| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:45 am Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
 |
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:19:40 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:14:33 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:37:28 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:25:04 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:04:36 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:02:31 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:54:00 -0700, rand mair fheal
mmf@tania-che.com> wrote:
To deter parishioners from attending?
Only the ones who could walk on water?
Every parish has its eccentrics.
And it>s wankers.
At least they refrain in kirk. Don>t they?
http://www.boingboing.net/2004/11/04/pope-endorses-wankin.html
Bonkbonk.net?
ROFL, there is actually a bonkbonk.com
There has to be. And I bet someone payed a shitful of money for the
domain.
I>m fukkin discustard!![/quote] |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:45 am Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:09:38 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:34:49 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:42:09 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:23:12 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:02:31 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
Only the ones who could walk on water?
Or swim.
Hovercraft owners?
Hovercrafts are sacrilidgeous.
Why?
Only jesus is allowed to walk on water.
Does he have a license?
No, that>s why he got the death penalty.
A bit like "driving while black"?
It>s relatively safe at night.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:20 am Post subject: Re: Forget the blackhole, earth is gonna explode ! |
|
|
On Sep 30, 1:34 am, The tragedy of balding men with long hair
<goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]
The energy released from the collisions will cause the intergalactic
space police to come down and arrest everyone on Earth.
[/quote]
And we will all be neck shackled to one another and spanked hard with
moon rocks <====not a joke, but very Informative. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
oldcoot
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:12 pm Post subject: Re: Live Nude Astronomy * KECK Telescope Teams Up With GRAVI |
|
|
On Oct 10, 1:41 am, "Painius" <starswirlern...@maol.com> wrote:
[quote]"oldcoot" sed :
The "gravitational" lensing discussed in the article, under the FS
paradigm, is simple *flow lensing*, that is, deflection of light due
to large scale flows of the intergalactic medium but with little or no
*acceleration* component to the flow. 'Member as to how gravity is the
effect upon matter of _and only of_ the acceleration component. But
light, being massless, is deflected (lensed) in traversing *any* flow
whether the flow is accelerating or not.
..I see space, every part of it, as accelerating,
however quickly or slowly, toward some sink or
another. So it seems to me that even under the
FSP, it would still be okay to call it "gravitational
lensing". Maybe it>s me, but i cannot conceive of
any area of space where there is "no *acceleration*
component to the flow".
Yeah, but here>s the rub. And it has altogether to do with the "dark[/quote]
matter" issue. The Void-Space acolytes look at *every* instance of
excessive lensing as caused by gravity, hence their all-inclusive term
"gravitational lensing".. which necessitates their inventing "dark
matter" to explain it. They have no concept of simple flow lensing,
since in their universe there is 'Nothing' to flow. So under the FS
paradigm it>s essential to make the clear-cut distinction. Sure, as
you say, there may be (and probably is) `some` acceleration component,
however small, to every flow. But it>s not sufficient to constitute
GRAVITY. So it>s not "gravitational" lensing but simple flow lensing
which predominates.
[quote]Even in the center of that gigantic "hole" in space
that ranges 1 billion light years across, the space
would still be accelerating, a hardly noticeable
change, to be sure, but still accelerating toward
the surrounding matter...
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2308796.cms
Yup. But suppose there were a luminous background object directly[/quote]
behind that great "hole". The light from the object, in traversing the
"hole", would be deflected (lensed) by *any* crosswise flow, period.
It wouldn>t matter if the flow were accelerating a little, a lot, or
not at all. But to any matter embedded in the flow, even a single
atom, it *would* matter.. because momentum is imparted to matter
**only** by an acceleration component irrespective of the actual
velocity of the flow.
It>s only the acceleration component which
constitutes gravity. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:10 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:09:51 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:19:57 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:37:17 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:42:09 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:23:12 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:02:31 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Or swim.
Hovercraft owners?
Hovercrafts are sacrilidgeous.
Why?
Only jesus is allowed to walk on water.
Does he need a water walking license?
A permit, actually.
Pedant.
A water walking pedant?
Does it clip to ones shoes?[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:14 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:23:40 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:16:42 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:25:25 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:15:11 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:01:56 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:38:21 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
Mine does.
State model.
HP PSC 2355
I am familiar with that shite. They do not have an infinite ink supply.
Whatever but it prints using black when the colour runs out.
Ah, you answered backwards way first.
Anyway I don>t like them. Stupidly priced cartridges.
Get a brother - 99p cartriges.
