Science and Technology news... :: View topic - posted reply of Stonehenge, bride of Jesus now ousts Judas

Elijahovah · Guest

Reply to post regarding change in Stonehenge
worship 500 years after previous worship:

So if stonehenge was founded on Koyak 21
(Jan 3 winter solstice solar ecipse) in 1554 BC
(when Moses disputed astronomy with high priest Janus)
with Venus and the moon at winter solstice and nodal,
we can be sure a change took place in 500 years
or 1054 BC. I find it interesting that the Amizaduga Venus
tablets (lunar dates of Venus) are debated as 56 years
or 64 years. The 56 years implies the nodal lunar cycle
of the 56 peg holes included Venus.
(As for nodal, i previously posted how 250 droconic months
are 18 lunar years (222 synodic months), an intercalary month
(223 months) and 7.5 synodic months (=230.5 synodic).
This means (twice 18.6 years), 37.2 years are whole 461
whole synodic months but the 56 years returns it to half
a synodic (691.5 synodics)
of which 750 draconic months would either
alternate new moon and full moon, or
691 synodics = 749.5 draconic
692 synodics = 750.5 draconic
Clearly the 56-year calendar is not from astral geniuses
in 1554 BC, however they did used 56 years. So of course
error accumulates. Stonehenge has a 56-year calendar
which spans 504 years to 1050 BC.
The interesting thing about 500 years is
this, that although 56 years cycles to 504 years, scholars
know that lunar Venus dates cannot be retained if a sothic
19-year lunar calendar is used because Venus is of the
365-day calendar. Yes it can be observed adavnced in the
Julian calendar but eventually Venus passes greatest elongation,
and solar conjunction within 243 years to repeat. Where as the
365-day method errs only 2 days per 40 calendar years, so as to
advance only 60 days in 1200 years (1199 Julian). So because of
this drift where lunar is regarded 19-year Sothic and Venus is
regarded as 365-day Egyptian dated, the end result is a 19-year
lunar date of Venus repeats in 275 years (Venus as 243 +8+8+8+8)
NOT in 256 years (4x 64 years) nor 280 years (5x 56 years) for
Stonehenge.
continuing a 56-year cycle from 275 years will thus reach 499 years
instead fo 504 years. Thus Venus lunar dates of 1554 BC
could be expected in 1055 BC instead of 1050 BC.
The 1199 Julian years of Venus takes you to 355 BC.
But Venus as 243 years totals 1458 years as sothic
to 96 BC.
and the moon in 19 years totals 1463 years as sothic
to 91 BC.
The lunar dates of 275-year Venus will drift back
8 Julian dates each cycle, so that
1554 BC Jan 4 Koyak 21 calendar absent new moon
1280 BC Dec 27 (Koyak 21 = Oct 27 calendar new moon)
1005 BC Dec 19 (Koyak 21 = Aug 19 calendar new moon)
730 BC Dec 11 (Koyak 21 = Jun12 calendar new moon)
455 BC Dec 3 (Koyak 21 = April 4 calendar new moon)
180 BC Nov 25 (Koyak 21 = Jan 25 calendar new moon)
The above Julian dates are expected to be the same synodic
Venus on absent new moon. Following 25- year calendar
of Egyptian moon. In the case of Jan 25 of 180 BC the date
Koyak 21 has become a 2-day moon for a Venus 183-days
past superior conj, and then Paopi 16
is a 1-day moon on Nov 16 so that Nov 25 is a 10-day moon
for a Venus 185-days past superior conj.

