Science and Technology news... :: View topic - Intel rejects Vista, will stay with XP and wait for windows7

Guest · Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: Re: Young Earth

donald wrote:

[quote]LOL, isn>t this fun.

Pick you favorite dogma:

http://www.godchecker.com/

donald
[/quote]
My favorite is missing.
http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/index.php?_search-results=Y&name=Flying+Spaghetti+Monster
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

donald · Guest

me@privacy.net wrote:
[quote]donald wrote:

LOL, isn>t this fun.

Pick you favorite dogma:

http://www.godchecker.com/

donald

My favorite is missing.
http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/index.php?_search-results=Y&name=Flying+Spaghetti+Monster
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

[/quote]
Thank you for this me.

I had lost track of the site a few years ago.

donald

PS: I am an Atheist.
I am the worst kind.
I know why I am an Atheist.

Its a shame the "believers" don>t know why they are "believers".

JosephKK · Guest

On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:06:11 -0700, "BobW"
<nimby_GIMME_SOME_SPAM@roadrunner.com> wrote:

[quote]
"JosephKK" <quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:khtqe496g59ta0c44h66l5gehhcptnn87b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:46:10 -0700, "BobW"
nimby_GIMME_SOME_SPAM@roadrunner.com> wrote:

"Hattori Hanzo" <OutintheSnow@billsbackyard.org> wrote in message
news:t6voe4pt65s55ifd8tgcfuks71esattmnd@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:45:01 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com
wrote:

Will pay reasonable shipping costs - but please ask only if you can
use a given item set.

Take your SPAM to an appropriate SALES group, IDIOT!

Bad economy brings all the utter idiots out of the woodwork! You are
one such idiot. Stop filling the group with your putrifications.

You call a person who is giving away equipment AND paying for the shipping
costs a spammer and an idiot? You are not a smart man, Hattori.

Bob

That is just AlwaysWrong. I did see your reply.

What>s an "AlwaysWrong"? Is he just some lonely troll looking for the
attention he never received as a child?

Bob
[/quote]
Yep. Has about two dozen nyms now. Earned the appellation, which is
quite a feat.

JosephKK · Guest

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:05:51 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:

[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:00:41 -0400, Ben Bradley wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:34:46 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
JosephKK wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 18:29:44 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:53:47 GMT, Jan Panteltje

The Chinese astronauts returned safely some hours ago.
They did a spacewalk too.
US has not been doing anything else then space walking around the ISS the last few years.

Both will aim for the moon.

My congratulations to China, followed the whole thing live on CCTV9 (Hotbird) via satellite).

It was a perfect mission, their electronics works too :-)

Neither space walks, no putting men on the moon, is inherently
valuable. And nowadays, with so much technology behind us, neither is
especially difficult; all it takes is a heap of money.
What might well be inherently valuable is doing a bit of asteroid mining.

Maybe, there is a shitpot of delta V involved.

Perhaps not too bad with some large solar sails and an investment return
over a longer period than the first quarter.

Solar sails to move asteroids around? First quarter what? Quarter
century? ;)

Instead of just sails, how about a parabolic reflector focused on the
'stroid, pointing in a direction such that when the rock melts and
starts outgassing, or actually boils, that the stuff that shoots out
makes the rock a little rocket motor. You>d probably get more thrust
that way than just with sails. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
[/quote]
Try working on the physics a bit so that the ejecta does not destroy
the solar focusing reflector.

Aetherist · Guest

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:13:37 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

[quote]In article <m37te4d4ub6b9o59l6vid6971ji60gt6ud@4ax.com>,
TheAetherist@best.net says...
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:43:34 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
[/quote]
<Snip...>

[quote]The question is, how do we dissapate the kinetic energy. In the
description I provided, one side 'impacts' the rod stop with the rigid
plumger transfering all the plunger>s energy (thus momentum) into
the rod stop along the line of travel. On the other end the cotton
acts to dissapate (randomize the plunger>s momentum) into other
directions reducing the amount that is transfered back along the
original direction. In both cases, total momentum and energy is
conserved, just that some of the momentum at one end does not remain
coherrent.

Eureka!

I found the description of this.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hbimp35.htm

Explain "efficiency".

Ok, let>s say you have a big pillow in your hand and a baseball
bat swinging toward>s your head. Would you put the pillow in
front or not? Same momentum in the bat both with or without.

All the energy gets turned to heat. That>s 100% efficient.

Get it yet???

No, because the whole issue is nuts.
[/quote]
I don>t know how to interpret this. But if you mean that rather
endless back & forth, I agree.

On this particular concept the whole thing hinges on how well
the momentum of the plumgers transfers momentum to the end
stops, in otherwords, the mechanical efficieny of the processes.
If they are the same, the device won>t work, period. I>ve
seen it work, hell it>s so easy to build anyone can try it for
themselves..

krw · Guest

In article <22bb2510-0527-439e-814e-8ba96bb11475
@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, gdewilde@gmail.com says...
[quote]On Oct 8, 1:43 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Acceleration is the the same as deceleration, with a negative sign
(acceleration has either, use both and you>ll see why it doesn>t
work).

It>s pretty retarded to make a bullshit based analogy draped with
signs of negativity. I know your kind, your kind of people dedicate
their lives to looking for a cheap skate cop-out excuse not to ever do
anything. This is why you can never accomplished anything other than
acting like a retard. You start out with assuring yourself you are a
failure. As if even that wasn>t obvious to you.
[/quote]
Negativity? Me? Hardly. I>m positive that you>re full of shit.

[quote]I think you should learn to keep the retarded remarks to yourself and
not drool all over the usenet. I have all this nice hard worked
documentation here and you just made sure you wont get to see any of
it. You didn>t think I was going to make effort to defend my invention
talking with a dismissive idiot did you?
[/quote]
Ohhh. I>m sorry. <what a maroon!>

[quote]But more importantly,
"With financial institutions continuing to fail on Wall Street,
Hollywood has experienced what one economist called "The worst crisis
ever for celebrity wealth." According to statistics obtained
exclusively by Dateline Hollywood, the average A-list celebrity stock
portfolio has fallen 35% this week, with some stars losing as much as
72% of their wealth. "
http://www.datelinehollywood.com/dateline_hollywood/2008/09/celebrity....

So you think they>re ripe for picking? Go fer it.

That was specially for people like you.
[/quote]
Hardly. I know a scammer when I see one.

[quote]Kinda gives away how predictable you are doesn>t it?
[/quote]
That>s the whole purpose of science.

[quote]http://www.datelinehollywood.com/dateline_hollywood/2008/09/lindsay-lohan-s.html
She recently transformed herself into a political blogger on her
MySpace page, and now Lindsay Lohan has announced that she has
suspended her relationship with Samantha Ronson so she can focus on
the bailout plan for Wall Street. She wrote it about it in her blog
this morning:

LOOK Keith!!! Isn>t this amazing!??!?!?!
[/quote]
You would be impressed.

[quote]It>s so you!
[/quote]
Hardly. Skanks aren>t my type.

[quote]She wrote it about it in her blog this morning!!!
[/quote]
Perhaps she can write. You can>t.

--
Keith

krw · Guest

In article <m37te4d4ub6b9o59l6vid6971ji60gt6ud@4ax.com>,
TheAetherist@best.net says...
[quote]On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:43:34 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

In article <39cc6a4b-327a-4989-a7fc-
96cb1eb17dda@s20g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, fototour@gmail.com
says...
On Oct 8, 4:14 am, Aetherist <TheAether...@best.net> wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:08:18 -0700, Aetherist <TheAether...@best.net> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:34:24 +1000, "Timo A. Nieminen" <t...@physics..uq.edu.au> wrote:

On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Aetherist wrote:

Snip...

There are some very novel and interesting concepts in this area. The
classic propellant-less drive is a simple rod which has a spring coiled
around its center. On each end is mounted a stop plug. There are two
plungers fitted on either side of the spring that can travel along the
rod. The plungers are compressed against the spring and then released.
they then travel in opposite directions along the rod until impacting
the stop plugs. One stop lug is metal, the other a cotton wad.. The
difference in efficency of transfering the plunger>s energy to the
rod, rather tan the cotton and rod, will propel the rod in one direction.

This also will work, but so far as I know, has found no practical
applications...

Why do you think this would work? Was Newton so wrong?

I don>t think Newton IS wrong. Momentum is alway a vector, energy is not.
If I have two equally energetic masses who>s vectors are, intially in
opposing directions. Assuming that we imparted this energy as vectors at
the same time the the net momentum to the imparting device is zero..

The question is, how do we dissapate the kinetic energy. In the
description I provided, one side 'impacts' the rod stop with the rigid
plumger transfering all the plunger>s energy (thus momentum) into
the rod stop along the line of travel. On the other end the cotton
acts to dissapate (randomize the plunger>s momentum) into other
directions reducing the amount that is transfered back along the
original direction. In both cases, total momentum and energy is
conserved, just that some of the momentum at one end does not remain
coherrent.

Eureka!

