| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ozobn
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:00 am Post subject: The Nasty Propaganda Tricks Used To Push Global Warming Scam |
 |
|
Yes, Global Warming "Is Just Propaganda"
Nigel Calder
October 4 2008
QUOTE: But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable increase of
CO2 in the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
Besides being a former editor of New Scientist, Nigel Calder has written
three books on climate change. His latest is The Chilling Stars (Icon
Books) co-authored with the Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark and
described by The Times as 'the new totem of the climate-change
sceptics'.
Worldwide interest in my quite run-of-the-mill comment, on the need to
debate the manmade global warming hypothesis, is pleasing but not
surprising. It confirms that my fellow science writers have
miscalculated badly. Most readers don>t want endless scare stories about
climatic doom, accompanied by authoritarian lectures about their carbon
footprints. They>re hungry for a variety of opinions.
Unfortunately only 1% of the huge number of articles on climate change
in the posh London newspapers deviate from the official line of the
IPCC. That>s not my reckoning. It comes from researchers at Oxford
University who complain about the more balanced reporting in the
not-so-posh papers, with a deviancy rate of 23%. They say it has 'skewed
public understanding of human contributions to climate change'. In other
words, kindly abandon the journalistic principle that different points
of views should be heard on controversial matters, or else a lot of
dreadful people out there (you or me) may not truly believe that climate
change is their fault.
Yes, you>ve got it. Man-made global warming is just propaganda. My
father Ritchie Calder was a science writer too, but during the Second
World War he played a leading part in Allied propaganda against Nazi
Germany. He told me quite a lot about the tricks, employed in what was
then a good cause. Now I watch them being used every day by the global
wamers.
For example: exaggerate small facts. A brilliant wartime example came
when someone in occupied Belgium was chalking V on public walls. He
meant V for Vrijheid, or freedom. But London announced that in occupied
Europe people were writing V for Victory everywhere. So people listening
secretly to the BBC went out and did just that, to annoy the Germans and
hearten their neighbours.
The polar bears qualify as a similarly astute exaggeration from the
global warming camp. Some years ago, a small family of bears was caught
in a violent storm, and drowned. That could have happened a hundred or a
thousand years ago. But no, the Disneyesque sob story is put about, by
Al Gore and others, that bears are drowning because the Arctic ice is
melting. Total rubbish, because the polar bears are thriving. But it>s
dazzling propaganda.
Another technique is to hush up unfavourable news. In wartime that can
mean not informing even the bereaved relatives if an important warship
has sunk without the enemy knowing. Again the polar ice provides a
modern parallel. Last year you were told - shock, horror! -- that Arctic
sea ice was at its lowest extent since satellite measurements began.
What went unreported was that Antarctic sea ice was simultaneously at a
record high. The collusion of my fellow journalists in the deception is
disturbing. Although the big freeze in Antarctica was plainly announced
in a press release from the US weather bureau, NOAA, not a single
newspaper in North America or Europe carried this unfavourable story.
My Dad>s chief opponent was Hitler>s propaganda minister Josef Goebbels.
Among many meditations on his craft, he wrote, 'The English follow the
principle that when you lie, you should lie big, and stick to it.' And
of course Goebbels did the same himself - most wickedly in the case of
the Jews.
One big lie about climate change is that man-made global warming is
proven scientifically. Not so. On the contrary, any objective physicist
would say that the evidence is strongly against it. The very mechanism
for the supposed greenhouse warming, reinforced by that extra CO2,
requires tropical air temperatures to rise faster at high altitudes (6
miles above the ground) than they do lower down. Weather balloons that
routinely carry thermometers to those heights and beyond have shown no
such trend over recent decades.
That negative result was an important element of what I had in mind when
remarking, in my comment last Monday, that the scientific evidence is
far stronger for a rival explanation of climate change. It>s the
discovery that the Sun controls the cosmic rays that help to make the
Earth>s clouds. The supporting observations and experiments are
explained in simple terms by Dr Henrik Svensmark and me in our book The
Chilling Stars.
The biggest lie of all, breathtaking in its audacity, is the insistence
that mankind>s misbehaviour means that global warming is getting worse.
The measurements for August 2008 are just in, and they confirm the world
is distinctly cooler this year than last. It>s fair enough to argue
about whether the Earth>s temperature has stopped rising, or merely
paused, or gone into reverse.
But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable increase of CO2 in
the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1906
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"IPCC staff is working feverishly on a theory that supports global
cooling as proof of global warming. Stay tuned." Addison Gardner |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
bozno
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:39 am Post subject: Re: The Nasty Propaganda Tricks Used To Push Global Warming |
|
|
"Lloyd" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:f7e35a14-74a6-48f6-8b28-ad2d3dba2a9a@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 5:17 pm, "DeadFrog" <DeadF...@Virgin.net> wrote:
[quote]"chemist" <tom-bol...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ac65c0b6-2abe-43b1-a534-afe6a6186f54@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 3:00 am, "ozobn" <oz...@yyy.com> wrote:
Yes, Global Warming "Is Just Propaganda"
Nigel Calder
October 4 2008
QUOTE: But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable increase
of
CO2 in the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
Besides being a former editor of New Scientist, Nigel Calder has
written
three books on climate change. His latest is The Chilling Stars
(Icon
Books) co-authored with the Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark and
described by The Times as 'the new totem of the climate-change
sceptics'.
Worldwide interest in my quite run-of-the-mill comment, on the need
to
debate the manmade global warming hypothesis, is pleasing but not
surprising. It confirms that my fellow science writers have
miscalculated badly. Most readers don>t want endless scare stories
about
climatic doom, accompanied by authoritarian lectures about their
carbon
footprints. They>re hungry for a variety of opinions.
Unfortunately only 1% of the huge number of articles on climate
change
in the posh London newspapers deviate from the official line of the
IPCC. That>s not my reckoning. It comes from researchers at Oxford
University who complain about the more balanced reporting in the
not-so-posh papers, with a deviancy rate of 23%. They say it has
'skewed
public understanding of human contributions to climate change'. In
other
words, kindly abandon the journalistic principle that different
points
of views should be heard on controversial matters, or else a lot of
dreadful people out there (you or me) may not truly believe that
climate
change is their fault.
Yes, you>ve got it. Man-made global warming is just propaganda. My
father Ritchie Calder was a science writer too, but during the
Second
World War he played a leading part in Allied propaganda against Nazi
Germany. He told me quite a lot about the tricks, employed in what
was
then a good cause. Now I watch them being used every day by the
global
wamers.
For example: exaggerate small facts. A brilliant wartime example
came
when someone in occupied Belgium was chalking V on public walls. He
meant V for Vrijheid, or freedom. But London announced that in
occupied
Europe people were writing V for Victory everywhere. So people
listening
secretly to the BBC went out and did just that, to annoy the Germans
and
hearten their neighbours.
The polar bears qualify as a similarly astute exaggeration from the
global warming camp. Some years ago, a small family of bears was
caught
in a violent storm, and drowned. That could have happened a hundred
or a
thousand years ago. But no, the Disneyesque sob story is put about,
by
Al Gore and others, that bears are drowning because the Arctic ice
is
melting. Total rubbish, because the polar bears are thriving. But
it>s
dazzling propaganda.
Another technique is to hush up unfavourable news. In wartime that
can
mean not informing even the bereaved relatives if an important
warship
has sunk without the enemy knowing. Again the polar ice provides a
modern parallel. Last year you were told - shock, horror! -- that
Arctic
sea ice was at its lowest extent since satellite measurements began.
What went unreported was that Antarctic sea ice was simultaneously
at a
record high. The collusion of my fellow journalists in the deception
is
disturbing. Although the big freeze in Antarctica was plainly
announced
in a press release from the US weather bureau, NOAA, not a single
newspaper in North America or Europe carried this unfavourable
story.
My Dad>s chief opponent was Hitler>s propaganda minister Josef
Goebbels.
Among many meditations on his craft, he wrote, 'The English follow
the
principle that when you lie, you should lie big, and stick to it.'
And
of course Goebbels did the same himself - most wickedly in the case
of
the Jews.
One big lie about climate change is that man-made global warming is
proven scientifically. Not so. On the contrary, any objective
physicist
would say that the evidence is strongly against it. The very
mechanism
for the supposed greenhouse warming, reinforced by that extra CO2,
requires tropical air temperatures to rise faster at high altitudes
(6
miles above the ground) than they do lower down. Weather balloons
that
routinely carry thermometers to those heights and beyond have shown
no
such trend over recent decades.
That negative result was an important element of what I had in mind
when
remarking, in my comment last Monday, that the scientific evidence
is
far stronger for a rival explanation of climate change. It>s the
discovery that the Sun controls the cosmic rays that help to make
the
Earth>s clouds. The supporting observations and experiments are
explained in simple terms by Dr Henrik Svensmark and me in our book
The
Chilling Stars.
The biggest lie of all, breathtaking in its audacity, is the
insistence
that mankind>s misbehaviour means that global warming is getting
worse.
The measurements for August 2008 are just in, and they confirm the
world
is distinctly cooler this year than last. It>s fair enough to argue
about whether the Earth>s temperature has stopped rising, or merely
paused, or gone into reverse.
But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable increase of CO2
in
the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1906
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"IPCC staff is working feverishly on a theory that supports global
cooling as proof of global warming. Stay tuned." Addison Gardner
I believe that CO2 has risen due to the higher sea temperatures
Uh, the oceans are gaining CO2, not losing it.[/quote]
******************************************
I presume you have a reference for this wild statement?
Don>t keep it to yourself, share it with the rest of us!
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"One thing lefties cannot abide is any hint of Christian religion. New
Age yes, Muslim yes, vague yoga-nistics sure, Mother Earth and soaring
hawks as spiritual messengers absolutely, but Christianity? Not a
chance." Anon |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
obozn
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:54 am Post subject: Re: The Nasty Propaganda Tricks Used To Push Global Warming |
|
|
"Lloyd" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:00b8ac3a-e322-474e-a193-dfc14624e956@v28g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 7:39 pm, "bozno" <bo...@u.com> wrote:
[quote]"Lloyd" <lpar...@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:f7e35a14-74a6-48f6-8b28-ad2d3dba2a9a@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 5:17 pm, "DeadFrog" <DeadF...@Virgin.net> wrote:
"chemist" <tom-bol...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ac65c0b6-2abe-43b1-a534-afe6a6186f54@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 3:00 am, "ozobn" <oz...@yyy.com> wrote:
Yes, Global Warming "Is Just Propaganda"
Nigel Calder
October 4 2008
QUOTE: But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable
increase
of
CO2 in the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years
ago.
Besides being a former editor of New Scientist, Nigel Calder has
written
three books on climate change. His latest is The Chilling Stars
(Icon
Books) co-authored with the Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark and
described by The Times as 'the new totem of the climate-change
sceptics'.
Worldwide interest in my quite run-of-the-mill comment, on the
need
to
debate the manmade global warming hypothesis, is pleasing but not
surprising. It confirms that my fellow science writers have
miscalculated badly. Most readers don>t want endless scare stories
about
climatic doom, accompanied by authoritarian lectures about their
carbon
footprints. They>re hungry for a variety of opinions.
Unfortunately only 1% of the huge number of articles on climate
change
in the posh London newspapers deviate from the official line of
the
IPCC. That>s not my reckoning. It comes from researchers at Oxford
University who complain about the more balanced reporting in the
not-so-posh papers, with a deviancy rate of 23%. They say it has
'skewed
public understanding of human contributions to climate change'. In
other
words, kindly abandon the journalistic principle that different
points
of views should be heard on controversial matters, or else a lot
of
dreadful people out there (you or me) may not truly believe that
climate
change is their fault.
Yes, you>ve got it. Man-made global warming is just propaganda. My
father Ritchie Calder was a science writer too, but during the
Second
World War he played a leading part in Allied propaganda against
Nazi
Germany. He told me quite a lot about the tricks, employed in what
was
then a good cause. Now I watch them being used every day by the
global
wamers.
For example: exaggerate small facts. A brilliant wartime example
came
when someone in occupied Belgium was chalking V on public walls.
He
meant V for Vrijheid, or freedom. But London announced that in
occupied
Europe people were writing V for Victory everywhere. So people
listening
secretly to the BBC went out and did just that, to annoy the
Germans
and
hearten their neighbours.
The polar bears qualify as a similarly astute exaggeration from
the
global warming camp. Some years ago, a small family of bears was
caught
in a violent storm, and drowned. That could have happened a
hundred
or a
thousand years ago. But no, the Disneyesque sob story is put
about,
by
Al Gore and others, that bears are drowning because the Arctic ice
is
melting. Total rubbish, because the polar bears are thriving. But
it>s
dazzling propaganda.
Another technique is to hush up unfavourable news. In wartime that
can
mean not informing even the bereaved relatives if an important
warship
has sunk without the enemy knowing. Again the polar ice provides a
modern parallel. Last year you were told - shock, horror! -- that
Arctic
sea ice was at its lowest extent since satellite measurements
began.
What went unreported was that Antarctic sea ice was simultaneously
at a
record high. The collusion of my fellow journalists in the
deception
is
disturbing. Although the big freeze in Antarctica was plainly
announced
in a press release from the US weather bureau, NOAA, not a single
newspaper in North America or Europe carried this unfavourable
story.
My Dad>s chief opponent was Hitler>s propaganda minister Josef
Goebbels.
Among many meditations on his craft, he wrote, 'The English follow
the
principle that when you lie, you should lie big, and stick to it.'
And
of course Goebbels did the same himself - most wickedly in the
case
of
the Jews.
One big lie about climate change is that man-made global warming
is
proven scientifically. Not so. On the contrary, any objective
physicist
would say that the evidence is strongly against it. The very
mechanism
for the supposed greenhouse warming, reinforced by that extra CO2,
requires tropical air temperatures to rise faster at high
altitudes
(6
miles above the ground) than they do lower down. Weather balloons
that
routinely carry thermometers to those heights and beyond have
shown
no
such trend over recent decades.
That negative result was an important element of what I had in
mind
when
remarking, in my comment last Monday, that the scientific evidence
is
far stronger for a rival explanation of climate change. It>s the
discovery that the Sun controls the cosmic rays that help to make
the
Earth>s clouds. The supporting observations and experiments are
explained in simple terms by Dr Henrik Svensmark and me in our
book
The
Chilling Stars.
The biggest lie of all, breathtaking in its audacity, is the
insistence
that mankind>s misbehaviour means that global warming is getting
worse.
The measurements for August 2008 are just in, and they confirm the
world
is distinctly cooler this year than last. It>s fair enough to
argue
about whether the Earth>s temperature has stopped rising, or
merely
paused, or gone into reverse.
But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable increase of
CO2
in
the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1906
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"IPCC staff is working feverishly on a theory that supports global
cooling as proof of global warming. Stay tuned." Addison Gardner
I believe that CO2 has risen due to the higher sea temperatures
Uh, the oceans are gaining CO2, not losing it.
******************************************
I presume you have a reference for this wild statement?
Don>t keep it to yourself, share it with the rest of us!
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"One thing lefties cannot abide is any hint of Christian religion. New
Age yes, Muslim yes, vague yoga-nistics sure, Mother Earth and soaring
hawks as spiritual messengers absolutely, but Christianity? Not a
chance." Anon
"Around half of all carbon dioxide produced by humans since the[/quote]
industrial revolution has dissolved into the world>s oceans—with
adverse effects for marine life—according to two new studies.
******************************************************
Did You Know...?
27 Jan 2008
The world>s natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions
annually than all human sources combined.
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/A4a.html
So much for your bunkum statement above!
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"CO2 variations show little correlation with our planet>s climate on
long, medium and even short time scales." R. Timothy Patterson,
Professor Of Geology, Director Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Center,
Carleton University, Canada000/200001271631.html |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
John M.
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: Re: The Nasty Propaganda Tricks Used To Push Global Warming |
|
|
On Oct 10, 5:22 am, maur...@tpg.com.au (Mauried) wrote:
[quote]
What happens to the CO2 in the atmosphere that isnt produced by
humans.
Does that get dissolved in the oceans as well, or are the oceans smart
enuf to only allow human produced CO2 to dissolve in them.