Your brother can get you cartridges for 99p?
Impossible.
but you said...
Keeping it in the family eh!?[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:15 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:22:55 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:16:14 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:01:56 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:38:21 +0100, Naked Gonad <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:24:11 +0100, rand mair fheal <mmf@tania-che.com> wrote:
In article <op.uinynnft4buhsv@fx62.mshome.net>, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:28:38 +0100, rand mair fheal <mmf@tania-che.com
wrote:
Why is it no printer I>ve come across will print in black when one of the
colours has run out?
you need an infinite ink supply
higher end printers
Didn>t know they came with those. I>ve seen them advertised to fit regular printers though.
Mine does.
State model.
HP PSC 2355
Printer/Scannner/Copiers rarely Print and Scan and Copy for long.
I recommend the Brother DCP-135C. Ł25 including delivery. Ł1 a cartridge.
Assuming you have a brother, of course.
Well, you could always use someone elses bruv.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:16 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:24:21 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:16:57 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:34:30 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:20:47 +0100, Eli Grubman <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:56:01 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 02:28:38 +0100, rand mair fheal <mmf@tania-che.com> wrote:
In article <op.uikahngv4buhsv@fx62.mshome.net>, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:18:30 +0100, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
rand mair fheal wrote:
In article <48e5f365$0$67959$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
rand mair fheal wrote:
In article <48e587a0$0$33681$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
rand mair fheal wrote:
chomskyites for mccain
integer> ::= ['-'] <digit> {<digit>} {bomb, bomb Iran}
1138 prefix thx
soylent #0f0;
cmy
soylent magenta
I>m getting separations anxiety!
Actually he>s wrong. You used RGB. There is no such colourspace as CMY, it
would be CMYK, and you didn>t specify four values.
actually there is on some printers
they take cmy (or ymc) input and do k substitution in the printer
Why is it no printer I>ve come across will print in black when one of the colours has run out?
They will if there>s a separate non-white (I hesitate to use the word
"bl*ck") cartridge.
All printers have that. Some have multicolour cartriges, but none have the black along with them.
I>ve never looked.
you>ve never had to change a print cartridge?
It>s often cheaper to get a new printer.
Mine has a separate black, as do a lot of printers.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:17 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:20:18 -0500, "John \"C\""
honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com> wrote in message
news:op.uiro7jh04buhsv@fx62.mshome.net...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:15:59 +0100, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:28:38 +0100, ah <splifingate@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:29:04 +0100, ah <splifingate@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:10:31 +0100, ah <splifingate@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
Fibre, Baby!
And here was me thinking the US was now behnd in internet
access.
Show me a website where you can buy what you have.
There are none; it comes only to Tire 1 Elite customers (i.e.,
those who are
That should read "Tier" ;/
willing to pay greater than 33% of their monthly income).
But you>re retired.
God forbid!
I>m sure you said you were.
I may be old, but I>m not retired!
I said you were a sewage attendant, and you said you had retired.
"ah" misspelled "retarded"...
HJ
p.s. Surprised that you couldn>t see that, Phucker!
They sound identical in Upper Class English.
Or is it "returded"?[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Jeffâ–˛Relf
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:17 pm Post subject: At its largest, Antarctica a quarter the size of Eurasia. |
|
|
At its largest, Antarctica is 5.4 megamiles^2,
a quarter the size of Eurasia ( 20.8 megamiles^2 ),
and 98 percent of it is ice, not land.
This low distortion map shows the relative sizes of the continents:
Upload.WikiMedia.ORG/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Dymaxion_map_unfolded-no-ocean.png
P.S. Antarctica collects ice-melting soot, not just meteorites.
P.P.S. Does “ Pinius ” smoke “ Pinners** ” ?
**: UrbanDictionary.COM/define.php?term=Pinner |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:18 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:48:05 -0500, "John \"C\""
honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Eli Grubman" <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:38jte49h8dpb1mtq52495jcen5ga7ecd3d@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:05:33 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:16:53 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com
wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:29:36 -0400, ah <splifingate@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:11:34 +0100, ah <splifingate@gmail.com
wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:01:44 +0100, ah
splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
48e8167e$0$67963$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
rand mair fheal wrote:
In article
48e6d09f$0$33699$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com>,
ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:44:22 -0400, ah
splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Peter Hucker wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:03:06 +0100, ah
splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry.
How>s this:
http://a2n.eu/j4RXj
You>re shrinking. Are you cold?
