| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fitz
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: Are the spins of stars far more important than presently bel |
 |
|
Here>s someone who thinks they are.
(Click link below:)
http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm
This book was written by a mathematical physcist who was one of that
group who got us on the moon. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
oldcoot
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:21 pm Post subject: Re: Are the spins of stars far more important than presently |
|
|
That>s a pretty convoluted convocation of void-spacery, actually.
First these assertions are made :
"..the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a scalar,
standing wave, resonance universe."
Then, "..all electrons give and receive tiny bits of energy among each
other and they do this basically (in all directions) in a scalar
manner.
....the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance that has a
spherical waveform."
Well, since the electron is a standing wave, this immediately begs the
question "A wave of 'What'?" Obviously a supporting medium is
demanded, just as you can>t have a whirlpool of water without water.
Then in the remainder of the treatise, the very existance of such a
supporting medium (the 'aether') is methodically denied. Duh. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Painius
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: Re: Are the spins of stars far more important than presently |
|
|
"oldcoot" <oldcoot7074@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message...
news:203b866f-5196-4b9e-9d99-6b7d67c99391@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
[quote]
That>s a pretty convoluted convocation of void-spacery, actually.
First these assertions are made :
"..the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a scalar,
standing wave, resonance universe."
Then, "..all electrons give and receive tiny bits of energy among each
other and they do this basically (in all directions) in a scalar
manner.
...the electron is a scalar, standing wave, resonance that has a
spherical waveform."
Well, since the electron is a standing wave, this immediately begs the
question "A wave of 'What'?" Obviously a supporting medium is
demanded, just as you can>t have a whirlpool of water without water.
Then in the remainder of the treatise, the very existance of such a
supporting medium (the 'aether') is methodically denied. Duh.
[/quote]
Yep, UR right, you ol' coot-- 'sgonna be a long, long
time before the void of science>s empty head is finally
and completely filled.
Meanwhile, as to the question: "Are the spins of stars
far more important than presently believed?"...
naaaahhhhh
Well, okay, maybe.
But i seriously doubt if they can match "What>s for
supper?" or "Hey Mildred, don>t i have any clean socks?"
any time soon.
happy days and...
starry starry nights!
--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth
P.S.: Thank YOU for reading!
P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
chatnoir
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:12 pm Post subject: Re: Are the spins of stars far more important than presently |
|
|
On Jul 29, 10:54 am, fitz <zeus...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]Here>s someone who thinks they are.
(Click link below:)
http://www.rbduncan.com/schrod.htm
This book was written by a mathematical physcist who was one of that
group who got us on the moon.
[/quote]
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=246635
excerpt:
Re: Schrödinger>s Universe
fitz wrote:
[quote]Schrödinger>s Universe
One of the very best books, that has recently come out, is Dr. Milo
Wolff>s brand new book: Schrödinger>s Universe.
I>ve just now finished reading it and I predict that someday it will be
ranked in importance right up there next to Newton>s Principia.
I agree with the premise set forth in this book that this is indeed a
scalar, standing wave, resonance universe.
[/quote]
So why don>t you just summarise which predictions the theory makes
that
differs from existing conventional theories, and how they can be
tested.
--
Dirk |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
