| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:15 am Post subject: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
 |
|
http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Benj
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:16 am Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century.
[/quote]
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
gabydewilde
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 11, 7:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century.
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
[/quote]
Or what about the US Department Of Energy?
In 60 years they have not accomplished anything!
And it was not like they didn>t have any money or tools like Nicola
Tesla.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LENRCANRthedoelies.pdf |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
gabydewilde
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:48 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 11, 1:48 pm, "None4You" <None4...@nospam.cya> wrote:
[quote]"gabydewilde" <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0624b9e-3e90-4405-b823-8cd79862d380@e17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 11, 7:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century.
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
Or what about the US Department Of Energy?
In 60 years they have not accomplished anything!
And it was not like they didn>t have any money or tools like Nicola
Tesla.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LENRCANRthedoelies.pdf
I>m not taking a Faraday slam sitting down. I' m not a fan of Faraday
either. I suggest you watch and learn what a Faraday cage ishttp://www..flixxy.com/helicopter-cable-inspector.htm
[/quote]
I>m more than aware the academic establishment deserves ZERO credit
for the industrial revolution.
Academics can absorb information and that>s it.
Intelligence by definition is the skill of questioning things.
If you cant see the difference that would be exactly what I>m talking
about.
____
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
None4You
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
"gabydewilde" <gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d0624b9e-3e90-4405-b823-8cd79862d380@e17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 11, 7:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century.
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
[/quote]
Or what about the US Department Of Energy?
In 60 years they have not accomplished anything!
And it was not like they didn>t have any money or tools like Nicola
Tesla.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LENRCANRthedoelies.pdf
I>m not taking a Faraday slam sitting down. I' m not a fan of Faraday
either. I suggest you watch and learn what a Faraday cage is
http://www.flixxy.com/helicopter-cable-inspector.htm |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
tadchem
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 11, 1:23 am, gabydewilde <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 7:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century.
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
Or what about the US Department Of Energy?
In 60 years they have not accomplished anything!
And it was not like they didn>t have any money or tools like Nicola
Tesla.
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LENRCANRthedoelies.pdf
[/quote]
"Accomplishing" anything is not their job.
The DOE is a government agency. As such they have no interest,
mandate, or authority in developing new technology. As a government
agency their power is to GOVERN - to control what is already here.
Novelty to them represents something over which they have no control.
Their tool kit is money. They use rewards (grants) and punishments
(fees and fines) to influence the behavior
of others in their little realm. Simply Skinner. Along the way they
siphon off whatever $ they need to sustain their little effort.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:41 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 11, 1:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
[/quote]
ROFL, I>ve begun to enjoy your 'tongue in cheek' satirical posts.
Right, Faraday (and Maxwell) were both cluless dunces and frauds.
That>s why electric motors and transformers, plus radio and television
do not operate in accordance with their fradulent and misleading
deductions! All of these devices really operate by magical methods
and odic force, all subjects in which scientists remain blissfully
ignorant!
Obviously Stan Meyer was the only real scientist of our time, who saw
farther because he stood with his feet firmly placed on solid earth,
and did not stand on the shoulders of those who went before him, nor
was Stan misguided by any of the obviously false beliefs of basic
scientific principles. This factors are what contributed to his great
successes, which will forever benefit mankind!
Sure, right! ROFL!!!!!!
Benj, thank you for your humor but please try to practice kindly
behavior by not, except when required, heaping ridicule on those who,
lacking a technological education, really do believe in silly nonsense
clams, and lack all ability to discriminate between actual science and
the many, many scams that generally target the mass of incredibly
ignorant "true believers." Be truthful, but try to be tactful when
doing so (unlike me...I>m about a subtle as a sledge hammer! Sometimes
there is a justifiable reason to be totally blunt.)
Harry C. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 11, 1:23 am, gabydewilde <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 7:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.thunderbolts.info/online_videos.htm
Watch and learn.
Get you head out of your.....er...the 20th century.
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
Or what about the US Department Of Energy?
In 60 years they have not accomplished anything!
