Science and Technology news... :: View topic

server · Guest

message unavailable

hanson · Guest

<andrea_gazze@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:e39befa5-cc97-4de9-8896-d0d8a7d0b794@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
[quote]Hi,
I have to use this autoclave. There are four keys. I know that 2 are
for 134 degrees and 2 are for 121 degrees. I`m interested in 121
degrees: which is the difference between the 2 keys of 121 degrees?
How long a cycle of 121 degrees last? I shoul do 2 autoclaving cycles
at 121 degrees.

Thank you,
Andrea

ahahahaha... Andi-pooh, ask your boss, or[/quote]
reading the Instruction Pamphlet always helps.
Ciao... & thanks for the laughs... Giovannihihihi...

Guest

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
[quote]
One other note is that there has never been a case where a person
contracted any two or three
of the three old age diseases of Parkinsons, Prion and Alzheimers. I
know of no case where a person had say Parkinsons and then
also had Alzheimers. Now this may or may not support this theory of
mercury as the cause, because
one would think that if mercury is the poison cause that in some
people the mercury would set up two
or more of these diseases simultaneously. And perhaps even see cases
of Autistic children starting to
have Alzheimers or Parkinsons. Now maybe there are such cases but have
not been reported. And
maybe there are many such cases but one of the diseases takes over and
masks the presence of
the other disease and noone bothered to autopsy for 2 or more diseases
simultaneously.

[/quote]
Maybe there is some evidence of these simultaneous multiple mixes.
There is evidence
that Prion disease comes in a plethora variety and where some prion
proteins are gradations
from a set standard. So the variety of diseased proteins in prion
disease could be the fact
that the person has both Alzheimers along with CJD or some Prion
disease simultaneously.

And, if I am not mistaken, there is evidence in Parkinsons disease of
the forgetfullness found
in Alzheimers. It would be that the Parkinsons shaking would mask the
Alzheimers loss of
memory.

And also, let me comment on the old and decrepit idea that these
diseases are genetic based.
The genetic base flys out the window with a mercury poisoning
causation, because mercury can
be an accumulative poison just like lead poisoning would be that the
surroundings of the individual
are family members and so where one of the family is in increasing
exposure to mercury buildup,
all the members of the family are likely to have increasing exposure
to the mercury. No doubt some
genetics plays a role in these 5 diseases such as whether the genetics
of the proteins to clean out the
body of mercury present, would play a factor in who in the family gets
these diseases. But old medical
ideas on these 5 diseases placed too much emphasis on genetics when
genetics has little importance
to the fact that mercury is a poison. Mercury as a poison is not a
genetics issue.

The thing we have to remember is the big picture of these diseases for
the last 2,000 years of history.
All five of these diseases were either unknown or rare before 1901.
Only in the 20th century do these
five diseases really emerge to prominence, especially Autism and
Alzheimers. So a commonsense
reasonable person would ask what has changed by 1901 that was so
different than the preceding 1899
years? The answer to me is that our increasing industrial air
pollution of the modern times where
mercury becomes available to be breathed in by every person no matter
where they reside on the globe.
That the coal fired electric power stations in USA and China and have
mercury drift into the air and
be breathed in by any person in any country of the world. By the way,
I found out that scientists deem the
South Pole upwind is the cleanest oxygen air in the entire globe.

But my point is that the rise of these 5 diseases starting about 1901
parallels the rise of mercury in the
air that every person on the globe cannot escape breathing. We have
had other pathways of increasing
contact with mercury such as teeth fillings in dentistry and such as
the thimerosal in baby vaccines. But
the biggest culprit of making mercury inescapable for every living and
breathing human is the mercury
we put in the air by burning coal and other petrol products such as
oil refineries. With the increasing
dirty and mercury laden air of the globe, so has risen the incidence
of these 5 diseases.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Guest

Bob wrote:
[quote]On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:41:27 -0700 (PDT),
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com wrote:

Well I have to ask, do we classify the bacteria that fix nitrogen as
plants
or animals or neither?

Bacteria are bacteria. They are not plants or animals. They are -- in
one simple view -- an equal third kingdom to plants and animals.

For the current kids coming up in high school biology, they are taught
that there are about 5 kingdoms, including bacteria, plants, animals
(plus fungi, protozoans).