Considering the period fo 1055 BC we have David
as king in 1077 BC, taking Jerusalem in 1070 BC.
Solomon of 1037 BC building the temple in 1034 BC.
The 40-year cycle of Venus falls on 1117 BC and 1077 BC
and 1037 BC and 997 BC. Where as Jupiter>s 83-year
cycle falls as Jova or kingship on 1117 BC and 1034 BC.
The return of Mars is the famed 997 BC on July 10 Tamuz
as it was in 1770 BC July 10 (Adam>s famed year 2256
which honors 600-year Venus as a 1200-year cycle).
So the change that took place 500 years apart, was it
the first 500 years? 1554-1055 BC

-- ELIJAH
Judging the error in men who incompetent die in
the next global destruction this year.
Competent is the one like Abram who took med
advice to have a child with Sarah though he could
have one with Hagar in the same unclean condition.
Competent is like Lot who took evacuation advice
when 10 men in Sodom could not be found to
evacuate the whole city to save them.
Competent like the bride of Christ who does not
know all things and just may someday glorify information
knowledge from their own members, yes from those
Jehovah gave to their own people, instead of from
the libraries of Jehovah>s knowledge that Jehovah has
given to the pagan United Nations, (UNICEF),
and NASA, catholic scientists, and born again physicists,
and rapturist medical doctors, etc.
Jesus said it was Elijah who had to seek shelter from
the unclean Syrian (a woman) because Jewish women
didnt want him around. Did this make Elijah a sinner
in the world. Is the bride of christ its own
forerunner and Elijah that it regards knowledge that
Jehovah gives to the great crowd as being inferior to worldly
sources of Jehovah>s knowledge. Why is it so important
to show that the world does have these facts or data
as truth about Jehovah, his earth, his animals, his science.
Why is it the bride is telling its children to not learn nor
school nor speak as if they>ve learned any new unknown
truth because only the bride has that authority to claim
what Jehovah>s truth is, and then is is from worldly sources
not from her own children. Is the bride seeking to rid her children
so she can save the corrupt world instead.

This reminds me of my own JW mother who although said
we could not have pagan school friends, sent us out
to play with neighbor children to be out of her hair. Yet
reminding us they were worldly, when dispute arose she
regarded us her own children as the liars and punished us
for what the wolrdly neighbors accused us of. Though mom
brought many adults into the JWs, when she led a young girl
to be baptized, my sister said There you can have your
new daughter. I wonder if, as so many JWs who sacrifice the
blood of their own children to instead baptize someone
elses children as their new spritual family, whether the bride
of Jesus has gathered a great crowd to sacrifice them because
she rather save others of the world when the time comes.
I hope not, i think not, but then who is abusing the whole
crowd. It has to be Judas, not the bride, but the nonanointed
writing staff, and legal staff, and its elder staff. Interestingly,
it was Peleg who made his son the first elder (king).
And that king did not stop the mass suicide of Ur in 2029 BC.
Jesus did not appoint elders before his death, so who appoints
elders as kings after his death. Was it Jesus or was it his apostles.

I submitted an article that proved the Maya descended from
Noah and that Maya chronology though wrong is a twist
of true chronology of Noah. THE RESULT? A Maya article
on how the Maya have become converted to be children
of the bride. But the question is why is it more important
that the children be obediently stupid rather than understand
the truth as reason to be obedient. Why does the bride seek
to do it the Catholic way merely to crave and seek and collect
obedience. Jesus taught obedience to Jehovah not obedience
to himself. Thus he taught obedience to Jehovah not obedience
to the bride. So will the bride teach that obedience to the bride as
above obedience to Jehovah. Yes, Jesus did say to obey him
is to obey Jehovah. To obey the bride is to obey Jehovah. But
why does she grieve and torture her children by holding back
knowledge that isnt too much for them to bear. Yes they can
decern what is too much to bear. Or is Judas discerning beside
the bride so that she can control the money box, and claim it
is for the bride. The bride will soon say to its Judas, be gone,
go do what you seek to do, you do not want my feet to have
the perfume of truth poured upon it. You withheld from my
children and now you dare to say it is i who have withheld
so i can have this wasted upon my feet. This is to Judas,
the non-anointed writing staff and legal reps of the WatchTower
Society, because of you you slaughter the bride this year.
You demon. The queen you sit beside will oust you like she
did Haman, you raper of Jehovah>s Witnesses.
Jehovah proves that C-14 ages us and that it could be
diluted within our bodies to grow young since Feb 1985.
But rejecting this knowledge from a child born in the great crowd
is to honor knowledge only if WatchTower writers personally
find such knowledge of Jehovah in worldy sources of Satan.
Yes indeed is it not great to boast knowing Jehovah...
(as Satan knows and trembles) and so make treasures of
Jehovah for Jehovah more with worldly quotes than knowledge
from the bride>s own children. For this reason those too old
who live thru Armageddon will still age and die after it, too
late to correct contaminated longevity, its cure presented
by Jehovah in Feb 1985. So unlike Russell, unlike Rutherford,
unlike Franz. The bride will not get the blame, Judas beside the
bride will get that blame.

