www.GetXFactor.com

Leading Technology, Science,
Agriculture News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

From cracks to catastrophes, “singularity t heory” could she
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Nonlinear Science Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roger Bagula
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:20 pm    Post subject: From cracks to catastrophes, “singularity t heory” could she Reply with quote

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/080604_singularity.htm

From cracks to catastrophes, “singularity theory” could shed light

June 5, 2008
Courtesy European Science Foundation
and World Science staff

The­re’s of­ten more to eve­ry­day events than meets the eye. The
fold­ing of pa­per, or drip­ping of wa­ter from a tap, are two
ex­am­ples: they both in­volve the crea­t­ion of points known as
sin­gu­lar­i­ties.

Sin­gu­lar­i­ties oc­cur at places of cut­off or of sud­den change, as
in forma­t­ion of cracks, light­ning strikes, crea­t­ion of ink drops in
print­ers, and the break­ing of a cup when it drops. These points
re­quire soph­is­t­icated math­e­mat­i­cal tech­niques to de­scribe,
an­a­lyse and pre­dict.

Lightning is one phe­no­me­non ex­hi­bit­ing sin­gu­lar­i­ties. Others
in­clude crum­pled pa­per and drip­ping wa­ter. (Im­age cour­tesy NASA)
Sci­en­tists say many sin­gu­lar­i­ties have much in com­mon at all size
scales—from mi­cro­scop­ic in­ter­ac­tions to the forma­t­ion of the
uni­ver­se it­self dur­ing the so-called Big Bang. But these seem­ingly
dis­par­ate events are usu­ally stud­ied by dif­fer­ent sci­en­tists in
re­la­tive isola­t­ion.

A work­shop or­gan­ised by the Eu­ro­pe­an Sci­ence Founda­t­ion in
Par­is in Jan­u­ary was one of the first at­tempts to un­ify the field
of sin­gu­lar­i­ties by bring­ing to­geth­er ex­perts in the dif­fer­ent
fields from as­tron­o­my to nano­sci­ence—the study of atom­ic-scale
struc­tures.

The meet­ing was aimed at de­vel­op­ing com­mon math­e­mat­i­cal
ap­proaches to sin­gu­lar­i­ties. Im­proved un­der­stand­ing of the
un­der­ly­ing math would have many ben­e­fits, for ex­am­ple in mak­ing
ma­te­ri­als more re­sist­ant to break­ing, re­search­ers say.

The event was a suc­cess and and paved the way for fur­ther re­search
with great­er cross-pollina­t­ion of ideas, said the con­ven­or, Jens
Eg­gers of the founda­t­ion.

The work­shop con­firmed, sci­en­tists said, that most or all
sin­gu­lar­i­ties, from mi­cro­scop­ic cracks to the Big Bang, share a
key prop­er­ty known as self-si­m­i­lar­ity. This means that un­der
mag­nif­ica­t­ion the event looks al­most the same. For ex­am­ple a
crack in a piece of plas­tic ex­hibits the same jag­ged struc­ture when
mag­ni­fied, say, 100 times. This means com­mon math­e­mat­i­cal
ap­proaches can be ap­plied.

But the dev­il is in the de­tails when it comes to com­par­ing
dif­fer­ent types of sin­gu­lar­i­ties, work­shop par­t­i­ci­pants
cau­tioned. Dif­fer­ent sys­tems might have some com­mon fea­tures such
as self-si­m­i­lar­ity, but al­so un­ique as­pects that re­quire
spe­cial­ised stu­dy. One aim of the work­shop was to iden­ti­fy the
com­mon meth­ods that could be ap­plied as a founda­t­ion for more
de­tailed spe­cif­ic study.

Jay Fine­berg of He­brew Uni­ver­s­ity in Je­ru­sa­lem, for ex­am­ple,
pre­sented in­ves­ti­ga­t­ions of cracks in struc­tures or rock
forma­t­ions. Fine­berg dis­cussed new ex­pe­ri­ments in­volv­ing gels,
al­low­ing the crack’s struc­ture to be de­ter­mined in great de­tail
down to mi­cro­scop­ic di­men­sions, yield­ing some un­ex­pected find­ings.

Cracks are of­ten sur­pris­ingly com­plex, Eg­gers not­ed, with “many
small side branches, which ap­pear to have com­pli­cat­ed, if not
frac­tal, struc­ture.” Frac­tal struc­ture here means much the same as
self-si­m­i­lar­ity, in­volv­ing a ge­o­met­ric pat­tern that looks
un­changed un­der mag­nif­ica­t­ion or re­duc­tion.

Anoth­er ex­am­ple con­cerned the sin­gu­lar­i­ties of crum­pling in
pa­per, pre­sented by Tom Wit­ten of the James Franck In­sti­tute in
Chi­ca­go. Crum­pled pa­per com­prises many ridges and tips that de­fy
sim­ple anal­y­sis. There are many un­an­swered ques­tions even in
de­scrib­ing each in­di­vid­ual cone-shaped tip, Eg­gers said;
fig­ur­ing out the un­der­ly­ing math would not just help un­der­stand
what hap­pens when we crum­ple pa­per, but al­so oth­er phys­i­cal
sys­tems in­volv­ing ridges and tips, such as the way bi­o­log­i­cal
mo­le­cules fold in­to their char­ac­ter­is­tic forms.

One branch of sin­gu­lar­ity the­o­ry is “catas­tro­phe the­o­ry,” which
rose to prom­i­nence in the 1970s, in­i­tially de­vel­oped by French
math­e­ma­ti­c René Thom and ex­pand­ed by U.K. math­e­ma­ti­c Er­ik
Zee­man. Ca­tas­tro­phe the­o­ry deals with events with space-and-time
com­po­nents, such as col­li­sions be­tween wave fronts, Eg­gers said.
“In that case, a prob­lem that takes place in all of space can be
re­duced to a prob­lem that takes place along cer­tain lines,” known as
caus­tics, “which can be clas­si­fied ac­cord­ing to ca­tas­tro­phe
the­o­ry.” But not all sin­gu­lar­ity prob­lems are ame­na­ble to this
sim­plifica­t­ion.

The sub­ject “cuts across dis­ci­plines and spe­cial­iz­a­tions, such as
ex­pe­ri­men­tal phys­ics, the­o­ret­i­cal phys­ics, and rig­or­ous
math­e­mat­i­cal proofs,” Eg­gers said. “This work­shop very much
re­flected this fact, as we had speak­ers from very dif­fer­ent
back­grounds.”
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Nonlinear Science Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum