Science and Technology news... :: View topic

Lord Vader · Guest

I Control - The Verticunt?>

The Vertical- Umm they Don>t know and the
Hoolly Version - BaBy.?

GooD Luck in Your NB Heritage as Described?

I say Google or Gogel as it is actually Pronounced - It is a
Hard "o" as in Go - in that this is thins theings we must Give UP
or TgHe Me is will sure ly Be / be Described as Sulen in that -
the "Plug" is Really "
"

Another Galaxie?

Why the Brits were Hear with a ?

Kick it off to the size as we adjust Per the Adjustment pof
incoming - But she is a niece Blonde and we can umm Learn?

"Kadaitcha Man" <f ck-you.ya.cunt@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote in
message news:wju2cg$tx5$f@macerated-muffins.org...
[quote]Ulrict Reinhold <urine@tokyo.com>, the boozing down-and-out and
three-way poo-stabber who likes wanton unprotected anal sex with ticks,
and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with a naked furburger, wrote
in <%b8Of.28648$915.9525@southeast.rr.com>:

Ignore
Article canceled by Pan 0.14.2.91

Ignore
Article canceled by Pan 0.14.2.91

Cunt.

[/quote]

Kadaitcha Man · Guest

Ulrict Reinhold <urine@tokyo.com>, the boozing down-and-out and
three-way poo-stabber who likes wanton unprotected anal sex with ticks,
and whose partner is a woman of pleasure with a naked furburger, wrote
in <%b8Of.28648$915.9525@southeast.rr.com>:

[quote]Ignore
Article canceled by Pan 0.14.2.91

Ignore
Article canceled by Pan 0.14.2.91
[/quote]
Cunt.

Lord Vader · Guest

Umm - Thank You?

Assassination of My Family Name should Begin ASAP?

ForGet the Small ones?

"Kadaitcha Man" <f ck-you.ya.cunt@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> wrote in
message news:5h20ha$m0g$x@pent-up-twofers.org.au...
[quote]Lord Vader <LordVader@shaw.ca>, the cloying drifter and unkempt
battie-boy who likes wretched off-the-wrist shots with flamingos, and
whose partner is a gigsy with a damp pot holder, wrote in
RfaOf.99871$H%4.66992@pd7tw2no>:

I say Google or Gogel as it is actually Pronounced - It is a
Hard "o" as in Go - in that this is thins theings we must Give UP
or TgHe Me is will sure ly Be / be Described as Sulen in that -
the "Plug" is Really "

What a fucking load of shit. 'Google' is two verbs in a contraction.

Go.
Ogle.

go : v.intr.
To move or travel; proceed.

ogle : verb
To look intently and fixedly: eye, gape, gawk, gaze, goggle, peer,
stare.
Idioms: gaze open-mouthed, rivet the eyes on.

[/quote]

Kadaitcha Man · Guest

Lord Vader <LordVader@shaw.ca>, the cloying drifter and unkempt
battie-boy who likes wretched off-the-wrist shots with flamingos, and
whose partner is a gigsy with a damp pot holder, wrote in
<RfaOf.99871$H%4.66992@pd7tw2no>:

[quote]I say Google or Gogel as it is actually Pronounced - It is a
Hard "o" as in Go - in that this is thins theings we must Give UP
or TgHe Me is will sure ly Be / be Described as Sulen in that -
the "Plug" is Really "
[/quote]
What a fucking load of shit. 'Google' is two verbs in a contraction.

Go.
Ogle.

go : v.intr.
To move or travel; proceed.

ogle : verb
To look intently and fixedly: eye, gape, gawk, gaze, goggle, peer,
stare.
Idioms: gaze open-mouthed, rivet the eyes on.

brian a m stuckless · Guest

[quote]"Ken" <krushpin@videotron.ca> wrote in message
If we have a glass of water at exactly 300 K and another
one at exactly 290 K in a room at 295 K, which glass of
water will reach 295 K first? why?
[/quote]
$$ Volume/(Cube Area)=Edge/3.
$$ You MEASURE the following (..BEFORE begining the calculation):
$$ 1. The volume/(SURFACE area) of the room, water A and water B.
$$ 2. The iNside and OUTside temperatures of the room, and A & B.
$$ 3. The SPECiFiC-heat-CAPACiTY of the iNside & OUTside AMBiENT.
$$ 4. The RATE of heat-GAiN & the RATE of heat-LOSS, of the room.
$$
$$ Then with THiS you can calculate if A or B reaches 295K FiRST.
$$ [An ANSWER depends on the RATE-of-thermal-CHANGE in the room].
$$
$$ Brian A M Stuckless.
Re: help me with this.

brian a m stuckless · Guest

Jay R. Yablon wrote: >
[quote]Many of the widely-studied solutions to Einstein>s field
equations are taken in vacuo, that is, at events where the
energy momentum tensor T^uv=0. This includes Schwarzchild
and Kerr geometries, for example.

Have there been many exact solutions found where T^uv not= 0?
$$ No.
I am speaking of analytical solutions where the differential
equations are solved exactly, *not* numerical approximations.
$$ YABsolutely no.[/quote]

[quote]Maxwell>s energy tensor of electrodynamics
T^u_v = (1/4pi) [F^ut F_vt - (1/4) lambda^u_v F^st F_st].

-=- ..interested in solutions where F^uv_u=0 (free space)
-=- ..and where F^uv_u=J^v (space with current sources).
Conditions of interest include static spherical symmetry in
the nature of Schwarzchild, and rotation with spherical
symmetry about the z-axis in the nature of Kerr.
--Jay R Yablon.
To be clear, I am *not* looking for solutions where the metric
is assumed to be a Minkowski metric. Lots of analyses assume
a flat-space background for electrodynamics.

Rather, I am looking for *exact* solutions, to the extent that
such solutions are known, which derive a curved spacetime
metric from the electromagnetic field strength tensor, that is,
which derive g_uv = g_uv(F^uv) via the Maxwell tensor T^u_v,
whereby T^u_v(g_uv, F_uv) simply becomes T^u_v(F_uv) once the
g_uv(F^uv) are found.
[/quote]
$$ Maxwell used REAL "flat" plates in air to derive his equations.
$$ This is why GR is only "approximately" flat, at-great-distance.
$$ Even a dot has extreme "curvature", so you can imagine a point.
$$ GR is a "point-SURFACE manifold" at the end of it>s WORLD-line.
$$ This is why GR is NOT a "local" theory (where it>s all Newton).
$$ This is why GR is a "far-field" theory (where it>s all Newton).
$$ [ The "SURFACE" of a GR-"POiNT" is "FLAT-at-a-GREAT-distance ].
$$
$$ Tom R ought derive a set from lab work ..using "CURVED" plates.
$$ [Just let the PLATEs be M1 and m1 and the air as the "AEther"].
$$
$$ Hope this helps, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).
GR CUT OFF it>s own WORLD-line, having DECLARED no PRiOR geometry.
p.s. A GR-"geodesic" is *NOT* Uncle Al>s "OTHER LONGER way round".

[quote]Thanks.> > Jay R. Yablon > > Email: jyablon@nycap.rr.com
Re: Solution to Einstein>s Field Equations where T^uv not= 0?.[/quote]

LeoK · Guest

[quote]Let>s assume for a moment that a photon could have mass. Where>s
the proof? For a photon to have mass, the mass must be either
gravitational or inertial. So either photons generate gravity,
which experiment clearly shows they don>t, or they respond to
potential energy to change their speed in a vacuum, which they don>t.
Therefore, since all experiments clearly show that photons do
not have mass, where is your proof that photons have mass?
The TimeLord
[/quote]
First I have to inform this Bilge directs the last post to alt.morons,
which more or less proves him to be a TROLL. OK.

But, TimeLord,
you have a good point in your arguing, I have to admit that.
You miss one crucial thing in your post above:

There was a concept of space having vacuum but this is no more
the case. The space has vacuum energy - it is not totally empty -
besides hydrogen that we knew about before. (Average 0.1 neutral
hydrogen atoms (H) per cubic centimetre.)

TimeLord,
you forget the recent discovered vacuum ENERGY in your
reasoning here. I suggest you returning to the schedule table and make
a new calculus about the photon, with the vacuum ENERGY in mind.

Or at lest the measurements you referred to here have to consider the
energy in space how to interacting with the photon.

For to be mathematical one can roughly write it anything like this:

h = [Eemf] - mPH + h

Which stands for:
Planck>s constant, h, equals to the local vacuum energy, [Eemf],
minus the mass of the photon, mPH, plus Planck>s constant, h.

This formula is considering the vacuum energy, Eemf, and therefore
there also pops up a mass concept of the photon, mPH. Visible only
Planck>s constant, h, seems to be detected without the full situation
in mind. But there clearly are more under the surface.

For the math nerds: See here is the proof of light having mass.
mPH is in the formula, so the photon must has mass. The minus
sign of the mass of the photon does not indicate negative mass.
It is there because that Planck>s constant is seen as
a positive unit.

And it also shows why the photon seems to having zero mass when
measuring its gravity or reactions on potential energy. The photon
does only "show" its energy of h. And is "hiding" its
mass, mPH.

Take it or leave it, but don>t redirect to non-physics groups.

LeoK

Old Pif · Guest

Secretariat wrote:
[quote]The 16th International Congress on Care of the Terminally Ill, taking place in Montreal, Canada,
in September of 2006, will give health care professionals, therapists, volunteers, and all those
involved in care for the dying the opportunity to renew themselves as providers of care and
obtain the inspiration that will help shape the palliative care of the future.
For more information, see http://www.pal2006.com
[/quote]
Do they take care about terminally ill economies?

brian a m stuckless · Guest

$$ Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts [..@GR.Buffy.com] wrote:
[quote]In order for a system consisting of multiple constituents to be
bound as a single system, it must not fly apart on its own. That
is, in order to disassemble the system you must somehow reach
into it and _pull_ one or more constituents out of the system
(of course this requires you to somehow hold on to some of the
other constituents). In pulling it apart you of course do work,
which is putting energy into the constituents of the system. The
total amount of work you must do to completely disassemble the
system is minus the binding energy of the system. That _is_ the
way it was originally defined, and since you must do positive
work to disassemble it, binding energy is inherently negative.
Equivalently, when assembling the system an amount of energy
must be released, which is also minus the binding energy.

For example, in Newtonian gravitation, the gravitational
potential \phi for a point mass M is -kM/r (k is Newton>s
gravitational constant). The minus sign is essential, because
the force _must_ be -grad phi. The minus sign in this last
equation is essential, because the force _must_ be directed
away from regions of higher potential energy. Remember that
gravitation is attractive and energy is conserved -- these two
properties completely determine those minus signs. So a system
that is gravitationally bound has negative potential energy,
and it is quite appropriate to equate this to the binding
energy of the system (disassembling it means separating the
masses to infinity, where the gravitational potential energy
is zero, as is the binding energy).

In relativity, applying E=mc^2 in the rest frame of the system,
and always disassembling it into components at rest far away in
that frame, the mass of the system is simply the sum of: a) the
masses of its constituents, b) their kinetic energies (while
part of the system), and c) the binding energy. Note if binding
energy were positive there would be a funny minus sign in there.

Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts [..@GR.Buffy.com].
[/quote]
$$ You lack a distinction between "Total ENERGY" & "Total ENTHALPY".
$$ [LaGrangian L; intrinsic REST energy eM; Volt*Amp*sec energy eV].
$$
$$ GUESS iSS STANDARD TOTAL ENTHALPY E = m*c^2 + pL*c + pA*fA
$$ = eM + L + eV
$$ = eM + L + nA*hbar*fA
$$ = eM + Kinetic energy eK
$$ ..Note, *total-OTHERwise-ENERGY*... = eM + L - (m*v^2 / 2).
$$
$$ Where kinetic energy eK is the photoelectric "iONization energy".
$$ [This energy is NOT ONLY particular to the photoelectric effect].
$$
$$ STANDARD Total ENTHALPY ..NO "funny minus sign in there", Dimwit.

brian a m stuckless · Guest

[quote]"Dr Tim" <timrobinson@paradise.net.nz> a écrit dans le message de
I>ve read the text books and searched the web,
but I still have not achieved enlightenment.
I have a PhD in maths and I am not yet entirely senile.
I have elementary knowledge of Clifford algebra.

1) The wave function of a spin 1/2 particle is a spinor.
[/quote]
$$ A "spinor" is one Ph.Tivitist>s "mental vibrator" ..it>s hard to
$$ grasp because the Tivitist sees him/her self in a "spinor-sling",
$$ (with the "mental vibrator" mounted-vertically-positioned below).

$$ Basically the Tivitist "spinor" rotates ..to mental oscillations.

p.s. "VARiOUS vacu" exist, ONLY in squeezed Swiss-cheese-like minds.
[Clearly a vacuum is ONLY a "mental state or condition", after all].
Re: How the mental "spinor" MASTURBATEs 'UNphysically', so to speak.

[quote]True. More precisely, the wave function is a function from space to
the
spinor space.

2) Spinors are only useful because fermions exist.

False. They aren>t useful to something else today, but in contrast to
mathematics, in physics what is true today won>t necessarily be true
tomorow.

3) Spinor is to vector as vector is to matrix.

