www.GetXFactor.com

Leading Technology, Science,
Agriculture News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

A strange world
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Geology - Meteorology Forum  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
server
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:57 am    Post subject: A strange world Reply with quote

message unavailable
Back to top
Z0B0N
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:57 am    Post subject: Re: A strange world Reply with quote

"Lloyd" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:d3d23d29-f62d-471e-bc35-b41065158fa2@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
[quote]On Jul 9, 10:57 pm, "James" <kingko...@iglou.com> wrote:
Doesn>t it seem strange that the entire global warming scientific
case
is based on the increase of co2 in the atmosphere from the use of
fossil
fuels?

When you>ve eliminated all other sources, the source that>s left,
regardless of how much you might wish otherwise, is the logical
choice.

[/quote]
EXACTLY!
It>s the sun plus naturally occurring El Nino/La Nina!




Regards

Bonzo

"A lot of environmental messages are simply not accurate. But that>s the
way we sell messages in this society. We use hype. And we use those
pieces of information that sustain our position." Professor Jerry
Franklin, Ecologist, University of Washington
Back to top
Z0B0N
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:57 am    Post subject: Re: A strange world Reply with quote

"Ouroboros_Rex" <its@casual.com> wrote in message
news:g55eso$b33$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
[quote]James wrote:
Doesn>t it seem strange that the entire global warming scientific
case
is based on the increase of co2 in the atmosphere from the use of
fossil fuels? There is no other issue and yet they can only point to
normal phenomena like floods, heat waves and similar crap that
everyone has seen before as bona fide evidence.

No, they can point directly to the 40% of current atmospheric CO2
that is released from fossil fuels via isotopic studies, as you well
know.
[/quote]
Do you have a link for this garbage?
Thought not.
--


Warmest Regards

Bonzo

"It>s very appropriate that it [An Inconvenient Truth] got an Oscar from
the land of make-believe." Dr. Timothy Ball, Chairman of the Natural
Resources Stewardship Project (NRSP.com), Former Professor Of
Climatology, University of Winnipeg
Back to top
John M.
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:50 am    Post subject: Re: $500,000 will be awarded to the first person to prove, i Reply with quote

On Jul 8, 9:05 am, "Z00BN" <Z0...@dooo00od00.com> wrote:
[quote]"John M." <john_howard_mor...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message

news:afc29f55-9f87-4c10-9284-a86ac314eb5b@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

It seems that you don>t read what you write. You still want ironclad
proof of AGW through augmenting atmospheric CO2, and you can>t have
it.

ROTFLMAO
Because there is NO PROOF!
Forget about "ironclad"!!
[/quote]
Wow! No Zob got something right for a change. There never has been and
never will be proof in science. Proof lies in the realm of logic and
mathematics.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   Science and Technology news... Forum Index -> Geology - Meteorology Forum  
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum