| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hanson Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: Japan developing remote control for humans |
|
|
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@example.com> wrote in message
news:4360dac0$1@news.usenetzone.com...
[quote]"tadchem" > <thomas.davidson@dla.mil> wrote in
Jan Panteltje wrote:
And it works!
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/TECH/10/25/human.remote.control.ap/index.html
Put on the headset, and even control yourself!
[Tom]
They need a less conspicuous headset for use by elected officials.
[Pante]
Good joke, really, I have been thinking of applications...
For example army computer guides soldiers in complete
darkness in unknown terrain. -- Put one on your kids, they
WILL (for the first time eh) go where you ask.
Prisoners (control) glue the headset on or something,
they will follow directions... -- Animals, pets, dog does
not want to come? Activate remote, GPS build in, rest
is automatic.
LOL -- hehe -- > Schools... watch the teacher...
And of cause this is only the beginning, after DNA modification
the future generation will have a RJ45 connector.....
You ain>t seen nothing yet... Think too Japanese kamikaze zeros...
[hanson][/quote]
Seriously... for a moment, Jan, such technology may push the
development of all kinds of medical devices for controlling nerve
caused damages or deficiencies AND for control of neuralgic
pains from the foot region to sciatica, to spinal issues to migraines,
and perhaps even to improve/help visual/ocular issues.
....... now, back to the far more important fun stuff again:
uncle Al made a cameo, yesterday.... but no "welcome back"s:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/5db7ad17cececb4e
ahahaha... hahahanson |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
quietguy Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:08 am Post subject: Re: Japan developing remote control for humans |
|
|
They are much too late - it has already been invented - it is called... a wife!
David |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Foley U. Matthews Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:55 pm Post subject: Re: SmartMedia cards |
|
|
On Stardate Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:54:20 +0200, "Marek Doniec"
<M-Doniec@web.de> applied digits to the keyboard and routed the
information from some kind of brain (presumably), thusly:
[quote]All you need is here:
http://www.elm-chan.org/reports/mpc/report_e.html
"Iafrica" <andrewgray@iafrica.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3b51f526.0@news1.mweb.co.za...
Does anyone know if you get an interface IC that enables you to read from
a
SSFDC as if it were RAM.
I would like to use a SmartMedia card in an MP3 decoder, but do not know
much about them.
What would be the best way to extract a datastream (e.g. 128 Kbps) for MP3
decoding?
Thanks
Andrew
[/quote]
Foley U. Matthews. there | I believe in : Paying NO voluntary taxes, i.e.
are no e>s in my true email | Lotteries, Gambling... The Executive Producer
Visit the Ellen Foley Info | is to blame!... and perhaps, Love (is/can be)
http://www.go.to/ellen-foley | "Fully expecting to be Hurt!" |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Marc Noon Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:07 pm Post subject: Re: Capturing EM interference with a microphone |
|
|
Here>s a good link.
http://www.logic1.com/rf-engineering/rfdetector/
Also try and put a radio real close to your computer and see if it slows
down any processes. Start at 100Mhz transmitters and work up.
I guess the experiment would be like a counter for 10 second... see if it
counts the same number after 10 seconds has elapsed. Then try to scale the
distances.
Marc
<greenaum@BOLLOCKSyahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:43757f71.4888035@news.cable.ntlworld.com...
[quote]An easy way, use an in-ear earphone, or other earphone. They>ve got a
coil of wire inside to pick up EMI, and a jack plug on the end. Tho
they>re comparitively lo-impedance but, it>s an experiment innit?
Like others have said, put a bit of plasticine over the sound holes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
if love is a drug, then, ideally, it>s a healing, healthful drug... it>s
kind of like prozac is supposed to work (without the sexual side
effects and long-term damage to the brain and psyche)[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Chris Guest
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2005 4:59 pm Post subject: Re: Silly Electric motor improvement |
|
|
[quote]In conventional motors the magnetic material is behind the conductors.
the large mass of iron is needed to carry the amount of magnetic field
produced by the high currents in the rotor.
if you put an unbroken layer of ferrite in front of the conductors
it will shield them from the magnetic filed on the other side of
the ferrite, this will make the motor less efficient.
[/quote]
The iron "behind" the conductors only wastes energy in edy currents it has
no efect on the force. If you recall electric motor design the conductors
are in slots and the force is on the conductors in the slots. The force is
only increased by the high permeability between the concutor layers. All the
rest does not do anything.
I>m just working out a patent application (sorry you too late - you>ve
published it!)