Too vague. A spinor is defined by its transformation property under a
rotation. A spinor is a vector of C^2. It can be mapped to a vector
in
R^3, which is the representation space of the "spinor" representation
of
SO(3).

4) It takes two complex numbers to specify a 3-d spinor.

True.

5) 3-d spinor space is four dimensional.

True.

6) A spinor is a more complicated thing than a vector.

Too vague.

7) A vector is a less complicated thing than a spinor.

Too vague.

If you agreed with statements 3, 6 and 7,
I>d like to know how these can be reconciled.

8) Spinors are related to spherical harmonics.

False.

9) "up" and "down" are spherical harmonics of order 1/2

False. "up" = (1,0); "down" = (0,1) up to a complex factor of modulus
1=2E
There is no spherical harmonic of half integer order.

10) "up" and "down" are functions from the unit sphere onto some
spinor space.

False. The spin a an "internal" propery, it is a function of Z_2,
that is
of an "internal" variable, not of R^3.

11) Marjorana can build spherical harmonics of all orders
as symetric combinations of "up" and "down".

I>ve seen statements of this, eg |up up> = x + iy,
but I still don>t understand why this is true.

? I think you mean tensor products of spinors.

12) Quaternons are spinors.

True and false. There is no multiplication for the spinors.

13) Quantum mechanics text books mention quaternions but don>t use
them.

This is a shame, because I am familiar with quaternions.

There is what is called "quaternionic" QM, like the orthodox one is
complex,
but that has nothing to do with the spin, and it isn>t developed and
validated.

The usefulness of quaternions in othodox QM isn>t for describing the
spinor,
but for expressing their transformations. The quaternionic line is
isomorphic to the group SU(2), which is the universal covering of
SO(3).
Its base is made of the pauli matrices and the unit matrix. [POST].
Re: How the mental "spinor" MASTURBATEs, 'UNphysically', so to speak.[/quote]

Scar Face · Guest

I suggest you take a long holiday (say ten years) tied to a bed naked with a
young woman with no clothes on on top of you. She>ll keep you nice and clean
holding your dick with her bum.

Spin half that does apply to a photon with a spin of half. Electrons have
spin half too.

Photons can have spin 0,1/2,1,11/2...5/2...and the same in negative 1/2
integers numbers.

If an electron changes state from 1/2 to -1/2 then a photon of -1 is
emitted.

A workman said that, go hack a christian doctor to peices because they
damage the brains of workers to make them stupid. Since their heads hace
gone wrong amputation is the only solution then all the workers being
extemely stupid can dance into the night carried the heads of the pigs on
pointed stick singing "he thought he was a head now he is just a head!" and
burn their fested flesh on the embers of the homes they stole from us while
dogs tear at their bones and we take glittering junk and throw it in the mud
while feasing of toast and tea and cake and beat up the cook.

Christian Psychopath! Go "rape" a nun.

GeorgeBush Jr · Guest

"Robert Henderson" <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3mEtMCBIpNWHFwin@anywhere.demon.co.uk...
[quote]In message <fja7vc$hom$1@aioe.org>, Ian Thorpe <IanThorpe19757@yahoo.com
writes
Please help,

As of late I seem to have RACIST IMPOSTERS mimicking me. I accuse one of
being a SUPER POWERFUL racist imposter.

Please look at my HEADERS to see who is the genuine troll. I>m hoping
there
are some obvious differences. Can someone help me out by pointing out
these
differences?

Thanks.
Ian Thorpe

PS. As everyone knows I troll with multiple NNTP servers under the aliases
CricketLeague, IVAR, David Singh, Ian Thorpe, George Bush Jr,
NewsToBeRead,
and a few others that I use a little less frequently.

The aliases aren>t working Ian. THEY are on to all of THEM. For God>s sake
go to ground man and remain completely silent. It is your only hope.
Security status NUTCASE. RH
--
Robert Henderson
Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/ blairscandal/
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk
[/quote]

My fellow patriotic brit Robert Henderson,

My fellow patriotic brit Robert Henderson,

Who is the low iq BRIT WHORE PUSSY that gave birth to your
dumbcunt ass that doesnt know the difference between "fool" and "full".

I am certain you will find your WHORE MOMs PET to be your
genetic father if you get a DNA test and a PATERNITY test.

My lovely, gorgeous, sexy whore wife Laura Bush tried to douse my DICK in
HOTWATER, but it still DISAPPEARED. Thats how POWERFUL, BRAVE,
CHARISMATIC man this AGCE, AGPE, AGVE is.