[/quote]
Actually, during the recently past years since WWII (remember that
little thing?), they>ve accomplished much. First, they began as the
Atomic Energy Commission, which oversaw the development of the Atomic
Bomb that ended WWII and in the process saved many millions of lives
on both sides of that small disagreement. Then there were the
foundations of Project Plowshare, which focused on the peaceful
applications of nuclear energy, including the nuclear power industry
and nuclear medicine among many other "little" accomplishments. Among
their current responsibilities is the licensing of every nuclear
reactor in the US, some of which produce power to light our homes and
run our air conditioners and space heaters, along with the many small
reactors that produce the short half-lived radioactive products that
are used routinely to diagnose your medical issue (which hopefully you
will never need to have done, but most people under the age of 40 have
already experienced), or to treat your cancer (God forbid you will
ever have that, but since everyone must eventually die, cancer and
heart disease are todays major "Grim Reapers"). I bet that you don>t
realize that nearly all of the nuclear reactors that produce these
life-saving, short lived, radioactive drugs are located with a 1/2
mile driving distance from all major hospitals.
Nah, the DOE has never accomplished anything... Bull. The problem is
simply that you have no concept what they actually do, and have done
for over 50 years, and likely will never fully comprehend because your
mind is already made up and you believe in "magic". Your posts
repeatedly indicate this. I>m simply trying to diagnose what possible
problem it is that you have that causes this very misguided pattern of
thinking. Lack of education?
[quote]And it was not like they didn>t have any money or tools like Nicola
Tesla.
[/quote]
Personally, I thank God that Nicola Tesla ran out of funding and was
recognized to have become insane before he seriously injured too many
people with his wireless energy transmission schemes. Now the real
facts are this: Tesla was a "One Trick Dog" in that his work on multi-
phase electricity and the development of 3-phase motors and generators
was pure genius (evidently he did not believe that Faraday was
clueless, since all of Tesla>s great work was based on Faraday>s
discoverys, but Tesla>s genious was to extend these fundamental
concepts and extend them to multiple-phases.)
Now here is where Tesla>s history becaome a little vague. I believe
that it can be argued that Tesla did originate the concept of the
resonant high-frequency transformer, although it seems clear that he
did not understand its princples of operation. The high-powered and
unloaded version of which is today called a "Tesla Coil". It soon
became clear that Tesla did not understand either it>s function, or
basic operation...still it was a spectacular device when seen in
operation. Others argued that Tesla did not grasp Maxwell>s work, or
for that matter the very basis of high-frequency electromagnetic
radiation, its application, or the adverse public health issues that
the it could produce.
It>s is not clear who shut down Tesla>s continuing experiments, but I
suspect that it was the either the US Government or the New York State
Public Health Service, not his bankrupcy. Still, it seems well
docmented that Tesla was quite insane by this time.
Today, both indiduals and public health officials are deeply concerned
about the health effects of relatively milliwatt levels of radiated
electromagnetic energy from cell phones and microwave ovens. Some
people are also concerned about the radiation from overhead high-
voltage transmission lines. Tesla>s dream was to radiate hundreds of
megawatts. Tesla did also not appear to grasp the ramifications of
the inverse-square law govening the energy density of radiated energy.
This alone would suggest to many at that time that part of his
intellect and brain was experiencing a serious malfunction. On top of
that, Tesla>s concept of the distribution of effective power levels
through omni-radiated energy was silly at even a superficial glance to
any competent engineer of his time, since it was obvious that most of
the radiated energy would simply leave the earth and radiate into
endless space.
Now here is something that I have noticed. Most of the really great
seminal discoveries in history have come from very serious, well
trained research scientists under the age of 35! Then something
happens, I don>t know exactly what, but little new is accomplished by
many people in science after this somewhat midlife age. There are
some exceptions but not many. This may be due because of a tendency
of older scientists to sit back, relax, and write a few books or
lecture to and share their accumulated knowledge with the younger
generation, or simply laziness. Your call. What I have observed that
could be meaniful is that many young graduate students appear to have
a incredible amount of energy to be expended on a subject that puzzles
them. Sex and entertainment is totally rejected, and they live on
sometimes as little as 4-hours of sleep each night, mostly found in a
lab chair. They survive on a diet of pizza, cheese steaks, and the
ever present cans of Coke and SpaghettiOs® or Ramen Noodles, most
likely producred from a nearby vending machine what serves them hot
and ready to eat.