I found the description of this.

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hbimp35.htm

Explain "efficiency".

Ok, let>s say you have a big pillow in your hand and a baseball
bat swinging toward>s your head. Would you put the pillow in
front or not? Same momentum in the bat both with or without.
[/quote]
All the energy gets turned to heat. That>s 100% efficient.

[quote]Get it yet???
[/quote]
No, because the whole issue is nuts.

<you too can snip crap you don>t respond to>

--
Keith

JosephKK · Guest

On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:12:11 -0700, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

[quote]JosephKK wrote:

On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:45:01 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote:

Will pay reasonable shipping costs - but please ask only if you can
use a given item set.

4a) Ye Olde Boonton BRC-260A "Q" meter; very well packed for shipping,
and i will pay the first $50 of shipping.
This will be gutted in about 30 days if there is no interest.

7) Good for power xmitter: variable cap 34-1134F, 6"wide, 4"high, 9"
long including shaft.

8) HP310A wave analyzer with manual.

12) 1mm flat cable: 5.75 ft 44 cond DigiKey WM15-5-ND and 5.50 ft 50
cond DigiKey AM50G-5-ND.

13) 10.4" dia X 4" wide coil form suitable for winding an air-core 1H
inductor.

14) Wordstar 5.5 with user and 3rd party manuals; working.

Does the 310A work? I am getting interested, but i need to know some
more about what it does.

I packaged it up about a year or so ago.
I did not try to test an inductor for Q, but i was able to use it to
measure an inductor and a capacitor, and (i think) find the peak
resonance of an inductor (been too long ago).
Like i previously mentioned, i am in Portland OR.
First come first served.
[/quote]
I have found an adequate description:

"HP-310A WAVE ANALYZER, a frequency selective voltmeter-receiver
covering 1 KHz to 1.5 MHz with bandwidths 200,1000, and 2000 Hz;
resolution 200 Hz/div. Modes AFC-Normal-BFO-USB-LSB-AM. Amplitude
ranges 10 uV to 100 V full scale, 16 steps. AFC: dynamic hold-in +/-3
KHz min @ 100 KHz; tracking 100 Hz/sec. Has headphone jack and is
operable as VLF receiver. Requires 115/230 V 60 Hz; 10.8x16.8x18.4,
50lbs sh. Used-reparable w/ manual, "

at: http://www.fairradio.com/catalog.php?mode=viewitem&item=482

Oh well, i suspect it would take me too long to learn how to use it
well for the purposes i had in mind. Passing.

Jasen Betts · Guest

On 2008-10-10, Aetherist <TheAetherist@best.net> wrote:
[quote]On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:43:34 -0500, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

Ok, let>s say you have a big pillow in your hand and a baseball
bat swinging toward>s your head. Would you put the pillow in
front or not? Same momentum in the bat both with or without.

Get it yet???
[/quote]
same amount of momentum transferred into your head (assuming the mass
of the pillow is insignificant, or including it in the mass of the head)

the difference is with the pillow there the momentum transfer is
spread over a longer time frame and a larger area.

a soft landing will not reduce the amount of momentum transfer.

In a collision momentum is always conserved.

Bye.
Jasen

Jasen Betts · Guest

On 2008-10-09, bud-- <budnews@isp.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 8, 1:27 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:

And I really miss good old Norton tools. Seriously saved my arse once, not to mention
all the useful everyday uses for a video editing company.

Does anyone make techie tools these days? Like disk editor?
[/quote]
The disk editor I use is called linux :)
(linux makes the disk available to ordinary applications via a
filename (also the memory address space etc)) one can then use
any hex editor to mess with the contents or use command-line file
manipulation tools like dd (which featured in an earlier thread
being used to erase a partition table) I once wrote a simple
application in C which scans through a disk looking for interesting
strings (which might be the start of a file) attempting to resurrect
lost files

Bye.
Jasen

Guest · Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: Re: Young Earth

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit

bulegoge@columbus.rr.com wrote:
[quote]
me@privacy.net wrote:

I expressed no beliefs. I simply asked you whether you have a
single shred of actual evidence that your invisible friend up
in the sky exists.

The evidence is the universe. Since man has been in existence man has
universally accepted their world around them as evidence for God. That
is not to say that the self evidence of the world will lead man to a
consistent set of beliefs as to who or what God is, but I think every
culture, forever, has realized that their existence cannot be
rationalized in any other manner except the existence of God (or
perhaps of gods).
[/quote]
Nonsense. Belief in God is not universal. Also, if you point at
something that leads one person to conclude that God exists and
another equally intelligent and educated person to come to the
opposite conclusion and call it "evidence" you simply do not know
what the word "evidence" means.

