Science and Technology news... :: View topic - More use of arachidonic acid in bodybuilding

DZ · Guest

Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
[quote]DZ wrote:
Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
DZ wrote:
No, Taka, you don>t understand.

Tom is one of our musclehead nerd scientists, a biochemist from
Oxford. He refers to "Arachis hypogaea", which is geek talk for
peanuts. Get it? Arachi-donic.

Oh, we get it. Don>t we?

Actually, Tom meant arachidic acid. It>s only if you>re from Oxford that
you can afford playing those "remind me what fats should I eat" games,
and then sit back and watch the fireworks.

Man, i don>t get why some people are so excited by lipids.
[/quote]
Not me man, no.
I>m not excited by lipids even the slightest.

Lucas Buck · Guest

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:32:46 +0200, Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:

[quote]Taka wrote:

On Jul 24, 2:15 am, Tom Anderson <t...@urchin.earth.li> wrote:

Another German!

Actually, all great discoveries come originally from German or Russian
heads.

Germans at that time stole *everything* from Brits. That>s why Tom is so
irked by them.

The others like Jewish

Jews have about one third of Nobel Awards. Not bad for a nation of the size
of a grown up city. They are freaking geniuses, I>m afraid.

and Japanese

A bit closer to reality, but they invented for example neutrinos.
[/quote]
And God _still_ refuses to pay them royalties. (he>s yet _another_ cheap Jew, apparently)

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

DZ · Guest

Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
[quote]This led to a celebrated bit of chip design: when Digital designed
their then-cutting-edge CVAX processor, on a spare bit of the die,
they wrote "CVAX: When you care enough to steal the very best" in
Russian!

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html
[/quote]
In Russian, it doesn>t make any sense though. It>s just a bunch of
words put together:

"Ð¡Ð’ÐÐšÐ¡... ÐšÐ¾Ð³Ð´Ð° Ð²Ñ‹ Ð·Ð°Ð±Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ‚Ðµ Ð´Ð¾Ð²Ð¾Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð¾ Ð²Ð¾Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ Ð½Ð°ÑÑ‚Ð¾ÑÑ‰Ð¸Ð¹ Ð»ÑƒÑ‡ÑˆÐ¸Ð¹"

"Ð—Ð°Ð±Ð°Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ‚Ðµ" is not even a Russian word, should be "Ð—Ð°Ð±Ð¾Ñ‚Ð¸Ñ‚ÐµÑÑŒ".

If you translate back, it is "SVAX.. When you ??? enough steal genuine
better"

vauxall · Guest

x-no-archive:yes
On Jul 25, 1:08 pm, Tom Anderson <t...@urchin.earth.li> wrote:

[quote]the real enemy, the vile, criminal scum of Southern Europe, led by
the despicable French.
[/quote]
When did we Italians ever take orders from the French? We have always
faithfully obeyed our Kraut-stinking German Sherperd and always will!

V.

Tom Anderson · Guest

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Andrzej Rosa wrote:

[quote]Taka wrote:

On Jul 24, 2:15 am, Tom Anderson <t...@urchin.earth.li> wrote:

Another German!

Actually, all great discoveries come originally from German or Russian
heads.

Germans at that time stole *everything* from Brits. That>s why Tom is so
irked by them.
[/quote]
Oh, i>m not irked. I have nothing but respect and fraternal affection for
Germans and Germany. Indeed, our nations stand shoulder-to-shoulder
against the real enemy, the vile, criminal scum of Southern Europe, led by
the despicable French. Plus, they like a drink, so they can>t be all bad.

It>s just that during a certain period in chemistry and biochemistry, it
seems like abso-bloody-lutely every bloody thing was discovered and named
by Germans.

[quote]The others like Jewish

Jews have about one third of Nobel Awards. Not bad for a nation of the
size of a grown up city. They are freaking geniuses, I>m afraid.
[/quote]
Like Hungarians.

[quote]and Japanese

A bit closer to reality, but they invented for example neutrinos.
[/quote]
Well, they are the masters of miniaturisation.

[quote]are just masters of stealing this intellectual property and making lot
of money with it ...

Tom>s not upset by the money Germans earned. Just that they didn>t
invent neither Chemistry, nor industry, nor economy, but somehow he had
to learn all those funny sounding names.
[/quote]
Yes, that>s basically it.

[quote]Anyway, Russians stole _a lot_ from the West. They used to send their
spies (not like DZ, of course, he is simply well informed) to industrial
conventions and simply buy stuff on a mass scale to be reverse
engineered and copied. At least that is what Victor Suvorov wrote in
his autobiographic book. He was one of those spies.
[/quote]
The Soviets famously used to clone a lot of western computers - their
mainframes were basically all IBMs, for example. They>d get hold of
western (by which i really mean American) chips, put them under an
electron microscope, and copy their layout. This led to a celebrated bit
of chip design: when Digital designed their then-cutting-edge CVAX
processor, on a spare bit of the die, they wrote "CVAX: When you care
enough to steal the very best" in Russian!