Now the thing that makes this interesting to me, is that nobody is
forcing these potential discover geniuses to live this way, other that
the lure of the soluton of a puzzle that captivates them. Hell,
nobody over the age of 35 lives this way, or feels such intense
motivation.
Now this is something that should be researched, including how to
create this intense motivation in older than 35 people.
Harry C. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:28 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 12, 12:41 pm, hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 1:16 am, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
On Oct 11, 12:15 am, knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
ROFL, I>ve begun to enjoy your 'tongue in cheek' satirical posts.
Right, Faraday
[/quote]
Another CONover lie added below to make his loser case.
[quote](and Maxwell)
[/quote]
Although Maxwell' equations have been screwed with as you were taught
before....
[quote]were both cluless dunces and frauds.
[/quote]
That is what they said at the time about Faraday>s "parlor tricks."
[quote]That>s why electric motors and transformers, plus radio and television
do not operate in accordance with their fradulent and misleading
deductions! All of these devices really operate by magical methods
and odic force, all subjects in which scientists remain blissfully
ignorant!
[/quote]
After you take a typing and spelling lesson do the experiment CONman.
Subject: Re: Stanley Meyer>s Court Case
From: "Ted Zettergren" <ted.zettergren@swipnet.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 15:59:28 +0100
John Feiereisen skrev i meddelandet <756atu$mkn
$1@client2.news.psi.net>...
[quote]For those of you who are unfamiliar, Stanley Meyer patented some
equipment for fueling an IC engine with hydrogen. In addition to this
legitimate work, he claimed to be able decompose water into hydrogen
and oxygen with >100% thermal efficiency, thereby inventing a
"water-powered car". He sold "marketing rights" for this technology
to unsuspecting people, one of whom is a regular reader of s.e.h.
Back a couple years, a couple of his investors got wise to his scam
and took him to court, where Meyer was found guilty of "gross and
egregious fraud" and ordered to repay those 'investors'. As far as I
know, those were the only 'investors' who ever recouped their
'investment'. Meyer died earlier this year and his followers insist
he was poisoned (all good perpetual motion inventors are stalked by
THE CONSPIRACY).
After being found guilty of fraud, Meyer sent a long rambling letter
to the remainder of his 'investors', obviously hoping to ward off a
spate of trials which would have drained him of his ill-gotten gains.
It was replete with conspiracy paranoia and claimed that a recording
device in the courtroom was turned off so the judge (obviously working
under the direction of THE CONSPIRACY) could railroad Meyer into an
unjust guilty verdict.
As far as I know, Meyer>s home base was Grove City, Ohio, and the
court case took place in Shelby county, Ohio. I am going to be
passing through Ohio in a couple weeks and Grove City is but 3 miles
off my planned route. I can pass through Shelby county with only
minor adjustment of my planned route through Indiana. I figured I>d
stop in at the courthouse and see if I can pick up copies of the
records of the trial.
Does anybody know precisely where and when the trial took place?
City, county, etc., date(s)??? Possibly an official case name?
Thanks.
[/quote]
VERY GOOD Mr. Feiereisen
Take a copy of the tape fromx that trial and put it on the Real Player
so we all can listen to what really happened in the Court.
The most interesting is to hear what the WFC Expert Witnesses and
Electrical Engineer Mathias Johanson has to say.
The first part of the trial started on Thursday/Friday, 1/2 February
1996 before Judge William Corzine III at the Common Pleas Court,
Chillicothe, Ohio.
By the way. If you like to do some experiment, try this.
AT FIRST:
You must know the difference between a chemical reaction and a
nuclear reaction. A lot of people don>t understand that but they like
to argue a lot in every NG on Internet.
In a chemical reaction you need a lot of current and some salt for
making the water conductive.
In a nuclear reaction you don>t need any current at all, only high
voltage. How much current you need in a real application depends
on how clean your water is. As cleaner as better.
