| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
server Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:57 am Post subject: A strange world |
|
|
| message unavailable |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Z0B0N Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:57 am Post subject: Re: A strange world |
|
|
"Lloyd" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:d3d23d29-f62d-471e-bc35-b41065158fa2@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Jul 9, 10:57 pm, "James" <kingko...@iglou.com> wrote:
Doesn>t it seem strange that the entire global warming scientific
case
is based on the increase of co2 in the atmosphere from the use of
fossil
fuels?
When you>ve eliminated all other sources, the source that>s left,
regardless of how much you might wish otherwise, is the logical
choice.
[/quote]
EXACTLY!
It>s the sun plus naturally occurring El Nino/La Nina!
Regards
Bonzo
"A lot of environmental messages are simply not accurate. But that>s the
way we sell messages in this society. We use hype. And we use those
pieces of information that sustain our position." Professor Jerry
Franklin, Ecologist, University of Washington |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Z0B0N Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:57 am Post subject: Re: A strange world |
|
|
"Ouroboros_Rex" <its@casual.com> wrote in message
news:g55eso$b33$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
[quote]James wrote:
Doesn>t it seem strange that the entire global warming scientific
case
is based on the increase of co2 in the atmosphere from the use of
fossil fuels? There is no other issue and yet they can only point to
normal phenomena like floods, heat waves and similar crap that
everyone has seen before as bona fide evidence.
No, they can point directly to the 40% of current atmospheric CO2
that is released from fossil fuels via isotopic studies, as you well
know.
[/quote]
Do you have a link for this garbage?
Thought not.
--
Warmest Regards
Bonzo
"It>s very appropriate that it [An Inconvenient Truth] got an Oscar from
the land of make-believe." Dr. Timothy Ball, Chairman of the Natural
Resources Stewardship Project (NRSP.com), Former Professor Of
Climatology, University of Winnipeg |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
John M. Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: Re: $500,000 will be awarded to the first person to prove, i |
|
|
On Jul 8, 9:05 am, "Z00BN" <Z0...@dooo00od00.com> wrote:
[quote]"John M." <john_howard_mor...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:afc29f55-9f87-4c10-9284-a86ac314eb5b@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
It seems that you don>t read what you write. You still want ironclad
proof of AGW through augmenting atmospheric CO2, and you can>t have
it.
ROTFLMAO
Because there is NO PROOF!
Forget about "ironclad"!!
[/quote]
Wow! No Zob got something right for a change. There never has been and
never will be proof in science. Proof lies in the realm of logic and
mathematics. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|