fossilid
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:03 pm Post subject: If these are inorganic, then so is NASA. |
 |
|
If these are inorganic, then so is NASA.
NASA has never admitted there was organics on Mars. But geology
textbooks says clearly that all “naturally formed” inorganic soil
grains/particles of 1 to 60 micrometers (which are clays and silts),
are all flaky, angular and irregular in shape, no matter what minerals
may be contained in the inorganics. SEM/TEM may show images contrary
to the above, but what they show are “man-made” objects or objects
reduced in size by the preparation process for imaging the objects.
The optical microscope on board Phoenix Mars Lander has taken many
photomicrographs showing numerous objects between 10 to 60 micrometer
in diameter. Most of those objects are not flaky, angular or irreqular
at all. So, they are not inorganic, period. An examplary photo is at:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555314562&p=93
If those “cells” were inorganic in origin, then so is NASA. |
|