Stanley Meyers method>s have NOTHING to do with chemical
reactions.
HOW TO?
As a guide, you need US Patent 4,936,961 ref. figure 1 to 3F.
If you read something about magical frequencyis, forget that.
It works fine with 10KHz or something else if you preferred.
Use 50% duty cycle. BUT! the frequency will be doubled in the
step up circuit and that>s the frequency the Water-Cell will work
with. The components must resist at least 2000V.
The Water-Cell is very simple. Take a lot of stainless steel tubes
with the inner diameter of the bigger tube 3mm bigger than the outer
diameter of the inner tube. From now you must look at this
Water-Cell as a capacitor with water as dilectricum.
The Water-Cell and the INDUCTOR will resonate at a specific
frequency. It>s a normal RC-circuit.
Now the most important: The Water-Cell/Inductor frequency and
the doubled frequency from the generator must be exactly the
same. A special condition exists in a L/C Circuit, when it is
energized at a frequency at which the inductive reactance is equal
to the capacitive reactance, XL = XC.
Adjust the voltage peak level to reach a maximum hydrogen/oxygen
producing with a minimum of current using. If you earlier make
hydrogen with the electrolysis method with a lot of current,
this experiment will really surprise you.
For even less current you can make some experiment with a
centertapped puls-transformer.
Have a nice trip to Ohio!
Ted!
.................................................................
You see CONman, Faraday did experiments and built things and left the
math for later.
YOU, on the other hand can>t do ANYTHING for which the math has yet
been determined. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
foolsrushin
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On 12 Oct, 21:50, hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]On Oct 11, 1:23 am, gabydewilde <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[/quote]
[cut: though not unkindly!]
[quote]Now here is something that I have noticed. Most of the really great
seminal discoveries in history have come from very serious, well
trained research scientists under the age of 35! Then something
happens, I don>t know exactly what, but little new is accomplished by
many people in science after this somewhat midlife age.
[/quote]
I think you know. Scientists marry late. Passion for a dishy bird
substitutes science; the children become an increasing attraction as
they become less smelly and noisy; then become an absolute delight!
Demands on time exclude reading papers; crosswords prove more
attractive; change the world becomes maintain the world, instead.
Trips to the park with the dog and kids, a meal out, maybe darts down
the pub, and a holiday: 'It seems a lot for three; can we afford it
darling! Tell me.'
Down the pub:
A: I was sorry to hear about Bert, do you suppose he>ll be all right?
B: They admitted him to hospital last night. Not so serious I am told.
A: St. Mary>s?
B: Yes, in Ward C.
A: I am sure Jane and I can find time to visit him.
B: Welcome faces, he will see.
That>s what happens to them! Could they go on? For sure!
If they wanted to ... !
[cut]
[quote]Now this is something that should be researched, including how to
create this intense motivation in older than 35 people.
Harry C
--[/quote]
foolsrushin. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
BURT
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 12, 1:53 pm, foolsrushin <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On 12 Oct, 21:50, hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 1:23 am, gabydewilde <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[cut: though not unkindly!]
Now here is something that I have noticed. Most of the really great
seminal discoveries in history have come from very serious, well
trained research scientists under the age of 35! Then something
happens, I don>t know exactly what, but little new is accomplished by
many people in science after this somewhat midlife age.
I think you know. Scientists marry late. Passion for a dishy bird
substitutes science; the children become an increasing attraction as
they become less smelly and noisy; then become an absolute delight!
Demands on time exclude reading papers; crosswords prove more
attractive; change the world becomes maintain the world, instead.
Trips to the park with the dog and kids, a meal out, maybe darts down
the pub, and a holiday: 'It seems a lot for three; can we afford it
darling! Tell me.'
Down the pub:
A: I was sorry to hear about Bert, do you suppose he>ll be all right?
B: They admitted him to hospital last night. Not so serious I am told.
A: St. Mary>s?
B: Yes, in Ward C.
A: I am sure Jane and I can find time to visit him.
B: Welcome faces, he will see.
That>s what happens to them! Could they go on? For sure!
If they wanted to ... !
