www.GetXFactor.com

Leading Technology, Science,
Agriculture News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Question on template matching
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Image Processing Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Xiaoxiao
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:44 pm    Post subject: Question on template matching Reply with quote

Hi,

I am reading some documents on template matching of digital image
processing and I understood most of it, but have one confusion
question. I.e., when we do template matching, is the size of template
(mask) matter? For example, I would like to find ring shapes in an
image and I use a ring mask, if I don>t know adhead the sizes of the
rings in the images and I only uses a fixed size of the ring template,
will it find all the rings (different sizes) in the image? From
intuition, I would guess that the template matching should find them,
but from the equation of the template matching, I confused that is I
think if I don>t have a same size ring mask with the rings in the
image, I will not get maximum convulations on the locations of rings
with different sizes, then can i find them?

Sorry for the long question. Basically, the question is asking whether
the mask size is matter in the template matching. If not, why?

Thanks a lot.
Back to top
Martin Leese
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Question on template matching Reply with quote

Xiaoxiao wrote:
[quote]Hi,

I am reading some documents on template matching of digital image
processing and I understood most of it, but have one confusion
question. I.e., when we do template matching, is the size of template
(mask) matter?
[/quote]
Yes.

[quote]For example, I would like to find ring shapes in an
image and I use a ring mask, if I don>t know adhead the sizes of the
rings in the images and I only uses a fixed size of the ring template,
will it find all the rings (different sizes) in the image?
[/quote]
No.

[quote]From
intuition, I would guess that the template matching should find them,
but from the equation of the template matching, I confused that is I
think if I don>t have a same size ring mask with the rings in the
image, I will not get maximum convulations on the locations of rings
with different sizes, then can i find them?
[/quote]
No.

[quote]Sorry for the long question. Basically, the question is asking whether
the mask size is matter in the template matching.
[/quote]
Yes.

[quote]If not, why?
[/quote]
Not applicable.

--
Regards,
Martin Leese
E-mail: please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID
Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
Back to top
Xiaoxiao
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Question on template matching Reply with quote

On Oct 7, 2:18 pm, Elmar Sack <Elmar.S...@mnet-online.de> wrote:
[quote]Xiaoxiao wrote:
Hi,

I am reading some documents on template matching of digital image
processing and I understood most of it, but have one confusion
question. I.e., when we do template matching, is the size of template
(mask) matter? For example, I would like to find ring shapes in an
image and I use a ring mask, if I don>t know adhead the sizes of the
rings in the images and I only uses a fixed size of the ring template,
will it find all the rings (different sizes) in the image? From
intuition, I would guess that the template matching should find them,
but from the equation of the template matching, I confused that is I
think if I don>t have a same size ring mask with the rings in the
image, I will not get maximum convulations on the locations of rings
with different sizes, then can i find them?

Sorry for the long question. Basically, the question is asking whether
the mask size is matter in the template matching. If not, why?

Thanks a lot.

The following link may help you to overcome the fixed template size problem:http://www.lps.usp.br/~hae/software/cirateg/index.html

Regards,
Elmar- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
Thanks Martin and Elmar for the clarification and help. It seems
template matching is not that powerful as I thought.
Back to top
Elmar Sack
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Question on template matching Reply with quote

Xiaoxiao wrote:

[quote]Hi,

I am reading some documents on template matching of digital image
processing and I understood most of it, but have one confusion
question. I.e., when we do template matching, is the size of template
(mask) matter? For example, I would like to find ring shapes in an
image and I use a ring mask, if I don>t know adhead the sizes of the
rings in the images and I only uses a fixed size of the ring template,
will it find all the rings (different sizes) in the image? From
intuition, I would guess that the template matching should find them,
but from the equation of the template matching, I confused that is I
think if I don>t have a same size ring mask with the rings in the
image, I will not get maximum convulations on the locations of rings
with different sizes, then can i find them?

Sorry for the long question. Basically, the question is asking whether
the mask size is matter in the template matching. If not, why?

Thanks a lot.
[/quote]
The following link may help you to overcome the fixed template size problem:
http://www.lps.usp.br/~hae/software/cirateg/index.html

Regards,
Elmar
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Image Processing Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum