| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Eric Stevens
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:22 am Post subject: Re: I am extremely annoyed with Wikipedia - worldwide expose |
 |
|
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:15:54 -0600, jerry warner <jwarner@mchsi.com>
wrote:
[quote]
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:52:57 -0600, jerry warner <jwarner@mchsi.com
wrote:
David wrote:
Qumran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qumran
"In their book Archaeology of the Hidden
Qumran, The New Paradigm (Helsinki, 2002)
Minna Lonnqvist and Kenneth Lonnqvist
brought a modern approach to the Qumran
studies based on contextual archaeology
with its spatial studies and interpretation
of symbolic language of the archaeological
data, arguing that the Dead Sea Scrolls had
been driven out from their archaeological
context by the text scholars who had only
focused their studies on the scrolls. Ever
since the publication of the book
contextualism has been part of the Qumran
studies. The Lonnqvists, who had carried out
a survey in situ at Qumran, studied unpublished
archaeological finds and read scrolls, argued
that the scrolls and the settlement are
associated to an Essene-type of group which,
however, finds the closest parallels in the
contemporary Jewish Therapeutic group known
to have lived in Egypt."
*****
Who got there first, way before Lonnqvists (BTW
I commend their work), on a multi-disciplinary
approach to Qumran Studies taking in the
archaeology, textual studies, linguistics, and
calendar etc. and knew all about the Therapeuts?
Answer: Dr. Barbara Thiering
Yet, here is Wikipedia>s stunning ignorance and
lack of proper standard -
Academic Reception of her Work
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Thiering#Academic_Reception_of_her_Work
It is Dr. Vermes, instead, who has been
discredited on the issue of the Teacher
of Righteousness as the sect>s founder.
Even though he originally asked for the
carbondating of the relevant scrolls with
possible Christian Connections and so
was a mover and a skaker, he never
integrated the results (including paleography)
into the scholarship.
Barbara Thiering did. (Yes, there are
Christian Connections!)
David Christainsen
awwww! two bad creep.
Apart from top-posting, do you have a spelling problem?
Eric Stevens
Im newe to usenette. But usenette is coming down nxt year
I guess all of us will be elsewhere. Good luck to you.
Then you are wasting your effort, aren>t you?[/quote]
Eric Stevens |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
David
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:39 pm Post subject: Re: I am extremely annoyed with Wikipedia - worldwide expose |
|
|
On Nov 20, 3:38 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
[quote]...
Go aheadpreacher, go to the world opinion, but leave us alone.
[/quote]
Yet another CHEAP taunt from Peter Alaca.
David Christainsen |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Elijahovah
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject: Re: I am extremely annoyed with Wikipedia - worldwide expose |
|
|
On Nov 20, 2:38 pm, Peter Alaca <p.al...@purple.invalid> wrote:
[quote]Go ahead preacher, go to the world opinion, but leave us alone.- Hide quoted text -
[/quote]
You have no business saying us, You alone are not an us, and if you
get two
more anuses two agree with you, you three still are not an us.
Wikepedia has nothing to do with facts. Sources? And you think no
scholastic sources are totally deliberately fraudulent. YOu claim
things
edited are self research. I dont need to quote any source if i say
5+3 = 8 because it is fact, and astronomy is fact yet you people
claim the astronomy must have a source of some better scholar than
myself. The topic of the star Sothis (Sothic cycle) has been trashed a
dozen
times each time i corrected it. Though leap days do make 1460 Julian
years
equal to 1461 calendar years (365 day constant), the star has
repeatedly
for 100 years been shown by astronomy to have been close to that only
for 2000 years because of the apporach and passing of 6 hour Right
Ascension
(summer solstice sun). Prior to that 2000 years earlier it was 3 days
earlier
which makes for 12 years less than 1460 years. Specifically, an
advance
of one day creates a 1456-year cycle, and then 2 days makes a 1452
year cycle
(as in 2770-1314 BC and then 139 AD).
Further, fraud is that they dont include that the actual Censorinus is
140 AD July 21
and it is astronomically calulated as being 139 AD July based on
Seleucus Greek years
of Egyptian dates.
Yet put this in there, and they delete it.
This is why Daniel says Mene Mene Tekel Parsen you have been found
deficient,
insufficient, weighed, judged, faulty, and your rule will be destroyed
this year.
When we get hit on April 9 during world war 3 which will be
rolling quite rapidly at that time, by the asteroid they blasted on
July 4 and
said it would come back at us, yet have no photo but the dust hiding
all the
mass pieces now headin toward us, do stay home like the governments
tell you too
because my church wants you to drown in the 6000 feet of water when
the meltdown
under this crust is reached in 7 days.
The mantle is 1800 miles thick under the crust. To melt only a mile of
it is nothing
as already proven by 2 miles 4400 years ago (dating as 20,000 BC in
C14).
You deserve the death that comes back to you because you are all just
like'
Wikipedia.
