| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Saul Levy Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: Re: Keplerian-ish goo. |
|
|
How about using real terms instead of this gobbledegook, Jeff? lmao!
Look up Kepler>s Third Law for help.
Saul Levy
On 31 Jul 2008 08:06:57 GMT, Jeff?Relf <Jeff_Relf@Seattle.Invalid>
wrote:
[quote]As I understand it, ignoring other objects,
the action ( Velocity * Distance ) per degree
of a comet orbiting the sun is constant ( Keplerian ).
The comet is moving its slowest when it>s farthest from the sun,
at its apogee, where it covers the most distance per degree.
Conversely, If the Milky Way were a perfect frizbee,
the action would be much higher at the edge than the center.
The frizbee is not Keplerian because, for each degree turn,
both the Velocity and the Distance are higher at the edge;
i.e. the action is much higher at the edge, not constant throughout.
If I>m not mistaken, the Milky Way is part Keplerian, part frizbee;
Keplerian-ish goo , if you will, where much of the goo goes unseen.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
G=EMC^2 Glazier Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: Might spectral lines vary with distance from the galacti |
|
|
Cactus saul We could also relate our faster or slower speed as well.
Say the star is coming to us at 60 mps,and we are moving away from it at
60mps What then? Best to keep in mind Saul The effects of SR depends
upon how fast one moves. I know Cactus Saul you are bringing in Lorentz
contraction in which a moving object is shortened in its direction of
motion(Yes) We must not forget the part gravity plays in this
scenario. Nor its ability to curving the path of light making its travel
time longer. Going with QM and string theory thinking Light is a wave
vibration,and its wave length gets shorter or longer with
acceleration,and gravity. Also Saul if it curves that has the same
effect on it as acceleration. I find curve as a part of spin,and
it helps my Spin is in theory Go figure Bert |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
G=EMC^2 Glazier Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:25 pm Post subject: Re: Might spectral lines vary with distance from the galacti |
|
|
ODY I love to enhance my ideas by over stating. Sad but I know its
true Bert |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
oldcoot Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: The Milky Way is an invisible ring ? |
|
|
On Jul 31, 1:32 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf <Jeff_R...@Seattle.Invalid> wrote:
[quote]
The Milky Way is an invisible ring ?
90 percent of its mass is in its outer, invisible ring ?
Not sure what 'Bill' you>re referencing, but if it was me, nuthin' was[/quote]
ever said about the M.W. being invisible. The statement was made that
unlike the solar system which has 99% of its mass concentrated in the
center, in the Sun, a spiral galaxy has a much higher percentage of
its mass spread out peripherally. Mutual gravitation in the outlying
mass would contribute substantially (if not in toto) to the galaxy>s
non-Kelperian rotation.. thus ameliorating the perceived need for
"dark matter". |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Saul Levy Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: Re: Might spectral lines vary with distance from the galacti |
|
|
Blame it on dark matter, Paine! lmao!
A "solid disk" rotation is impossible either way whatever the reason
is.
Saul Levy
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:29:15 GMT, "Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com>
wrote:
[quote]"Saul Levy" <saullevy1@cox.net> wrote in message...
news:3br094pvnndoo251daf3tj3qmmr8vg5b7v@4ax.com...
On 30 Jul 2008 06:03:47 GMT, Jeff?Relf <Jeff_Relf@Seattle.Invalid
wrote:
How is the speed of a star in the Milky Way measured ?
Isn>t it based on the redshift of spectral lines ?
Might spectral lines vary with distance from the galactic core ?
These are called Doppler shifts, Jeff.
Some stars are moving away (redshift) and some are coming towards us
(blueshifts).
Since galaxies don>t rotate as a solid disk (BEERTbrain has claimed
otherwise!) they do show faster shifts close to the nucleus and slower
shifts farther and farther out.
Actually, Saul, according to what i>ve read, Bert is more
right than wrong on this. E.g....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curve
While velocity studies seem to suggest that the rotation
curve is not perfectly flat, that spiral galaxies don>t go
around in precisely the same manner as a solid disk or
a frisbee, the rotation is a lot more like a solid disk than
Johannes Kepler would have guessed.
It>s certainly not as Keplerian dynamics would predict.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
G=EMC^2 Glazier Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:12 pm Post subject: Re: Might spectral lines vary with distance from the galacti |
|
|
Ody When you compare my far out thinking to the great imperial thinkers
and I end up more that 50% right I am greatly flattered. I think I am
closer to 75% on the money Go figure Bert |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Jeffβ²Relf Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:32 am Post subject: The Milky Way is an invisible ring ? |
|
|
That was a very nice post, Bill, thanks.
No one else explained it as well. The Milky Way is an invisible ring ?
90 percent of its mass is in its outer, invisible ring ? |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Saul Levy Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:42 am Post subject: Re: The Milky Way is an invisible ring ? |
|
|
The last time I saw it, it sure wasn>t invisible, Jeff!
Saul Levy
On 31 Jul 2008 20:32:10 GMT, Jeff?Relf <Jeff_Relf@Seattle.Invalid>
wrote:
[quote]That was a very nice post, Bill, thanks.
No one else explained it as well. The Milky Way is an invisible ring ?
90 percent of its mass is in its outer, invisible ring ?[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Jeffβ²Relf Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: If you saw 5 percent of me, my left foot, would that mean yo |
|
|
You joked:
β The last time I saw [ the Milky Way ], it sure wasn>t invisible. β.
You saw 5 percent of it, which hardly counts.
If you saw 5 percent of me, my left foot, would that mean you saw me ?
β The dark matter halo is the single largest part of the [ Milky Way ]
as it covers the space between
100,000 light-years to 300,000 light-years from the galactic center.
It is also the most mysterious part of the Galaxy.
It is now believed that about 95% of the Galaxy
is composed of dark matter, a type of matter that
does not seem to interact with the rest of the Galaxy>s
matter and energy in anyway except through gravity.
The dark matter halo is the location of
nearly all of the Galaxy>s dark matter,
which is more than ten times as much mass as all of
the visible stars, gas, and dust in the rest of the Galaxy.
The luminous matter makes up approximately .09 tera solar masses.
The dark matter halo is likely to include around
[ .6 tera to 3 tera ] solar masses of dark matter. β
-- WikiPedia [ β tera- β = trillion, β peta- β = quadrillion ] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Jeffβ²Relf Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: Mulligan stew. |
|
|
Boy Scout>s aren>t homeless, so they don>t eat Mulligan stew.
I>ve had the real thing, put together by homeless youth.
I contributed nothing but ate it anyways.
No one who manages to pay the β entrance fee β to get into Seattle,
and doesn>t get kicked out, could possibly starve.
That>s why rent is so sky high, and laws so strict,
while food costs nothing ( if you>re not too picky ). |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Jeffβ²Relf Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: Does Saul Levy know what β action β means in physics ? |
|
|
Do you know what β action β means in physics ?
β The Planck constant has dimensions of energy multiplied by time,
which are also the dimensions of action. β
β The dimensions may also be written as momentum times distance
(NΒ·mΒ·s), which are also the dimensions of angular momentum. β
-- WikiPedia [ Action = Mass * Velocity * Distance ]
The action, per degree turn, is highest at the edge of a frizbee.
Action Per Degree is constant for an object in Keplerian motion.
At the apogee, the speed is slowest
and the distance traveled ( per degree ) is highest.
If the speed of the stars orbiting the Milky Way
is the same no matter the distance from the center,
the the action per degree is higher at the edges ..
but not as high as it would be if it were like a spinning frizbee. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Saul Levy Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: Re: Mulligan stew. |
|
|
Our scout leaders called it Mulligan stew, Jeff. It tasted quite
good.
We were "camped out" in a cabin in North Park in the Pittsburgh area.
I doubt the homeless get to live there.
That cabin used a pot-bellied stove. One night I had to stay up late
to feed wood into the stove to keep it lit.
Saul Levy
On 1 Aug 2008 04:41:22 GMT, Jeff?Relf <Jeff_Relf@Seattle.Invalid>
wrote:
[quote]Boy Scout>s aren>t homeless, so they don>t eat Mulligan stew.
I>ve had the real thing, put together by homeless youth.
I contributed nothing but ate it anyways.
No one who manages to pay the entrance fee to get into Seattle,
and doesn>t get kicked out, could possibly starve.
That>s why rent is so sky high, and laws so strict,
while food costs nothing ( if you>re not too picky ).[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Saul Levy Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: Re: Does Saul Levy know what action means in physics ? |
|
|
Read Kepler>s Third Law, Jeff.
It says the same thing, but much more succinctly.
You are too wordy to be a scientist! lmao!
Saul Levy
On 1 Aug 2008 05:03:02 GMT, Jeff?Relf <Jeff_Relf@Seattle.Invalid>
wrote:
[quote]Do you know what action means in physics ?
The Planck constant has dimensions of energy multiplied by time,
which are also the dimensions of action.
The dimensions may also be written as momentum times distance
(N·m·s), which are also the dimensions of angular momentum.
-- WikiPedia [ Action = Mass * Velocity * Distance ]
The action, per degree turn, is highest at the edge of a frizbee.
Action Per Degree is constant for an object in Keplerian motion.
At the apogee, the speed is slowest
and the distance traveled ( per degree ) is highest.
If the speed of the stars orbiting the Milky Way
is the same no matter the distance from the center,
the the action per degree is higher at the edges ..
but not as high as it would be if it were like a spinning frizbee.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Saul Levy Guest
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:01 am Post subject: Re: If you saw 5 percent of me, my left foot, would that mea |
|
|
I>ve seen it from the top of Kitt Peak and from 2000 miles south in
Mexico where it is very dark (during a solar eclipse trip).
Beat that!
I saw what there was to see. I can>t see what>s invisible.
Is your foot dirty? lmao!
Saul Levy
On 1 Aug 2008 04:17:51 GMT, Jeff?Relf <Jeff_Relf@Seattle.Invalid>
wrote:
[quote]You joked:
The last time I saw [ the Milky Way ], it sure wasn>t invisible. .
You saw 5 percent of it, which hardly counts.
If you saw 5 percent of me, my left foot, would that mean you saw me ?
The dark matter halo is the single largest part of the [ Milky Way ]
as it covers the space between
100,000 light-years to 300,000 light-years from the galactic center.
It is also the most mysterious part of the Galaxy.
It is now believed that about 95% of the Galaxy
is composed of dark matter, a type of matter that
does not seem to interact with the rest of the Galaxy>s
matter and energy in anyway except through gravity.
The dark matter halo is the location of
nearly all of the Galaxy>s dark matter,
which is more than ten times as much mass as all of
the visible stars, gas, and dust in the rest of the Galaxy.
The luminous matter makes up approximately .09 tera solar masses.
The dark matter halo is likely to include around
[ .6 tera to 3 tera ] solar masses of dark matter.
-- WikiPedia [ tera- = trillion, peta- = quadrillion ][/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|