In this very newsgroup, you have looked at the universe and seen
what you think is evidence that God exists. Another fellow here
has looked at the exact same universe and seen what he thinks is
evidence that a demon lives in his rectum. Neither of you are
pointing at actual evidence. You are both rationalizing.

[quote]I would say that athiesm is a relatively recent phenomenon.
[/quote]
The word is "atheism."

More nonsense. Unbelief is as old as religion. The only times
when it seems like there are no unbelievers is when being an
unbeliever gets you killed.

That being said, why are you nattering on about atheism?
Can you point to a post where I said there was no god?
Or does the fact that I asked you for evidence make me an
atheist in your eyes?

[quote]It does not show any real enlightenment at all. I can see
where a person could easily reject the dogmas of any given
religious system, but complete rejection of God (or gods)
is not rational at all.
[/quote]
Not rational? YOU are the one who believes things that he
Has no evidence of.

[quote]I can offer no evidence
[/quote]
Like I said.

[quote]to add to what you experience every single day.
[/quote]
I experience nothing that is actual evidence that god exists,
and another fellow here mas said that what he experiences
every day is proof that a demon lives up his asshole and that
your god does not exist. You can>t both be right, and he makes
as good a case as you do. A bit better case, actually.

[quote]You have ducked the question again and
again, just as you have ducked the question of whether you are
bearing false witness about whether Hitler was a Christian,
and thus are disobeying your Lord>s commandments.

Why do you attempt to shame me with a lame attempt to claim I broke
one of the ten commandments?
[/quote]
Because you did! You bore false witness about Adolph Hitler>s
Christianity. When I called you on it you ignored the evidence.
To bear true witness you would look at the evidence I provided.

[quote]What held beliefs or principles can I shame you with. (Oh yeah -
as an atheist
[/quote]
You have zero evidence that I am an atheist. You are once again
breaking the biblical commandment against bearing false witness.

[quote]you have no moral obligation to any higher authority,
[/quote]
Sure I do. Is it too much to ask that there be some small scrap
of evidence that your higher authority actually exists first?

[quote]so there is no means of trying to get you to evaluate your
actions relative to some "higher" principle that you hold.
[/quote]
More nonsense. One can easily believe is a higher principle
without accepting by blind faith that god exists. Even atheists
(by the way, you have no reason to believe that I am one) hold
to higher principles. Ever hear of humanism?

[quote]You live in a world where you can condemn me for my inconsistancies,
[/quote]
Wow. In your world the mere asking for evidence is seen as
condemning you?

[quote]but, you, being so brilliant, have no set of principles to
which I can compare your statements to.
[/quote]
You are correct in that I have not expressed my religious views
one way or another. I could be a Christian of the sort who
believes that the just shall live by Faith and that Faith is the
substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
(does you fantasy world include a belief that all Christians
believe as you do?) I could be a Zen Buddhist. I could be a
Unitarian. I could follow Shinto, Wicca, or Animism. Or I
might even be an agnostic or atheist. What I believe does not
change the fact that you have no evidence to support what *you*
believe.

[quote]That does give an athiest a rather nice advantage.
[/quote]
Why do you think that this is some sort of a contest? I have
not revealed what I believe. I just asked you if you have any
evidence for what you believe. BTW, The word is "atheist."

[quote] If you are
right and he exists, he will be asking you the same question
when you meet him. How will you answer? Will you tell him
that he is wrong and that the ten commandments don>t apply
to you?

I will answer him that based upon my readings of what Hitler said to
his closest friends I came to the conclusion that Hitler despised
Christianity.
[/quote]
And what happens when he asks you "did you even bother to do a search
on Google to see if there is evidence that Hitler actually said that?"

And what happens when he says that passing on falsehoods without examining
whether they are true is no better in his eyes than inventing new falsehoods?

What happens when he asks you "did you change your position when that
me@privacy.net fellow showed you documented evidence that you had been
passing on false information?"

[quote]I will also say that I understood that Hitler held some level of
respect for Jesus "The rebel" but any attempt to explain or
advance the works of Jesus, especially as conducted by Saint Paul,
where categorically rejected by Hitler.
[/quote]
Here is another thing you can do a web search on: look up the
No True Scotsman Fallacy and compare it to the above argument.

TheM · Guest

"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6l7fpqFav4evU1@mid.individual.net...
[quote]TheM wrote:
"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6l7akfFb2dkaU1@mid.individual.net...
Not that much, maybe around 2 to 3 terabucks.
About the cost of an Iraq war plus a capitalism bailout.
Both money well spent eh? Better than wasted on industry with something to show for it afterwards.

--
Dirk

Yeah, you could show those endless fields of PV to the collateral, resulting starving
unemployed millions; that would be something to show for it.

And your solution is that when greedy bankers screw up - give them *your* money? that>ll teach 'em...

--
Dirk
[/quote]
No, but don>t replace one idiocy with another either.

The way things are screwed up right now you really don>t have much choice.
Iceland privatized its banks couple years back... now they>re all in government
hands again.

M

TheM · Guest

"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:gclu7o$hu7$1@aioe.org...
[quote]On a sunny day (Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:30:19 +0200) it happened "TheM"
DontNeedSpam@test.com> wrote in <wLuHk.4488$x84.122202@news.siol.net>:

"Dirk Bruere at NeoPax" <dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote in message news:6l7akfFb2dkaU1@mid.individual.net...
Not that much, maybe around 2 to 3 terabucks.
About the cost of an Iraq war plus a capitalism bailout.
Both money well spent eh? Better than wasted on industry with something to show for it afterwards.

--
Dirk

Yeah, you could show those endless fields of PV to the collateral, resulting starving
unemployed millions; that would be something to show for it.

M

If you could use electricity to make clean water and food,
and water is simple, my air de-humifier makes clear water,
there are better ways too, and food, and the rest of the electricity to
run the FED money printing presses, mmm
I did think some days ago, maybe USA should be changed to USSA
United Socialist States of America.

I find it really funny times: first he robs you of your freedom and privacy by
reading your emails, then he robs you of your money with high oil prices and
sends it to Saudi Arabia, then he robs you of your life savings by forcing
a panic in the markets, and he bought all that with a small tax cut,
and now he robs you of the taxes you payed and gives it to the banks.
I know many in the USA cannot read and write, but getting ripped that way makes
you wonder about their other capabilities too.
Every living soul in the US now has a > 30000 $ debt.

ahum
LOL
Did you see how volatile gold is these days? Up 30% one day down 20% the other.

And what has really changed? Nothing.

Bush is just doing his panic thing, same as after 9/11, why not lock him
up? that would stabilise the world.
[/quote]
Its not quite as bad, I think the US will pull out of this, possibly before Europe does.
But US is definitely loosing its primacy. Clear signs are there for a while now.
Remember, roman empire did not just dissapear over night, it took some time.

M

Jim Thompson · Guest

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:18:32 -0700, JosephKK <quiettechblue@yahoo.com>
wrote:

[quote]On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:06:11 -0700, "BobW"
nimby_GIMME_SOME_SPAM@roadrunner.com> wrote:

"JosephKK" <quiettechblue@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:khtqe496g59ta0c44h66l5gehhcptnn87b@4ax.com...
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:46:10 -0700, "BobW"
nimby_GIMME_SOME_SPAM@roadrunner.com> wrote:

"Hattori Hanzo" <OutintheSnow@billsbackyard.org> wrote in message
news:t6voe4pt65s55ifd8tgcfuks71esattmnd@4ax.com...
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:45:01 -0700, Robert Baer
robertbaer@localnet.com
wrote:

Will pay reasonable shipping costs - but please ask only if you can
use a given item set.

Take your SPAM to an appropriate SALES group, IDIOT!

Bad economy brings all the utter idiots out of the woodwork! You are
one such idiot. Stop filling the group with your putrifications.

You call a person who is giving away equipment AND paying for the shipping
costs a spammer and an idiot? You are not a smart man, Hattori.

Bob

That is just AlwaysWrong. I did see your reply.

What>s an "AlwaysWrong"? Is he just some lonely troll looking for the
attention he never received as a child?

Bob

Yep. Has about two dozen nyms now. Earned the appellation, which is
quite a feat.
[/quote]
But limited IP range. So I never see his posts...

* Flag:TURD NNTP-Posting-Host:(72\.197\..)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC>s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine Sometimes I even put it in the food

Guest · Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: Re: Young Earth

On Oct 10, 6:25 pm, Kris Krieger <m...@dowmuff.in> wrote:
[quote]For all you know, he/she/it will ask him "Is Gino>s cheesesteak *really*
better than Pats>s...?"

Ha![/quote]

I was in Philly just a few months ago and went to Gino>s. Didn>t try
Pats. Ginos was pretty good, but what>s wuth the canned mushrooms?


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Electronics - design Forum	Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 68, 69, 70 ... 102, 103, 104 Next
Page 69 of 104