www.GetXFactor.com

Leading Technology, Science,
Agriculture News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

If these are inorganic, then so is NASA.
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Science Skeptics Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fossilid
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:19 pm    Post subject: If these are inorganic, then so is NASA. Reply with quote

If these are inorganic, then so is NASA.

NASA has never admitted there was organics on Mars. But geology
textbooks says clearly that all “naturally formed” inorganic soil
grains/particles of 1 to 60 micrometers (which are clays and silts),
have to be flaky and angular in shape, no matter what minerals may be
contained in the inorganics. SEM/TEM may show images contrary to the
above, but what they show are “man-made” objects or objects reduced in
size by the preparation process for imaging the objects.

The optical microscope on board Phoenix Mars Lander has taken many
photomicrographs showing numerous objects between 10 to 60 micrometer
in diameter. Most of those objects are not flaky, angular or irreqular
at all. So, they are not inorganic, period. An examplary photo is at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555314562&p=93


If those “cells”were inorganic in origin, then so is NASA.
Back to top
rwalker
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:57 am    Post subject: Re: If these are inorganic, then so is NASA. Reply with quote

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:19:53 -0700 (PDT), fossilid
<lin440315@yahoo.com.tw> wrote:

[quote]If these are inorganic, then so is NASA.

NASA has never admitted there was organics on Mars. But geology
textbooks says clearly that all “naturally formed” inorganic soil
grains/particles of 1 to 60 micrometers (which are clays and silts),
have to be flaky and angular in shape, no matter what minerals may be
contained in the inorganics. SEM/TEM may show images contrary to the
above, but what they show are “man-made” objects or objects reduced in
size by the preparation process for imaging the objects.

The optical microscope on board Phoenix Mars Lander has taken many
photomicrographs showing numerous objects between 10 to 60 micrometer
in diameter. Most of those objects are not flaky, angular or irreqular
at all. So, they are not inorganic, period. An examplary photo is at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555314562&p=93


If those “cells”were inorganic in origin, then so is NASA.

[/quote]
Please. Go and get a GED. Once you>ve managed that, try to get into
a college that will accept the likes of you and study biology, and
include histology and anatomy in your course of study. Once you>ve
managed that, come home, get your "fossils" and smash yourself over
the head with them for wasting your life and everyone else>s time.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Science Skeptics Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum