| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
V for Vendicar Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
[quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Pressurized_Reactor
Two under construction. Finland and France.
Six on order in Asia.. Expect more.
[/quote]
And a couple in Iran.
Praise Gawd.
Only 200,000 more to build and then the entire world will be nuclear
powered. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
V for Vendicar Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:58 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"Angelo Campanella" <a.campanella@att.net> wrote
[quote]Hey, have you heard that some scientists now believe that one of the the
causes of the slight temperature rise observed in recent years is the
REMOVAL of contaminatis and particulates (industrial smoke) from the
atmosphere via decades of EPA cleanups. The clear air is a better
insulator.
[/quote]
Well, lets see.. MMMM ya. It>s only been in the scientific literature
for the last 50 years.
MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOONNNNNNN |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
zzbunker@netscape.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:13 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
On Jul 19, 2:16 am, "Rob Dekker" <r...@verific.com> wrote:
[quote]"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
"DB" <a...@some.net> wrote in message
news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym. There is
nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries are running some 5
billion bl/year while consumption is currently 31 billion bl/year.
You can>t drill for what isn>t there.
"DB", the Dumb Bastard <a...@some.net
is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
are not damaged goods like you are...
Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad...
en
If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
Hanson,
Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on the 150,000
years of oil that we supposedly have ?
[/quote]
Those issues still amaze many people.
Since digital systems, silicon graphics, A.I., WWW, Mars landers,
satellites, GPS, lasers,
PV Cells, HDTV, Tidal Enegy, Wind Energy, and Robots were mostly
invented because
of the cranks stuck on 150,000 years of anything: oil, nuclear,
gas, electric, elevators, or whatever.
[quote]Ever heard of carbonates ? They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare occurance of carbon
that luckily survived the millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these carbohydrates that you
rave about, or simply stop repeating the same lie.
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Rob Dekker Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:16 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
[quote]"DB" <abc@some.net> wrote in message
news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym. There is
nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries are running some 5
billion bl/year while consumption is currently 31 billion bl/year.
You can>t drill for what isn>t there.
"DB", the Dumb Bastard <abc@some.net
is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
are not damaged goods like you are...
Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad11b?hl=[/quote]
en
[quote]If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
[/quote]
Hanson,
Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on the 150,000
years of oil that we supposedly have ?
Ever heard of carbonates ? They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare occurance of carbon
that luckily survived the millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these carbohydrates that you
rave about, or simply stop repeating the same lie.
[quote]
[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
DB Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 11:31 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
Rob Dekker wrote:
[quote]
Hanson,
Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on the 150,000
years of oil that we supposedly have ?
Ever heard of carbonates ? They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare occurance of carbon
that luckily survived the millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these carbohydrates that you
rave about, or simply stop repeating the same lie.
[/quote]
Hanson:
BAWHAWHAWHAWHWAHAWHHAW. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Androcles Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:17 pm Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"Rob Dekker" <rob@verific.com> wrote in message
news:g5s13u$f1p$1@news.parasun.com...
|
| "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
| > "DB" <abc@some.net> wrote in message
| > news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
| > > It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym. There is
| > > nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries are running some 5
| > > billion bl/year while consumption is currently 31 billion bl/year.
| > > You can>t drill for what isn>t there.
| > >
| >
| > "DB", the Dumb Bastard <abc@some.net>
| > is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
| > who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
| > sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
| > no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
| > >
| > Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
| > buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
| > consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
| > are not damaged goods like you are...
| > Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
| > Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
| >
|
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad11b?hl=
| en
| > If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
| > turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
| > that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
| > into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
|
| Hanson,
|
| Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on the 150,000
| years of oil that we supposedly have ?
| Ever heard of carbonates ? They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of
it.
| Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare occurance of
carbon
| that luckily survived the millions of years of terrestrial
transformations.
|
| It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these carbohydrates that you
| rave about, or simply stop repeating the same lie.
|
It>s COAL he>s talking about, you fuckin' idiot.
"try to grasp why 150>000 years of buried carbon" |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
DB Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:38 pm Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
Androcles wrote:
[quote]
It>s COAL he>s talking about, you fuckin' idiot.
[/quote]
http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/2396
But then, you 'believe'........ |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
hanson Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
AHAHAHA... green Carbohydrates, bedekkered... ahahaha..
[quote]
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message[/quote]
news:Gyggk.27541$GO7.7467@newsfe12.ams2...
[quote]
The carbohydrated "Rob Dekker", an enviro green pecker
rob@verific.com> wrote in > message
news:g5s13u$f1p$1@news.parasun.com...
|
| "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > "DB" <abc@some.net> wrote in message
| > news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
| > > It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym.
| > > There is nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries
| > > are running some 5 billion bl/year while consumption is
| > > currently 31 billion bl/year. You can>t drill for what isn>t there.
|
hanson wrote:[/quote]
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
[quote]| > "DB", the Dumb Bastard <abc@some.net
| > is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
| > who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
| > sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
| > no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
|
| > Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
| > buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
| > consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
| > are not damaged goods like you are...
| > Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
| > Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
|
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad11b?hl=
| en
| > If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
| > turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
| > that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
| > into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
|
Class 3 enviro Dekker, the green pecker wrote
| Hanson,
| Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on
| the 150,000 years of oil that we supposedly have ?
| Ever heard of carbonates ?
| They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
| Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare
| occurance of carbon that luckily survived the millions of
| years of terrestrial transformations.
| It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these
| carbohydrates that you rave about, or simply stop repeating
| the same lie.
Androcles wrote:
It>s COAL he>s talking about, you fuckin' idiot.
"try to grasp why 150>000 years of buried carbon"
hanson wrote:[/quote]
Right, Andro, but take it easy on Bob Decker who is
just a silly green pecker... which is what he is thinking
with and so it is understandable that he does not
understand the simplest High School chem.
These two posters above, Bob and Dan, are valued assets
of mine because these "fuckin' idiots" are making me
money through their beliefs and fears.. in that they keep
the prices of the C&H commodities high.... ahahaha...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
[quote]
Bob, "carbohydrates"?.... hahahaha... ... ahahaha...[/quote]
So, Bob, you mean that you are so densely green that
you do not know where to get "carbohydrates" from?
[quote]
"It is time that I tell you WHERE"... ahahaha...[/quote]
How about the supermarket or the grocery store
where you can buy them in form of cereal, bread,
sugar etc.. and for YOUR joy and benefit a green
colored lollie-pop!.... or you can get them in all types
of fruits and veggies in case you are a vegan, bent
green that way...
Oh, BTW, .... ahahahaha....
don>t eat any veggies that are more than a few weeks
old, and much less the ones that have undergone
"millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
[quote]
Bob, thanks for the laughs and the $$$$$.... ahahaha...[/quote]
.... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
[quote]
PS:[/quote]
Andro, thanks for the post. I would have missed
this gem... ahahahahaha.... |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Androcles Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:52 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:uIugk.72$GI.40@trnddc05...
| AHAHAHA... green Carbohydrates, bedekkered... ahahaha..
| >
| "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
| news:Gyggk.27541$GO7.7467@newsfe12.ams2...
| >
| > The carbohydrated "Rob Dekker", an enviro green pecker
| > <rob@verific.com> wrote in > message
| > news:g5s13u$f1p$1@news.parasun.com...
| > |
| > | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| > | news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | > "DB" <abc@some.net> wrote in message
| > | > news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
| > | > > It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym.
| > | > > There is nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries
| > | > > are running some 5 billion bl/year while consumption is
| > | > > currently 31 billion bl/year. You can>t drill for what isn>t
there.
| > | > >
| hanson wrote:
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | > "DB", the Dumb Bastard <abc@some.net>
| > | > is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
| > | > who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
| > | > sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
| > | > no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
| > | > >
| > | > Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
| > | > buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
| > | > consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
| > | > are not damaged goods like you are...
| > | > Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
| > | > Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
| > |
| >
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad11b?hl=
| > | en
| > | > If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
| > | > turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
| > | > that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
| > | > into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
| > |
| Class 3 enviro Dekker, the green pecker wrote
| > | Hanson,
| > | Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on
| > | the 150,000 years of oil that we supposedly have ?
| > | Ever heard of carbonates ?
| > | They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
| > | Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare
| > | occurance of carbon that luckily survived the millions of
| > | years of terrestrial transformations.
| > | It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these
| > | carbohydrates that you rave about, or simply stop repeating
| > | the same lie.
| >>
| Androcles wrote:
| > It>s COAL he>s talking about, you fuckin' idiot.
| > "try to grasp why 150>000 years of buried carbon"
| >
| hanson wrote:
| Right, Andro, but take it easy on Bob Decker who is
| just a silly green pecker... which is what he is thinking
| with and so it is understandable that he does not
| understand the simplest High School chem.
| These two posters above, Bob and Dan, are valued assets
| of mine because these "fuckin' idiots" are making me
| money through their beliefs and fears.. in that they keep
| the prices of the C&H commodities high.... ahahaha...
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| >
| Bob, "carbohydrates"?.... hahahaha... ... ahahaha...
| So, Bob, you mean that you are so densely green that
| you do not know where to get "carbohydrates" from?
| >
| "It is time that I tell you WHERE"... ahahaha...
| How about the supermarket or the grocery store
| where you can buy them in form of cereal, bread,
| sugar etc.. and for YOUR joy and benefit a green
| colored lollie-pop!.... or you can get them in all types
| of fruits and veggies in case you are a vegan, bent
| green that way...
| Oh, BTW, .... ahahahaha....
| don>t eat any veggies that are more than a few weeks
| old, and much less the ones that have undergone
| "millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
| >
| Bob, thanks for the laughs and the $$$$$.... ahahaha...
| ... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
| >
| PS:
| Andro, thanks for the post. I would have missed
| this gem... ahahahahaha....
You sweet-talk 'em, I>ll hustle 'em.
We play "good cop, bad cop", they are still fuckin' idiots
and I>m still having fun. (And I wanna be bad cop.) |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
hanson Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:58 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... Good Cop / Bad Cop... AHAHAHA...
[quote]
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message[/quote]
news:x7vgk.7087$EX5.4319@newsfe05.ams2...
[quote]
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:uIugk.72$GI.40@trnddc05...
| AHAHAHA... green Carbohydrates, bedekkered... ahahaha..
|
| "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
| news:Gyggk.27541$GO7.7467@newsfe12.ams2...
|
| > The carbohydrated "Rob Dekker", an enviro green pecker
| > <rob@verific.com> wrote in > message
| > news:g5s13u$f1p$1@news.parasun.com...
| > |
| > | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| > | news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | > "DB" <abc@some.net> wrote in message
| > | > news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
| > | > > It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym.
| > | > > There is nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries
| > | > > are running some 5 billion bl/year while consumption is
| > | > > currently 31 billion bl/year. You can>t drill for what isn>t
| > | > >there.
| hanson wrote:
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | > "DB", the Dumb Bastard <abc@some.net
| > | > is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
| > | > who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
| > | > sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
| > | > no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
| > |
| > | > Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
| > | > buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
| > | > consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
| > | > are not damaged goods like you are...
| > | > Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
| > | > Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
| > |
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad11b?hl=
| > | en
| > | > If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
| > | > turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
| > | > that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
| > | > into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
| > |
| Class 3 enviro Dekker, the green pecker wrote
| > | Hanson,
| > | Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on
| > | the 150,000 years of oil that we supposedly have ?
| > | Ever heard of carbonates ?
| > | They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
| > | Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare
| > | occurance of carbon that luckily survived the millions of
| > | years of terrestrial transformations.
| > | It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these
| > | carbohydrates that you rave about, or simply stop repeating
| > | the same lie.
|
| Androcles wrote:
| > It>s COAL he>s talking about, you fuckin' idiot.
| > "try to grasp why 150>000 years of buried carbon"
|
| hanson wrote:
| Right, Andro, but take it easy on Bob Decker who is
| just a silly green pecker... which is what he is thinking
| with and so it is understandable that he does not
| understand the simplest High School chem.
| These two posters above, Bob and Dan, are valued assets
| of mine because these "fuckin' idiots" are making me
| money through their beliefs and fears.. in that they keep
| the prices of the C&H commodities high.... ahahaha...
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
|
| Bob, "carbohydrates"?.... hahahaha... ... ahahaha...
| So, Bob, you mean that you are so densely green that
| you do not know where to get "carbohydrates" from?
|
| "It is time that I tell you WHERE"... ahahaha...
| How about the supermarket or the grocery store
| where you can buy them in form of cereal, bread,
| sugar etc.. and for YOUR joy and benefit a green
| colored lollie-pop!.... or you can get them in all types
| of fruits and veggies in case you are a vegan, bent
| green that way...
| Oh, BTW, .... ahahahaha....
| don>t eat any veggies that are more than a few weeks
| old, and much less the ones that have undergone
| "millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
|
| Bob, thanks for the laughs and the $$$$$.... ahahaha...
| ... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
|
| PS:
| Andro, thanks for the post. I would have missed
| this gem... ahahahahaha....
Androcles wrote:
You sweet-talk 'em, I>ll hustle 'em.
We play "good cop, bad cop", they are still fuckin' idiots
and I>m still having fun. (And I wanna be bad cop.)
hanson wrote:[/quote]
Yes you may, Andro... Keep whuppin' their green arses!
ahahahaha.. Thanks for the laughs... aahahahanson |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Androcles Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:58 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:yRvgk.77$GI.3@trnddc05...
| AHAHAHAHAHAHA.... Good Cop / Bad Cop... AHAHAHA...
| >
| "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
| news:x7vgk.7087$EX5.4319@newsfe05.ams2...
| >
| > "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| > news:uIugk.72$GI.40@trnddc05...
| > | AHAHAHA... green Carbohydrates, bedekkered... ahahaha..
| > | >
| > | "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
| > | news:Gyggk.27541$GO7.7467@newsfe12.ams2...
| > | >
| > | > The carbohydrated "Rob Dekker", an enviro green pecker
| > | > <rob@verific.com> wrote in > message
| > | > news:g5s13u$f1p$1@news.parasun.com...
| > | > |
| > | > | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
| > | > | news:Jhsek.162$kf4.93@trnddc03...
| > | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | > | > "DB" <abc@some.net> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:LRrek.118885$lb3.12092@fe097.usenetserver.com...
| > | > | > > It can>t be reasonably be replaced in the current paradym.
| > | > | > > There is nothing to, as you put it, 'drill out'. Discoveries
| > | > | > > are running some 5 billion bl/year while consumption is
| > | > | > > currently 31 billion bl/year. You can>t drill for what isn>t
| > | > | > >there.
| >
| > | hanson wrote:
| > | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | > | > "DB", the Dumb Bastard <abc@some.net>
| > | > | > is a class 3 enviro, a little green idiot ....
| > | > | > who parrots the green party line because he doesn>t have
| > | > | > sufficient education to think for himself, and that he has
| > | > | > no clue how badly the green shits are fucking him.
| > | > | > >
| > | > | > Here read again and try to grasp why 150>000 years of
| > | > | > buried carbon, in any desirable form, at the present
| > | > | > consumption rate, is *limitless* for normal people, who
| > | > | > are not damaged goods like you are...
| > | > | > Here it is again for your benefit and healing. Read the
| > | > | > Para that starts with: Initially, "they" say the earth had...:
| > | > |
| >
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.energy.renewable/msg/1f25c61fc45ad11b?hl=
| > | > | en
| > | > | > If you understand enough elementary chemistry, a light may
| > | > | > turn on in your head. If not then resign yourself to the fact
| > | > | > that you have fallen victim to the grand con that turned you
| > | > | > into damaged goods... ahahahaha... ahaha...ahahahanson
| > | > |
| > | Class 3 enviro Dekker, the green pecker wrote
| > | > | Hanson,
| > | > | Don>t you have anything better to do than your record stuck on
| > | > | the 150,000 years of oil that we supposedly have ?