No, but this didacticism is.
What>s a didickticism?
You wouldn>t understand.
you should teach people about it
I need a able partner.
and some device to illustrate the lesson
*sigh*
What is this World coming to?
Well it sounds fun to me.
Credit, or audit?
What?
So, you>ve not been to Uni, then.
Our Unis don>t do credits/audits.
right, right, right
Nor "grade point averages".
Secondary, or pre-secondary?
Neither.
Pre-secondary = primary.
"ah" graduated from:
Sammy Davis Junior - Senior High.
"ah" was the "token whitie" and the only white guy "Mainstreamed" in
American High School.
That>s why "ah" went to work under the "ground floor" and roamed around
the sewer for 40 years until such time as he was flushed-out.
Do I detect an inter-personal conflict?
We can safely assume that they don>t sleep together, I think.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: Re: If one farts in outer space, will it make a sound? |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:09:49 +1100, "TomTom" <tt@invalid.com> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:52:13 -0500, "John \"C\""
honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
If one farts in outer space, will it make a sound?
Of course it will.
An expression of certainty, from deep and personasl (sic) experience.
Physics, actually.
But it won>t travel far.
Speak only for yourself
Blow it out yer ass.
What about a full on meaty "power fart"?[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: Re: Don>t fret, Kanga, there>s always the Paralympics! |
|
|
John "C" wrote:
[quote]"Eli Grubman" <eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:c5lte4l54epkj95uuvc72g3g4i57ipgt78@4ax.com...
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:22:00 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:15:54 +0100, Eli Grubman
eli.grubman@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:38:58 +0100, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:07:42 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:50:56 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:09:47 +0100, Naked Gonad
bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
Might do, might not!
I>ve seen them. They exist all right.
Yeh but only where the lakes should be...ha!
They don>t believe in lakes up there.
Only because they can>t spell "lakes".
Just cause you can>t go chhhhhhh!
Sounds like hebrew.
Take that bach!
No such luch.
I have a Russian watch with the word "Luch" written in script on the
dial and it sure looks like "f ck".
I forgot and wore it to Church once and was embarrased and never wore it
again.
HJ
Oh well, if it stops working, you can always f ck it.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Naked Gonad
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:23 pm Post subject: Re: If one farts in outer space, will it make a sound? |
|
|
Eli Grubman wrote:
[quote]On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:22:29 +1100, "TomTom" <tt@invalid.com> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:05:17 +1100, "TomTom" <tt@invalid.com> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:09:49 +1100, "TomTom" <tt@invalid.com> wrote:
Eli Grubman wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:52:13 -0500, "John \"C\""
honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
If one farts in outer space, will it make a sound?
Of course it will.
An expression of certainty, from deep and personasl (sic)
experience.
Physics, actually.
Really? Which version of physics is it that allows sound to travel
in a vacuum, actually?
The fart releases vacuum-defeating gases. Therefore in the immediate
vicinity there is no vacuum.
In outer space?
Yes. Be sure to use the specially designed hatch made for this
purpose.
Ask a fuckwit to demonstrate its fuckwittery, and they
can>t help themselves! Actually.
You>ve never actually farted in outer space, have you?
Come back to us when you have.
But it won>t travel far.
Speak only for yourself
Blow it out yer ass.
You first, fuckwit.
Shit before the shovel, shitforbrains.
I wasn>t giving you an option, fuckwit.
I don>t need options. After you, asshole.
Eli
He who farts first..........[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
stefan
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject: Re: so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing? |
|
|
BradGuth schreef:
[quote]On Oct 9, 4:31 am, stefan <bng> wrote:
BradGuth schreef:
On Oct 8, 4:48 am, stefan <bng> wrote:
BradGuth schreef:
On Oct 7, 6:37 am, stefan <bng> wrote:
BradGuth schreef:
On Oct 6, 9:47 am, stefan <bng> wrote:
BradGuth schreef:
On Sep 19, 7:14 am, stefan <bng> wrote:
got1tiel schreef:
I saw a fox program on fake moon landings. but i keep asking myself,
whether or not the nasa landings are true or false, why didnt the
soviets exploit the controversial footage and push the story that the
landings were fake?
the soviets were experts at pushing propaganda stories (like the
hitler still alive story)
this would have been a great propaganda victory for them,especially
since they knew they would not make it to the moon themselves. what
could have held them back from pushing this story?
thx
nothing,they were killing us soldiers in vietnam that same year in
vietnam,they would also blow this pr stunt for the us..
and why would the us stop with the fake moon landings i question myself.
they could 'build' bases on the 'moon' or land on 'mars' with ease...
think of the propaganda !
WHY didn>t they do that?
well,simple of course,the landings were real and did cost a fortune..
Now you>re saying that the old USSR and Russia of today doesn>t tell,
fabricate and/or otherwise go along with lies? (especially of those
which directly benefit their existence?)
You>ve got to be kidding, but clearly you are not. Go figure.
~BradGuthBrad_GuthBrad.GuthBradGuth BG
you call that a sensible reply?
what about north korea?
eastern germany?
cuba?
and dozens more who would have a field day exposing this..but
noooo...not ONE exposed the us...doesn>t that ring a bell?
well??
and why isn>t there a us base on 'mars' or the 'moon' if it all was a hoax?
why go to the 'moon' and end the hoax?
it>s is all so simple right?
so a trip to mars would have been also easy,why didn>t they do that?
explain..
Why would them dirty rotten Russians that have few qualms about
killing off millions of their own kind, elect to expose themselves?
How else could Russia have made their people continually fund the
surplus/spare employment of 100,000, not to mention having to pay for
all of their cold-war R&D plus countless spendy toys?
~ BG
but why isn>t there a us base on 'mars' or the 'moon' if it all was a hoax?
why go to the 'moon' and end the hoax?
it>s is all so simple right?
so a trip to mars would have been also easy,why didn>t they do that?
explain..
Your LSD is running a tad low. Increase the IV drip and we>ll talk.
In other words, you>d have no idea as to how we>d manage to keep
10,000 spare/surplus military, including DARPA and their civil service
cartel up and running, much less of Russia sustaining 10 fold more.
kookoo..
Why didn>t you just say that you couldn>t say?
You do realize that our physically dark Selene/moon offers way more
gamma than our Van Allen belts can muster up. That impressive gamma
bandpass image was after all, obtained while having to look through
most all 70,000 km worth of our Van Allen badlands. Don>t otherwise
forget that GSO offers 2e3 Sv/year, as shielded by 2 g/cm2 (5/16"
aluminum), and it>s why such satellites need to be configured as rad-
hard.
~ BG
the moon landings are all a HOAX right???
they NEVER went to the moon RIGHT?
so why wine about the van allen radiation if they NEVER went to the
moon,they were never exposed to the radiation RIGHT?
they allready fooled us so why don>t they keep fooling us with
'landings' on mars or 'bases' on the moon ?
you must have a good explanation right?
You really should change you medication dosage.
iow,you don>t know WHY the us stopped the PR STUNT ?
idiot..
suddenly they changed their minds and threw away a gold mine in
prestige,goodwill,pride,wich came very cheap ofcourse because they never
left earth!
it>s obvious they would continue the scam.
Even those having failed 5th grade are smarter than you.
~ BG
my dog farts brighter thoughts than you..
The ongoing off-world scam of the past, of today and the foreseeable
future is most everything related to Mars, our moon, Mercury and soon
enough Pluto, because those are supposed to remain forever as failsafe
inert eye-candy to their pretend-Atheism mindset, of only Earth being
capable of life.
In other kind words, these folks in Usenet/newsgroups that are devout
status quo mainstreamers and otherwise brown-nosed clowns running
amuck merely elect to ignore the regular laws of physics, best
available science and to disqualify true history whenever their
mainstream boat starts to rock, or whenever their pretend-Atheism gets
a little LLPOF testy from time to time.
Ever notice how those opposed to whatever’s outside of their NASA/
Apollo version of what our physically dark Selene/moon is all about,
as well as banishing upon all things Venus or Sirius are pretty much
the same folks that don’t believe in AGW, nor least bit mind the
artificially inflated cost of most everything. These same folks also
can not see wrong with hardly anything our resident warlord(GW Bush)
has taken us into or having taken away from our constitutional rights
by way of his presidential signings and personally orchestrated
torture of others. Sort of makes we wonder what sorts of other
incompetence, debauchery and cloak and dagger follies these folks are
capable of.
The on-world scam of the day is still about artificially sustaining
cold wars and as many hot wars as we can muster, and otherwise the
continual provoking of others (especially if they have fossil fuels or
nuclear alternatives). It>s what mainstream religions and their
puppet governments do best.
~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG
''''[/quote]
yaadadadadadadadadada.....
nutcase... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
