Science and Technology news... :: View topic - If one can>t afford children, one should not have children.

Topaz · Guest

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:43:12 GMT, realistic@seanet.com (RFHall) wrote:

[quote]You mean it isn>t just the Muslims and the Blacks?
[/quote]

The West is the White race.

The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.

And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.

Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.

Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan

"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz · Guest

Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
"anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America>s only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn>t have any enemies in the Middle East.

No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.

Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.

The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can>t the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don>t control the media,
Jews do.

This is what President Nixon said:

http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html

"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

possum · Guest

"RaaN" <raan2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7618d89b-539a-456a-883f-c4d4ca528c9a@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Jul 29, 7:43 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
By Luke O>Farrell

Snipped Antisemitic Hate-Mongering Propganda
[/quote]
http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/index.php?link=template&story=237

possum · Guest

"RFHall" <realistic@seanet.com> wrote in message
news:489023c4.3326968@news.seanet.com...
[quote]On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:08:57 -0500, Topaz
mars1933@hotmail.com
wrote:

Walter:

Thanks for giving us a peek at a part of Nazi Germany that
not many of
us know.

RFHall
[/quote]
oh yes, thanks for 'the third reich, it>s popular virtues.'
please tell him no to bother to post " the architectural
glories of belson - the designer coffee table edition',
nobody here is going to like it, and i just don>t like
talking' to him ...
assHall.

possum

[quote]
http://www.seanet.com/~realistic/idealism.html
Realistic Idealism
Philosophy based on evidence.[/quote]

possum · Guest

"RFHall" <realistic@seanet.com> wrote in message
news:48902955.4751968@news.seanet.com...
[quote]On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:40:45 -0500, Topaz
mars1933@hotmail.com
wrote:

By LUKE O>FARRELL
http://www.heretical.com/ofarrell/index.html

There are two types of people in the world: people who
think there are
two types of people in the world and people who don>t. I>m
among the
first type and I think the world is divided into people
who recognize
the Jewish problem and people who don>t.

In other words, the world is divided into smart people and
dumb
people. If you>ve got an IQ of 80, have difficulty
operating a
can-opener, and recognize the Jewish problem, you>re
smart. If you>ve
got an IQ of 180, have already won a couple of Nobel
Prizes, and don>t
recognize the Jewish problem, you>re dumb.

I>ve been dumb for most of my life: it took me a long time
to
recognize the Jewish problem. I didn>t think for myself, I
just
accepted the propaganda and conformed to the consensus.
Jews are good
people. Only bad people criticize Jews. Jews good.
Anti-Semites bad.
But then, very slowly, I started to see the light.

Recognizing Jewish hypocrisy was the first big step. I was
reading an
article by someone called Rabbi Julia Neuberger, a
prominent British
liberal. I didn>t like liberals then, so I didn>t like her
for that
(and because her voice and manner had always grated on
me), but her
Jewishness wasn>t something I particularly noticed. But as
I read the
article I came across something that didn>t strike me as
very liberal:
she expressed concern about Jews marrying Gentiles,
because this
threatened the survival of the Jewish people.

That made me sit up and think. Hold on, I thought, I know
this woman
sits on all sorts of "multi-cultural" committees and is
constantly
being invited onto TV and radio to yap about the joys of
diversity and
the evils of racism. She>s all in favor of mass
immigration and
there>s no way she>s worried about Whites marrying
non-Whites, because
"Race is Just a Social Construct" and "We>re All the Same
Under the
Skin". She>s a liberal and she thinks that race-mixing is
good and
healthy and Holy. Yet this same woman is worried about
Jews marrying
Gentiles. Small contradiction there, n>est ce-pas?

Well, no. Big contradiction. She obviously didn>t apply
the same rules
to everyone else as she applied to her own people, the
Jews. She was,
in short, a hypocrite. But not just that - she was a
Jewish hypocrite.
And that>s a big step for a brainwashed White to take: not
just
thinking in a negative way about a Jew, but thinking in a
negative way
about a Jew because of her Jewishness.

After that, I slowly started to see the world in a
different way. Or
to be more precise: I started to see the world. I started
to see what
had always been there: the massive over-representation of
Jews in
politics and the media. And I started to notice that a lot
of those
Jews - like Rabbi Julia Neuberger, in fact - gave me the
creeps. There
was something slimy and oily and flesh-crawling about
them. And it
wasn>t just me, either: other Gentiles seemed to feel it
too.
Politicians often attract nicknames based on some
outstanding aspect
of their character or behavior. Margaret Thatcher was "The
Iron Lady".
Ronald Reagan was "Teflon Ron". Bill Clinton was "Slick
Willy". But
these are Gentile politicians and their nicknames are at
least
half-affectionate. Jewish politicians seem to attract a
different kind
of nickname. In Britain, Gerald Kaufman, bald, homosexual
Member of
Parliament for Manchester Gorton, is nicknamed "Hannibal
Lecter".
Peter Mandelson, now Britain>s Euro-Commissioner and Tony
Blair>s
suspected former lover, is "The Prince of Darkness".
Michael Howard
(né Hecht), the leader of the British Conservative Party,
is
"Dracula".

When I noticed this kind of thing, I started to ask
questions. What
was going on here? Why did Jews attract nicknames like
that? And why
had Gentiles reacted to them like that not just now, but a
long way
into the past? Shakespeare seems to have felt the same
kind of
repulsion when he created the vengeful lawyer Shylock, and
Dickens
when he created the parasitic master-thief Fagin. Classic
"anti-Semitic" stereotypes, but I knew that stereotypes
aren>t always
wrong. If anti-Semitic stereotypes aren>t always wrong,
then there>s
an obvious conclusion: neither is anti-Semitism. Gentiles
are
sometimes right to dislike and distrust Jews.

After all, at the same time I was noticing something else:
the massive
over-representation of Jews, not just among politicians
and
journalists, but among crooked businessmen too. In fact,
among very,
very crooked businessmen, the ones responsible for really
big frauds
at Gentile expense. Men like Robert Maxwell (né Hoch),
Ivan "Greed is
Good" Boesky, and Michael Milken. And, on a slightly
lesser scale,
Ernest Saunders, who finagled an early release from prison
because he
was coming down with Alzheimer>s, that well-known
incurable brain
disease from which no-one ever recovers. Only Saunders
managed to
confound medical science and recover from it.

Slimy. Hypocritical. Crooked. In a word: Jewish. But I
didn>t take the
final step, the step to full recognition of the Jewish
problem, until
I watched the reaction to Mel Gibson>s The Passion of the
Christ. I>m
not a Christian and I have little sympathy with modern
Christianity,
but I had a lot of sympathy for Mel Gibson as I watched
the hysterical
campaign against him. The hysterical, well-organized,
international
campaign by the slimy, hypocritical, crooked Jew Abe
Foxman, Head of
the Anti-Defamation League, and his fellow slimy,
hypocritical,
crooked Jews around the world. They didn>t like something
and they
were moving heaven and earth to get it stopped.

And what was it they didn>t like? A movie about an event
at the heart
of European art, literature, and culture: the crucifixion
of Christ.
So here was another obvious conclusion: Jews hate European
art,
literature, and culture. In other words, Jews hate White
civilization
and the White race who created it.

After that, it all fell into place. I finally recognized
that Jews
weren>t just slimy, hypocritical, and crooked, but
actively dangerous
too. If I thought of something harmful to White
civilization and the
survival of the White race - mass immigration, feminism,
multi-culturalism, anti-racism, gay rights - I realized
that Jews were
behind it, were promoting it through their control of the
media, and
had been doing so for decades.

Finally, I had seen the light. Finally, I had gotten smart
and
recognized the Jewish problem, the problem that even dumb
Gentiles
subconsciously recognize when they give nicknames like
"Hannibal
Lecter" and "Prince of Darkness" and "Dracula" to Jewish
politicians.
Jews really do want to eat us, and steal our souls, and
suck our
blood, and it>s about time we started firing a few silver
bullets.

You mean it isn>t just the Muslims and the Blacks?
[/quote]
fascism stamps on any face it has power to stomp on, and
would eventually stomp on joey the budgie....
what does one think it is? go on, you>re a one, have a go.

possum

Topaz · Guest

Mussolini, Benito - The Doctrine of Fascism

Fascism is the name of an ancient way of keeping a group of people
together under a united goal. Dating back to the Roman Empire,
political leaders like Julius Caesar used fascism as a way of
maintaining a consensus between the individuals in his land, as well
as establishing the kind of self-sacrificing heroism that has always
defined the basis for Indo-European culture. Fascism puts focus on the
whole, which includes people, culture, religion and nature.

It is therefore totally opposed to liberalism, which claims that the
freedom of the individual is of highest importance. It can be said
that the essence of fascism is that of an integralist tradition: each
nation is seen as an organic entity, meaning that there are no
internal conflicts between man and nature, nor man and state. In
liberal democracies, there is a constant conflict between the state
and the individual. Left wants to increase the power of the state,
while the Right wants to do the opposite. Fascism solves this by
simply equating the state with the people: what the state wants, the
people want, and vice versa.

Thus fascism is a way of finding a balance between the needs of
different individuals and having them work towards shared goals. This
will always remain as the stable foundation to healthy civilizations.
As soon as a house needs to be built it>s absolutely necessary to let
all parts involved focus on their task and work together in order to
fulfill each other with their respective specialization. Opposed to
the democratic view on work, where each individual is assumed to be
able to control and handle any given task, fascism claims the
opposite: only those who are in accordance with the natural abilities
of a specific task may fulfill them with the greatest perfection in
art. Anyone can build a fairly functioning place to stay, but how many
have the inherent skills to make it last for several years? It>s thus
not about "who can do what", but merely "who can do it best". As seen
from a democratic point of view, this is promotion of "inequality".
Fascism sees it as natural and is not bound to moral obligations: each
individual has a unique ability and should thus work towards improving
it.

Put into a pragmatic context, this form of political specialization is
solved through the traditional system of guilds, or "corporativism",
as it is also called. This means that all carpenters will unite under
a union for carpenters, all leaders will unite under a union of
leaders etc. The benefits of this are many, but practically it is a
fully mature way of combining cheap and effective education with an
economic stability for all parts involved. It develops each respective
craft and creates a sense of pride in one>s own ability and art. The
fascist form of corporativism is therefore a close relative to the
caste society, which focuses on individual specialization and denies
the democratic-capitalist way of valuing people according to money.
Within fascism, the natural ability of the individual is not seen as
an economic question, but a purely pragmatic one, leaving space for
individual improvement and development.

It must therefore be said that fascism is totally against the
political system of socialism, which sees all individuals as equal in
ability, but most importantly, divides the people up into economic
groups called "classes", where the working class is seen as suppressed
by the bourgeois class. Fascism wants to erase this clash and unite
the people under the things that ultimately bind them together:
history, culture and religious belief. In relation to this we can thus
address another common misconception about fascism: it is not simply a
political stance, but an overtly spiritual and transcendentalist
outlook on life..

The most noticeable difference between liberal democracy and a fascist
society, is however the question of leadership. Democracy is built
around the assumption that numerical votes automatically can decide
which idea is the one worth striving towards. Fascism claims the
opposite: no numerical votes or principle of the majority can find the
best solution to our problems. Only by recognizing the inherent
variation in ability among individuals, including leadership, may we
find a way of controlling and managing the issues of the state and its
different organs. Therefore, all traditional fascist societies have
been ruled by political leaders and not by the people, although the
general goals and ideals of both parties remain the same. Note that
this is not an actual hierarchy, as it is often presented from a
democratic point of view: a leader is just as worthy and useful for
society as a whole as a carpenter or an engineer. Corporativism wants
each individual to see his or her own specific place in the organic
order as a whole. Only through this view can we at last lay the
clashes between classes aside and start working for common goals
again..

Ultimately fascism is a philosophy for the future of modern
civilizations. Not until we dare to face the inherent problems with
democracy and its ways of creating moral illusions, can we find a
political system based on natural reality.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz · Guest

Here are some quotes from "With Hitler on the Road to Power" by Dr.
Otto Dietrich

The "Dritte Reich" stands firm. It rests on its foundations, on the
immortal values of the Nordic Race, and in the depth of Germany>s
soul.

We call Adolf Hitler our "Leader" (Fuehrer), because that is what he
is. He united State and Nation in Germany.

Only the eye-witness, who has experienced day by day, at the side of
Adolf Hitler, the wave of love and enthusiasm which greets him from
every class of German, can realize that such ovations, so rare in the
life of statesmen, signify no artificial feeling, but genuine
affection.. Hundreds, thousands throng the streets and roads, and
surge toward his car.. The scenes which we witness day by day are
touching and heart-rending. They are not isolated examples, but occur
everywhere.

The history of the National Socialist Movement shall be handed down to
posterity as the epic of the resurrected German Nation.

With indomitable will and unprecedented perseverance, which no
reverse can dishearten, this previously unknown man of the people,
with a few faithful adherents, dared to pierce the lines of the
Marxist terror.. He knows; terror is not overcome by intellect, but by
terror.

Adolf Hitler was not permitted to speak in public. The party lacked
the most essential means. It>s existence during the following years -
probably the most arduous of its life - was one long series of
persecutions, muzzling, and trickery. Whoever admitted National
Socialism, was banished from civil life, from the decadent bourgeoisie
and from the class-conscious workers. The mere suspicion of National
Socialism meant the loss of employment and bread, boycott and ruin of
business interests, the inevitable acceptance of misery.

Hundreds, thousands were imprisoned by the November State Government.
Throughout the streets raged bloodshed and scenes of Marxist terror.
All the powers of hell were let loose against the advancing young
movement.

After twelve years of inconceivably laborious preparation, the
N.S.D.A.P. felt strong enough to knock at the door of power in the
Reich

But strong elements of economic opposition were still prevalent, and
these he attacked at the beginning of 1932.

Even today, I can picture this meeting of prominent men. We came for
Godesberg, and drove up to the Park Hotel, amidst the hooting of the
Marxists. The room was over crowded. Huddled together, sat the chief
West German magnates. There were familiar and unfamiliar faces. Men in
the public eye , and those quiet , but no less influential powers,
who, moving behind the scenes, control the fate of economy by the soft
sounds issuing from their private offices- men said to bear a ledger
rather than a heart.

Joyful expectation brightened the faces of those already converted.
But the vast majority bore an air of superiority and cool reserve-
probably flattered that Hitler had approached them. Mere curiosity,
and general interest lured them to the meeting. They wanted to hear
Hitler speak. They had no intention of being converted; the came to
criticize, seeking confirmation of their own infallible opinion.

Our leader received a chilly ovation; he spoke from a slightly raised,
projecting balustrade, he hands resting lightly on the iron railing. I
sat, amongst the listeners, taking notes, and observing the effect of
his speech which lasted for over two hours. From world political
perspective and with cogent logic, out leader elucidated the relations
between economy and politics, their reciprocal effect, and their
results in Germany. He explained the cause of the situation , and
proposed the only possible remedy.

The general impression upon this group of most impassive listeners was
astounding. After an hour, their chilly reserve gave way to intense
interest. Hitler spoke of the titanic struggle of his political
warriors, needy and persecuted, but making every sacrifice, even that
of life, for their nation. He contrasted the German youth>s unselfish
idealism, personified in National Socialism, and the noble character
of working-class followers, with the lack of comprehension, the
materialism, and the heavy guilt of the purely economically
established Bourgeoisie. He pricked their social conscience without
causing offence.

They began to flush, fixed their gaze upon out Leader>s lips, and it
seemed as if their hearts were moved. He spoke to their very souls.
Faint, then thundering applause greeted Hitler at the conclusion of
his speech; he had won a battle.

The Jewish and Marxist Press lied boldly next day that Hitler had
feasted with the industrial magnates on champagne and lobsters.
Actually, a few minutes later, the night say us on the road again,
bent on fresh work.

Next day, Hitler addressed with equal success the Crefeld Silk
magnates in Godesberg. Later the national club in Hamburg. Everywhere,
the scene was the same.

Those were daring journeys, fraught with danger, through the very
strongholds of the Marxist potentates who were on the track of their
hated, sworn foe.

But Adolf Hitler fought his way through. The number-plate of his car
was smeared with oil and coated with dust- quite indiscernible.

Then we held our first meeting in Goerlitz, where the attendance
exceeded the hundred thousand figure. All the roads were crowed with
masses of people on foot, on bicycles, and in lorries, all with the
same destination.

Hitler spoke as the stars arose in the heavens, and amidst the flaring
torches.

Now the crowds recognized the luminous plane carrying our leader, who
had just devoted his time to them. Cheers broke out from a hundred
thousand throats, drowning even the thunder of our motors, whilst the
crowds brandished flaming torches in greeting.

We have experienced the following fact; In Germany, wherever economic
and moral distress was greatest, wherever things seemed most
intolerable, there, confidence in our leader was strongest, and
gripped all the people.

Wherever our leader approached, every man and woman came out. Crowds
lined the streets. Aged grandmothers, on whose distressed faces the
direst poverty was written, raised their arms in greeting. Wherever we
stopped, the women stretched out their children towards our leader.
There were tears of joy and emotion.

They used to meet upon the Platterhof. Adolf Hitler would often come
in the night fog to the Platterhof, to take counsel with his friends.

The "Conservative State Idea" appropriated our ideas. The most ancient
political mummies of the past suddenly appeared upon the scene, and,
without shame, claimed the credit for out previous successes.

The Youth stood by Hitler, because it knew that he personified the
Nation>s Youth. From the beginning, our leader had valued most highly
the immense importance of Youth for the movement. Not the old
generation, but a rising generation, uncorrupted by the destructive
poison of the world ideas of the ruling classes, could bear the new
Germany upon its shoulders.

Finally, on 30th January, 1933, our leader made the short drive over
the Wilhelmsplatz to the Reichskanzler>s Office. Amidst boundless
cheers. The seige was over, the fortress had fallen, the gates lay
open.

The political lie had played a prominent role in all epochs of
parliamentary history. But such accumulations of lies and defamations
as our opponents have hurled against the awakening young Germany in
the course of our 13 years' struggle have not been experienced.

What National Socialist>s blood does not boil, if he recalls the rapid
fire of press lies, that witches Sabbath of infernal songs of hatred,
which burst upon the National Socialist Movement every day?

The activity of the Marxist Press against National Socialism, by means
of profligacy, unscrupulous lies and base agitation of the public,
stands unrivalled throughout the press of the whole world.

But this systematic lying campaign of our opponents was always the
best evidence of the moral weakness of their own position. The more
desperate their situation was, the more unscrupulous became their
press agitation.

The agitation of the Jewish-Marxist Press against the N.S.D.A.P., has
been such an essential ingredient of our opponents' struggle during
all these years, that we would be guilty of historical forgery if we
did not lay due stress upon this lying campaign in our description of
the events.

The National Socialist Party has re-united people and State, it has
restored the people to the State, and the State to the people. In this
way, an organism, complete within itself, and comprising every
function of the life of the community, was born from the Nation
itself, in the midst of a decadent people and a corrupt State.

In Nuremberg, the Party represented the German people and the German
State, before the eyes of the whole world. This was a more complete, a
more morally dignified, and a more imposing representation than the
State and Nation have ever previously enjoyed.

If proves the recognition that a new valuation of men, a valuation
based upon the laws of nature, is beginning to force its way through
from the hearts of the European Nations. It is about to overcome
Liberalism, and replace it by a new conception of the living
community.

The democratic, parliamentary Liberalism apodictically claimed for
itself the eternal title of the most purposeful and best form of
representation of the peoples rights. At last with its own eyes, the
Nation has recognized National Socialism as the organization of
naturally chosen leaders. National Socialism>s achievements in the
fields of Socialism, Economy, Administration, and Reformation of the
Reich, speak for themselves. In one sweep, these leaders have
accomplished what dozens of previous parliamentary, democratic
governments vainly attempted in the most deplorable way.

Probably it is an act of justice and compensation, that the German
Nation, so sorely afflicted by the world-war, is chosen to lead the
way to a better future for the nations.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz · Guest

Disney and the Jews:
Eisner and His Kind Must Stop Harming Our Children

by William L. Pierce

We>ve spoken about the Jewish control of the news and entertainment
media before, but it>s a matter of such urgency that we need to talk
about it again and again. It is absolutely essential for us to
understand who controls our mass media and how they use their control
to undermine America.

Very recently a major rearrangement in the media world took place when
the Walt Disney company paid $19 billion to take control of Capital
Cities/ABC, the company that owns the ABC television network. That
makes the Disney company the biggest of the media conglomerates. And
it makes the man who controls Disney, Michael Eisner, the most
powerful media boss in the world.

What does this mean for the future of our people? Should we be
concerned that the company which brought us Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck,
and Snow White will in the future be playing a much bigger role in
forming the opinions of American television viewers and setting the
moral and cultural standards of our nation?

I>ll answer that question: Yes, we certainly should be concerned,
because the Walt Disney company is not what it used to be. It has been
transformed from a wholesome producer of children>s entertainment into
a malign instrument of subversion.

To understand how this happened, let>s go back to the beginning. Walt
Disney was born in 1901 in a working-class, Midwestern American
family. He spent his early years on the family farm in Missouri. As a
teenager he helped support his family by delivering newspapers. He
later attributed his ability to overcome obstacles and achieve success
to the work discipline that he developed as a boy with the newspaper
route.

Although young Walt came from a typical American background, with no
advantages or privileges, he was a person of exceptional talent and
drive. He felt a strong artistic urge while he was still in grade
school, and he took a correspondence course in drawing. He continued
to develop his drawing skills in high school as a cartoonist for his
school paper. He dropped out of school at 16 and served in the First
World War. After the war, instead of finishing high school, he and
another young artist began experimenting with animated films in a tiny
studio of their own in Kansas City. Using very primitive equipment,
they made short, animated cartoons based on fairy tales. They tried to
market their films through a New York film distributor, but the New
Yorker took advantage of the struggling, young filmmakers: he stole
their work and left them destitute.

In 1922, at the ripe age of 20, Walt Disney decided to make a fresh
start in Hollywood. He sold his camera to raise enough money to make
the trip to California. There he enlisted the support of his brother
Roy as a business manager, and he persuaded his fellow artist in
Kansas City to come join him. With Walt>s drive and determination,
they opened a new film studio. They invented a film character they
called Oswald the Rabbit, and a series of animated cartoons featuring
Oswald enabled the small studio to gain a foothold in the film
business.

Later, when sound films were introduced in 1927, Walt invented Mickey
Mouse. Walt himself provided Mickey>s voice. Mickey Mouse was an
enormous success and helped Walt Disney Productions prosper and grow.
Over the years Walt Disney>s fertile imagination gave us Donald Duck,
Goofy and Pluto, Dumbo the elephant, and a score of other animal
characters which have fascinated children all over the world for more
than 60 years. In 1937 Disney produced his great masterpiece, Snow
White and the Seven Dwarfs. This beautifully animated fairy tale
appealed to adults as well as to children. Like many fairy tales its
roots lie deep in the consciousness of our people.

After Snow White came Pinnochio, Fantasia, and Bambi. Walt Disney
Productions became a major power in the American film industry. And it
was unique, in that it was the only major film producer in Hollywood
not owned or controlled by Jews. The fact that Walt Disney was not a
Jew caused problems for him, however. He was surrounded by Jews who
resented his influence on American culture. A whispering campaign was
organized against him. Stories were spread that he was a fascist. He
began having labor problems.

The real problem, of course, was that Walt Disney>s vision of the
world, as reflected in the films he produced, was wholly different
from that of the Jewish film producers around him. As long as Walt was
making Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck cartoons, this problem could be
overlooked. When he began animating feature-length fairy tales like
Snow White and Cinderella, the Jews in Hollywood became increasingly
nervous. The world of Snow White was an entirely White world, a
European world. It stirred deep feelings in European Americans, and
the aim of the Jewish media bosses then as now was to make White
Americans forget their roots. They wanted to begin promoting
multiculturalism as soon as the Second World War was over, and Walt
was in their way. They couldn>t push racial mixing in their films and
have someone as popular as Walt Disney refuse to go along: the
contrast would be obvious to the public. Even Disney>s extremely
popular Nature films were resented by the rest of Hollywood. Films
which promoted a love for animals and the natural world were viewed
with suspicion by men whose view of life was entirely economic and
metropolitan.

These may seem like subtle differences, and in fact most people
outside of Hollywood were oblivious to the ideological and cultural
conflict between Walt Disney and the other film producers. The closest
that the conflict came to attracting public attention was during the
1940s and early 1950s, when Walt Disney>s total lack of sympathy for
Communism and his refusal to let Communist propaganda be introduced
into any of his productions set him apart from the rest of Hollywood.
While Walt was alive, however, there wasn>t much that Hollywood could
do about him. He was too popular with the American people.

After Walt died in 1966, however, the situation changed. His company
had depended on his genius for its prosperity, and without him it had
a difficult time keeping up with the competition. After Disney company
profits had declined for several years, Jewish corporate raiders Saul
Steinberg and Irwin Jacobs moved in for the kill. In 1984, after
Steinberg had milked the company of $32 million, Disney family
shareholders were too weak to resist a takeover by Michael Eisner, the
Jewish boss of Paramount Pictures. Eisner in turn brought in as his
second in command another Jew, Jeffrey Katzenberg. The company that
Walt Disney built-the company that gave us Snow White and Fantasia --
has been in Jewish hands ever since.

During his first day as chairman of the Disney company-his first day,
believe it or not-Eisner ordered the production of an R-rated film,
about the kinky sexual misadventures of a typically neurotic Jewish
family in the Los Angeles area. This was the first R-rated film ever
produced by the Disney company-but certainly not the last.

Actually, what Michael Eisner has done to the Disney company is far
worse than cutting the soul out of it. He has transformed it into
another instrument in the Jewish campaign to multiculturalize America.
He has made it into a spiritually destructive propaganda instrument
aimed at our children.

There are no better examples of this than a couple of recent
children>s films produced by the Disney company under Eisner: The
Jungle Book and Pocahontas. Actually, in 1967, the year after Walt
Disney>s death, the original Disney company made an animated film
based on Kipling>s Jungle Book stories of India. It was a film in the
Disney tradition, made to entertain children and not to brainwash
them. Last year Mr. Eisner produced a new, Politically Correct version
of The Jungle Book. The new version, which uses live characters
instead of animation, promotes interracial sex. In Mr. Eisner>s
version, White males are portrayed as contemptible, cowardly, inept,
and disloyal. The White heroine rejects her British-officer fiancee',
and lets herself be wooed and won by an Indian jungle boy, played by a
Chinese actor. And, of course, it bears no resemblance at all to
anything written by Rudyard Kipling. I hardly need comment on the film
Pocahontas, which has received so much publicity recently, except to
say that its message is the same as that of Eisner 's version of The
Jungle Book: namely, that racial mixing is A-OK, that there>s
absolutely no reason why a White man should not marry an Indian woman
or why a White woman should not have an affair with a Chinaman.
It took Mr. Eisner ten years to drag the Disney company down to the
Pocahontas level. He is a careful man. He knows that there is a lot at
stake. He certainly doesn>t want to move too fast and cause a negative
reaction from the American public. He didn>t want to alert the
American public to his intentions ten years ago. So he started with
R-rated sex films and gradually moved to films which tell White
children that miscegenation is fine and noble, and that non-Whites
really have much more character than Whites. But I believe that Mr.
Eisner had this outcome clearly in his mind from the first day that he
took over the Disney company and began degrading it.

And now Mr. Eisner will have the ABC television network under his
control too. I don>t expect that to change the party line at ABC very
much. ABC, like the other TV networks, has been pretty solidly Jewish
from the beginning. It was headed by Jewish media boss Leonard
Goldenson for more than 30 years. The fact that Capital Cities
Communications, whose chairman is Thomas Murphy, a Gentile, merged
with Goldenson>s ABC ten years ago didn>t really have much influence
on programming. Goldenson>s people remained in the policy-making
positions. Eisner>s buyout of ABC just consolidates things in Jewish
hands a bit. It takes Murphy out of the picture and makes it easier
for ABC to become even more Politically Correct than it was. It means
that we will be seeing programs on the ABC television network
promoting miscegenation and undermining White self-confidence a little
more frequently than before. It speeds up the schedule a bit for
introducing even more destructive propaganda than before. It means
that our children will be subjected to somewhat more intense
brainwashing than before.

The situation with the rest of the mass media of news and
entertainment isn>t really different, of course. Just as Jews took
over Hollywood in the 1930s, they also took over the other media, and
today they have such an overwhelming influence that even those who are
not Jews go along with their policies in order to get along.

Often when I point out this fact of Jewish media control to persons
who are Politically Correct, they will respond by saying that it makes
no difference who controls the media. Why does it bother me that Jews
run Hollywood, they ask in a sneering, condescending tone. I know that
people who respond in this way aren>t being honest. They would
certainly think it made a difference if I controlled the media, for
example. And actually I>d be concerned if any group with an agenda of
its own had control of the media. I>d be concerned if all of the media
were in the hands of Southern Baptists, for example, or radical
vegetarians.

I am especially concerned about the Jewish control of the media,
however, for two reasons. First, the people who control the media also
control the political process in America: they control, in effect, the
policies of our government and the course taken by our society. That>s
because the politicians, whether they>re Democrats or Republicans,
will not stand up to the Jews. Instead they grovel at the Jews' feet.
Every politician knows that he must be portrayed favorably by the
media if he is to be elected, and every politician knows who controls
the media.

The second reason why Jewish control of the media is such a disaster
for us is based in the unique nature of the Jews. If Baptists
controlled the media perhaps they>d persuade the government to have a
law against making love on Sunday. If radical vegetarians controlled
the media, we might have to eat soyburgers instead of hamburgers.
But we can survive those things. We might not be happy, but we could
survive: our people could survive. Neither the Baptists nor the
vegetarians would be trying to corrupt us spiritually or to destroy
our race.

But corrupt and destroy are exactly what Mr. Eisner is doing. That>s
the purpose of films like The Jungle Book and Pocahontas. They are
aimed, first, at the spiritual corruption of our children and,
ultimately, at the destruction of our people.

I know that statement sounds extreme to some people who are not
familiar with the facts of Jewish media control. They think that two
recent children>s films from the Walt Disney company which promote
racial mixing aren>t enough evidence to condemn all of the people who
control our news and entertainment media. And I must agree. One needs
much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone
who is not afraid to look at it, for anyone who is not so determined
to be Politically Correct that he refuses to see it.

For example, consider what has happened to the popular music industry
in recent years. It>s not just the "gangsta rap" that we>ve heard a
few Republican politicians complaining about because the media people
who>ve been pushing "gangsta rap" moved a little too fast and caused a
negative reaction from the American people. It>s the whole trend of
popular music away from traditional White forms and toward non-White
forms. I don>t have to tell you who controls the popular music
industry in America, but I will anyway. In particular, the biggest
music companies promoting Black "rap" music among White children-
companies like Time Warner and MTV-are solidly Jewish. A Jew named
Gerald Levin is to Time Warner what Michael Eisner is to Disney. And
MTV is owned by Sumner Redstone, another Jew, through his Viacom
Corporation. These three companies that I>ve just mentioned-Disney,
Viacom, and Time Warner-are America>s three biggest producers of mass
entertainment-they>re number one, number two, and number three,
respectively-and they>re all controlled by Jews. Is that just a
coincidence? Think about it!

I could spend the next hour talking about the genealogy of the biggest
media bosses. What you really need to do to be convinced, however, is
to study the matter for yourself. I>ll be happy to send you enough
facts to get you started. Just write to me.

The idea I want to leave you with today is this: In this era in which
the mass media have such a powerful influence over our people>s ideas
and attitudes and values, it is essential that we take the control of
those media away from a group which is utterly alien to us. It>s a
group whose primary aim is to deaden our sense of identity and kill
any sense of racial consciousness among us, so that we will not be
able to resist the poisonous doctrines which they>re promoting. These
doctrines are multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism and egalitarianism
-- and, of course, "diversity"-all of the racially destructive "isms"
of Political Correctness.

In this era when the single most important influence on the
development of a child>s self-image is television entertainment, it is
essential that people like Michael Eisner and Sumner Redstone not be
the ones setting the tone for that entertainment.

We all know that America has lost its sense of purpose and is
drifting. We all know that American society is coming apart. We all
know that our traditional values, our traditional life-style, our
traditional heroes and role models have been disparaged and ridiculed
by the controlled media. We all know that the idea of White racial
guilt, the idea of deferring to minorities, the idea that we should
tolerate perversion and accept it as "normal"-all of these ideas have
been pushed by the mass media. Alienation and delinquency among our
young people are increasing. The traditional American family is in
serious decline. Racial intermarriage is on the rise. Non-White
immigrants are pouring across our borders, and no serious effort is
being made to stop them. Our political system has become hopelessly
corrupt.

The only way that we can even begin to cure this illness is to regain
complete control of our mass media. Our media must be used to give our
people a sense of identity; a sense of racial community; a sense of
kinship, of belonging; a sense of racial and national purpose. We must
take control away from the people who are using the media now to
confuse and alienate and mislead us. Only when our own people are
setting the standards for the media, only when our own people are
deciding what attitudes and values should be taught to our children,
can we become strong and healthy again-and that means breaking the
Jewish control of the media. Let me hear from you on this most
important of all the issues facing our people.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz · Guest

By Dr. William Pierce
http://www.natvan.com

"The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War.
They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in
advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in
publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit
of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature.
They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were
ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German
sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe
that it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were
promoting the same culture of lies that they have been promoting here.

That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First
World War some important government business, including the
ratification of a new German constitution, took place in the city of
Weimar. The Jews loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the
most degenerate period in Germany>s history. The Jews, of course,
didn>t think of it as
degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and
"cool." Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was
considered a virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been
written by Jews in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to
the skies and looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the
so-called
"Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to
the Weimar period.