| > | > | Ever heard of carbonates ?
| > | > | They are minerals that store carbon. Lots of it.
| > | > | Oil (carbohydrates in general) is just an extremely rare
| > | > | occurance of carbon that luckily survived the millions of
| > | > | years of terrestrial transformations.
| > | > | It is time that you tell us WHERE we can find these
| > | > | carbohydrates that you rave about, or simply stop repeating
| > | > | the same lie.
| > | >>
| > | Androcles wrote:
| > | > It>s COAL he>s talking about, you fuckin' idiot.
| > | > "try to grasp why 150>000 years of buried carbon"
| > | >
| > | hanson wrote:
| > | Right, Andro, but take it easy on Bob Decker who is
| > | just a silly green pecker... which is what he is thinking
| > | with and so it is understandable that he does not
| > | understand the simplest High School chem.
| > | These two posters above, Bob and Dan, are valued assets
| > | of mine because these "fuckin' idiots" are making me
| > | money through their beliefs and fears.. in that they keep
| > | the prices of the C&H commodities high.... ahahaha...
| > | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/04d763eacfc4ad19?hl=en
| > | >
| > | Bob, "carbohydrates"?.... hahahaha... ... ahahaha...
| > | So, Bob, you mean that you are so densely green that
| > | you do not know where to get "carbohydrates" from?
| > | >
| > | "It is time that I tell you WHERE"... ahahaha...
| > | How about the supermarket or the grocery store
| > | where you can buy them in form of cereal, bread,
| > | sugar etc.. and for YOUR joy and benefit a green
| > | colored lollie-pop!.... or you can get them in all types
| > | of fruits and veggies in case you are a vegan, bent
| > | green that way...
| > | Oh, BTW, .... ahahahaha....
| > | don>t eat any veggies that are more than a few weeks
| > | old, and much less the ones that have undergone
| > | "millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
| > | >
| > | Bob, thanks for the laughs and the $$$$$.... ahahaha...
| > | ... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
| > | >
| > | PS:
| > | Andro, thanks for the post. I would have missed
| > | this gem... ahahahahaha....
| >
| Androcles wrote:
| > You sweet-talk 'em, I>ll hustle 'em.
| > We play "good cop, bad cop", they are still fuckin' idiots
| > and I>m still having fun. (And I wanna be bad cop.)
| >
| hanson wrote:
| Yes you may, Andro... Keep whuppin' their green arses!
| ahahahaha.. Thanks for the laughs... aahahahanson
|
As long as we laugh, hahahanson, we are ALIVE!
f ck the gods, f ck the stupid mentality of the dingleberries,
death comes to us all and there is f ck-all we can do about it.
(Except there is, and nobody tries. I plead guilty, I have not
tried enough. I knew this when I was 13 years old and let
myself down. Oh to be that age and know then what I know
now. Alas, it does not work that way.)
So we laugh and say "f ck it". And we die. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Benj Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:58 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
On Jul 4, 10:26 pm, "Mike Jr." <n00s...@comcast.net> wrote:
[quote]For sure we know how to do nuclear power but try to get one licensed these
days. That may change with energy costs so high, but the politics of it have
kept nuclear power off of the list since the 1970>s.
[/quote]
And the real problems is what to do with nuclear waste that lives
essentially forever.
My vote is to just build the plants and ship all the waste to
Alabama.
[quote]We are still building coal fired plants but they are burping more and more
CO2 into the atmosphere and are under increasing scrutiny.
[/quote]
Not the problem. CO2 is a POLITICAL problem, namely how to stop all
the lies about CO2 causing AGW. The REAL problem with coal is all the
OTHER nasty pollutants like heavy metals. Unfortunately the CO2
boondoggle has shunted money that SHOULD have desperately gone to the
coal pollutants problem into a non-problem where there is a political
agenda and big money to be made.
[quote]Check my recent appends in sci.physics. My investigation has led me
to conclude that CO2 AGW is physically not possible. That is, the
science behind AGW is deeply flawed. Therefore I see no reason for a
green energy policy.
[/quote]
Well the "reason" is spelled "political agenda" It>s funny that what
with a bunch of us screaming about CO2 AGW not being possible the AGW
crowd and now shifted gears to some bogus "feedback theory" to
explain how the impossible really is true. It would really be funny if
so much money and the fate of the world were not involved! |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
DB Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
Benj wrote:
[quote]On Jul 4, 10:26 pm, "Mike Jr." <n00s...@comcast.net> wrote:
For sure we know how to do nuclear power but try to get one licensed these
days. That may change with energy costs so high, but the politics of it have
kept nuclear power off of the list since the 1970>s.
And the real problems is what to do with nuclear waste that lives
essentially forever.
[/quote]
The problem is political, not technical. It can be very safely vitrified
and dropped into the mariana trench. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
chazwin Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
On Jul 4, 7:07 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
[quote]Not to diminish the bomb effort but at least they knew E=mc^2 three
decades before they started.
Now with peak oil everyone wants really fundamental research done "on
the wing."
They want "new mature" green industries yesterday.
I>m not saying that breakthroughs are impossible in this climate.
"When a man knows he>s going to be hung in a fortnight, it
concentrates the mind wonderfully" applies to everyone.
I>m just saying that attitude makes me really really nervous.
Bret Cahill
[/quote]
Too little too late.
Let>s face it, as a species, we ain>t gonna make it!
We will either f ck the world up over some idiotic religious/
ideological argument and blow the shit out of each other, or we will
just wind down when the oil and other fossil fuels are used up. We can
always go back to hunting and gathering!
The most dangerous time for nuclear holocaust will be when the
resource gap will begin to tighten. The Western powers will find
increasing numbers of excuses to invade, destabilise and control the
dwindling resources. Within 30 years there will be US troops in a
radioactive Iran. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Rob Dekker Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:36 pm Post subject: Re: Even Manhatten Project Wasn>t "On the Fly" R&D |
|
|
"Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message
news:j9wgk.10157$A42.9113@newsfe14.ams2...
.....
[quote]| > | Bob, "carbohydrates"?.... hahahaha... ... ahahaha...
| > | So, Bob, you mean that you are so densely green that
| > | you do not know where to get "carbohydrates" from?
| > |
| > | "It is time that I tell you WHERE"... ahahaha...
| > | How about the supermarket or the grocery store
| > | where you can buy them in form of cereal, bread,
| > | sugar etc.. and for YOUR joy and benefit a green
| > | colored lollie-pop!.... or you can get them in all types
| > | of fruits and veggies in case you are a vegan, bent
| > | green that way...
| > | Oh, BTW, .... ahahahaha....
| > | don>t eat any veggies that are more than a few weeks
| > | old, and much less the ones that have undergone
| > | "millions of years of terrestrial transformations.
| > |
| > | Bob, thanks for the laughs and the $$$$$.... ahahaha...
| > | ... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
| > |
| > | PS:
| > | Andro, thanks for the post. I would have missed
| > | this gem... ahahahahaha....
|
| Androcles wrote:
| > You sweet-talk 'em, I>ll hustle 'em.
| > We play "good cop, bad cop", they are still fuckin' idiots
| > and I>m still having fun. (And I wanna be bad cop.)
|
| hanson wrote:
| Yes you may, Andro... Keep whuppin' their green arses!
| ahahahaha.. Thanks for the laughs... aahahahanson
|
As long as we laugh, hahahanson, we are ALIVE!
f ck the gods, f ck the stupid mentality of the dingleberries,
death comes to us all and there is f ck-all we can do about it.
(Except there is, and nobody tries. I plead guilty, I have not
tried enough. I knew this when I was 13 years old and let
myself down. Oh to be that age and know then what I know
now. Alas, it does not work that way.)
So we laugh and say "f ck it". And we die.
[/quote]
Ever watched Brother Bear ? There are these two moose.... |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|