Chris.
[quote]
--
Bye.
Jasen[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Karl Uppiano Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 4:47 am Post subject: Re: Silly Electric motor improvement |
|
|
"Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Keusf.32566$PD2.27887@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
[quote]
In conventional motors the magnetic material is behind the conductors.
the large mass of iron is needed to carry the amount of magnetic field
produced by the high currents in the rotor.
if you put an unbroken layer of ferrite in front of the conductors
it will shield them from the magnetic filed on the other side of
the ferrite, this will make the motor less efficient.
The iron "behind" the conductors only wastes energy in edy currents it has
no efect on the force. If you recall electric motor design the conductors
are in slots and the force is on the conductors in the slots. The force
is only increased by the high permeability between the concutor layers.
All the rest does not do anything.
I>m just working out a patent application (sorry you too late - you>ve
published it!)
[/quote]
If you are right, you will be credited with revolutionizing the power and
energy industries, and may finally free us from dependence on foreign oil. I
would be surprised if experienced magnetics engineers haven>t already
optimized their designs, but you could prove me wrong. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Chris Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:07 am Post subject: Re: Silly Electric motor improvement |
|
|
"Jasen Betts" <jasen@free.net.nospam.nz> wrote in message
news:391a.43b33d59.cd362@clunker.homenet...
[quote]["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.]
On 2005-12-28, Chris <nimbo@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
For high efficiency the magnetic circuit has to be as short as
possible. To carry the same magnetic field would take more ferrite
material than iron in the same application. The obvious choice would
be to use more ferrite, but then the windings have to cover more area
and copper losses, size, weight, and expense go up.
There is no need for the magnetic circuit as the magnetic field does not
exist, it is a ficticious field that is the consequence of special
relativity and electrons moving relative to fixed charges in the
conductors
and in other conductors.
QM says otherwise
The concept of the magnetic field is false. Chuck it in the bin.
what do you intend to replace it with,
hopefully whatever you replace it with can explain the operation of a
solenoid, if not it has little chance of being useful in motor design.
Bye.
Jasen[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Chris Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 4:34 am Post subject: Re: Silly Electric motor improvement |
|
|
"Jasen Betts" <jasen@free.net.nospam.nz> wrote in message
news:391a.43b33d59.cd362@clunker.homenet...
[quote]["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.]
On 2005-12-28, Chris <nimbo@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
There is no need for the magnetic circuit as the magnetic field does not
exist, it is a ficticious field that is the consequence of special
relativity and electrons moving relative to fixed charges in the
conductors
and in other conductors.
QM says otherwise
[/quote]
Quantum mechanics is entirely electrostic, magnetism is not mentioned.
[quote]
The concept of the magnetic field is false. Chuck it in the bin.
what do you intend to replace it with,
hopefully whatever you replace it with can explain the operation of a
solenoid, if not it has little chance of being useful in motor design.
[/quote]
Solenoids are not involved in electric motors.
The mechanism of solenoids is a quantum mechanical effect involving photons.
Try Fineman (pity he died).
Use it in mutual and self inductance.
I wonder where Maxwell went? May he rest in peace.
Chris. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Chris Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 3:33 pm Post subject: Re: Silly Electric motor improvement |
|
|
"Jasen Betts" <jasen@free.net.nospam.nz> wrote in message
news:391a.43b33d59.cd362@clunker.homenet...
[quote]["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.]
On 2005-12-28, Chris <nimbo@ukonline.co.uk> wrote:
For high efficiency the magnetic circuit has to be as short as
possible. To carry the same magnetic field would take more ferrite
material than iron in the same application. The obvious choice would
be to use more ferrite, but then the windings have to cover more area
and copper losses, size, weight, and expense go up.
There is no need for the magnetic circuit as the magnetic field does not
exist, it is a ficticious field that is the consequence of special
relativity and electrons moving relative to fixed charges in the
conductors
and in other conductors.
QM says otherwise
[/quote]
Quantum Mechanics does not mention magnetism only electrotatic forces are
involved.
[quote]
The concept of the magnetic field is false. Chuck it in the bin.
what do you intend to replace it with,
hopefully whatever you replace it with can explain the operation of a
solenoid, if not it has little chance of being useful in motor design.
[/quote]
Solenoids are not involved in electric motor design.
Mutual and Self Inductance are quantum mechanical effects invoving photons
inside the solenoid. Think of Fyneman.
