature
Conservancy) to Easter Island, and *** not end up being
investigated *** for ripping off old people to the
tune of 600 extra dollars a year in that crazy,
insane Medicare Drug Do-Over that no one understood?
The Big Old People Rip-Off was written by BigPharma,
not Nancy Johnson.
Why the junket to Easter Island?
Who is really behind the Nature Conservancy and what
is their agenda? Are they a fake philanthropy for
certain wealthy families like the Robert Woods Johnson
and Mayo "Clinic" ? (These are fake philanthropies
behind and involved in the Lyme crimes.)
Why are the same people (Welds, Nature Conservancy)
involved in the Lyme Disease scam?
Did they want to show Nancy Johnson something?
The wreckage of the planet, at this point, seems to
me to be deliberate, under Junior. What better way
to reduce the population than through "naturally
occurring epidemics" and, of course, fake
wars on terror:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DURHAM_BUSH_CRIME.htm
"Genetic susceptibilities to Diseases" was the Number
Two Intellectual Property sought by the Yale Lyme
Crooks, with their "L2 Diagnostics":
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYME_CORRUPTICUT.htm
Everyone needs to think long and hard about that.
Why should Yale, Corixa, SmithKline, and the financial
supporters of the ALDF be the only people privileged
to this obvious bioweapons information?
Consider: What would have happened if LYMErix
remained on the market, if it was the very thing
that was giving a large percentage of all people
(apparently independent of HLA, if we can believe
Mark Klempner & Gary Wormser in their 2005 report:
http://www.actionlyme.org/MKLEMPNER.htm ),
eventually, MS, ALS, and cancer?
Because it was:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PAM3CYS_IMMUNE_SUPPRESSION.htm
I, as a survivor of the Lyme Crymes and the Cheney-
Israeli Coup d' Etat, think I am entitled to know all
about Nancy Johnson>s Easter Island junket.
Maybe we could have her waterboarded after the
naked Palestinian Hanging.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
http://www.relapsingfever.org
===================================================
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/11/07-7
Published on Friday, November 7, 2008 by the Brattleboro Reformer
(Vermont)
The Wrecking Crew Leaves
Brattleboro Reformer Editorial
On its way out the door, the Bush administration is rushing to gut
some important
laws and regulations protecting the environment. Regarding the
Endangered Species
Act, for instance, the administration wants to impose major exceptions
to rules
requiring scientific review of federal projects that might harm or
threaten endangered
species.
The administration wants federal agencies to decide for themselves
whether highways,
dams, mines and other projects will harm endangered animals or plants.
The changes
would apply to any project the federal government funds, builds or
authorizes.
This giveaway to commercial interests would greatly reduce the
mandatory, independent
reviews government scientists have been conducting in the 35 years
since the act
was adopted. The new regulations also would bar federal agencies from
assessing
whether emissions from proposed projects would further endanger
species or habitats
by contributing to global warming.
In response to these proposed changes, individuals, groups and
officials submitted
more than 300,000 comments. The Interior Department quickly assigned
15 employees
to "review" all of them in 32 hours, a cynical speed-reading exercise
with a predictable outcome.
Not surprisingly, the Interior Department "brightly concluded that no
significant
environmental harm would result from simply allowing federal agencies
to voluntarily
decide whether their projects might be a threat to wildlife," writes
executive
director Carl Pope, of the Sierra Club.
The rush job is a result of the administration>s desire to finalize
all regulatory
changes before it leaves office, making it difficult and time-
consuming for the
incoming Obama administration to reverse them.
In another area, a rule put forward by the National Marine Fisheries
Service, now
under final review, would lift the requirement that environmental
impact statements
be prepared for certain fisheries management decisions. In addition,
it would give
review authority to regional councils dominated by commercial and
recreational fishing
interests, according to The Washington Post.
The administration has received almost 200,000 public comments on the
rule, as well
as protests from 80 members of Congress and 160 conservation groups,
according to
the Post.
In yet another outrage, the administration signed a rule on Oct. 31
exempting thousands
of factory farms from needing permits that limit water pollution. In
addition, the
Environmental Protection Agency did not adopt improved controls for
bacteria and
other pathogens that can pose risks to human health and wildlife,
according to the
Natural Resources Defense Council.
Factory farms, also known as concentrated animal feeding operations,
confine animals
on an industrial scale and produce massive amounts of manure and other
waste that
can pollute waterways with dangerous contaminants. These farms lack
waste treatment
facilities comparable to those that treat human sewage, according to
the Natural
Resources Defense Council.
There are many more such damaging rule changes in the pipeline than
can be detailed
here. Others include, according to The New York Times, a rule that
would weaken
a Clean Air Act program requiring utilities to install modern
pollution controls
when they upgrade their plants to produce more power. The EPA also
will issue a
rule to make it easier for coal-fired plants to locate near national
parks. And
the Interior Department is awaiting EPA approval of a proposal that
would make it
easier for mining companies to dump toxic wastes in valleys and
streams.
The new administration will undo all this craziness - but with an
unfortunate expense
of time, energy and money. A decent future for the U.S. and the world
will require
thinking through and working out responsible and integrated economic,
energy, food
and environmental policies which don>t destroy one sector to boost
another.
The Bush administration>s ill-considered rule changes are the last
gasp of an
exhausted and discredited ideology.
© 2008 Brattleboro Reformer |
|