You should BEG and FORCE YOUR WIFE, SISTERS and DAUGHTERS
to SPREAD their LEGS to this BRAVE AMERICAN AGCE, AGPE and
AGVE and get IMPREGNATED.

Thats the ONLY WAY we can BREED SOME BRAVE AMERICANS
at least in the FUTURE since there are NO BRAVE AMERICANS at present
in our great nation of America.

The ONLY AMERICAN MAN that brought ME and our WORLD FAMOUS
FBI, CIA, NSA and SECRET SERVICE agencies to our KNEES and
TURNED US into IMPOTENT EUNUCHS is this
AmerGovtCriminalsExposer,AmerGovtPsychopathsExposer,
AmerGovtVampiresExposer (AGCE, AGPE, AGVE).

ALL AMERICAN WOMEN should CRAVE and BEG this BRAVE
AMERICAN to FATHER THEIR KIDS to BREED BRAVE and CHIVALROUS
AMERICANS who we dont have many in our country now.

You should CHANGE YOUR SEX to a FEMALE and have YOUR BABIES
FATHERED by THIS BRAVE UNIQUE AMERICAN MAN AGCE,
AGPE, AGVE.

This TERRORIST AmerGovtCriminalsExposer, AmerGovtPyschopathsExposer,
AmerGovtVampiresExposer (AGCE, AGPE, AGVE) emailed me this week
with subject "ADVANCE CHRISTMAS GREETINGS to the CHIMP
George Bush Jr" and FORCED my TINY WHITE DICK DISAPPEAR FOREVER.

Tonight when I speak to Lord Jesus, I will beg him for a NEW BIG WHITE DICK.

I suspect this TERRORIST AGCE, AGPE, AGVE will keep EMAILING ME
DEATH THREATS and FORCE MY DICK DISAPPEAR EVERY DAY and I
will have to keep BEGGING Lord Jesus for a NEW BIG WHITE DICK everyday.

This TERRORIST publicly threatened he will RAPE and MAIM my LOVELY
DAUGHTERS and still I dont have the GUTS TO ARREST HIM for the fear of
him EXPOSING how me, my DICKSUCKERS FBI, CIA and NSA SECRTELY
and ILLEGALLY TORTURE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of INNOCENT
AMERICANS every day with PSYCHO-ELECTRONIC WEAPONS.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/msg/ef677b1ef32633b1?hl=en&

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.privacy/msg/238657d378a212ff?hl=en&

Your IMPOTENT PRESIDENT
George Bush Jr aka dubya
&
Your FBI, CIA and NSA IMPOTENT GENIUS AGENTS

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dilaudid · Guest

You spoke with him?

I>m gonna spend a moment helping you understand.

"VISUAL COMPLEX ANALYSIS by Tristan Needham

Pg 139 IV The Riemann Sphere

1 The Point at Infinity

"In discussing inversion we saw that results about lines could always be
understood as special limiting cases of results about circles, simply by
letting the radius tend to infinity. This limiting process is nevertheless
tiresome and clumsy; how much better it would be if lines could literally be
described as circles of an infinite radius.

Here is another, related inconvenience. Inversion in the unit circle is
a one-to-one mapping of the plane to itself that swaps pairs of points. The
same is true of the mapping z --> (1/z). However, there are exceptions: no
image point is presently associated with z = 0, nor is 0 to be found among
the image points.

To resolve both these difficulties, note that as z moves further and
further away from the origin, (1/z) moves closer and closer to zero. Thus as
z travels to ever greater distances (in any direction), it is as though it
were approaching a single point at infinity, written (sideways figure
eight), whose image is 0. Thus by definition, this point (infinity)
satisfies the following equations:

1/(infinity) = 0, 1/0 = (infinity)

The addition of this single point at infinity turns the complex plane
into the so called "extended complex plane." Thus we may now say, without
qualification, that z --> (1/z) is a one-to-one mapping of the extended
plane to itself."

See my friend Albert was a real rebel and only he could appreciate the
absolute brilliance of my friend Riemann. As soon as Al saw Riemann dividin'
by zero he just had to incorporate Riemann>s Math into his General
Relativity Theory. "Of only two things I am certain, the stupidity of
humanity and the universe, and I>m not certain about the
universe." -Einstein

These two to see eye to eye on things of such mystical relevance to
everything. It>s like Newton being "The Last Sorceror" Alchemy is a matter
of necessity not choice. Only the epiphany of humanity can actually do the
magical. You speak with Riemann about this when you get time cause he also
has some secrets about Prime Number Distribution that will rattle the
foundations of Knowledge. But enough for now digest division by zero because
it is infinite or remains undefined either way we get closer to GOD!