The acceletarion of charges generates photons according to hf where the
frequency of the sinusoid exciter if f and h plancs constant. The number of
photons is the energy of the sinusoid devided by hf.
These photons are emitted and absorbed during the cycle making inductance.
When a solenoid is subjected to a step functon then the photons have a
distribution of frequency similar to a radiating black body (see planck who
worked out the messy equation) and are re-absorbed at the same time causing
the effect of inductance.
[quote]
Bye.
Jasen[/quote] |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Chris Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:57 am Post subject: Re: Silly Electric motor improvement |
|
|
[quote]there will be forces on the high permeability material
they may not be useful forces (probably much of the force will be radial -
I haven>t given it a whole lot of thought), but there will be forces
present.
if you don>t beleive me compare the behavior of sand and iron filings
around
a running motor.
[/quote]
I suppose so. These things are quite complicated.
Chris. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
everness Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:03 pm Post subject: Re: $$$$$make ounces of cash with the usual enormous amount |
|
|
alanmikaluk@shaw.ca the unfortunate wrote:
<secrets to becoming filthy rich snipped>
yes, i, too, followed alanmikaluk>s advice and am now a billionaire
unfortunately, alan, i can no longer tolerate other people becoming rich
and jeopardizing my own wealth and position - and you just won>t stop
giving away the secret, will you?
therefore i am going to have to have you whacked
sincerely,
line_voltage
(ps: it>s nothing personal you understand. it>s just business.
multi-level marketing, pyramid scheme business) |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Allan Adler Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 7:58 pm Post subject: Re: travel questions |
|
|
"Frustra Nomen Quaeris" <neoholistic@hotmail.com> writes:
[quote]Powdered milk, oatmeal and fruit are no problem, though.
I suggest your friend take a look at a "naturista" shop when in Spain.
They sell special products, for example for diabetics and celiacs, and
also oatmeal and low-fat foods.
[/quote]
Thanks for this information.
In case one does go to restaurants in Spain, what are the options for avoiding
cigarette smoke? In France, the only non-smoking establishment seems to
be MacDonalds, which also prints detailed nutritional information about
its food and seems to have positioned itself to appeal to the health
conscious.
[quote]Also, in order to use an electric appliance from the USA in Spain all
you need is an adaptor. They are dirt cheap and available at most hardware
stores. For Spain the AC standard is 220V, 50Hz, and the plug form factor
is two parallel round prongs.
[/quote]
I asked at a place that sells both the coils and adaptors. They say one
also needs a transformer. For a 300W device such as the coil, the package
of the coil, the transformer and the adaptor cost about $50. It would probably
be cheaper just to purchase a coil in Spain. The coil was also described in
French and Spanish and, in Spanish, is called a "calentador de inmersion".
What kind of place would sell them in Spain and what would they normally
cost?
--
Ignorantly,
Allan Adler <ara@zurich.csail.mit.edu>
* Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and
* comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Karl Uppiano Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:19 pm Post subject: Re: All solid capacitors ??? |
|
|
"Some Guy" <Some@Guy.com> wrote in message news:45BB6944.8E451E61@Guy.com...
[quote]Gigabyte is making a big deal about their motherboards having "all
solid capacitors".
Is this some new type of capacitor technology, or are they saying
that they don>t use electrolytic (paper?) capacitors?
[/quote]
Could be tantalums (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantalum). |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Karl Uppiano Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:07 am Post subject: Re: All solid capacitors ??? |
|
|
"Some Guy" <Some@Guy.com> wrote in message news:45BB6944.8E451E61@Guy.com...
[quote]Gigabyte is making a big deal about their motherboards having "all
solid capacitors".
Is this some new type of capacitor technology, or are they saying
that they don>t use electrolytic (paper?) capacitors?
[/quote]
It is a new technology. Conductive polymer instead of electrolytic paste. I
did some Googling around, and found this explanation from an industry
newsletter:
http://www.low-esr.com/epn0901lowesrart.html-ssi |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Robert Baer Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:23 am Post subject: Re: All solid capacitors ??? |
|
|
Karl Uppiano wrote:
[quote]"Some Guy" <Some@Guy.com> wrote in message news:45BB6944.8E451E61@Guy.com...
Gigabyte is making a big deal about their motherboards having "all
solid capacitors".
Is this some new type of capacitor technology, or are they saying
that they don>t use electrolytic (paper?) capacitors?
Could be tantalums (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantalum).
Then again, aluminum electrolytics are solid (no liquids used in[/quote]
electrolytics since the 1930>s AFAIK). |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|