| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bret Cahill
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
 |
|
[quote]If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
� �You are the one with ZERO education.
[/quote]
Then why are you and so many other nut cases responding to my posts?
Look, everyone agrees we need to get my readership down.
Since I>m opposed to censorship my readership cannot be eliminated
altogether but we can all agree it would be greatly reduced if all you
nut jobs with nothing to say went to other threads.
Bret Cahill |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Sir Frederick
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:15 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:59:55 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill <BretCahill@aol.com>
wrote:
[quote]If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
Sorry, I don>t have time to educate everyone. You need to focus on
the posts you understand.
Bret Cahill
Or you could do the improper action of dumbing down your[/quote]
posts such that the average citizen of the world could understand.
I don>t think you>re sorry at all. Also, if you have time to post, then
you have time to educate. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Michael Black
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:02 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Bret Cahill wrote:
[quote]If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
Sorry, I don>t have time to educate everyone. You need to focus on
the posts you understand.
From an idiot who is cross-posting this to[/quote]
sci.energy
sci.electronics.basics
alt.philosophy
I seem to recall this nonsense started with even more irrelevant
newsgroups.
One mark of an idiot is that he cross-posts. This newsgroup,
sci.electronics.basics, has been so cluttered with these junk posts
that I have no idea who started it, but you are certainly continuing
it.
Once you cross-post to such varied newsgroups, you don>t get discussion,
you get arguments. And cross-posting is the domain of the loon, not
just those who start it but those who reply. All kinds of newsgroups
have been devastated by such cross-posting, by idiots who don>t actually
care about discussion but think their "message" is so important that
everyone should see it. So they cross-post and they get what they
deserve.
You will never be taken seriously, if that is your intent, if
you continue to cross-post. Find the appropriate newsgroup, I
doubt sci.electronics.basics is the one, and post your drivel there.
Michael |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:28 am Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
[quote]
If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
[/quote]
You are the one with ZERO education.
[quote]Sorry, I don>t have time to educate everyone.
[/quote]
A wasted mind is a terrible thing: Brett is the perfect example of
what happens when taking too many illegal drugs. How many bad trips have
you taken?
[quote]You need to focus on the posts you understand.
[/quote]
You need to only post what YOU understand, which would be nothing but
blank lines.
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
Sporadic E is the Earth>s aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming'
sheep. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Michael A. Terrell
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:22 am Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
Bret Cahill wrote:
[quote]
If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
� �You are the one with ZERO education.
Then why are you and so many other nut cases responding to my posts?
[/quote]
The only nut case in the thread is you.
[quote]Look, everyone agrees we need to get my readership down.
[/quote]
And miss your devolution while it is playing live, and still in
progress? You will continue to have your ignorant ass nailed to the
wall every time you cross post to any of the electronics newsgroups. You
don>t know any electronics, you bloody moron!
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[quote]Since I>m opposed to censorship my readership cannot be eliminated
altogether but we can all agree it would be greatly reduced if all you
nut jobs with nothing to say went to other threads.
[/quote]
You are opposed to anything which you don>t understand, you knuckle
dragging, bottom feeding nut job, fruit cake, or whatever other honorary
title you chose for yourself.
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
Sporadic E is the Earth>s aluminum foil beanie for the 'global warming'
sheep. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bret Cahill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:25 am Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
[quote]If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
You are the one with ZERO education.
[/quote]
You dodged the issue:
If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
Posting here is no substitute for a formal ecucation.
[quote]Then why are you and so many other nut cases responding to my posts?
� �The only nut case in the thread is you.
[/quote]
Dodge two:
Here, I>ll try again:
Why are you and so many other nut cases responding to my posts?
[quote]Look, everyone agrees we need to get my readership down.
� �And miss your devolution while it is playing live, and still in
progress? �
[/quote]
Dodge three:
Everyone agrees we need to get my readership down.
Three dodges and you are OUT!
Care to try again? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bret Cahill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:34 am Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
[quote]Oh well, Bret was entertaining for a while but he>s bitbin
fodder now.
[/quote]
Does this mean you>ll stay on _other_ threads?
After all, we can all see my readership is too large.
Bret Cahill |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Eric Gisin
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 5:49 am Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
"Michael Black" <et472@ncf.ca> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.64.0807301358040.31834@darkstar.example.org...
[quote]On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Bret Cahill wrote:
If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
Sorry, I don>t have time to educate everyone. You need to focus on
the posts you understand.
From an idiot who is cross-posting this to
sci.energy
sci.electronics.basics
alt.philosophy
I seem to recall this nonsense started with even more irrelevant
newsgroups.
One mark of an idiot is that he cross-posts. This newsgroup, sci.electronics.basics, has been so
cluttered with these junk posts
that I have no idea who started it, but you are certainly continuing
it.
Once you cross-post to such varied newsgroups, you don>t get discussion,
you get arguments. And cross-posting is the domain of the loon, not
just those who start it but those who reply. All kinds of newsgroups
have been devastated by such cross-posting, by idiots who don>t actually
care about discussion but think their "message" is so important that
everyone should see it. So they cross-post and they get what they
deserve.
You will never be taken seriously, if that is your intent, if
you continue to cross-post. Find the appropriate newsgroup, I
doubt sci.electronics.basics is the one, and post your drivel there.
Actually, cross-posting to irrelevant groups is a sign of schizophrenia. Also:[/quote]
going on irrelevant tangents, conspiracy theories, bizarre beliefs, "alternative" science,
new-age woo, vague/metaphoric language. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Damon Hill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
"Eric Gisin" <gisin@uniserve.com> wrote in
news:comdnQRUiIsckwzVnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@posted.uniservecommunications:
[quote]Actually, cross-posting to irrelevant groups is a sign of
schizophrenia. Also: going on irrelevant tangents, conspiracy
theories, bizarre beliefs, "alternative" science, new-age woo,
vague/metaphoric language.
[/quote]
By that metric, he>s almost Guthian--or Plutonium. :)
Oh well, Bret was entertaining for a while but he>s bitbin
fodder now.
--Damon |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bret Cahill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:32 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
[quote]If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
? ?You are the one with ZERO education.
Then why are you and so many other nut cases responding to my posts?
We>re hardly nut cases.
[/quote]
Circular furrows are impossible? And then trying to defend your [lack
of] reasoning on the matter?
Three months and $100,000 in diesel to plow a field?
I deal with all kinds of people and I>ve _never_ heard anything that
wacky over such a short period of time.
Forget about the Pell grant. You>ll never get through the math.
[quote]The reason we respond to your posts is that we>re trying to make
things better by letting you know that you, and whoever follows you,
are headed for disaster downstream.
[/quote]
Gonna laugh me to death with circular furrows?
You wouldn>t sue over the IP me if I compiled your attempts to fake
being a techie would you?
[quote]Look, everyone agrees we need to get my readership down.
And yet, in the face of that, you keep posting.
[/quote]
If you can>t take the heat, go to another thread.
[quote]Since I>m opposed to censorship my readership cannot be eliminated
altogether
Sure it can.
Just stop posting.
[/quote]
You have two choices:
1. Get ridiculed ever time you try to pretend you know anything about
science or technology, and/or
2. Cut/snip tech issues and dodge 'n flame 'n flame 'n dodge.
.. . .
[quote]The problem isn>t that we have nothing to say,
[/quote]
Then why aren>t you saying it?
There>s only one answer: Every time you try to comment on tech you
know you>ll get ridiculed.
[quote]it>s that you think you
_do_.
[/quote]
If you think I>m not saying anything, then you need to take my advice
and go to another thread.
Bret Cahill |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bret Cahill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:35 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
If home 'n hearthers git pushed too far, are you going to shoot up
more "liberaloons." |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
John Fields
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:59:40 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]If you need a formal education, then the proper action is to get a
Pell Grant and go to college.
? ?You are the one with ZERO education.
Then why are you and so many other nut cases responding to my posts?
[/quote]
---
We>re hardly nut cases.
The reason we respond to your posts is that we>re trying to make
things better by letting you know that you, and whoever follows you,
are headed for disaster downstream.
---
[quote]Look, everyone agrees we need to get my readership down.
[/quote]
---
And yet, in the face of that, you keep posting.
---
[quote]Since I>m opposed to censorship my readership cannot be eliminated
altogether
[/quote]
---
Sure it can.
Just stop posting. It>s not like your drivel is important anyway.
---
[quote]but we can all agree it would be greatly reduced if all you
nut jobs with nothing to say went to other threads.
[/quote]
---
The problem isn>t that we have nothing to say, it>s that you think you
_do_.
JF |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Bret Cahill
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 3:01 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
[quote]Oh well, Bret was entertaining for a while but he>s bitbin
fodder now.
Does this mean you>ll stay on _other_ threads?
After all, we can all see my readership is too large.
Actually, the problem isn>t with the readership, it>s with the
authorship.
[/quote]
I don>t see anyone holding a gun to anyone>s head forcing him to read
my posts.
If you think you are wasting your time reading my posts, then the
rational thing to do is to click on another thread.
Anything else is irrational.
But it>s easy for me to predict you>ll do the irrational thing. Why?
You want to fantasize about having a tech background and I pop that
fantasy every time you are foolish enough to comment on technology.
You have unwittingly revealed you are ignorant of the math necessary
for a tech degree and by your too-clever-by-half word games that you
have never done anything trying to make money in industry.
If you act dumb people will just think you are . . . surprise
surprise . . . dumb.
In fact, you are now scared to death to comment on any tech.
So you have two choices:
1. get your fantasy popped, or,
2. dodge 'n flame 'n flame 'n dodge.
Bret Cahill |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
John Fields
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:06 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:34:13 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]Oh well, Bret was entertaining for a while but he>s bitbin
fodder now.
Does this mean you>ll stay on _other_ threads?
After all, we can all see my readership is too large.
[/quote]
---
Actually, the problem isn>t with the readership, it>s with the
authorship.
JF |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: Re: If You Cannot Understand My Posts, Then Obviously You Sh |
|
|
On Jul 31, 7:35 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]If home 'n hearthers git pushed too far, are you going to shoot up
more "liberaloons."
[/quote]
You are just dodging the vital economic
issue that is right around the corner.
Current bets are running that there is
a 25% chance of recession, with a
trace of rain. But you want us to return
to the full-fledged late seventies, high-tax
Jimmy Carter lowering of the economic
stagflation boom.
We are a free people, and you can>t force
us to kneel down and pray to Paul Ehrlich.
BTW, have you heard that we>re in for 30
years of global cooling, according to NASA?
It>s already the case that 1998 was the
peak. No year since has beaten that local
maximum. But now that the Pacific Decadal
Oscillation-a large-scale, slow-cycling ocean
pattern- has shifted to its cool phase, we>re
going to see how Greenolas face gittin'
pushed too far by empirical results. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
