| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
David Bostwick
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:40 pm Post subject: Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ? |
 |
|
In article <d40308df-1e33-4a0d-a4a2-a5723bfc9641@d70g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 10, 3:08 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf <Jeff_R...@Seattle.Invalid> wrote:
Suppose you stop collecting diplomas ..
who will you work for then ? a Nasdaq company ?
The spot-price for gold is now 916.75 USD per troy ounce
a 3.37-fold increase from the 272 USD/ounce at the start of 2000;
so Nasdaq, as measured in gold, lost 90** percent in ~9 years.
**: .90 = 1 - 1,645 / 3.37 / 5,050 ".
Why do you keep saying stupid things like 'nasdaq, as measured in
gold' ?
[/quote]
More stupider, why is this nonsense in sci.* groups? And why am I extending
the chain? |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Eric Gisse
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject: Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ? |
|
|
On Oct 10, 12:27 pm, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 10, 12:40 pm, david.bostw...@chemistry.gatech.edu (DavidBostwick) wrote:
Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why do you keep saying stupid things like 'nasdaq, as measured in
gold' ?
More stupider, why is this nonsense in sci.* groups?
Because it was alleged that physicists and other scientists hired by
wall street created the complex derivatives that if not caused,
certainly contributed to the crash by hiding bad debt under
mathematical complexity.
[/quote]
Was it 'alleged' by anyone not functionally retarded?
[quote]
And why am I extending the chain?
Because you don>t know better?[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
hanson
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6l7v6fFb76ljU2@mid.individual.net...
[quote]hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/0e705ad8f337fa0f?hl=en
wherein he adressed "spudnik" with:
Now that is an unusual and maybe novel idea
which slipped out of spud>s mind and menation
as he kicked up the dust in disdain and made
the Aether rise again and again....
To use the non-integral portions of the fractal
properties domain dimensions is a truly
interesting notion to probe for the existence of
an Aether.
Classical and Einsteinian laws use strictly the
integer powers of 2. But if you describe nature in
terms of fractal power values then exponents
of 1.99xxx and 2.001xxx, etc. etc. will occur. [1]
Dirk wrote:
Wusseeeee... Real Men use uncomputable numbers,
or at least primes, as the basis for their new
post Einstein physics.
hanson wrote:[/quote]
.... ahahaha... clarify your 3 line-3AM-dispatch...
as it sounds sexist and misogynic... ahahaha...
Does your intended conveyance of thought
refer to your suggestions in your post in
http://tinyurl.com/3nvmac
Are you prodding me to respond to that or is
that a new item that you are pointing at?
[quote]
hanson continued initally:
[1] So, what is that Aetheral thing that is, ....thus far
invisible and un-researched, ... looming, hovering
and stirring in the power domains of +/- 0.1xxx or
+/- 0.999xxx next to the integer of 2 ?
Cool, Aetheric notion, spud. Thanks!
hanson
PS:
Come to think of you are not really the first one
to stir up the dust that way in vain.. and make the
Aether, like the dust, rise again & again & again:
http://tinyurl.com/5x72j4 wherein the professor[/quote]
pontificated at length about:
[quote]**** "Consequences of the existence...
**** in a universe with less than one dimension”.
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jeffâ–˛Relf
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:23 am Post subject: Nasdaq turned 10 pounds of gold into just one, 9 years later |
|
|
If, at the start of 2000, you cashed in 10 pounds of gold
to buy a Nasdaq Composite fund .. then today, almost 9 years later,
you cashed out what>s left of that fund and used it to buy gold ..
... you>d have just one pound ( ignoring taxes, fees, etc. ).
Nasdaq turned 10 pounds of gold into just one, 9 years later.
Personally, I don>t see how you could fail to understand that. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jeffâ–˛Relf
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 6:47 am Post subject: Valuing assests based on earnings and management, not the ma |
|
|
There>s nothing complex about this latest popped-bubble.
When everyone is rich, fat, drunk and happy,
no one looks too closely at the fine print.
The same thing happened 20 years ago, durring the Savings&Loan Crisis;
McCain was a big part of that, even back then.
20 years from now, I expect it will happen all over again.
If people could be more disciplined ( ha ha ),
they>d value assests based on earnings and management, not the market.
No one asked:
“ How well are the houses being managed ?
have they been abandoned to squatters and looters ?
How much income/rent is being generated ? none ? ”. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
spudnik
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 7:11 pm Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
I forgot, where or what I wondered about fractal Ds.
anyway, I do not dyspute the need or existence
of an aether, since M&M *et al* found more
than "null = THE PHOTON is it>s own wave & medium!"
[quote]Come to think of you are not really the first one
to stir up the dust that way in vain.. and make the
Aether, like the dust, rise again & again & again:
http://tinyurl.com/5x72j4 .... or in
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.new-theories/msg/8a9db...