In fact why is there any CO2 in the atmosphere at all.
Why isnt it all dissolved in the oceans.
[/quote]
Oxygen and nitrogen also have measurable solubility in ocean water. Do
you have a similar question concerning these two gases? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Whata Fool
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: Re: The Nasty Propaganda Tricks Used To Push Global Warming |
|
|
mauried@tpg.com.au (Mauried) wrote:
[quote]What happens to the CO2 in the atmosphere that isnt produced by
humans.
Does that get dissolved in the oceans as well, or are the oceans smart
enuf to only allow human produced CO2 to dissolve in them.
In fact why is there any CO2 in the atmosphere at all.
Why isnt it all dissolved in the oceans.
[/quote]
The total mass of the oceans has not changed measurably, it is
mostly very cold, and any expectation of falling atmospheric CO2
concentrations is not rational.
Rain apparently does absorb CO2 if the pH of rain water is
between 5 and 6 compared to ocean water at about 8, what else could
make rain water acidic.
The fact that rainwater and ground water creates rocks suggests
that carbonates result from atmospheric CO2 to some extent.
The total mass of vegetation could increase enough that the annual
cycle of atmospheric CO2 is great enough to handle the amount put there
by man after the natural absorption by rain and surface waters.
There still is not enough effect that can be identified as
being caused by the increased atmospheric CO2 concentration to say for
sure anything at all with certainty.
If the August, 2008 anomaly of -0.010 is correct, either CO2 in
the atmosphere does not affect temperatures or actually causes cooling. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mauried
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: Re: The Nasty Propaganda Tricks Used To Push Global Warming |
|
|
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:54:38 +1100, "obozn" <obozn@v.com> wrote:
[quote]
"Lloyd" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:00b8ac3a-e322-474e-a193-dfc14624e956@v28g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 7, 7:39 pm, "bozno" <bo...@u.com> wrote:
"Lloyd" <lpar...@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:f7e35a14-74a6-48f6-8b28-ad2d3dba2a9a@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 5:17 pm, "DeadFrog" <DeadF...@Virgin.net> wrote:
"chemist" <tom-bol...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ac65c0b6-2abe-43b1-a534-afe6a6186f54@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 6, 3:00 am, "ozobn" <oz...@yyy.com> wrote:
Yes, Global Warming "Is Just Propaganda"
Nigel Calder
October 4 2008
QUOTE: But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable
increase
of
CO2 in the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years
ago.
Besides being a former editor of New Scientist, Nigel Calder has
written
three books on climate change. His latest is The Chilling Stars
(Icon
Books) co-authored with the Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark and
described by The Times as 'the new totem of the climate-change
sceptics'.
Worldwide interest in my quite run-of-the-mill comment, on the
need
to
debate the manmade global warming hypothesis, is pleasing but not
surprising. It confirms that my fellow science writers have
miscalculated badly. Most readers don>t want endless scare stories
about
climatic doom, accompanied by authoritarian lectures about their
carbon
footprints. They>re hungry for a variety of opinions.
Unfortunately only 1% of the huge number of articles on climate
change
in the posh London newspapers deviate from the official line of
the
IPCC. That>s not my reckoning. It comes from researchers at Oxford
University who complain about the more balanced reporting in the
not-so-posh papers, with a deviancy rate of 23%. They say it has
'skewed
public understanding of human contributions to climate change'. In
other
words, kindly abandon the journalistic principle that different
points
of views should be heard on controversial matters, or else a lot
of
dreadful people out there (you or me) may not truly believe that
climate
change is their fault.
Yes, you>ve got it. Man-made global warming is just propaganda. My
father Ritchie Calder was a science writer too, but during the
Second
World War he played a leading part in Allied propaganda against
Nazi
Germany. He told me quite a lot about the tricks, employed in what
was
then a good cause. Now I watch them being used every day by the
global
wamers.
For example: exaggerate small facts. A brilliant wartime example
came
when someone in occupied Belgium was chalking V on public walls.
He
meant V for Vrijheid, or freedom. But London announced that in
occupied
Europe people were writing V for Victory everywhere. So people
listening
secretly to the BBC went out and did just that, to annoy the
Germans
and
hearten their neighbours.