There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar
Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It
depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the
flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the
communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the
one
hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of
course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the
Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews
outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from
their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles
under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the
Jews apparently didn>t stop to think -- or didn>t care -- that a
normal, healthy White person would view things differently. Check it
out for yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores.

The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World
War, the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to
America after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the
healthiest elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as
many Americans have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany
the Jews were a bit premature. Although they had much of the media
under their control,
they didn>t control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The
healthiest Germans resisted and beat them.

In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control
before they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully.
In America they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in
America. It>s still possible for Americans to win, but it>s going to
be a lot tougher this time. We>d better get started. The first step is
to regain at least partial control of our media, so that we can begin
contradicting the lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a
part of that first step."

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

Topaz · Guest

Here are some quotes from the official NSDAP book on the proceedings
of the 1936 Nuremberg Rally by Dr. Walther Schmitt:

Adolf Hitler>s double proclamation to the party rally makes clear the
inner National Socialist unity of political accomplishment and
cultural guidance. That alone says more about the National Socialist
movement than all the intellectual analysts could say with a thousand
essays. The combination of politics and culture in the party rally>s
program is clear proof of the enormous confidence that fills the
German renewal movement, and which as always spurs it on to still
greater accomplishments. No matter how splendid and triumphant the
political accomplishments discussed in the morning are, come evening
the party reports on it cultural strengths and achievements. It knows
that great political accomplishments also demand great works of art,
and that only these will justify its position in history.

As the Führer has said, National Socialism sees artistic creations as
the highest expression of a nation>s being. This view, which breaks
decisively from the past, was expressed in the conclusion of his
speech about the new German cultural era at Nuremberg in 1936: "Art is
the only truly immortal product of human activity."...

Adolf Hitler announced at the conclusion of the 1936 party rally that
it will in the future become a great German Olympic festival: "What
came of the pitiable rallies of our former opponents! Now we see a
great exhibition of the nation in political, military, spiritual,
cultural and economic arenas. The physical activity of the nation must
also be included in the splendid new facilities of the party rally
grounds. It will be a new Olympia, one in modern form and under a
different name!" Once again the Führer revealed in these words the
greatness of an idea which is not a dead teaching, rather part of our
innermost being, an ever living appeal to all sound feelings and to
the creative strength of each German...

We sense that just as Napoleon transformed Paris into the glittering
center of his state with monumental plans, so too the national capital
of Berlin will become a source of pride and greatness for the entire
nation.

It finally would be improper if the artistic level of the ceremonies
themselves were not of a level keeping with their vast new
surroundings. This was evident both in the youth ceremonies and those
of the Labor Service at the 1936 Party Rally of Honor. Their simple
clarity and almost architectural form were a deep expression of the
new German life. The same was true of the powerful oath of political
leaders of the movement, held under the deep black night sky. As Adolf
Hitler was greeted, spotlights suddenly shot up 150 kilometers into
the heavens, creating a dome of light of unimaginable splendor above
the Zeppelin Field. This political roll call of National Socialism
took place under a symphony of flags, light and disciplined columns,
towered over by the marble platform.

Every moment of this party really demonstrated the creative,
constructive will of the National Socialist movement. Everyone in
Nuremberg felt this and was swept away by its force. The spiritual
strength of the party of construction led to an inevitable
confrontation with Jewish-International Bolshevism, whose systematic
work of destruction has brought one nation after another in Europe to
crisis and misery.

As a proud victor, the Führer in his opening proclamation could list
the accomplishments of his government and the movement, which National
Socialism has done in less than four years since it took power. The
battle against unemployment and the large new economic undertakings
are part of a long series of accomplishments that only four years ago
seemed an impossible dream, but today are already part of a history
that National Socialism hardly speaks about any longer. Yet these
great achievements are not the party>s crowning glory. More beautiful
and glorious is the educational work of the movement, its building of
a new German man. The accomplishments thus far have never been rivaled
by any previous government in so short a time..

The Führer spoke of the lessons of political development in recent
years. He spoke as well of the experiences that Germany and the
National Socialist movement have had with the destructive Bolshevist
idea. He proclaimed the iron will of the new Germany to drive back
with force any Bolshevist attack. In this moment the Führer of Germany
became the greatest political prophet in all of Europe.

The National Socialists who heard Germany>s Führer know that the words
Adolf Hitler spoke in Nuremberg are the result of serious, mature
reflection, careful observation, and irresistable logic. Here speaks a
man who knows better than anyone else the bestial nature and methods
of Bolshevism. His warning and firm bearing were therefore a political
prophecy that will guide the future development of European politics.
The movement in Nuremberg understood. The thanks and jubilation of his
followers doubled as he called up the old iron laws and virtues of the
National Socialist movement to stand up to Bolshevism, hammering them
once more into the hearts of his followers. Our brown army overcame
Jewish-Bolshevist anarchy in Germany, marching under the eagles of the
National Socialist standards and our red battle flags. The spirit that
led the German war for independence against Moscow will make Germany
strong in the future, defeating any Bolshevist attack on Central
Europe. That is the message of Nuremberg.

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Philosophy - Meta Forum	Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3