| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: Now, our famous geologist confuses continental rift and |
 |
|
On 7 oct, 07:21, "Sunny" <wombatlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]jpturc...@neuf.fr> wrote in message
news:e2851605-6f35-42c4-9f39-c57a49084252@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...> On 6 oct, 09:03, "George" <sterile dozy dolt idiot @george.net> wrote:
"Greatest Froggy fraud of all Times" <mining-non-pion...@neuf.fr
wrote in
messagenews:0e79c6b2-434d-4b65-a379-97c98b6ef0d0@v53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 5, 4:57 pm, J. Taylor <nchiw...@embarqmail.NOSPAM.com> wrote:
George
You fucking degenerate moron of Yates, you dare calling me a fraud ...
snip rest of Turcaud rave
He got the "Fraud" title exactly right.
[/quote]
.... amusing how the two gutless stinking Rats , Yates & Tyrwhitt>s son
"Sunny ze turd" get together. That type of toads of course needs a
slap in the mouth to get them running, and unfortutely that shit is
not within striking distance
They would not anyway since as I would appear the Yates -Tyrwhitt team
will cower quick back to their rats hole.
Hey squinting beasts, Tyrwhiit, Thomson, Koehn etc are not frauds ...
those shithead of Agassiz, Wegener, Einstein, Buckland, Darwin are
not frauds ... The Miing Criminals are not frauds .. that shamefess
fucking shithouse of West Australia Parliament with all those balless
sex sniffing sons of Bich inside is not frauds
Fucking sickening shit of Yates & Tyrwhittt Sunny, you would not know
day from night like most in that Land of Bastards australia if
required to say so
Anyway what does matter is the fact that the rivers in the LOB are
running dry, the sea is invading the land from beneath indeed, the
whole Murray Darling Dust Bowl is just that now and still more goodies
in the pipeline ! That 's excellent for a land of Criminal Rabble who
does not hesitate to squeeze through Collective Crimes a most gallant
Mining Man of everything even of the credit for all those discoveries
of which that Antipodean Manure benefits from nearly 40 years now.
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer
Discoverer of Telfer Mine ( Australia largest Copper & Gold MIne)
Nifty (Cu) & Kintyre (U, Th) Mines, all in the Great Sandy Desert
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile + 33 6 50 17 14 64
Office + 33 5 16 19 14 21
Founder of the True Geology
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~
for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html <http://www.tnet.com.au/
%7Ewarrigal/grule.html>
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/nac.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm <http://
members.iimetro.com.au/%7Ehubbca/turcaud.htm>
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm
True Geology Foundation document :
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/69327 |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Stuart
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
On Oct 8, 9:19 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
[quote]Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
On Oct 7, 11:51 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
What factual data?
The data summarized by Chudinov in Part 2 A of his book "Eduction
Concept of the Earth>s Expansion Theory " ISBN 9067642991
--
Ah well.
Thats what I get for checking the best seller list.
Looks like you>re denying more inconvenient data.
[/quote]
LOL.
Stuart |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Florian
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:19 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
Stuart <bigdakine@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 7, 11:51 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
What factual data?
The data summarized by Chudinov in Part 2 A of his book "Eduction
Concept of the Earth>s Expansion Theory " ISBN 9067642991
--
Ah well.
Thats what I get for checking the best seller list.
[/quote]
Looks like you>re denying more inconvenient data.
--
Florian
"Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D>abord elle est ridiculisée.
Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée
comme ayant toujours été une évidence." - Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Florian
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:19 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
George <George@george.net> wrote:
[quote]"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1iogmmv.11el5lhgz8tiaN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
Ron you brought the San andreas fault where as we were discussing
deformations of fractures in the middle of the pacific. I reminded you
that those fractures are scars left by transform faults between two
ridge segments, then you introduced the san andreas fault as an example
of fracture deformations...
It is an example of crustal deformation, a classic one at that.
[/quote]
Who cares! Don>t your understand you are out of the topic?
Fact is that there are no significant deformation in the midle of the
pacific, away from the boundaries.
--
Florian
"Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D>abord elle est ridiculisée.
Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée
comme ayant toujours été une évidence." - Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Florian
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
Stuart <bigdakine@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]Thats what I get for checking the best seller list.
Looks like you>re denying more inconvenient data.
LOL.
[/quote]
Yep, zero counter arguments. Thanks for confirming.
--
Florian
"Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D>abord elle est ridiculisée.
Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée
comme ayant toujours été une évidence." - Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Stuart
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 2:56 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
On Oct 8, 11:03 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
[quote]Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Thats what I get for checking the best seller list.
Looks like you>re denying more inconvenient data.
LOL.
Yep, zero counter arguments. Thanks for confirming.
[/quote]
Sorry, don>t have time to hunt down non-peer reviewed hard to
find resources.