[/quote]
Alright, thanks for that reply for it now moves forward in a big way.
The old biology
had no rhyme or reason to have 5 or more kingdoms. In the
Complimentarity Principle of
Physics of Quantum Mechanics, complimentarity means "only two things".

So if we have Complimentarity invasive in biology and pervading
biology means that
the old Linnaeus Classification into 5 or more is no longer any good.
In fact, Complimentarity
would immediately imply the Classification of all life is two and only
two kingdoms. And
those two kingdoms would be Animals and Plants. And those two kingdoms
would be
classified as to how they obtain their energy. Plants get their energy
from the nonliving
environment-- the Sun or rocks as in rock-eaters and Animals get their
energy by eating
living material. So all bacteria that subsist by eating other living
material are animals and
bacteria that subsist from Sun or eating of rocks are plants.

Complimentarity forces biology to have only 2 kingdoms.

[quote]

Now I know and most everyone would agree with me that almost all, not
all
but well over 99% of living creatures on Earth get their energy
_ultimately_ from the Sun
as the Sun provides plants with energy and then the animals subsist on
the
plants.

yes

Now, Bob, can I put Nitrogen into that equation replacing energy: Most
all living creatures
on Earth get their nitrogen when traced back, ultimately came from
plants.

No, They get it from bacteria. Only bacteria can fix atmospheric
nitrogen. N2-fixing plants do it because of their intimate symbiosis
with bacteria. (Hm, are there some N2-fixing fungi?)

[/quote]
Alright from bacteria, but some bacteria are animals and the others
are plants.
So I suppose some N2 fixing bacteria are plants, but maybe pleasantly
surprized
to find out if all N2 fixing bacteria are animals. I always thought of
N2 fixing bacteria
as a symbiotic relationship where the plant gives the bacteria its
food it needs. So I
sort of thought before this discussion that the N2-fixing bacteria
were thus all to be
classified as Animals.

Now if all N2-fixing bacteria indeed depend on their plant hosts for
food, then all of the
Nitrogen that flows through the Nitrogen Cycle is dependent on
animals. And this
is a fine example of Complimentarity in biology. Where first life had
to be a group of
living individuals so that one can nourish the other and thus survive
and multiply.

[quote]
You noted "natural" N2-fixation, as from lightning. I don>t know the
magnitude of that. I presume it is known.

Another way of
saying this is that all nitrogen in all living organisms trace the
nitrogen back to some plant tissue.

Nonsense. Most life on earth is bacteria. And they are certainly not
dependent on plants. There was over 2 billion years of life on earth
prior to animals, and then plants came on even later than that. (As
always, the real truth is more complex. But that is a reasonable
start.)

[/quote]
I concur that is nonsense when we eliminate the bacteria Kingdom and
place bacteria
into either animal or plant bacteria.
[quote]

Now apparently that is not true, since Bob cites that website of where
nitrogen is fixed
in the intestine of animals.

That is minor. I think you can safely ignore it -- based on what that
item said. Anyway, note that such N2-fixation is due to bacteria.

My questioning is after the idea that life on Earth is a complimentary
relationship between
animals and plants and that would mean first-life was both a group of
animals along with plants.
First life could not have been a single line evolving of plants
without animals, or animals without
plants.

First life was presumably bacterial. Maybe simpler. Not plants or
animals, which are more complex.

[/quote]
Most scientists would easily concede to the idea that all of biology
is physics.
And since physics is rooted in Quantum Mechanics where we have
Complimentarity,
then all of biology has to start not from a Linnaeus Classification
but from a
Complimentarity Classification of only 2 kingdoms. Then every living
organism
is either in the plant kingdom or animal kingdom. Some may have
gradations between
the two, but essentially there are two.

Everything in Physics is particle versus wave, and no third thing. All
is dualistic and complimentary
in physics. And since biology is a subset of physics, all of biology
starts with two dualistic kingdoms.

That means the first life on Earth or some alien planet was a colony
of life where some were plants and
others were animals.

(snipped)
[quote]
P.S. Bob, I am limited in accessing science journals and don>t feel
like paying for access.

...

Offhand don>t know.

If you have a journal citation -- which you can get thru google or
such -- send me the item, and I will try to get the article for you.
Ok to send email to my yahoo acct: b_bruner at ...

bob
[/quote]
Bob, I need information on the EGRET satellite telescope that was
dismantled circa 2000 but had
photographed the Solar System in gamma radiation wavelength.
Apparently it had photographed Jupiter
because one web site said it was "too bright to resolve" words to that
effect. What I want to know is
the extent of EGRET>s photos of Jupiter and its satellites in gamma
wavelengths. Bob>s search engines
are stronger than mines since Bob has the Berkeley resource. And ever
since about 2000 the Internet
searches in science have changed for the worse in that you get only
"fronts" where you have to pay money
to get into the heart of the article.