Garry Denke · Guest

Researchers Disagree About Age, Purpose of Stonehenge
http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/science/September-October/Researchers-Disagree-About-Age--Purpose-of-Stonehenge.html

I see that Pearson, Pitts and Richards have proven, a) SH did not
begin as a cemetery and, b) SH did not begin as a wooden building. No
bones were in any of the 56 Aubrey Holes at first, they were full of
56 Pembrokeshire Blue Stone. Those 3000 BC bones had to be buried
after Blue Stone was removed. That makes their SH arrival date earlier
(3100 BC) coinciding with the Ditch surrounding them. Pearson, Pitts
and Richards might consider 3100 BC Pembrokeshire Blue Coal
(anthracite) explorers from Preseli Hills marking SH fast silting-in
Ditch coal duster with 56 Pembrokeshire Blue Stone (volcanics) who
abandoned the duster later which became their cemetery. Wainwright and
Darvill might consider this also since that is what happened (great
Cursus Coal Cache found). In 7 days Public Consultation of the Future
of SH will end. Lt-Col William Hawley and Robert Newall original 1920s
evidence (56 'X' Holes) first holding Blue Stone has been confirmed.
Scroll Trench was also a Hawley and Newall discovery West-SW of
Heelstone (unfinished). Will it be Pearson, Pitts and Richards digging
up the Arc Trench ending? or will it be Wainwright and Darvill digging
up the Arc Trench ending? SH is just Stonehenge? or SH is Stonehenge
Hospital? In 7 days.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scroll_Trench

Garry Denke

Elijahovah · Guest

Reply to post regarding change in Stonehenge
worship 500 years after previous worship:

So if stonehenge was founded on Koyak 21
(Jan 4 winter solstice solar ecipse) in 1554 BC
(when Moses disputed astronomy with high priest Janus)
with Venus and the moon at winter solstice and nodal,
we can be sure a change took place in 500 years
or 1054 BC. I find it interesting that the Amizaduga Venus
tablets (lunar dates of Venus) are debated as 56 years
or 64 years. The 56 years implies the nodal lunar cycle
of the 56 peg holes included Venus.
(As for nodal, i previously posted how 250 droconic months
are 18 lunar years (222 synodic months), an intercalary month
(223 months) and 7.5 synodic months (=230.5 synodic).
This means (twice 18.6 years), 37.2 years are whole 461
whole synodic months but the 56 years returns it to half
a synodic (691.5 synodics)
of which 750 draconic months would either
alternate new moon and full moon, or
691 synodics = 749.5 draconic
692 synodics = 750.5 draconic
Clearly the 56-year calendar is not from astral geniuses
in 1554 BC, however they did used 56 years. So of course
error accumulates. Stonehenge has a 56-year calendar
which spans 504 years to 1050 BC.
The interesting thing about 500 years is
this, that although 56 years cycles to 504 years, scholars
know that lunar Venus dates cannot be retained if a sothic
19-year lunar calendar is used because Venus is of the
365-day calendar. Yes it can be observed adavnced in the
Julian calendar but eventually Venus passes greatest elongation,
and solar conjunction within 243 years to repeat. Where as the
365-day method errs only 2 days per 40 calendar years, so as to
advance only 60 days in 1200 years (1199 Julian). So because of
this drift where lunar is regarded 19-year Sothic and Venus is
regarded as 365-day Egyptian dated, the end result is a 19-year
lunar date of Venus repeats in 275 years (Venus as 243 +8+8+8+8)
NOT in 256 years (4x 64 years) nor 280 years (5x 56 years) for
Stonehenge.
continuing a 56-year cycle from 275 years will thus reach 499 years
instead fo 504 years. Thus Venus lunar dates of 1554 BC
could be expected in 1055 BC instead of 1050 BC.
The 1199 Julian years of Venus takes you to 355 BC.
But Venus as 243 years totals 1458 years as sothic
to 96 BC.
and the moon in 19 years totals 1463 years as sothic
to 91 BC.
The lunar dates of 275-year Venus will drift back
8 Julian dates each cycle, so that
1554 BC Jan 4 Koyak 21 calendar absent new moon
1280 BC Dec 27 (Koyak 21 = Oct 27 calendar new moon)
1005 BC Dec 19 (Koyak 21 = Aug 19 calendar new moon)
730 BC Dec 11 (Koyak 21 = Jun12 calendar new moon)
455 BC Dec 3 (Koyak 21 = April 4 calendar new moon)
180 BC Nov 25 (Koyak 21 = Jan 25 calendar new moon)
The above Julian dates are expected to be the same synodic
Venus on absent new moon. Following 25- year calendar
of Egyptian moon. In the case of Jan 25 of 180 BC the date
Koyak 21 has become a 2-day moon for a Venus 183-days
past superior conj, and then Paopi 16
is a 1-day moon on Nov 16 so that Nov 25 is a 10-day moon
for a Venus 185-days past superior conj.

Considering the period fo 1055 BC we have David
as king in 1077 BC, taking Jerusalem in 1070 BC.
Solomon of 1037 BC building the temple in 1034 BC.
The 40-year cycle of Venus falls on 1117 BC and 1077 BC
and 1037 BC and 997 BC. Where as Jupiter>s 83-year
cycle falls as Jova or kingship on 1117 BC and 1034 BC.
The return of Mars is the famed 997 BC on July 10 Tamuz
as it was in 1770 BC July 10 (Adam>s famed year 2256
which honors 600-year Venus as a 1200-year cycle).
So the change that took place 500 years apart, was it
the first 500 years? 1554-1055 BC

-- ELIJAH
Judging the error in men who incompetent die in
the next global destruction this year.
Competent is the one like Abram who took med
advice to have a child with Sarah though he could
have one with Hagar in the same unclean condition.
Competent is like Lot who took evacuation advice
when 10 men in Sodom could not be found to
evacuate the whole city to save them.
Competent like the bride of Christ who does not
know all things and just may someday glorify information
knowledge from their own members, yes from those
Jehovah gave to their own people, instead of from
the libraries of Jehovah>s knowledge that Jehovah has
given to the pagan United Nations, (UNICEF),
and NASA, catholic scientists, and born again physicists,
and rapturist medical doctors, etc.
Jesus said it was Elijah who had to seek shelter from
the unclean Syrian (a woman) because Jewish women
didnt want him around. Did this make Elijah a sinner
in the world. Is the bride of christ its own
forerunner and Elijah that it regards knowledge that
Jehovah gives to the great crowd as being inferior to worldly
sources of Jehovah>s knowledge. Why is it so important
to show that the world does have these facts or data
as truth about Jehovah, his earth, his animals, his science.
Why is it the bride is telling its children to not learn nor
school nor speak as if they>ve learned any new unknown
truth because only the bride has that authority to claim
what Jehovah>s truth is, and then is is from worldly sources
not from her own children. Is the bride seeking to rid her children
so she can save the corrupt world instead.

This reminds me of my own JW mother who although said
we could not have pagan school friends, sent us out
to play with neighbor children to be out of her hair. Yet
reminding us they were worldly, when dispute arose she
regarded us her own children as the liars and punished us
for what the wolrdly neighbors accused us of. Though mom
brought many adults into the JWs, when she led a young girl
to be baptized, my sister said There you can have your
new daughter. I wonder if, as so many JWs who sacrifice the
blood of their own children to instead baptize someone
elses children as their new spritual family, whether the bride
of Jesus has gathered a great crowd to sacrifice them because
she rather save others of the world when the time comes.
I hope not, i think not, but then who is abusing the whole
crowd. It has to be Judas, not the bride, but the nonanointed
writing staff, and legal staff, and its elder staff. Interestingly,
it was Peleg who made his son the first elder (king).
And that king did not stop the mass suicide of Ur in 2029 BC.
Jesus did not appoint elders before his death, so who appoints
elders as kings after his death. Was it Jesus or was it his apostles.

I submitted an article that proved the Maya descended from
Noah and that Maya chronology though wrong is a twist
of true chronology of Noah. THE RESULT? A Maya article
on how the Maya have become converted to be children
of the bride. But the question is why is it more important
that the children be obediently stupid rather than understand
the truth as reason to be obedient. Why does the bride seek
to do it the Catholic way merely to crave and seek and collect
obedience. Jesus taught obedience to Jehovah not obedience
to himself. Thus he taught obedience to Jehovah not obedience
to the bride. So will the bride teach that obedience to the bride as
above obedience to Jehovah. Yes, Jesus did say to obey him
is to obey Jehovah. To obey the bride is to obey Jehovah. But
why does she grieve and torture her children by holding back
knowledge that isnt too much for them to bear. Yes they can
decern what is too much to bear. Or is Judas discerning beside
the bride so that she can control the money box, and claim it
is for the bride. The bride will soon say to its Judas, be gone,
go do what you seek to do, you do not want my feet to have
the perfume of truth poured upon it. You withheld from my
children and now you dare to say it is i who have withheld
so i can have this wasted upon my feet. This is to Judas,
the non-anointed writing staff and legal reps of the WatchTower
Society, because of you you slaughter the bride this year.
You demon. The queen you sit beside will oust you like she
did Haman, you raper of Jehovah>s Witnesses.
Jehovah proves that C-14 ages us and that it could be
diluted within our bodies to grow young since Feb 1985.
But rejecting this knowledge from a child born in the great crowd
is to honor knowledge only if WatchTower writers personally
find such knowledge of Jehovah in worldy sources of Satan.
Yes indeed is it not great to boast knowing Jehovah...
(as Satan knows and trembles) and so make treasures of
Jehovah for Jehovah more with worldly quotes than knowledge
from the bride>s own children. For this reason those too old
who live thru Armageddon will still age and die after it, too
late to correct contaminated longevity, its cure presented
by Jehovah in Feb 1985. So unlike Russell, unlike Rutherford,
unlike Franz. The bride will not get the blame, Judas beside the
bride will get that blame.

Elijahovah · Guest

C-14 of stonehenge.
In 1473 BC Joshua took 12 stones out
the Jordan river to prove that thru Jehovah
events such as a river drying up instantly
can be predicted. In doing so those stones may date
3000 BC but the event is still 1473 BC.
If you were to LATER construct a cemetary from those stones
and bury someone then it does not mean the cemetary is
3000 BC. So too the Blue Stones if kept by the people
were dated to 3100 BC. That places them after Jericho
because
The Flood of 2370 BC had C-14 we date as 20,000 BC
The ice age ends in 2320 BC having C-14 we date as 10,000 BC.
Then Jericho built in 2237 BC is dated as 7000 BC.
Because it is the organic plant matter from 2300 BC being dated,
not humans.
C-14 entered plants first. So they appear younger than humans,
having obtained the current levels before people did.
But humans of Noah>s family were not yet old enough to die
(at 240).
And since human death in 2030 BC (born in 2269 BC
maturing with a C-14 at 2239 BC) is dated as 2030 BC
it means that a false 3100 BC date for blue stones
will fall after 2300 BC but before 2270 BC.
Carried to England they were laid in 1554 BC.
And of course the bones laid afterward.

Elijahovah · Guest

by the way i have just gone to your link now and i had no idea the
article said 2300 BC.
The year 2300 BC was my calculation based on the curve i described.
However, the stones are 2300 BC but the site was not reached and
populated
until 1554 BC honored on Jan 4.
Genesis is true.
It is the skeletal time scale and you people will not beleive
until first you die in a global disaster and perhaps its
survivors will remember you and raise you, return you to life,
after all the more important cooperative people are raised to life
first
since Adam who died in 3096 BC.
Sorry guys but stonehenge was not built before Adam.
And if Adam were found his body would C-14 date as
a false 23,096 BC.

Elijahovah · Guest

ok ok blue stones are 2 to 4 tons obviously not transported
3000 miles.... 250 miles it says....hmmm why.
Why would you move blue stone 250 miles from its source
instead of worshipping with it near its location.
Were the pyramids built 250 miles from their source of
quarry ?

Elijahovah · Guest

C-14 of stonehenge.
In 1473 BC Joshua took 12 stones out
the Jordan river to prove that thru Jehovah
events such as a river drying up instantly
can be predicted. In doing so those stones may date
3000 BC but the event is still 1473 BC.
If you were to LATER construct a cemetary from those stones
and bury someone then it does not mean the cemetary is
3000 BC.
The Blue Stones being 2-4 tons could not have been
kept by the people who traveled 3000 miles from
Ur. The stones come from only 250 miles away
where in 2300 BC (C-14 dated as 3100 BC)
no one at that time lived anywhere near England.
The glacier created by the Flood in 2370 BC pushed
the stones 250 miles to their location of Stonehenge
in 2300 BC being 746 years before the first settlement
created Stonehenge in 1554 BC.
That places them after Jericho because
The Flood of 2370 BC had C-14 we date as 20,000 BC
The ice age ends in 2320 BC having C-14 we date as 10,000 BC.
Then Jericho built in 2237 BC is dated as 7000 BC.
because it is the organic plant matter from 2300 BC being dated,
not humans.
C-14 entered plants first. So they appear younger than humans,
having obtained the current levels before people did.
But humans of Noah>s family were not yet old enough to die
(at 240).
And since human death in 2030 BC (born in 2269 BC
maturing with a C-14 at 2239 BC) is dated as 2030 BC
it means that a false 3100 BC date for blue stones
will fall after 2300 BC but before 2270 BC.
And of course the bones laid afterward.

by the way i have just gone to your link now and i had no idea the
article said 2300 BC.
The year 2300 BC was my calculation based on the curve i described.
However, the stones are 2300 BC but the site was not reached and
populated
until 1554 BC honored on Jan 4.
Genesis is true.
It is the skeletal time scale and you people will not beleive
until first you die in a global disaster and perhaps its
survivors will remember you and raise you, return you to life,
after all the more important cooperative people are raised to life
first
since Adam who died in 3096 BC.
Sorry guys but stonehenge was not built before Adam.
And if Adam were found his body would C-14 date as
a false 23,096 BC.

Garry Denke · Guest

On Oct 11, 8:59 am, Elijahovah <rschil...@wi.rr.com> wrote:
[quote]by the way i have just gone to your link now and i had no idea the
article said 2300 BC.
The year 2300 BC was my calculation based on the curve i described.
However, the stones are 2300 BC but the site was not reached and
populated
until 1554 BC honored on Jan 4.
Genesis is true.
It is the skeletal time scale and you people will not beleive
until first you die in a global disaster and perhaps its
survivors will remember you and raise you, return you to life,
after all the more important cooperative people are raised to life
first
since Adam who died in 3096 BC.
Sorry guys but stonehenge was not built before Adam.
And if Adam were found his body would C-14 date as
a false 23,096 BC.
[/quote]
http://www.amazon.com/Emperors-Rome-Imperial-Julius-Emperor/dp/1906719012/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223767034&sr=1-1

So Elijah has not read The Book.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesar%27s_invasions_of_Britain
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_conquest_of_Britain

When the Romans came Druids kept 'The stone which the builders
refused' safe. Romans excavated Stonehenge center. Druids et al wise.
Heelstone downplayed. Vatican letters (Roman) say J.C. claimed Mishkan
beneath Stonehenge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabernacle

Garry Denke


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Archaeology Forum
Page 1 of 1