So of us actually have a day job.
Stuart |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
George
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:37 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1ioibq3.1k15bofdl6r8cN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
[quote]George <George@george.net> wrote:
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1iogmmv.11el5lhgz8tiaN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
Ron you brought the San andreas fault where as we were discussing
deformations of fractures in the middle of the pacific. I reminded you
that those fractures are scars left by transform faults between two
ridge segments, then you introduced the san andreas fault as an example
of fracture deformations...
It is an example of crustal deformation, a classic one at that.
Who cares!
[/quote]
That>s amusing. When confronted with evidence you can>t deny, you decide
that it doesn>t matter. How disingenuous of you.
[quote]Don>t your understand you are out of the topic?
Fact is that there are no significant deformation in the midle of the
pacific, away from the boundaries.
[/quote]
Define "significant". Relative to the boundaries, it is true that the
deformation is insignificant. That doesn>t mean that there is no
deformation, Flopsy. There is deformation - plenty of it, in fact.
George |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Peter Jason
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:54 am Post subject: Re: Now, our famous geologist confuses continental rift and |
|
|
As usual, engineers will solve the problem as soon as the
venal politicians and the craven lawyers get out of the way.
The solution can be found by copying the oil industry,
namely pipelines.
If do the Google Earth thing and observe the Murray River
you will see that it meanders to a great extent, thereby
losing vast amounts of water to seepage & evaporation, and
contamination too.
There>s nothing new in all this, as can be seen from studies
and engineering of the Nile river in Africa.
If the Yanks can build oil pipelines across Alaska, and the
Russians across Siberia, why the hell can>t we build a
straight pipeline along the Murray and so put the foetid
trickle underground? No more water losses, which can then
be metered and allocated to stop the farmers stealing it.
In times of flood all the water can follow the river>s
normal course.
Come to think of it, if they can build the Ghan Railroad up
to Darwin from Adelaide in record time, why not run a
pipeline on an easement along side the railroad tracks up to
the swamps in some national park or other. Solar-driven
pumps along the way will do the job.
Of course the lawyers lie in wait, like leeches in the tall
grass, to take up some green/conservation cause which will
put the whole project forward 50 years!
[quote]Anyway what does matter is the fact that the rivers in the
LOB are
running dry, the sea is invading the land from beneath
indeed, the
whole Murray Darling Dust Bowl is just that now and still
more goodies
in the pipeline ! That 's excellent for a land of Criminal
Rabble who
does not hesitate to squeeze through Collective Crimes a
most gallant
Mining Man of everything even of the credit for all those
discoveries
of which that Antipodean Manure benefits from nearly 40
years now.
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
battler in the back block
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject: Re: Now, our famous geologist confuses continental rift and |
|
|
"Peter Jason" <pj@jostle.com> wrote in message
news:mKidnRnaCIva5nDVnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@netspace.net.au...
[quote]As usual, engineers will solve the problem as soon as the venal
politicians and the craven lawyers get out of the way.
The solution can be found by copying the oil industry, namely pipelines.
If do the Google Earth thing and observe the Murray River you will see
that it meanders to a great extent, thereby losing vast amounts of water
to seepage & evaporation, and contamination too.
There>s nothing new in all this, as can be seen from studies and
engineering of the Nile river in Africa.
If the Yanks can build oil pipelines across Alaska, and the Russians
across Siberia, why the hell can>t we build a straight pipeline along the
Murray and so put the foetid trickle underground? No more water losses,
which can then be metered and allocated to stop the farmers stealing it.
In times of flood all the water can follow the river>s normal course.
Yeah you gotta stop those sly bloody farmers from stealing the water.[/quote]
Doesn>t matter that they have to pay a fortune for water allocations every
year wether they are able to get it to use or not. Why not get rid of all
the farmers full stop? Go back to throwing sticks around.
[quote]
Come to think of it, if they can build the Ghan Railroad up to Darwin from
Adelaide in record time, why not run a pipeline on an easement along side
the railroad tracks up to the swamps in some national park or other.
Solar-driven pumps along the way will do the job.
Of course the lawyers lie in wait, like leeches in the tall grass, to take
up some green/conservation cause which will put the whole project forward
50 years!
Anyway what does matter is the fact that the rivers in the LOB are
running dry, the sea is invading the land from beneath indeed, the
whole Murray Darling Dust Bowl is just that now and still more goodies
in the pipeline ! That 's excellent for a land of Criminal Rabble who
does not hesitate to squeeze through Collective Crimes a most gallant
Mining Man of everything even of the credit for all those discoveries
of which that Antipodean Manure benefits from nearly 40 years now.
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Stuart
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
On Oct 9, 11:13 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
[quote]Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Sorry, don>t have time to hunt down non-peer reviewed hard to
find resources.