Bob, please search for EGRET GAMMA JUPITER SATELLITE

I am hoping that someone reported whether Io or Europa or Ganymede
shone even brighter than
Jupiter in gamma radiation.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Yevgen Barsukov · Guest

[quote]With advanced batteries, you can go and purchase them, 18650 Li-ion
with 3.7V average and 2.2Ah in bulk for 2$/cell - about 4 Wh/dollar.
Looking for price per power - this cell is rated for continuous
discharge
at 1h rate (full discharge in 1hr), so about 8W per cell, 4W/dollar.

Which is $250 per kWh?
Seems pretty cheap to me. Maybe stacking a whole load like in the Tesla
would be the answer for solar PV at night.
[/quote]
To be perfectly accurate, they also need charging and protection
electronics,
wiring and casing. So to be generous, we should double the price for
an actual
operational ready to go battery power system.
But as you can see, pure battery price is not terribly bad
already.
Management system cost fraction can indeed decrease with overal system
size.

Regards,
Yevgen

[quote]
--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/- Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London[/quote]

galathaea · Guest

On Jun 26, 4:57 pm, "I.N. Galidakis" <morph...@olympus.mons> wrote:
[quote]Last week while I was thinking about the analytic continuation of the Ackermann
function in the complex plane, I fell on my head after stepping on a discarded
banana peel which I previously had tried to smoke. The fall resulted in a sudden
and dangerous revelation, if you will, which caused the spontaneous birth of
dozens of new scientific & non-scientific Murphy>s Laws.

I suspect the originator of the revelation was Goddess Eris, but I cannot be
sure because I was unconscious for several minutes.

I don>t know if they are correct. I don>t even know if they are funny, so some
may find them objectionable or even offending. In either case, don>t blame me.
Blame the banana peel and Goddess Eris. They made me do it.

Sorted according to category for your reading convenience and efficient
apoplexy. Brace yourselves. The news are bad (as they usually are with Murphy>s
Laws) ;o)

http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/writing/NewMurphysLaws.html
[/quote]
my favorite

"The more YOU know about The Universe, the more The Universe knows
about YOU" --- Nerdius>s Futility of Scientific Knowledge Law

btw
has there ever been found
an ethnobotanical origin to the banana peel use?

the earliest reference i know of is the anarchist cookbook

there>s been a lot of speculation over the years of a joke
have any metabolically active alkaloids ever been found?
besides the transmitter amino acid derivatives commonly found?

bananadine?

just wondering if you>d heard more of the history

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar

Logan Kearsley · Guest

On May 22, 12:17 am, EvilGo...@gmail.com wrote:
[quote]Hi all, I>m looking for decent, technically detailed, chemistry
specific
science fiction novels to read, any good recommendations would
be really appreciated.

Thanks
[/quote]
I>m amazed that nobody has mentioned Hal Clement yet. More than half
of his books essentially hinge on explorations of weird chemical
environments.
_Mission of Gravity_
_Under_
_Star Light_
_Close to Critical_
_Iceworld_ (sort of; doesn>t go into extensive detail)
_Fossil_
_The Nitrogen Fix_
_Cycle of Fire_ (also sort of)
_Still River_

-l.

Active Member · Guest

"Archimedes Plutonium" Anagram #17:
"Tiresome Unlaid Chump"

<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cd35de4b-c95f-4221-b622-30aa0d8ff678@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
[quote]
Bob wrote:[/quote]

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax · Guest

Yevgen Barsukov wrote:
[quote]With advanced batteries, you can go and purchase them, 18650 Li-ion
with 3.7V average and 2.2Ah in bulk for 2$/cell - about 4 Wh/dollar.
Looking for price per power - this cell is rated for continuous
discharge
at 1h rate (full discharge in 1hr), so about 8W per cell, 4W/dollar.
Which is $250 per kWh?
Seems pretty cheap to me. Maybe stacking a whole load like in the Tesla
would be the answer for solar PV at night.

To be perfectly accurate, they also need charging and protection
electronics,
wiring and casing. So to be generous, we should double the price for
an actual
operational ready to go battery power system.
But as you can see, pure battery price is not terribly bad
already.
Management system cost fraction can indeed decrease with overal system
size.
[/quote]
If the electronics industry can make a 400W PC PSU to retail at $6 I
don>t see that as being the price bottleneck ultimately.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London

I.N. Galidakis · Guest

galathaea wrote:
[quote]On Jun 26, 4:57 pm, "I.N. Galidakis" <morph...@olympus.mons> wrote:
Last week while I was thinking about the analytic continuation of the
Ackermann function in the complex plane, I fell on my head after stepping on
a discarded banana peel which I previously had tried to smoke. The fall
resulted in a sudden and dangerous revelation, if you will, which caused the
spontaneous birth of dozens of new scientific & non-scientific Murphy>s Laws.

I suspect the originator of the revelation was Goddess Eris, but I cannot be
sure because I was unconscious for several minutes.

I don>t know if they are correct. I don>t even know if they are funny, so
some may find them objectionable or even offending. In either case, don>t
blame me. Blame the banana peel and Goddess Eris. They made me do it.

Sorted according to category for your reading convenience and efficient
apoplexy. Brace yourselves. The news are bad (as they usually are with
Murphy>s Laws) ;o)

http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/writing/NewMurphysLaws.html

my favorite

"The more YOU know about The Universe, the more The Universe knows
about YOU" --- Nerdius>s Futility of Scientific Knowledge Law

btw
has there ever been found
an ethnobotanical origin to the banana peel use?

the earliest reference i know of is the anarchist cookbook
[/quote]
The earliest reference I can remember, is Gary Larson>s "The Far Side" books,
where, if memory serves right, he presents several interesting studies of
primates, bananas and banana peels.

Unfortunately I have given my entire Far Side collection to a friend,
mathematics professor and geometer Paris Pamfilos, and since then I have lost
track of it, so I cannot pinpoint the exact cartoons I am talking about. At the
time I gave the books, I wasn>t aware of the following (older) Murphy>s Law:

"The three things you should NEVER lend, are women, books and cars" [*]

[*] I believe this Law has lately been modified to include CD>s and DVD>s as
well.

Another old reference is the film "Transylvania 6-5000", where I believe "Igor"
presents an interesting case of how a fall from a banana peel may affect normal
consciousness. Not a very funny film, but the Igor character is somewhat
interesting.

[quote]there>s been a lot of speculation over the years of a joke
have any metabolically active alkaloids ever been found?
besides the transmitter amino acid derivatives commonly found?

bananadine?

just wondering if you>d heard more of the history
[/quote]
I don>t know of any other refs. All I DO know, is that I will never AGAIN, try
to smoke one, because the laughter which resulted from me giving mental birth to
the aforementioned laws, exhausted me so much that I want to sleep for two weeks
straight, now. And I have work to do ;o)

[quote]-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar
--[/quote]
I.N. Galidakis

David Bernier · Guest

I.N. Galidakis wrote:
[quote]galathaea wrote:
On Jun 26, 4:57 pm, "I.N. Galidakis"<morph...@olympus.mons> wrote:
Last week while I was thinking about the analytic continuation of the
Ackermann function in the complex plane, I fell on my head after stepping on
a discarded banana peel which I previously had tried to smoke. The fall
resulted in a sudden and dangerous revelation, if you will, which caused the
spontaneous birth of dozens of new scientific& non-scientific Murphy>s Laws.

I suspect the originator of the revelation was Goddess Eris, but I cannot be
sure because I was unconscious for several minutes.

I don>t know if they are correct. I don>t even know if they are funny, so
some may find them objectionable or even offending. In either case, don>t
blame me. Blame the banana peel and Goddess Eris. They made me do it.

Sorted according to category for your reading convenience and efficient
apoplexy. Brace yourselves. The news are bad (as they usually are with
Murphy>s Laws) ;o)

http://ioannis.virtualcomposer2000.com/writing/NewMurphysLaws.html
my favorite

"The more YOU know about The Universe, the more The Universe knows
about YOU" --- Nerdius>s Futility of Scientific Knowledge Law

btw
has there ever been found
an ethnobotanical origin to the banana peel use?

the earliest reference i know of is the anarchist cookbook

The earliest reference I can remember, is Gary Larson>s "The Far Side" books,
where, if memory serves right, he presents several interesting studies of
primates, bananas and banana peels.

