| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marc Verhaegen
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:35 am Post subject: Human ancestors born big brained? |
 |
|
"The new finding, published in Science magazine, conflicts with earlier
ideas that suggest they had a tall, thin body shape adapted for running."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7721999.stm |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Lee Olsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:35 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
On Nov 16, 2:35 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
[quote]"The new finding, published in Science magazine, conflicts with earlier
ideas that suggest they had a tall, thin body shape adapted for running.
[/quote]
Human females can>t run? Says who, the wetloon that doesn>t know a
mountain
beaver from a capybara?
FYI:
http://tinyurl.com/7u5wo
" In fact, he walked and ran with better mechanics than we do today.
The mechanics of his femur, femur head, pelvis, and lower back are
superior to those of today. We have had to sacrifice some of that
efficiency of walking and running to give birth to children with
larger brains."
http://www.nwemail.co.uk/unknown/viewarticle.aspx?id=795363
THE recent Keswick/Buttermere round 34km road race is regarded as one
of the toughest running events in the country.
This year the race was won by Steve Littler, of Wesham Road Runners,
who set a new record time
of two hours, three minutes and 13 seconds – two minutes inside the
time set by Kenny Stuart and Jon Broxap in 1982.
Chris Steele, of Borrowdale Fell Runners, was second (2:10.18), with
Paul Waterston, of Morpeth Harriers, third (2:17.40).
First lady was Julie Carter, from Cumberland Fell Runners, (2:42.27).
That>s 2:42:27 and faster than the average kudu, got it?
"http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7721999.stm |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lee Olsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:35 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
On Nov 16, 5:25 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
[quote]my little boy,
[/quote]
Pervert says:
[quote]compare H.erectus & H.sapiens, and a windhound & a bulldog,
andthan tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance
runner...
[/quote]
More brainless lip-service from Marc.
Hyenas are closer in stature to bulldogs than greyhounds.
Wetloons are stupid stupid stupid |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Marc Verhaegen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:25 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
my little boy, compare H.erectus & H.sapiens, and a windhound & a bulldog,
andthan tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance
runner...
[quote]"The new finding, published in Science magazine, conflicts with earlier
ideas that suggest they had a tall, thin body shape adapted for running.
Human females can>t run? Says who
[/quote]
The SDcience paper, my bly
[quote], the wetloon that doesn>t know a
mountain beaver from a capybara?
FYI:
http://tinyurl.com/7u5wo
" In fact, he walked and ran with better mechanics than we do today.
The mechanics of his femur, femur head, pelvis, and lower back are
superior to those of today. We have had to sacrifice some of that
efficiency of walking and running to give birth to children with
larger brains."
[/quote]
:-D
savanna fantasts are stupid stupid stupid |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lee Olsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:06 pm Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
On Nov 17, 9:20 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
[quote]Pervert says:
compare H.erectus & H.sapiens, and a windhound & a bulldog,
and then tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance
runner...
savanna fool:
More brainless lip-service from Marc.
Hyenas are closer in stature to bulldogs than greyhounds.
ah??
[/quote]
ah yes. Why do you think this guy was pumping iron and taking
steroids, to get skinny??
http://tinyurl.com/6as3q2 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Marc Verhaegen
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:20 pm Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
[quote]Pervert says:
compare H.erectus & H.sapiens, and a windhound & a bulldog,
and then tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance
runner...
[/quote]
savanna fool:
[quote]More brainless lip-service from Marc.
Hyenas are closer in stature to bulldogs than greyhounds.
[/quote]
ah?? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lee Olsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
"tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance"
Show us with attribution marks where anyone here stated such a thing,
liar. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lee Olsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:49 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
On Nov 17, 4:27 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
[quote]savanna fool now admits erectus was no long-distance runner:
[/quote]
"Now"? You lying pervert. There are no attribution marks because
there never were any.
I said, you brainless nitwit, even grandma and the kids could run down
a tortoise (at Gona). I said Homo
got to the carcuss first, (on occasions tooth marks over cut marks =s
first to scene =s faster than other scavengers). Long legs equal
running. Not all femurs were the size of the ones found at Georgia
(which were proportional to moderns anyway=runners).
I have no idea how FAR they were running, no one does, but we know one
thing, one does not have to run very fast to run down a kudu. Women
and kids catch baby kudus and kill them with sticks today, and you are
claiming early Homo
couldn>t do that? You are crazy.
Take your lies back to your swamp were someone will believe you. Your
thick bone argument is as thick as your head.
[quote]
Op 18-11-2008 01:20, in artikel
2e556763-a611-4866-874f-1c2b67828...@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
paleoc...@hotmail.com> schreef:
Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
"tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance"
Show us with attribution marks where anyone here stated such a thing,
liar.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Marc Verhaegen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
savanna fool now thinks hyenas are bulldogs...
Op 18-11-2008 00:06, in artikel
c5f381b5-9cb2-4456-942f-cbf626296f4d@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@hotmail.com> schreef:
[quote]On Nov 17, 9:20 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
Pervert says:
compare H.erectus & H.sapiens, and a windhound & a bulldog,
and then tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance
runner...
savanna fool:
More brainless lip-service from Marc.
Hyenas are closer in stature to bulldogs than greyhounds.
ah??
ah yes. Why do you think this guy was pumping iron and taking
steroids, to get skinny??
http://tinyurl.com/6as3q2
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Marc Verhaegen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:27 am Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
savanna fool now admits erectus was no long-distance runner:
Op 18-11-2008 01:20, in artikel
2e556763-a611-4866-874f-1c2b67828121@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
<paleocity@hotmail.com> schreef:
[quote]Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
"tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance"
Show us with attribution marks where anyone here stated such a thing,
liar.[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lee Olsen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
On Nov 18, 12:27 am, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
[quote]our little boy
[/quote]
Pervert, you need to find a park bench.
[quote]now think Savanna Fiction = running down tortoises:
[/quote]
How did stone tools cut-marks get inside the neck of a tortoise,
wetloon? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Marc Verhaegen
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject: Re: Human ancestors born big brained? |
|
|
our little boy now think Savanna Fiction = running down tortoises:
:-DDD
[quote]On Nov 17, 4:27 pm, Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
savanna fool now admits erectus was no long-distance runner:
"Now"? You lying pervert. There are no attribution marks because
there never were any.
I said, you brainless nitwit, even grandma and the kids could run down
a tortoise (at Gona). I said Homo
got to the carcuss first, (on occasions tooth marks over cut marks =s
first to scene =s faster than other scavengers). Long legs equal
running. Not all femurs were the size of the ones found at Georgia
(which were proportional to moderns anyway=runners).
I have no idea how FAR they were running, no one does, but we know one
thing, one does not have to run very fast to run down a kudu. Women
and kids catch baby kudus and kill them with sticks today, and you are
claiming early Homo
couldn>t do that? You are crazy.
Take your lies back to your swamp were someone will believe you. Your
thick bone argument is as thick as your head.
Op 18-11-2008 01:20, in artikel
2e556763-a611-4866-874f-1c2b67828...@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com, Lee Olsen
paleoc...@hotmail.com> schreef:
Marc Verhaegen <m_verhae...@skynet.be> wrote:
"tell us if you still the nonsense that erectus was a long-distance"
Show us with attribution marks where anyone here stated such a thing,
liar.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