[/quote]
--USA out of Darfur Cruizade!
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3537willl_zardari_survive.html
--ROTC, your summer vacation in the Sahara Desert ( S u d a n ) ;
presage the Draft for your middleschool class of '12 --
brought to you by Allstate (tm) and Oxford U.Press!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080813moloch_brown.html
http://wlym.com
--Wikipedia deletes notice of nullification
of "preclearance rule" of Voting Rights Act
in LaRouche v. Fowler, March 27, 2000;
is the VRAo1965 a dead letter?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act#Pre-Clearance_2 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
mike3
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 9:51 pm Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
On Sep 27, 9:49 pm, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
[quote]ahahaha... ahahaha.. AHAHAHA... "Uncle rect-Al"
Uncle...@hate.spam.net> exited himself so bad
that his Beytsim fell off and gummed up his actas he wrote:
empirical idiot, fucking imbecile, piece of diversity shit
[because]
hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/4f4685f5cfaad8f5?hl=en>> Like air, sound & heat that you can>t see neither
it>s all around and it>s called Aether....
hanson wrote:
ahahaha... so, uncle rect-Al immediately performed 1 of
his Yiddisher street corner acts wherein he plays as an
"empirical idiot and fucking imbecile", here on his own
website:http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
and wherein uncle rect-Al finds and presents
"==http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 - No aether" =="
which is "a piece of diversity shit" that does not contain
the word "No" and much less the word "aether"... ahahaha...
[/quote]
But MME disproves Aether.
GOOGLE: "Michelson Morley Experiment Aether Disproof"
(no quotes)
Read, debunk:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment
<snip more uncivilized stuff. Geez, it seems there is very little
of that here from both sides> |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
hanson
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:36 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
Varney -"mike3" <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> excited and
aetherically cranked himself too as he wrote:
[quote]
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:[/quote]
ahahaha... ahahaha.. AHAHAHA... "Uncle rect-Al"
<Uncle...@hate.spam.net> exited himself so bad that
his Beytsim fell off and gummed up his act as he wrote:
http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 - "No aether"
empirical idiot, fucking imbecile, piece of diversity shit
[because]
[quote]
hanson wrote:[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/4f4685f5cfaad8f5?hl=en
Like air, sound & heat that you can>t see neither
it>s all around and it>s called Aether....
[quote]
hanson wrote:[/quote]
ahahaha... so, uncle rect-Al immediately performed 1 of
his Yiddisher street corner acts wherein he plays as an
"empirical idiot and fucking imbecile", here on his own
website: http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
and wherein uncle rect-Al finds and presents
"==http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 - No aether" =="
which is "a piece of diversity shit" that does NOT contain
the word "No" and much less the word "aether"... ahahaha...
[quote]
Excited Varney Mikey wrote:[/quote]
But MME disproves Aether.
GOOGLE: "Michelson Morley Experiment Aether Disproof"
(no quotes) Read, debunk:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-Morley_experiment
<snip more uncivilized stuff. Geez, it seems there is very little
of that here from both sides>
[quote]
hanson wrote:[/quote]
ahahahaha... See Varney, like the dust or chronic pain
... the Aether just does rise again and again and again
cuz MMX/MME only demonstrates that light spreads
equally in all directions... & proves nothing more then
that light spreads equally in all directions...
Live with THAT!...
.... and all the assumptions, hopes, conjectures and
insinuations that MME disproved an Aether.. well...
ahaha.. they are and remain just assumptions, hopes,
conjectures and insinuation... nothing more and nothing
less... ahaha... Get used to it...Live with it. AHAHAHA...
[quote]
Now tell me something NEW,... not regurgitated crap[/quote]
from the last century. **Physics didn>t stop in 1877**.
But thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahanson |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
spudnik
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:02 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
that dyscussion about pi-dimensional spaces was routinely bogus,
for you. you should only say,
their have to be *at least* three spatial dimensions
for flatlanders to exist, and AbbotAbbotAbbot.
[quote]than "null = THE PHOTON is it>s own wave & medium & zerodimensional moment"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.new-theories/msg/8a9db...
[/quote]
--USA out of Darfur Cruizade!
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3537willl_zardari_survive.html
--ROTC, your summer vacation in the Sahara Desert ( S u d a n ) ;
presage the Draft for your middleschool class of '12 --
brought to you by Allstate (tm) and Oxford U.Press!http://
larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080813moloch_brown.htmlhttp://wlym.com
--Wikipedia deletes notice of nullification
of "preclearance rule" of Voting Rights Act
in LaRouche v. Fowler, March 27, 2000;
is the VRAo1965 a dead letter?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Voting_Rights_Act#Pre-Clearance_2 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Androcles
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:31 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:eU9Ik.302$Rx2.116@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
[quote]Varney -"mike3" <mike4ty4@yahoo.com> excited and
aetherically cranked himself too as he wrote:
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
ahahaha... ahahaha.. AHAHAHA... "Uncle rect-Al"
Uncle...@hate.spam.net> exited himself so bad that
his Beytsim fell off and gummed up his act as he wrote:
http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031 - "No aether"
empirical idiot, fucking imbecile, piece of diversity shit
[because]
hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/4f4685f5cfaad8f5?hl=en
Like air, sound & heat that you can>t see neither
it>s all around and it>s called Aether....