Lazy boy. The references are peer reviewed.
[/quote]
But the book isn>t. Right?
Stuart |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Florian
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:10 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
George <George@george.net> wrote:
[quote]"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1ioibq3.1k15bofdl6r8cN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
George <George@george.net> wrote:
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1iogmmv.11el5lhgz8tiaN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
Ron you brought the San andreas fault where as we were discussing
deformations of fractures in the middle of the pacific. I reminded you
that those fractures are scars left by transform faults between two
ridge segments, then you introduced the san andreas fault as an example
of fracture deformations...
It is an example of crustal deformation, a classic one at that.
Who cares!
That>s amusing. When confronted with evidence you can>t deny, you decide
that it doesn>t matter. How disingenuous of you.
[/quote]
Idiot, deformations at transform faults are out of topic when discussing
deformations far from boundaries.
[quote]Don>t your understand you are out of the topic?
Fact is that there are no significant deformation in the midle of the
pacific, away from the boundaries.
Define "significant". Relative to the boundaries, it is true that the
deformation is insignificant.
[/quote]
Finally. It>s gonna snow frogs...
[quote]That doesn>t mean that there is no
deformation, Flopsy. There is deformation - plenty of it, in fact.
[/quote]
....or not. Those deformations are not significant. Period.
--
Florian
"Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D>abord elle est ridiculisée.
Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée
comme ayant toujours été une évidence." - Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Florian
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:13 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
Stuart <bigdakine@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]Sorry, don>t have time to hunt down non-peer reviewed hard to
find resources.
[/quote]
Lazy boy. The references are peer reviewed.
check again: ISBN 9067642991
--
Florian
"Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D>abord elle est ridiculisée.
Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée
comme ayant toujours été une évidence." - Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
George
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:58 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1iokex0.1ht2oo11iw6e2jN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
[quote]George <George@george.net> wrote:
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in message
news:1ioibq3.1k15bofdl6r8cN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
George <George@george.net> wrote:
"Florian" <auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net> wrote in
message
news:1iogmmv.11el5lhgz8tiaN%auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net...
Ron you brought the San andreas fault where as we were discussing
deformations of fractures in the middle of the pacific. I reminded
you
that those fractures are scars left by transform faults between two
ridge segments, then you introduced the san andreas fault as an
example
of fracture deformations...
It is an example of crustal deformation, a classic one at that.
Who cares!
That>s amusing. When confronted with evidence you can>t deny, you decide
that it doesn>t matter. How disingenuous of you.
Idiot, deformations at transform faults are out of topic when discussing
deformations far from boundaries.
[/quote]
Since there are plenty of transform faults extending far from boundaries
into the interiors of plates, they certainly are completely relevant to
intraplate deformation.
[quote]Don>t your understand you are out of the topic?
Fact is that there are no significant deformation in the midle of the
pacific, away from the boundaries.
Define "significant". Relative to the boundaries, it is true that the
deformation is insignificant.
Finally. It>s gonna snow frogs...
That doesn>t mean that there is no
deformation, Flopsy. There is deformation - plenty of it, in fact.
...or not. Those deformations are not significant. Period.
[/quote]
No?
http://igs.indiana.edu/geology/earthquakes/eqInIndiana/index.cfm
http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/feb25/articles32.htm
http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/cgi/content/abstract/149/6/955
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AGUFM.T23B1422H
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=624&page=30
No significant intraplate deformation, eh? Care to rephrase your bullshit
statement?
George |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Stuart
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
On Oct 10, 9:30 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
[quote]Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
On Oct 9, 11:13 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Sorry, don>t have time to hunt down non-peer reviewed hard to
find resources.
Lazy boy. The references are peer reviewed.
But the book isn>t. Right?
A peer-reviewed book?
Dude, learn the difference between a book and proceedings.
[/quote]
I do, having edited one.
[quote]
Anyway, the references in the book are peer-reviewed.
[/quote]
Anyway, the references are not accessible online. Nor can I find the
book.
Stuart |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Florian
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:30 am Post subject: Re: Where did the extra mass come from? |
|
|
Stuart <bigdakine@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 9, 11:13 am, auxotectonics_deletethis@nachon_andthis.net
(Florian) wrote:
Stuart <bigdak...@aol.com> wrote:
Sorry, don>t have time to hunt down non-peer reviewed hard to
find resources.
Lazy boy. The references are peer reviewed.
But the book isn>t. Right?
[/quote]
A peer-reviewed book?
Dude, learn the difference between a book and proceedings.
Anyway, the references in the book are peer-reviewed.
--
Florian
"Toute vérité franchit trois étapes. D>abord elle est ridiculisée.
Ensuite, elle subit une forte opposition. Puis, elle est considérée
comme ayant toujours été une évidence." - Arthur Schopenhauer |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