The polar bears qualify as a similarly astute exaggeration from
the
global warming camp. Some years ago, a small family of bears was
caught
in a violent storm, and drowned. That could have happened a
hundred
or a
thousand years ago. But no, the Disneyesque sob story is put
about,
by
Al Gore and others, that bears are drowning because the Arctic ice
is
melting. Total rubbish, because the polar bears are thriving. But
it>s
dazzling propaganda.
Another technique is to hush up unfavourable news. In wartime that
can
mean not informing even the bereaved relatives if an important
warship
has sunk without the enemy knowing. Again the polar ice provides a
modern parallel. Last year you were told - shock, horror! -- that
Arctic
sea ice was at its lowest extent since satellite measurements
began.
What went unreported was that Antarctic sea ice was simultaneously
at a
record high. The collusion of my fellow journalists in the
deception
is
disturbing. Although the big freeze in Antarctica was plainly
announced
in a press release from the US weather bureau, NOAA, not a single
newspaper in North America or Europe carried this unfavourable
story.
My Dad>s chief opponent was Hitler>s propaganda minister Josef
Goebbels.
Among many meditations on his craft, he wrote, 'The English follow
the
principle that when you lie, you should lie big, and stick to it.'
And
of course Goebbels did the same himself - most wickedly in the
case
of
the Jews.
One big lie about climate change is that man-made global warming
is
proven scientifically. Not so. On the contrary, any objective
physicist
would say that the evidence is strongly against it. The very
mechanism
for the supposed greenhouse warming, reinforced by that extra CO2,
requires tropical air temperatures to rise faster at high
altitudes
(6
miles above the ground) than they do lower down. Weather balloons
that
routinely carry thermometers to those heights and beyond have
shown
no
such trend over recent decades.
That negative result was an important element of what I had in
mind
when
remarking, in my comment last Monday, that the scientific evidence
is
far stronger for a rival explanation of climate change. It>s the
discovery that the Sun controls the cosmic rays that help to make
the
Earth>s clouds. The supporting observations and experiments are
explained in simple terms by Dr Henrik Svensmark and me in our
book
The
Chilling Stars.
The biggest lie of all, breathtaking in its audacity, is the
insistence
that mankind>s misbehaviour means that global warming is getting
worse.
The measurements for August 2008 are just in, and they confirm the
world
is distinctly cooler this year than last. It>s fair enough to
argue
about whether the Earth>s temperature has stopped rising, or
merely
paused, or gone into reverse.
But the key fact is that, despite that indisputable increase of
CO2
in
the air, the Earth is no warmer now than it was 12 years ago.
http://co2sceptics.com/news.php?id=1906
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"IPCC staff is working feverishly on a theory that supports global
cooling as proof of global warming. Stay tuned." Addison Gardner
I believe that CO2 has risen due to the higher sea temperatures
Uh, the oceans are gaining CO2, not losing it.
******************************************
I presume you have a reference for this wild statement?
Don>t keep it to yourself, share it with the rest of us!
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"One thing lefties cannot abide is any hint of Christian religion. New
Age yes, Muslim yes, vague yoga-nistics sure, Mother Earth and soaring
hawks as spiritual messengers absolutely, but Christianity? Not a
chance." Anon
"Around half of all carbon dioxide produced by humans since the
industrial revolution has dissolved into the world>s oceans—with
adverse effects for marine life—according to two new studies.
******************************************************
Did You Know...?
27 Jan 2008
The world>s natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions
annually than all human sources combined.
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/A4a.html
So much for your bunkum statement above!
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"CO2 variations show little correlation with our planet>s climate on
long, medium and even short time scales." R. Timothy Patterson,
Professor Of Geology, Director Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Center,
Carleton University, Canada000/200001271631.html
[/quote]
What happens to the CO2 in the atmosphere that isnt produced by
humans.
Does that get dissolved in the oceans as well, or are the oceans smart
enuf to only allow human produced CO2 to dissolve in them.
In fact why is there any CO2 in the atmosphere at all.
Why isnt it all dissolved in the oceans. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