Elijah |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Tom McDonald
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: Re: I am extremely annoyed with Wikipedia - worldwide expose |
|
|
jerry warner wrote:
[quote]
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:52:57 -0600, jerry warner <jwarner@mchsi.com
wrote:
David wrote:
Qumran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qumran
"In their book Archaeology of the Hidden
Qumran, The New Paradigm (Helsinki, 2002)
Minna Lonnqvist and Kenneth Lonnqvist
brought a modern approach to the Qumran
studies based on contextual archaeology
with its spatial studies and interpretation
of symbolic language of the archaeological
data, arguing that the Dead Sea Scrolls had
been driven out from their archaeological
context by the text scholars who had only
focused their studies on the scrolls. Ever
since the publication of the book
contextualism has been part of the Qumran
studies. The Lonnqvists, who had carried out
a survey in situ at Qumran, studied unpublished
archaeological finds and read scrolls, argued
that the scrolls and the settlement are
associated to an Essene-type of group which,
however, finds the closest parallels in the
contemporary Jewish Therapeutic group known
to have lived in Egypt."
*****
Who got there first, way before Lonnqvists (BTW
I commend their work), on a multi-disciplinary
approach to Qumran Studies taking in the
archaeology, textual studies, linguistics, and
calendar etc. and knew all about the Therapeuts?
Answer: Dr. Barbara Thiering
Yet, here is Wikipedia>s stunning ignorance and
lack of proper standard -
Academic Reception of her Work
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Thiering#Academic_Reception_of_her_Work
It is Dr. Vermes, instead, who has been
discredited on the issue of the Teacher
of Righteousness as the sect>s founder.
Even though he originally asked for the
carbondating of the relevant scrolls with
possible Christian Connections and so
was a mover and a skaker, he never
integrated the results (including paleography)
into the scholarship.
Barbara Thiering did. (Yes, there are
Christian Connections!)
David Christainsen
awwww! two bad creep.
Apart from top-posting, do you have a spelling problem?
Eric Stevens
Im newe to usenette. But usenette is coming down nxt year
I guess all of us will be elsewhere. Good luck to you.
[/quote]
:-)
--
Tom "Go Pack" McDonald |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Xtes-00k
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:40 am Post subject: Re: I am extremely annoyed with Wikipedia - worldwide expose |
|
|
[quote]You deserve the death that comes back to you because you are all just
like' Wikipedia.[/quote]
Elijah
Interesting thought.
Guys keep on posting |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
jerry warner
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:44 pm Post subject: Re: I am extremely annoyed with Wikipedia - worldwide expose |
|
|
Eric Stevens wrote:
[quote]On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:15:54 -0600, jerry warner <jwarner@mchsi.com
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:52:57 -0600, jerry warner <jwarner@mchsi.com
wrote:
David wrote:
Qumran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qumran
"In their book Archaeology of the Hidden
Qumran, The New Paradigm (Helsinki, 2002)
Minna Lonnqvist and Kenneth Lonnqvist
brought a modern approach to the Qumran
studies based on contextual archaeology
with its spatial studies and interpretation
of symbolic language of the archaeological
data, arguing that the Dead Sea Scrolls had
been driven out from their archaeological
context by the text scholars who had only
focused their studies on the scrolls. Ever
since the publication of the book
contextualism has been part of the Qumran
studies. The Lonnqvists, who had carried out
a survey in situ at Qumran, studied unpublished
archaeological finds and read scrolls, argued
that the scrolls and the settlement are
associated to an Essene-type of group which,
however, finds the closest parallels in the
contemporary Jewish Therapeutic group known
to have lived in Egypt."
*****
Who got there first, way before Lonnqvists (BTW
I commend their work), on a multi-disciplinary
approach to Qumran Studies taking in the
archaeology, textual studies, linguistics, and
calendar etc. and knew all about the Therapeuts?
Answer: Dr. Barbara Thiering
Yet, here is Wikipedia>s stunning ignorance and
lack of proper standard -
Academic Reception of her Work
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Thiering#Academic_Reception_of_her_Work
It is Dr. Vermes, instead, who has been
discredited on the issue of the Teacher
of Righteousness as the sect>s founder.
Even though he originally asked for the
carbondating of the relevant scrolls with
possible Christian Connections and so
was a mover and a skaker, he never
integrated the results (including paleography)
into the scholarship.
Barbara Thiering did. (Yes, there are
Christian Connections!)
David Christainsen
awwww! two bad creep.
Apart from top-posting, do you have a spelling problem?
Eric Stevens
Im newe to usenette. But usenette is coming down nxt year
I guess all of us will be elsewhere. Good luck to you.
Then you are wasting your effort, aren>t you?
[/quote]
hOW WILLIT FEEL TO BE BROADCASTING TO NOBODY COME JAN 31ST! ??? Not that I give a
shit.
[quote]
Eric Stevens[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