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html

tom

--
No noon today. Noon tomorrow. There>s always a noon tomorrow.

Lucas Buck · Guest

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC), DZ <21767@3028312337.71354487.15072.31715.17391> wrote:

[quote]Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
This led to a celebrated bit of chip design: when Digital designed
their then-cutting-edge CVAX processor, on a spare bit of the die,
they wrote "CVAX: When you care enough to steal the very best" in
Russian!

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html

In Russian, it doesn>t make any sense though. It>s just a bunch of
words put together:

"?????... ????? ?? ???????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ??????"

"????????" is not even a Russian word, should be "??????????".

If you translate back, it is "SVAX.. When you ??? enough steal genuine
better"
[/quote]
"Nothing sucks like a VAX", as those of us who worked on DEC UNIX used to quote.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Lucas Buck · Guest

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:34:11 +0000 (UTC), DZ <21171@1406019478.94664202.11632.10160.20323> wrote:

[quote]Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
DZ wrote:
Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
DZ wrote:
No, Taka, you don>t understand.

Tom is one of our musclehead nerd scientists, a biochemist from
Oxford. He refers to "Arachis hypogaea", which is geek talk for
peanuts. Get it? Arachi-donic.

Oh, we get it. Don>t we?

Actually, Tom meant arachidic acid. It>s only if you>re from Oxford that
you can afford playing those "remind me what fats should I eat" games,
and then sit back and watch the fireworks.

Man, i don>t get why some people are so excited by lipids.

Not me man, no.
I>m not excited by lipids even the slightest.
[/quote]
The clinical term for this is "homosexuality".

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Taka · Guest

On Jul 26, 9:46 am, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
[quote]On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC), DZ <21...@3028312337.71354487.15072.31715.17391> wrote:
Tom Anderson <t...@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
This led to a celebrated bit of chip design: when Digital designed
their then-cutting-edge CVAX processor, on a spare bit of the die,
they wrote "CVAX: When you care enough to steal the very best" in
Russian!

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html

In Russian, it doesn>t make any sense though. It>s just a bunch of
words put together:

"?????... ????? ?? ???????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ??????"

"????????" is not even a Russian word, should be "??????????".

If you translate back, it is "SVAX.. When you ??? enough steal genuine
better"

"Nothing sucks like a VAX", as those of us who worked on DEC UNIX used to quote.
[/quote]
But VAX used to be the most stable operating system in the World,
never froze. It was then stolen by Microsoft to use it as a base for
their new operating system called Windows2000 and up which replaced
the aging DOS. DOS did not have any multitasking capabilities and
therefore future.

UNIX is now in the hands of Apple to power their new operating system
X and higher. But they had better sticking to their original
graphical MacOS idea pioneered by Xerox.

Still better to use the UNIX OS in the original and free flavor such
as BSD/Linux ...

Taka

Andrzej Rosa · Guest

Taka wrote:

[quote]On Jul 26, 9:46 am, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC), DZ
21...@3028312337.71354487.15072.31715.17391> wrote:
Tom Anderson <t...@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
This led to a celebrated bit of chip design: when Digital designed
their then-cutting-edge CVAX processor, on a spare bit of the die,
they wrote "CVAX: When you care enough to steal the very best" in
Russian!

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html

In Russian, it doesn>t make any sense though. It>s just a bunch of
words put together:

"?????... ????? ?? ???????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ??????"

"????????" is not even a Russian word, should be "??????????".

If you translate back, it is "SVAX.. When you ??? enough steal genuine
better"

"Nothing sucks like a VAX", as those of us who worked on DEC UNIX used to
quote.

But VAX used to be the most stable operating system in the World,
never froze. It was then stolen by Microsoft to use it as a base for
their new operating system called Windows2000 and up which replaced
the aging DOS. DOS did not have any multitasking capabilities and
therefore future.

UNIX is now in the hands of Apple to power their new operating system
X and higher. But they had better sticking to their original
graphical MacOS idea pioneered by Xerox.

Still better to use the UNIX OS in the original and free flavor such
as BSD/Linux ...

Taka
[/quote]
Go back to badmouthing Jews. You make way more sense there.

--
Andrzej Rosa

Matti Narkia · Guest

Taka wrote:

[quote]On Jul 26, 9:46 am, Lucas Buck <sbcp...@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:22:05 +0000 (UTC), DZ <21...@3028312337.71354487.15072.31715.17391> wrote:
Tom Anderson <t...@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
This led to a celebrated bit of chip design: when Digital designed
their then-cutting-edge CVAX processor, on a spare bit of the die,
they wrote "CVAX: When you care enough to steal the very best" in
Russian!
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html
In Russian, it doesn>t make any sense though. It>s just a bunch of
words put together:
"?????... ????? ?? ???????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ??????"
"????????" is not even a Russian word, should be "??????????".
If you translate back, it is "SVAX.. When you ??? enough steal genuine
better"
"Nothing sucks like a VAX", as those of us who worked on DEC UNIX used to quote.