[/quote]
Empirical idiot, fucking imbecile, piece of diversity shit (whatever that
is)
and cackling maniac. The word is "excited", cha-cha, "exited" means Elvis
has left the building. Aether is like your hair. It may look good but you
don>t really need it.
Give these guys a call and they>ll explain it to you:
http://www.advancedhairstudio.com/ |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
hanson
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:06 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote
$wG3.21259@newsfe23.ams2...
hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/4f4685f5cfaad8f5?hl=en
Like air, sound & heat that you can>t see neither
it>s all around and it>s called Aether....
[quote]
"Androcles" wrote:[/quote]
Aether is like your hair. It may look good but
you don>t really need it.
[quote]
hanson wrote: -- http://tinyurl.com/4q8qqb --[/quote]
ahahahaha... That>s right, you don>t "NEED" it.
But that doesn>t prove that there is no Aether...
NOT by any means.. Your fine argument is like
"A fish doesn>t need a bicycle".. The bicycle is
there whether the fish recognizes it or not...
[quote]
BTW, are you bald now, that you come up[/quote]
with your Aetheric reasoning?... ahahahaha...
The Aether has you really in its grip and makes
you come back to it.. again and again & again
ahahahaha.... AHAHAHA... ahahahanson |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Androcles
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 5:17 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:7cbIk.389$r_3.312@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
[quote]
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote
$wG3.21259@newsfe23.ams2...
hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/4f4685f5cfaad8f5?hl=en
Like air, sound & heat that you can>t see neither
it>s all around and it>s called Aether....
"Androcles" wrote:
Aether is like your hair. It may look good but
you don>t really need it.
hanson wrote: -- http://tinyurl.com/4q8qqb --
ahahahaha... That>s right, you don>t "NEED" it.
But that doesn>t prove that there is no Aether...
[/quote]
Burden of proof is upon the claimant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam>s_razor
[quote]NOT by any means.. Your fine argument is like
"A fish doesn>t need a bicycle".. The bicycle is
there whether the fish recognizes it or not...
BTW, are you bald now,
[/quote]
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/SRvNM.htm
You resemble Dork in many ways. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
hanson
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 6:24 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
news:YmbIk.17261$bq4.13127@newsfe15.ams2...
[quote]
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:7cbIk.389$r_3.312@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote
$wG3.21259@newsfe23.ams2...
hanson wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/4f4685f5cfaad8f5?hl=en
Like air, sound & heat that you can>t see neither
it>s all around and it>s called Aether....
"Androcles" wrote:
Aether is like your hair. It may look good but
you don>t really need it.
hanson wrote: -- http://tinyurl.com/4q8qqb --
ahahahaha... That>s right, you don>t "NEED" it.
But that doesn>t prove that there is no Aether...
NOT by any means.. Your fine argument is like
"A fish doesn>t need a bicycle".. The bicycle is
there whether the fish recognizes it or not...
"Androcles" wrote:
Burden of proof is upon the claimant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam>s_razor
hanson wrote:[/quote]
..... ahahahaha... No, Occam>s_razor has nothing
to do with any proof. O.R. merely suggests to make
a choice amongst the possibilities at hand
in/by/with your belief system... ahahaha..
OTOH, and I repast .. "The Aether has you really
in its grip and makes you come back to it.. again
and again & again" which you have demonstrated
by your numerous post in this thread. You now have
shown all by yourself: "Proof positive that Aether exists"
ahahahaha.... AHAHAHA... ahahahanson |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Androcles
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
Cha-cha cranked himself and laughed maniacally again:
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:9qgIk.376$Rx2.238@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
[quote]ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.... AHAHAHAHA...
[/quote]
Making phun of phuckheads is so much phuckin phun. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
hanson
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: Re: Aether>s polylogy |
|
|
ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.... AHAHAHAHA...
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote
nothing of consequence nor interest except that he
proved that the Aether that has a periodicity, shown
by Andro>s periodic reappearance in this discussion
because of Andro>s inability to withstand the grip that
the Aether has on him... and in the fact that that Andro
has approached AGAIN the aetheric level of this past
post: -------- http://tinyurl.com/48nybm -------------
[quote]
You are so slow on the uptake, Andro... So, long sucker![/quote]
ahahahaha... HAHAHA... ahahanson |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
