www.GetXFactor.com

Leading Technology, Science,
Agriculture News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Burning Hydrocarbons Is Only for the Rich
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Energy forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rod Speed
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:23 pm    Post subject: Re: Burning Hydrocarbons Is Only for the Rich Reply with quote

Some fuckwit wogchild canuk claiming to be
Siobhan Medeiros <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote
just the juvenile pig ignorant shit you>s expect from
a stupid wogchild canuk that cant even work out
who is an american and who aint.
Back to top
Rod Speed
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Burning Hydrocarbons Is Only for the Rich Reply with quote

Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@elves.invalid> wrote
[quote]Siobhan Medeiros <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote

Iraq made the mistake of buying it>s radar components from
Sweden. The Swedes put in chips with embedded code
designed to shut down on the night of the invasion. Saddam>s
MIGs were flying blind and easy prey for coalition fighters.

You have ANY sources for that? In Sweden we take pride in
selling RELIABLE stuff. If something broke, it was probably
their own fault for bad maintenance or handling. Anyway, this
is the first time I>ve heard this allegation, and hopefully the last.
[/quote]
He>s so stupid that he hasnt even noticed that there were no MIGs flying.

[quote]Major weapon systems sales usually cause lots of debate in Sweden
if they involve countries currently at war. The only controversial radar
debate I can recall was about whether it was immoral to loan the Arthur
radar systems to the British, who were, most likely, planning to use it in Iraq.

Anyway, the Swedish government criticized the Iraq war and would not take sides like you imply.

Followups set to alt.politics.
[/quote]
Nope.

[quote]Might as well set it to nowhere, since I don>t read alt.politics.
I>m in sci.energy, and this thread is off topic here.
[/quote]
Then why did you post to it ?
Back to top
Sevenhundred Elves
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:47 am    Post subject: Re: Burning Hydrocarbons Is Only for the Rich Reply with quote

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:27:45 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

[quote]Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@elves.invalid> wrote
Siobhan Medeiros <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote

Iraq made the mistake of buying it>s radar components from
Sweden. The Swedes put in chips with embedded code
designed to shut down on the night of the invasion. Saddam>s
MIGs were flying blind and easy prey for coalition fighters.

You have ANY sources for that? In Sweden we take pride in
selling RELIABLE stuff. If something broke, it was probably
their own fault for bad maintenance or handling. Anyway, this
is the first time I>ve heard this allegation, and hopefully the last.

He>s so stupid that he hasnt even noticed that there were no MIGs flying.

Major weapon systems sales usually cause lots of debate in Sweden
if they involve countries currently at war. The only controversial radar
debate I can recall was about whether it was immoral to loan the Arthur
radar systems to the British, who were, most likely, planning to use it in Iraq.

Anyway, the Swedish government criticized the Iraq war and would not take sides like you imply.

Followups set to alt.politics.

Nope.

Might as well set it to nowhere, since I don>t read alt.politics.
I>m in sci.energy, and this thread is off topic here.

Then why did you post to it ?
[/quote]
I had an opinion on the matter. The topic isn>t particularly
interesting to the people on sci.energy, including yours truly, so I
set followups to the only appropriate NG it was crossposted to.

S.
Back to top
Rod Speed
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:05 am    Post subject: Re: Burning Hydrocarbons Is Only for the Rich Reply with quote

Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@elves.invalid> wrote:
[quote]On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:27:45 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@elves.invalid> wrote
Siobhan Medeiros <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote

Iraq made the mistake of buying it>s radar components from
Sweden. The Swedes put in chips with embedded code
designed to shut down on the night of the invasion. Saddam>s
MIGs were flying blind and easy prey for coalition fighters.

You have ANY sources for that? In Sweden we take pride in
selling RELIABLE stuff. If something broke, it was probably
their own fault for bad maintenance or handling. Anyway, this
is the first time I>ve heard this allegation, and hopefully the
last.

He>s so stupid that he hasnt even noticed that there were no MIGs
flying.

Major weapon systems sales usually cause lots of debate in Sweden
if they involve countries currently at war. The only controversial
radar
debate I can recall was about whether it was immoral to loan the
Arthur
radar systems to the British, who were, most likely, planning to
use it in Iraq.

Anyway, the Swedish government criticized the Iraq war and would
not take sides like you imply.

Followups set to alt.politics.

Nope.

Might as well set it to nowhere, since I don>t read alt.politics.
I>m in sci.energy, and this thread is off topic here.

Then why did you post to it ?

I had an opinion on the matter. The topic isn>t particularly
interesting to the people on sci.energy, including yours truly, so I
set followups to the only appropriate NG it was crossposted to.
[/quote]
You didnt, actually.
Back to top
Sevenhundred Elves
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:31 am    Post subject: Re: Burning Hydrocarbons Is Only for the Rich Reply with quote

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:05:37 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

[quote]Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@elves.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:27:45 +1000, "Rod Speed"
rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@elves.invalid> wrote
Siobhan Medeiros <sbm2006@shaw.ca> wrote

Iraq made the mistake of buying it>s radar components from
Sweden. The Swedes put in chips with embedded code
designed to shut down on the night of the invasion. Saddam>s
MIGs were flying blind and easy prey for coalition fighters.

You have ANY sources for that? In Sweden we take pride in
selling RELIABLE stuff. If something broke, it was probably
their own fault for bad maintenance or handling. Anyway, this
is the first time I>ve heard this allegation, and hopefully the
last.

He>s so stupid that he hasnt even noticed that there were no MIGs
flying.

Major weapon systems sales usually cause lots of debate in Sweden
if they involve countries currently at war. The only controversial
radar
debate I can recall was about whether it was immoral to loan the
Arthur
radar systems to the British, who were, most likely, planning to
use it in Iraq.

Anyway, the Swedish government criticized the Iraq war and would
not take sides like you imply.

Followups set to alt.politics.

Nope.

Might as well set it to nowhere, since I don>t read alt.politics.
I>m in sci.energy, and this thread is off topic here.

Then why did you post to it ?

I had an opinion on the matter. The topic isn>t particularly
interesting to the people on sci.energy, including yours truly, so I
set followups to the only appropriate NG it was crossposted to.

You didnt, actually.
[/quote]
It>s odd that you should say that. But I>m content knowing that
whatever I actually did was enough to make my news provider accept my
followups as correctly set to a single newsgroup.

TTFN
S.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Energy forum Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  
Page 7 of 7
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum