| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Vladimir Bondarenko Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:26 am Post subject: An exact simplification challenge - 64 (MeijerG) |
|
|
Hello,
MeijerG[{{-4, -7/2, 1/2}, {}}, {{0, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]
?
Best wishes,
Vladimir Bondarenko
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director
http://www.cybertester.com/ Cyber Tester, LLC
------------------------------------------------------
"We must understand that technologies
like these are the way of the future."
------------------------------------------------------ |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Dave Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: Re: An exact simplification challenge - 64 (MeijerG) |
|
|
Vladimir Bondarenko wrote:
[quote]Hello,
MeijerG[{{-4, -7/2, 1/2}, {}}, {{0, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]
?
Best wishes,
Vladimir Bondarenko
[/quote]
As a matter of interest, what is the purpose of posting these
simplification challenges? They don>t strike me as recreational type
challenges. They don>t seem to have perhaps the attraction of that 100
digit challenge of some time back, so I>m a bit puzzled on their purpose.
I>ll give you a challenge. Use your undoubted talents in CAS to
understand Sage, find bugs in it, and report bugs in a sensible way.
Better yet fix them.
Would it not be better to be known as someone who made a real
contribution to improving the quality of open source computer algebra
systems, rather than someone who can set a few simplification challenges?
Dave |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Vladimir Bondarenko Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:27 am Post subject: Re: An exact simplification challenge - 64 (MeijerG) |
|
|
On Jul 19, 9:26 pm, Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com> wrote:
[quote]Hello,
MeijerG[{{-4, -7/2, 1/2}, {}}, {{0, 0, 1/2}, {}}, 1]
?
Best wishes,
Vladimir Bondarenko
Co-founder, CEO, Mathematical Director
http://www.cybertester.com/ Cyber Tester, LLC
------------------------------------------------------
"We must understand that technologies
like these are the way of the future."
------------------------------------------------------
[/quote]
105 Pi^(3/2) (9770....
:) |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|