Unfortunately I have given my entire Far Side collection to a friend,
mathematics professor and geometer Paris Pamfilos, and since then I have lost
track of it, so I cannot pinpoint the exact cartoons I am talking about. At the
time I gave the books, I wasn>t aware of the following (older) Murphy>s Law:

"The three things you should NEVER lend, are women, books and cars" [*]

[*] I believe this Law has lately been modified to include CD>s and DVD>s as
well.

Another old reference is the film "Transylvania 6-5000", where I believe "Igor"
presents an interesting case of how a fall from a banana peel may affect normal
consciousness. Not a very funny film, but the Igor character is somewhat
interesting.

there>s been a lot of speculation over the years of a joke
have any metabolically active alkaloids ever been found?
besides the transmitter amino acid derivatives commonly found?

bananadine?

just wondering if you>d heard more of the history

I don>t know of any other refs. All I DO know, is that I will never AGAIN, try
to smoke one, because the laughter which resulted from me giving mental birth to
the aforementioned laws, exhausted me so much that I want to sleep for two weeks
straight, now. And I have work to do ;o)
[/quote]
There>s this from a Cecil Adams column from 2002:

<< However, in November 1967 researchers at New York University
reported that a chemical analysis of banana peel had found no
intoxicating chemicals and that the high was mainly psychological. >>

Cf.:
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/020426.html

Mainly psychological, partly ???. Small mystery...

David Bernier
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

C. Nick Kruzer · Guest

C. Nick Kruzer (me) wrote:

[quote]I>m not ashamed of being afraid. Moreover,
when it comes to someone getting hurt
because of online irresponsible and dangerous
information I would be ashamed if I wasn>t
afraid.
[/quote]
hanson wrote:

[quote]... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... Listen, are you
a scared- limp old woman or a scared-stiff dude
whose balls have fallen off?... Not that I
particularly care about your gender but it will
affect the tone and content of the answers you>ll
receive.
[/quote]
Your position and outcry for continued malice and oppression against me
due only to my opinion on a safety issue is suspect.

Just what is it that is really bugging you?

Is it the joke I made about the Rusty fan club? I didn>t intend malice
through sarcasm, I was being friendly. I was responding to what appeared
to be a very friendly gesture on your part when you claimed, "long time
no see, good friend". Were you being sincere, as I thought you were, or
was this some attempt to set me up with some evil trick that was
thwarted when I innocently made the joke about you being the President
of my fan club? Did this upset you so much that you couldn>t contain
yourself and had to make wild, adolescent insults about my genitalia?
I>m not accusing you of anything, I>m just asking. I could be wrong in
my horrible suspicions about you.

I think at least I should know the truth at what>s going on here. You
did say we were old friends. I was optimistic and happy when I read
that. At the time I reciprocated my affection, but didn>t want to
tarnish such a friendly offering by admitting that I didn>t remember
you. I was hoping that I might be reminded by something.

Maybe this whole thing is a mistake in communication. The possibility of
having a new or renewed good friend is too valuable to throw away due to
some error of reality or cognition. You are an intelligent person,
hanson, so I just can>t see you being so angry over an opinion about
safety. Are we still buddies, huh?

insula

C. Nick Kruzer · Guest

C, Nick Kruzer (cnk) [me] wrote:

[quote]I can>t intelligently explain why what I>m doing
should have the the effect I intend. If I had that
much intelligence, I would have formally and
successfully studied science and worked as a
scientist.
Unfortunately, I>m dumb as a post.
[/quote]
Quentin:

[quote]Of course you aren>t.

cnk:[/quote]

[quote]I suppose my appreciation of science
and sadness over my lack of ability are the
reasons why I feel protective of bright,
ambitious young persons with a possible future
in science.
[/quote]
Quentin:

[quote]You have plenty of ability.
What you may have been missing is
opportunity.
[/quote]
cnk:

[quote]In spite of my weaknesses, I have the presence
of mind to see that no matter how hard you and
any other may have tried to make me look
foolish here, you haven>t succeeded.
[/quote]
Quentin:

[quote]And never could.

[/quote]

[quote]Best wishes,
--
Quentin Grady ^ ^ /
New Zealand, >#,#< [
[/quote]
You>re a good Joe, Quentin.