Peace

"bernardz" <bernardz@mail.com> wrote in message
news:02182518-7b3c-4566-97c6-cd138ec178f8@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Jan 7, 11:35 pm, "Dilaudid" <dda...@adelphia.net> wrote:
Perhaps, you should investigate a treatise on complex analysis. I got
this
friend named Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann who created his very own
non-Euclidean geometry and decided to assert that 1/0 tends to infinity

Wrong.

1/0 is not solvable.

and
1/infinity tends to zero.

True.

The Mathematica Symbols did not translate to the
newsgroup leaving the Y superimposed on the = sign in the proof.

Not that it is too critical since the post is tongue in cheek God does
not
have time to do math but Riemann>s sphere is the non-Euclidean geometry
that
accurately describes the real universe.

It is yet to be shown that Riemann>s geometry accurately describes the
real universe.

Triangles on Earth add to 182
degrees.

Irrelevant.

I got another friend named Albert who insists this geometry describes
real
events. Now look at the proof and go figure.

When did Albert say that?

You may want a mild CNS
depressant to relax with. If so try Dilaudid, its so refreshing.

That may explain your comments.

Peace!

"bernardZ" <Berna...@nospam.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.21ecae054627e2a5989730@news...

In article <47812f8b$0$22613$4c368...@roadrunner.com>,
dda...@adelphia.net says...
Conversely, dividing both sides

1/1 = 1/1 and 0/0 = 0/0

No No No

you cannot divide by zero.
[/quote]

Dilaudid · Guest

Perhaps, you can convey this to Bernard z who fails to grasp division by
zero as defined by Riemann!

"zion-lion" <damianjohnbrown@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1626eb61-3b41-499b-a07c-ccce0f628e05@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

I was only thinking earlier that the atom is a spherical field bound
by a cube - bye bye miss american pie!

On 12 Jan, 04:10, TOH100 <toh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
[quote]On 9 Jan, 08:02, "Dilaudid" <dda...@adelphia.net> wrote:

You spoke with him?

I>m gonna spend a moment helping you understand.

"VISUAL COMPLEX ANALYSIS by Tristan Needham

Pg 139 IV The Riemann Sphere

1 The Point at Infinity

"In discussing inversion we saw that results about lines could always be
understood as special limiting cases of results about circles, simply by
letting the radius tend to infinity. This limiting process is
nevertheless
tiresome and clumsy; how much better it would be if lines could
literally be
described as circles of an infinite radius.

Here is another, related inconvenience. Inversion in the unit circle is
a one-to-one mapping of the plane to itself that swaps pairs of points.
The
same is true of the mapping z --> (1/z). However, there are exceptions:
no
image point is presently associated with z = 0, nor is 0 to be found
among
the image points.

To resolve both these difficulties, note that as z moves further and
further away from the origin, (1/z) moves closer and closer to zero.
Thus as
z travels to ever greater distances (in any direction), it is as though
it
were approaching a single point at infinity, written (sideways figure
eight), whose image is 0. Thus by definition, this point (infinity)
satisfies the following equations:

1/(infinity) = 0, 1/0 = (infinity)

The addition of this single point at infinity turns the complex plane
into the so called "extended complex plane." Thus we may now say,
without
qualification, that z --> (1/z) is a one-to-one mapping of the extended
plane to itself."

See my friend Albert was a real rebel and only he could appreciate the
absolute brilliance of my friend Riemann. As soon as Al saw Riemann
dividin'
by zero he just had to incorporate Riemann>s Math into his General
Relativity Theory. "Of only two things I am certain, the stupidity of
humanity and the universe, and I>m not certain about the
universe." -Einstein

These two to see eye to eye on things of such mystical relevance to
everything. It>s like Newton being "The Last Sorceror" Alchemy is a
matter
of necessity not choice. Only the epiphany of humanity can actually do
the
magical. You speak with Riemann about this when you get time cause he
also
has some secrets about Prime Number Distribution that will rattle the
foundations of Knowledge. But enough for now digest division by zero
because
it is infinite or remains undefined either way we get closer to GOD!

Peace

"bernardz" <berna...@mail.com> wrote in message

news:02182518-7b3c-4566-97c6-cd138ec178f8@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

On Jan 7, 11:35 pm, "Dilaudid" <dda...@adelphia.net> wrote:
Perhaps, you should investigate a treatise on complex analysis. I got
this
friend named Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann who created his very
own
non-Euclidean geometry and decided to assert that 1/0 tends to
infinity

Wrong.

1/0 is not solvable.

and
1/infinity tends to zero.

True.

The Mathematica Symbols did not translate to the
newsgroup leaving the Y superimposed on the = sign in the proof.

Not that it is too critical since the post is tongue in cheek God
does
not
have time to do math but Riemann>s sphere is the non-Euclidean
geometry
that
accurately describes the real universe.

It is yet to be shown that Riemann>s geometry accurately describes the
real universe.

Triangles on Earth add to 182
degrees.

Irrelevant.

I got another friend named Albert who insists this geometry describes
real
events. Now look at the proof and go figure.

When did Albert say that?

You may want a mild CNS
depressant to relax with. If so try Dilaudid, its so refreshing.

That may explain your comments.

Peace!

"bernardZ" <Berna...@nospam.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.21ecae054627e2a5989730@news...

In article <47812f8b$0$22613$4c368...@roadrunner.com>,
dda...@adelphia.net says...
Conversely, dividing both sides

1/1 = 1/1 and 0/0 = 0/0

No No No

you cannot divide by zero.

Here is the REAL mathematical proof of a CREATOR, written by Sollog.
You will be amazed when you read these :

http://sollogs.com/Discoveries/creator.shtmlhttp://sollogs.com/Discoveries/pdf.htm-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
[/quote]
I was only thinking earlier that the atom is a spherical field bound
by a cube - bye bye miss american pie!

Allan Seppälä · Guest

Olen jopa itse hämmästynyt siitä peittelemättömästä ydinalan panikoinnista,
jota jo parhaillaan päällemme kaatuvat ydinekotuhot täällä netissä
aiheuttaa. Oli tosiaan täys ylläri miten SELKEÄSTI ydinlobbaajat lopulta
alkoivat oivaltaa ydinalan syyksi nykymaailmamme jyrääviin tuhoihin.

Mehiläistuhon massiivisuus näyttää olevan kulminaatiopiste. Eli vielä viime
vuona tänne oli aika harvat kirjoittamassa, että ydinala tulee jatkossa
tappamaan kaiki maailmamme mehiläispopulaatiot. Toki silloin asiasta
kirjoittelin. Mutta tajuavia oli prosenteissa. Nyt kun päivästä toiseen käy
JUURI kuten olen esittänyt on jotain aniharvaa ydinpoliisia lukuunottamatta
alkanut faktat upota. Jopa mehiläiskasvattajaliiton sain viimein tajuamaan,
että ydintaposta on kyse. Aiemat ydinalan disinfot vaikenivat muutamissa
päivissä. Hienoa, että reaali alkaa kinostamaan ja lyömään massoina läpi
viime vuona vielä totaalivaikenevaan lehdistöömme myös. Ilmeisesti 90%
mehiläiskato ja sitä seuraava 1/3 osan ruokakato alkaa näkyä niin kiistatta.
Ilmeisesti ydinhallintomme on menettämässä peliä koko laajuudella luonnon
tuhoamisensa tiellä. Koska TABU:ja on laajasti nyt lisää:

A/Maailmanlaajuinen ilmoitettu niin sammakkoeläinten, kuin matelijoiden
kuoleminen niinikää maailmanlaajuisesti ydinpäästöjen
tritiumsadelammikkoihin on kylmästi määrätty vaiettavaksi 100%! Aika härski
aihe, kuin sentään kansainvälisesti todettiin faktaksi toki!

B/Maailman kaikki tunnetut havumetsät tulevat kuolemaan muutamissa
lähivuosissa. Japanista, Portugalista ja Siperiasta vääjäämättä 90%
metsistämme lähivuosina tappavista millisistä mäntyankeroisista on tehty
löydöksiä peräti 40kertaa. Vain hetki enää ja ydinteollisuuden säöhkölle ei
jatkossa ole lainkaan puuta! Tarkoin on vaiettu, että Venäjän puukauppa
takkuaa sikäläisistä megametsätuholähteistä jo. Aihe on SELKEÄSTI 60v
käyttöharhoilleen suunnitelluille ydinlaitoksillemme suoraa kuolemaa! Mega
TABU! Ilman muuta.

C/Kaspian kampamaneetit ajoivat Merentutkimuslaitoksen meriämme
kartoittamasta härskimmän päälle ei edes kalastajia ulkomerillemme sallita
raportoimaan maneetti-invaasioita. Kyseessä kun on se keskeisin
kulminaatiopiste, jonka TVO:n ydinlauhdekumpuamiset tuottaa megatuhona.
Raportointiin pestataan nyt silkkana sikailuna amatöörijoukkoa muka
tutkimaan leviä vaan. Ydinhallintomme törkyilee aiheessa niin, ettei mitään
rajaa. Kampamaneettien tiedetään jo kautta maailman tukkineeen voimaloiden
massiivivesikanavistot kuin korkki pullot. Ruotsissa tilanne on jo
sellainen, että ydinvoimaloissaan on 80% pysyvät varotehonalenemat.
Pian -50%. Tai kuten Venäjällä merilauhteesta ydinalalla on PAKKO luopua,
koskei meren valtaisat jopa 7 800eläintä/m2 kokoiset tulevat
kampamaneettikannat takaa enää ikinä asiallista jäähdytettä ydinvoimaloille.
Mega-TABU
aiheena myös.

D/ Niin tämä mehiläiskato johtuu tunnetusti ydinionisaation aiheuttamasta
ionosfäärimuutoksen suunnistusharhauttamisesta. Joka siis eksyttää muuten
terveet mehiläiset pois muutoksillaan pois tutuilta pesänsä paluureiteiltä.
Tästä tabusta alkaa asiis puhti olemaan ydinalaltamme poissa, kun KAIKKI
huomaa miten kato etenee. Aiemmin tekaistut virusvalheet eivät uppoa
kansaan. Koska jopa mehiläiskasvattajat huomaavat, että suunistuksen ongelma
ja ydinvoimalan läheisyys ratkaisee suoraan mehiläisten hävikin! Siksi
massoittain TVO:n lähistöltä pelastetaan mehiläispesiä turvaan
ydinsaasteilta Itä-Suomeen. Jotkut yksinkertaiset ydinlobbarit erehtyy
luulemaan näin hetkeksi kasvaneista paikallismehiläispopuloista, että kaiki
ikäänkuin olisi kohdallaan, kuten enneen. Ei toki!(

E/ Ruotsissa on kaikien aikojen rajuimmat metsäpalot 02.06.2008. Koko
Etelä-Suomessa metsäpalovaroitus. Tippaa ei vettä olla tuttuun tyyliin saatu
oikeastaan sitten lumien. Kuka oikeasti yllättyi, että jo viime vuona
viimein jopa EU:ssa myönnetty -40% ydinaavikoituminen etenee varmasti
tappaen yhä hurjemmin. Kuka enää edes muistaa, miten mm. Portugali paloi
kokonaan superkuivuuksiinsa. Tilanne jatkuu ja pahenee. Ranskassa myös jo
viime kesänä metsää kuivettui enemmän kuin säteilyllä pilattu ydinaavikkomaa
kasvoi. Tämä vuosi on taas edellistä pahempi. Vielä koettaa toki
Ilmatieteenlaitos vedättää hiilidioksidilisääntymisen synnytämine +30%
sadantakasvuharhoineen. Pelkkä vilkaisu jo ennen varsinaista kesää kuolevaan
ja kuivettuvaan luontoomme kertoo disinfon ydinalan panikoinniksi.
Virannomaistemme luotettavuus lähenee syystä nollaa. Ydinala tappaa ja
takuuvarmasti niin kauan, kunnest tuhoaa vähintään itsensä, kenties
säteilypäästöineen koko ihmiselon mahdollisuudet myös. Ja mikä oleelista
ydinalamme TARKOIN tietää mitä ydinkauhuja saamme jatkoon nähdä säteilyjen
kiristäessä elämisen mahdollisuuksia hetki hetki, hetkeltä kaikkialta
ympäriltämme!(( ((

PS. Kuten olemme huomanneet lehtien sivut yht äkkiä täyttyvät
virannomaisuhkailuista siitä, ettei nettiin saa jatkossa enää kirjoittaa
edes näistä mitä ympärillämme tapahtuu? Tajuaako kansamme miksi? Koska
ydinhallintomme tietää, että jatkossa kyyti käy niin hirveäksi tulevine
ydinpäästöjen punasadekausineen, ettei siitä saa antaa edes
silminnäkijälausuntoja enää! Tajjuatteko, homma on täysin poissa ydinalamme
hallinnasta. Einsteinin varotukset alkavat saamaan lihaa rajusti luittensa
ympärille. Yksi on tulevassa varma ydinala vetelee syyllisinä viimeisiään!


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Research Forum	Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next
Page 4 of 5