| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Michael Press
Guest
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: Re: Financial crisis |
 |
|
In article
<90e3aa31-02dc-4dfb-ac44-160d5de3a0fe@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
Bill Penrose <dangerousbill@gmail.com> wrote:
[quote]On Oct 9, 7:48 am, Yevgen Barsukov <evgen...@gmail.com> wrote:
The interesting question is if the financial system (and economy as a
whole)
can be seen "outside" like we see a chemical reaction.
Economists have been striving for generations to have their discipline
called a 'science', but no matter how sophisticated their models, it
still boils down to necromancy, fortune telling, and politically
motived wild guesses. Even weather prediction is more reliable.
Dangerous Bill '
[/quote]
At least they give astrology a good name.
--
Michael Press |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Nomen Nescio
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: Re: Financial crisis |
|
|
[quote]But any good textbook will tell you that the economytron
is curved in putspace while the corporatrons propagate
at $ = \C^±ß/EURO
This is because of the big bank, the stockytrino>s create
the externalitytrons that can be divided in fractures. As
you know the Conversation of monoplitry drops off at the
square of the petrosuv defined by Larry Silvester in 1204.
In any case it clearly shows you are wrong about everything.
[/quote]
Sez you and the textbooks that you quote and you>re both WRONG.
You did not consider relativistic effects due to the rates at
which the deficit is growing and the market is plunging. The
Paulson Exclusion Principle says that no two IDENTICAL
disinformions can occupy the same brokerage account simultaneously.
However, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find ANY economist, politician or CEO
that will spew identical disinformions twice within a time interval
of 2k_b (k_b = Bernanke>s Constant = 10 second sound bite) or
less -- or more -- so Paulson Exclusion does not apply.
The result is NEGATIVE curvature in the economytron, a singularity
on Wall St. and an almost impenetrable, infinite density in DC. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Spaceman
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:53 am Post subject: Re: Financial crisis |
|
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
[quote]But any good textbook will tell you that the economytron
is curved in putspace while the corporatrons propagate
at $ = \C^±ß/EURO
This is because of the big bank, the stockytrino>s create
the externalitytrons that can be divided in fractures. As
you know the Conversation of monoplitry drops off at the
square of the petrosuv defined by Larry Silvester in 1204.
In any case it clearly shows you are wrong about everything.
Sez you and the textbooks that you quote and you>re both WRONG.
You did not consider relativistic effects due to the rates at
which the deficit is growing and the market is plunging. The
Paulson Exclusion Principle says that no two IDENTICAL
disinformions can occupy the same brokerage account simultaneously.
However, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find ANY economist, politician or CEO
that will spew identical disinformions twice within a time interval
of 2k_b (k_b = Bernanke>s Constant = 10 second sound bite) or
less -- or more -- so Paulson Exclusion does not apply.
The result is NEGATIVE curvature in the economytron, a singularity
on Wall St. and an almost impenetrable, infinite density in DC.
[/quote]
ROFLOL
:) |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Han de Bruijn
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: Re: Financial crisis |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
[quote]The tool to facilitate economic functioning is a catalyst.
Nobody needs or wants money, all we want is the goods and
services it buys; and it is we, the people, that provide the
goods and services. Money is merely the measure of our
endeavours.
[/quote]
If _this_ would have been the view of everybody, then there wouldn>t
have been a financial crisis. So guess _why_ there is a crisis.
Answer: because money _isn>t_ a thing that we don>t want for its own
sake. Money, instead of a medium of exchange, has become an _Idol_.
Our goal in life has become: Making Money, instead of: Getting a Life.
Or rather: we think that there is no other way of getting a life than
through worshipping Money. I>m not really a Christian, but:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments
4 You shall not make for yourself an idol, [ .. ]
5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them;
Anthony Quinn>s father once asked him as a child: "do you want to
have a hot dog?" "Yes", he responded, but accidentally dropped the
coin that was meant to pay. As Anthony wanted to grab the coin, his
father said: "No! Never bow for money!". And they went home, still
hungry. (From the top of my head; details may easily be wrong ..)
[quote]He who controls the catalyst controls the economy.
Need is wanting what you have and I do not.
Greed is wanting what you have and I want more than you.
Economy, aka trade, is sharing what we both have.
You scratch my back and I>ll scratch yours, but someone
has to be first and that>s trust.
When too much money is in the system all you really get
is inflation. Nobody wants Zimbabwean dollars because
they cannot buy Zimbabwean goods and services, and
unless Zimbabwe provides goods and services they cannot
earn pounds, roubles, rupees, dollars or yen to buy the goods
and services of other nations. They cannot even feed themselves.
Rhodesia was once a thriving economy. Today it has a new
name and a greedy controller. Mugabe cannot be trusted,
he will not scratch our back. Instead he rails against Britain
and harps on the past. Britain will get its back scratched by
many others that we trust. War and revolution are the solution
to a greedy catalyst controller and his gang of criminal thugs.
[/quote]
Han de Bruijn |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
zzbunker@netscape.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:07 am Post subject: Re: Financial crisis |
|
|
On Oct 7, 8:29 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
[quote]The buzzword for the month: "confidence".
Nobody has any confidence in the banks or the government,
hence we have a crisis.
What does this have to do with science?
I>m still confident that two plus two equals four, the rest of the
crank theories depends on your confidence.
[/quote]
Well, that>s because the idiots in science never bothered to
explain
to anybody that "two plus two equals four" (locally).
So most of them were born bean counters, which is why
people with great than average intelliigences invented digital,
risc, fiber optics, and hologams. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