[cut]
Now this is something that should be researched, including how to
create this intense motivation in older than 35 people.
Harry C
--
foolsrushin.
[/quote]
And Faraday did what? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
foolsrushin
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:27 am Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On 12 Oct, 23:44, BURT <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 12, 1:53 pm, foolsrushin <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 12 Oct, 21:50, hhc...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 1:23 am, gabydewilde <gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
[cut: though not unkindly!]
Now here is something that I have noticed. Most of the really great
seminal discoveries in history have come from very serious, well
trained research scientists under the age of 35! Then something
happens, I don>t know exactly what, but little new is accomplished by
many people in science after this somewhat midlife age.
I think you know. Scientists marry late. Passion for a dishy bird
substitutes science; the children become an increasing attraction as
they become less smelly and noisy; then become an absolute delight!
Demands on time exclude reading papers; crosswords prove more
attractive; change the world becomes maintain the world, instead.
Trips to the park with the dog and kids, a meal out, maybe darts down
the pub, and a holiday: 'It seems a lot for three; can we afford it
darling! Tell me.'
Down the pub:
A: I was sorry to hear about Bert, do you suppose he>ll be all right?
B: They admitted him to hospital last night. Not so serious I am told.
A: St. Mary>s?
B: Yes, in Ward C.
A: I am sure Jane and I can find time to visit him.
B: Welcome faces, he will see.
That>s what happens to them! Could they go on? For sure!
If they wanted to ... !
[cut]
Now this is something that should be researched, including how to
create this intense motivation in older than 35 people.
Harry C
--
foolsrushin.
And Faraday did what?
[/quote]
Got on with it! You know that. He was fiercely independent, refused to
work on chemical weapons ( as I used to explain when discussing
hydrogen bomb output), married Sarah, sadly, no children. Those
children would have had a wonderful life, and enhanced us all down the
years. A permanet presence even now, a Standing Wave - while he
lasted. His love of God and his deep, heart-felt values never left
him!
--
foolsrushin. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Eeyore
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 12:59 am Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
hhc314@yahoo.com wrote:
[quote]Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nice presentation, but where are the equations? It>s impossible to
explain "science" with words! Only math is real.
Faraday knew no math and therefore was always a quack and charlatan.
Cosmology. Now THAT is science! Math based upon virtually no hard
data at all.
ROFL, I>ve begun to enjoy your 'tongue in cheek' satirical posts.
Right, Faraday (and Maxwell) were both cluless dunces and frauds.
That>s why electric motors and transformers, plus radio and television
do not operate in accordance with their fradulent and misleading
deductions! All of these devices really operate by magical methods
and odic force, all subjects in which scientists remain blissfully
ignorant!
[/quote]
You forgot the faerie dust ! It>s ESSENTIAL. Before 'big oil' killed him,
it>s rumoured Meyer had a new and better version.
Graham |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
gdewilde@gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:05 am Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 13, 2:27 am, foolsrushin <dolomi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[quote]
Got on with it! You know that. He was fiercely independent, refused to
work on chemical weapons
[/quote]
ROFL,
You talk about mass murder as if that would be a kosher thing to work
at.
Hilarious,
Makes me think of those human experimentation lectures.
Talk very professional while the soldier test subjects died within 5
seconds.
Adjust the mix, "next volunteer!"
Then they had this romantic advertisement about walking in the
hospital park.
ROFL
But those test subjects knew it was a medical experiment.
Most stuff is just tested in the wild.
People love to work at it so I guess you have a point.
____
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
gdewilde@gmail.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:09 am Post subject: Re: Faraday was a "Charlatan and a Fraud" |
|
|
On Oct 12, 9:59 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[quote]
You forgot the faerie dust ! It>s ESSENTIAL. Before 'big oil' killed him,
it>s rumoured Meyer had a new and better version.
[/quote]
Always Meyer bashing ahh Rabbit man?
You just love the smell of blood.
I guess you also believe Oswald did it.
And the terrorists attacked America!!
We must kill Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam!
It>s honorable!
Hail Petroslavery!
Death for all!
Hurray for the economic melt down!
Praise the ignorant fucks who made it so!
____
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
