| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Roland Vasco
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 4:05 am Post subject: What is cognitive? |
 |
|
SOmeone told me once "yuo hav a lto of accumulate cogniteive
knwodlege, you are a gold mind..." what doe sthat mean? I have no
accumulated anything, it is said to me realtime
What does cognitive means?
The company that said that to me was IBM in Coral Gables, Miami, Fl,
in 1988, when applying for a job, never did get the job so I presume
it is bad
Regards
Roland Vasco
http://www.evidence-timeline.com |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Wolf Kirchmeir
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 7:52 pm Post subject: Re: What is cognitive? |
|
|
On 9 Oct 2003 16:05:21 -0700, Roland Vasco wrote:
[quote]SOmeone told me once "yuo hav a lto of accumulate cogniteive
knwodlege, you are a gold mind..." what doe sthat mean? I have no
accumulated anything, it is said to me realtime
What does cognitive means?
The company that said that to me was IBM in Coral Gables, Miami, Fl,
in 1988, when applying for a job, never did get the job so I presume
it is bad
Regards
Roland Vasco
http://www.evidence-timeline.com
[/quote]
Cognitive = of or having to do with how an organism "knows" about its
environment, etc; more narrowly, of or having to do with the human ability to
know and understand (which is by no means as simple a concept as those words
suggest).
IMO, your interviewers were telling you that you were "overqualified" - a
polite way of saying that they didn>t want to pay you what you were worth. I
could give you a rant about employers' stupidity when it comes to hiring
well-qualified people, but this is not the forum for it.
--
Wolf Kirchmeir, Blind River ON Canada
"Nature does not deal in rewards or punishments, but only in consequences."
(Robert Ingersoll) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bjorn Reese
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 6:07 pm Post subject: Re: What is cognitive? |
|
|
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:52:30 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
[quote]IMO, your interviewers were telling you that you were "overqualified" - a
polite way of saying that they didn>t want to pay you what you were worth. I
[/quote]
Or the interviewers were looking for a coal mine, not a gold mine
(that is, they were looking for someone with other qualifications)
--
mail1dotstofanetdotdk |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Longley
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 8:01 pm Post subject: Re: What is cognitive? |
|
|
In message <pan.2003.10.12.13.07.31.920098@see.signature>, Bjorn Reese
<breese@see.signature> writes
[quote]On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:52:30 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
IMO, your interviewers were telling you that you were "overqualified" - a
polite way of saying that they didn>t want to pay you what you were worth. I
Or the interviewers were looking for a coal mine, not a gold mine
(that is, they were looking for someone with other qualifications)
[/quote]
Or - (perish the thought), they are wary that folk who *think* a lot
don>t actually *do* very much....and that the relationship between
knowing and doing tend not to be what many *think* it is ;-)
--
David Longley |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
David Longley
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 9:36 pm Post subject: Re: What is cognitive? |
|
|
In message <pan.2003.10.12.13.07.31.920098@see.signature>, Bjorn Reese
<breese@see.signature> writes
[quote]On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:52:30 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
IMO, your interviewers were telling you that you were "overqualified" - a
polite way of saying that they didn>t want to pay you what you were worth. I
Or the interviewers were looking for a coal mine, not a gold mine
(that is, they were looking for someone with other qualifications)
[/quote]
Or - (perish the thought), they are wary that folk who *think* a lot
don>t actually *do* very much....and that the relationship between
knowing & doing tends not to be what many *think* it is ;-)
--
David Longley |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
neepy
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 7:58 pm Post subject: Re: What is cognitive? |
|
|
David Longley <David@longley.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<9QQEL$ANMYi$EwSu@longley.demon.co.uk>...
[quote]In message <pan.2003.10.12.13.07.31.920098@see.signature>, Bjorn Reese
breese@see.signature> writes
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 15:52:30 -0400, Wolf Kirchmeir wrote:
IMO, your interviewers were telling you that you were "overqualified" - a
polite way of saying that they didn>t want to pay you what you were worth. I
Or the interviewers were looking for a coal mine, not a gold mine
(that is, they were looking for someone with other qualifications)
Or - (perish the thought), they are wary that folk who *think* a lot
don>t actually *do* very much....and that the relationship between
knowing & doing tends not to be what many *think* it is ;-)
[/quote]
Or maybe they checked out his website:
Roland Vasco
http://www.evidence-timeline.com |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