But VAX used to be the most stable operating system in the World,
never froze.
[/quote]
VAX was the name of the computer, the operating system was VMS, later
OpenVMS.

--
Matti Narkia

http://ma.gnolia.com/groups/Nutrition

DZ · Guest

Andrzej Rosa <bakters@yahoo.com> wrote:
[quote]Taka wrote:
But VAX used to be the most stable operating system in the World,
never froze. It was then stolen by Microsoft to use it as a base
for their new operating system called Windows2000 and up which
replaced the aging DOS. DOS did not have any multitasking
capabilities and therefore future. UNIX is now in the hands of
Apple to power their new operating system X and higher. But they
had better sticking to their original graphical MacOS idea
pioneered by Xerox. Still better to use the UNIX OS in the
original and free flavor such as BSD/Linux ...

Go back to badmouthing Jews. You make way more sense there.
[/quote]
But Taka has been posting from a 64-bit Linux through anonymous
proxies! (so that he can continue important research on how HIV has
nothing to do with AIDS without a fear of persecution). I conclude
that he must be an 3lit3 hax0r then.

Or maybe that just confirms what I>ve been telling you. If I had to
hookup some grandma who never used a computer to teh-internets these
days, I would choose something like Ubuntu Linux (encrypted, so she
could safely forget the laptop with the retirement accounts in the
park after she>s done feeding pigeons). Well, maybe not 64-bit. Would
be a lot less headache for both of us than with Windows or even Mac
OS.

DZ · Guest

Lucas Buck <sbcpark@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
[quote]DZ wrote:
Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
Man, i don>t get why some people are so excited by lipids.

Not me man, no. I>m not excited by lipids even the slightest.

The clinical term for this is "homosexuality".
[/quote]
Actually, this reminds me that recurrent discussion about the reasons
why these days women have be skinny to be considered beautiful.
Dr. Rosa, for example, used to say that the Western world turned gay,
while they still enjoy great ampleness (and potato vodka) back in the
good old Poland. OTOH, I think that the skinny projects a higher
brain-to-body ratio, which is a positive fitness trait in an urban
environment, and thus has been becoming increasingly sexy. (Dr. Rosa
and his female paleo-beasts are welcome to go back to his cave).

However, having just read "The Screwtape Letters" that was published
in 1942, I realized that this supposedly recent obsession with skinny
has been going on for probably a century.

A Satan subordinate says:

"... we now teach men to like women whose bodies are scarcely
distinguishable from those of boys. Since this is a kind of beauty
even more transitory than most, we thus aggravate the female>s chronic
horror of growing old (with many excellent results) and render her
less willing and less able to bear children. And that is not all. We
have engineered a great increase in the licence which society allows
to the representation of the apparent nude (not the real nude) in art,
and its exhibition on the stage or the bathing beach. It is all a
fake, of course; the figures in the popular art are falsely drawn; the
real women in bathing suits or tights are actually pinched in and
propped up to make them appear firmer and more slender and more boyish
than nature allows a full-grown woman to be. Yet at the same time, the
modern world is taught to believe that it is being 'frank' and
'healthy' and getting back to nature. As a result we are more and more
directing the desires of men to something which does not exist -
making the role of the eye in sexuality more and more important and at
the same time making its demands more and more impossible."

DZ · Guest

Lucas Buck <sbcpark@earthlink.NOSPAM.net> wrote:
[quote]DZ wrote:
Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> wrote:
This led to a celebrated bit of chip design: when Digital designed
their then-cutting-edge CVAX processor, on a spare bit of the die,
they wrote "CVAX: When you care enough to steal the very best" in
Russian!

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/creatures/pages/russians.html
http://simh.trailing-edge.com/semi/cvax.html

In Russian, it doesn>t make any sense though. It>s just a bunch of
words put together ... If you translate back, it is "SVAX.. When
you ??? enough steal genuine better"

"Nothing sucks like a VAX", as those of us who worked on DEC UNIX
used to quote.
[/quote]
Silver alert!!!

("On Topic" in sci.life-extension)

Taka · Guest

On Jul 31, 7:11 am, DZ <5...@40564206.1515126881.3442.26854.16183>
wrote:
[quote]I conclude
that he must be an 3lit3 hax0r then.
[/quote]
And I conclude that DZ is not only a clinical homo but also an
Internet stalker ... Couldn>t you contribute some real science here
instead of playing 007 or your shell games with numbers?

Taka

Guest

On Jul 30, 7:04 pm, DZ <31...@356322607.320964016.24810.6456.9978>
wrote:
[quote]
I think that the skinny projects a higher
brain-to-body ratio, which is a positive fitness trait in an urban
environment, and thus has been becoming increasingly sexy. (Dr. Rosa
and his female paleo-beasts are welcome to go back to his cave).
[/quote]
interesting theory. but it is only reasonable that a higher brain-to-
body ratio would be a positive fitness trait in urban environments for
both men and women. I fail to see any evidence that this is true for
men as it is for women. This theory doesn>t account for this fact.


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Life Extension Forum	Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Page 3 of 4