My real name is Paul Massey. I heard there were a lot of "Masseys" in
NZ. My most recent ancestors came from Canada, migrating South to
America. I live in Southern California in the City of Long Beach, a part
of Los Angeles County. I reside about 2000 feet from the Pacific Ocean.

I>ve held minor technical jobs in Public Health, Hospital, Laboratory
and Education. If you sweet talk me some more I>ll reveal my most
memorable moments of Chemistry. heh.

Don>t expect anything outrageously intelligent or interesting, it>s
interesting to me, though. It would probably sound silly to most
scientists here.

insula

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax · Guest

C. Nick Kruzer wrote:
[quote]C. Nick Kruzer (me) wrote:

I>m not ashamed of being afraid. Moreover,
when it comes to someone getting hurt
because of online irresponsible and dangerous
information I would be ashamed if I wasn>t
afraid.

hanson wrote:

... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... Listen, are you
a scared- limp old woman or a scared-stiff dude
whose balls have fallen off?... Not that I
particularly care about your gender but it will
affect the tone and content of the answers you>ll
receive.

Your position and outcry for continued malice and oppression against me
due only to my opinion on a safety issue is suspect.

Just what is it that is really bugging you?

Is it the joke I made about the Rusty fan club? I didn>t intend malice
through sarcasm, I was being friendly. I was responding to what appeared
to be a very friendly gesture on your part when you claimed, "long time
no see, good friend". Were you being sincere, as I thought you were, or
was this some attempt to set me up with some evil trick that was
thwarted when I innocently made the joke about you being the President
of my fan club? Did this upset you so much that you couldn>t contain
yourself and had to make wild, adolescent insults about my genitalia?
I>m not accusing you of anything, I>m just asking. I could be wrong in
my horrible suspicions about you.

I think at least I should know the truth at what>s going on here. You
did say we were old friends. I was optimistic and happy when I read
that. At the time I reciprocated my affection, but didn>t want to
tarnish such a friendly offering by admitting that I didn>t remember
you. I was hoping that I might be reminded by something.

Maybe this whole thing is a mistake in communication. The possibility of
having a new or renewed good friend is too valuable to throw away due to
some error of reality or cognition. You are an intelligent person,
hanson, so I just can>t see you being so angry over an opinion about
safety. Are we still buddies, huh?
[/quote]
He>s like that with almost everyone.
Google him and Uncle Al, for example.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax · Guest

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
[quote]C. Nick Kruzer wrote:
C. Nick Kruzer (me) wrote:

I>m not ashamed of being afraid. Moreover,
when it comes to someone getting hurt
because of online irresponsible and dangerous
information I would be ashamed if I wasn>t
afraid.

hanson wrote:
... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... Listen, are you
a scared- limp old woman or a scared-stiff dude
whose balls have fallen off?... Not that I
particularly care about your gender but it will
affect the tone and content of the answers you>ll
receive.

Your position and outcry for continued malice and oppression against me
due only to my opinion on a safety issue is suspect.

Just what is it that is really bugging you?

Is it the joke I made about the Rusty fan club? I didn>t intend malice
through sarcasm, I was being friendly. I was responding to what appeared
to be a very friendly gesture on your part when you claimed, "long time
no see, good friend". Were you being sincere, as I thought you were, or
was this some attempt to set me up with some evil trick that was
thwarted when I innocently made the joke about you being the President
of my fan club? Did this upset you so much that you couldn>t contain
yourself and had to make wild, adolescent insults about my genitalia?
I>m not accusing you of anything, I>m just asking. I could be wrong in
my horrible suspicions about you.
I think at least I should know the truth at what>s going on here. You
did say we were old friends. I was optimistic and happy when I read
that. At the time I reciprocated my affection, but didn>t want to
tarnish such a friendly offering by admitting that I didn>t remember
you. I was hoping that I might be reminded by something.
Maybe this whole thing is a mistake in communication. The possibility of
having a new or renewed good friend is too valuable to throw away due to
some error of reality or cognition. You are an intelligent person,
hanson, so I just can>t see you being so angry over an opinion about
safety. Are we still buddies, huh?

He>s like that with almost everyone.
Google him and Uncle Al, for example.
[/quote]
On the plus side, he does know a lot of stuff about a lot of stuff.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
Remote Viewing classes in London


www.GetXFactor.com Leading Technology, Science, Agriculture News and information	Part of the Identityscape.com network... getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Chemistry Forum	Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 36, 37, 38 Next
Page 1 of 38