www.GetXFactor.com

Leading Technology, Science,
Agriculture News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

An exact simplification challenge - 65 (MeijerG)
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Math - Symbolic Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Vladimir Bondarenko
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:02 am    Post subject: An exact simplification challenge - 65 (MeijerG) Reply with quote

Hello,

MeijerG[{{-1/2, 1/2}, {5/2}}, {{-1, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]

?
Best wishes,

Vladimir Bondarenko

Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director

http://www.cybertester.com/ Cyber Tester, LLC

------------------------------------------------------

"We must understand that technologies
like these are the way of the future."

------------------------------------------------------
Back to top
Mate
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:00 pm    Post subject: Re: An exact simplification challenge - 65 (MeijerG) Reply with quote

On Jul 20, 11:02 am, Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com> wrote:
[quote]Hello,

MeijerG[{{-1/2, 1/2}, {5/2}}, {{-1, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]

?
[/quote]
-56/45*Pi

Why don>t you use Maple syntax in a Maple group?
Back to top
Vladimir Bondarenko
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:22 pm    Post subject: Re: An exact simplification challenge - 65 (MeijerG) Reply with quote

On Jul 20, 1:00 pm, Mate <mmat...@personal.ro> wrote:
[quote]On Jul 20, 11:02 am, Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com> wrote:

Hello,

  MeijerG[{{-1/2, 1/2}, {5/2}}, {{-1, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]

                          ?

-56/45*Pi

Why don>t you use Maple syntax in a Maple group?
[/quote]
M> Why don>t you use Maple syntax in a Maple group?

For brevity. There is MmaTranslator in Maple, while,
alas, there is no such a functionality in Mathematica.

So, by and large, it>s much easier to convert a
Mathematica input into a Maple one, within Maple.

M> -56/45*Pi

Perfect!

Now how you got to this result?
Back to top
Vladimir Bondarenko
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:31 am    Post subject: Re: An exact simplification challenge - 65 (MeijerG) Reply with quote

On Jul 20, 1:00 pm, Mate <mmat...@personal.ro> wrote:
[quote]On Jul 20, 11:02 am, Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com> wrote:

Hello,

  MeijerG[{{-1/2, 1/2}, {5/2}}, {{-1, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]

                          ?

-56/45*Pi

Why don>t you use Maple syntax in a Maple group?
[/quote]
To show a result is not a solution of our challenges.

However, at times, this is the first step toward it.

So, if there is a person who can force a CAS to get
the result, and show us the steps?
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Math - Symbolic Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum